Impact of Early Defoliation on California Pima Cotton Boll Opening, Lint Yield, and Quality

REFERENCES

• Cathey, G. W. 1986. Physiology of defoliation in cotton production. In Cotton physiology. No. 1, ed. J. R. Mauney and J. M. Stewart, 143–53. Memphis, TN: The Cotton Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Cathey, G. W., K. E. Luckett, and S. T. Rayburn Jr. 1982. Accelerated cotton boll dehiscence with growth regulator and desiccant chemicals. Field Crops Research 5:113–20. doi:10.1016/0378-4290(82)90011-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhry, M. R., and A. Guitchounts. 2003. Cotton facts. Washington, DC: International Cotton Advisory Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, G. D., K. L. Edmisten, D. L. Jordan, R. Wells, J. E. Lanier, and G. S. Hamm. 2007. Defining optimal defoliation timing and harvest timing for compact, normal, and extended fruiting patterns of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) achieved by cultivar maturity groups. In Proceedings of 2007 World Cotton Research Conference-4 Proceedings, ed. G. D. Collins. Lubbock, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Copur, O., U. Demirel, R. Polat, and M. A. Gur. 2010. Effect of different defoliants and application times on the yield and quality components of cotton in semi-arid conditions. African Journal of Biotechnology 9:2095–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, C. 2010. W075-Cotton defoliation timing. 2010 The University of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service. http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_agexcrop/88 (accessed November 27, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Faircloth, J., K. Edmisten, R. Wells, and A. Stewart. 2004a. Timing defoliation applications for maximum yields and optimum quality in cotton containing a fruiting gap. Crop Science 44:158–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faircloth, J., K. Edmisten, R. Wells, and A. Stewart. 2004b. The influence of defoliationtiming on yields and quality of two cotton cultivars. Crop Science 44:165–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutmacher, R. B., R. N. Vargas, S. D. Wright, and B. A. Roberts. 2003. Selecting a harvest aid strategy. In Harvest aid materials and practices for California cotton, 22–28. University of California, Div. Agric. Nat. Res. Pub. No. 4043e.
   Google Scholar
• Karademir, E., C. Karademir, and S. Basbag. 2007. Determination the effect of defoliation timing on cotton yield and quality. Journal of Central European Agriculture 8:357–62.
   Google Scholar
• Kerby, T. A., and K. D. Hake. 1996. Cotton production manual. Monitoring Cotton’s Growth Chapter, 335–55. University of California, Div. Agric. Nat. Res. Pub. No. 3352.
   Google Scholar
• Long, R., and M. Bange. 2008. The impact of defoliation timing on fiber quality and textile performance. The Australian Cotton Grower 29:12–13.
   Google Scholar
• O’Geen, T., J. Deng, D. Beaudette, A. Swarowsky, V. Bullard, J. Maynard, J. Chang, D. McGahan, and N. Brauer, 2005. Soil web: An online soil survey browser. California Soil Resource Lab. http://casoilresource.lawr.ucdavis.edu/drupal/node/902 (accessed July 2, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, B. A., R. C. Curly, T. A. Kerby, S. D. Wright, and W. D. Mayfield. 1996. Defoliation, harvest, and ginning. In Cotton Production Manual, ed. S. J. Hake, T. A. Kerby, and K. D. Hake, 305–23. Div. Agric. Nat. Res. Pub. 3352. Oakland, CA: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, W. C., M. L. Cordell, and F. E. Groves. 2004. Defoliation timing based on heat units beyond cutout. In Summaries of Arkansas Cotton Research, ed. W. C. Robertson, 235–37. Fayetteville, AR: Arkansas Agric. Exp. Station, University of Arkansas Div. of Agric.
   Google Scholar
• Silvertooth, J. C., and D. R. Howell. 1988. Defoliation of Pima cotton. A College of Agriculture Report, University of Arizona Series P-72.
   Google Scholar
• Snipes, C. E., and C. C. Baskin. 1994. Influence of early defoliation on cotton yield, seed quality, and fiber properties. Field Crops Research 37:137–43. doi:10.1016/0378-4290(94)90042-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snipes, C. E., and T. Valco, 1999. Uniform harvest aid performance and fiber quality evaluation. Cotton Defoliation Work Group Research Report 1992-1996. Bulletin 358.
   Google Scholar
• Snipes, C. E., and G. D. Wills. 1994. Influence of temperature and adjuvants on thidiazuron activity in cotton leaves. Weed Sciences 42:13–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supak, J. R., and C. E. Snipes. 2001. Cotton harvest management: Use and influence of harvest aids. Number five. The cotton foundation reference book series. Memphis, TN.
   Google Scholar
• Suttle, J. C. 1985. Involvement of ethylene in the action of the cotton defoliant thidiazuron. Plant Physiology 78:272–76. doi:10.1104/pp.78.2.272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suttle, J. C. 1988. Disruption of the polar auxin transport system in cotton seedlings following treatment with the defoliant thidiazuron. Plant Physiology 86:241–45. doi:10.1104/pp.86.1.241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). 2012. National agricultural statistics. CA: Pacific Region.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. D., R. B. Hutmacher, G. Banuelos, S. I. Rios, K. A. Hutmacher, D. S. Munk, K. A. Wilson, J. F. Wrobles, and M. P. Keeley. 2014. Impact of Pima defoliation timing on lint and quality. Journal of Cotton Sciences 18:48–58.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. D., R. B. Hutmacher, G. Banuelos, B. A. Roberts, D. S. Munk, K. A. Wilson, S. I. Rios, K. A. Hutmacher, M. P. Keeley, and J. F. Wrobles. 2013. Comparing acala defoliation timings with yield and quality. Crop Management 12. doi:10.1094/CM-2013-0123-01-RS.
   Google Scholar