Crop response to biochar under differing irrigation levels in the southeastern USA

References

• Agegnehu, G., A. M. Bass, P. N. Nelson, B. Muirhead, G. Wright, and M. I. Birda. 2015. Biochar and biochar-compost as soil amendments: Effects on peanut yield, soil properties and greenhouse gas emissions in tropical North Queensland, Australia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 213:72–85. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2015.07.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antal, M. J., Jr., and M. Gronli. 2003. The art, science, and technology of charcoal production. Industrial Engineering Chemistry Research 42:1619–40. doi:10.1.210/ie0207919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balkcom, K. S., D. L. Rowland, and M. C. Lamb. 2004. Cotton yield conventional and conservation tillage systems under different irrigation levels. In Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf., 5–9 Jan. 2004, San Antonio, TX, ed. D. A. Richter, 2599–602. Memphis, TN: Natl. Cotton Counc. of Am.
   Google Scholar
• Branch, W. D. 2007. Registration of ‘Georgia-06G’ peanut. Journal of Plant Registrations 1:120. doi:10.3198/jpr2006.12.0812crc.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, J. I., Jr., M. C. Lamb, C. L. Butts, E. J. Williams, and M. Singletary. 2005. Applications of expert systems in peanut production. In Advances in peanut science, ed. H. E. Pattee, and H. T. Stalker. Stillwater, OK: Amer. Peanut Res. Educ. Soc. Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Downie, A., A. Crosky, and P. Munroe. 2009. Physical properties of biochar. In Biochar for environmental management: Science and technology, eds. J. Lehmann and S. Joseph, 13–32. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Gaskin, J. W., R. A. Speir, K. Harris, K. C. Das, R. D. Lee, L. A. Morris, and D. S. Fisher. 2010. Effect of peanut hull and pine chip biochar on soil nutrients, corn nutrient status, and yield. Agronomy Journal 102:623–33. doi:10.2134/agronj2009.0083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., J. Lehmann, and W. Zech. 2002. Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal: A review. Biology and Fertility of Soils 35 (4):219–30. doi:10.1007/s00374-002-0466-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffery, S., D. Abalos, M. Prodana, A. C. Bastos, J. W. van Groenigen, B. A. Hungate, and F. Verheijen. 2017. Biochar boosts tropical but not temperate yields. Environmental Research Letters. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa67bd.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karer, J., B. Wimmer, F. Zehetner, S. Kloss, and G. Soja. 2013. Biochar application to temperate soils: Effects on nutrient uptake and crop yield under field conditions. Agricultural and Food Science 22:390–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laird, D. A. 2008. The charcoal vision: A win-win-win scenario for simultaneously producing bioenergy, permanently sequestering carbon, while improving soil and water quality. Agronomy Journal 100 (1):178–81. doi:10.2134/agronj2007.0161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, M. C., R. B. Sorensen, R. C. Nuti, and C. L. Butts. 2014. Agronomic and economic effect of irrigation rate in cotton. Crop, Forage, & Turfgrass Management. doi:10.2134/cftm2014.0061.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, M. C., R. B. Sorensen, R. C. Nuti, C. L. Butts, W. H. Faircloth, D. Eigenburg, and D. L. Rowland. 2011. Agronomic and economic effect of irrigation rate in corn produced in Georgia. Crop Management. doi:10.1094/CM-2011-0721-02-RS.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, R. W. 2014. Potential annual and cumulative Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) via Biochar (Chapter 3). In: Geotherapy - Innovative methods of soil fertility restoration, carbon sequestration, and reversing CO2 increase, ed. T. J. Goreau, R. W. Larson, and J. Campe.  Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, J. 2007. A handful of carbon. Nature 447:143–44. doi:10.1038/447143a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann, J., and M. A. Rondon. 2006. Biochar soil management on highly weathered soils in the humid tropics. In Biological approaches to sustainable soil systems, ed. N. Uphoff, 105–24. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Major, J., M. Rondon, D. Molina, S. J. Riha, and J. Lehmann. 2010. Maize yield and nutrition during 4 years after biochar application to a Colombian savanna Oxisol. Plant and Soil 333 (1–2):117–28. doi:10.1007/s11104-010-0327-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mengel, K., and E. A. Kirkby. 1982. Principles of plant nutrition. Berne, Switzerland: Int. Potash Inst..
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R. W., and R. L. Donahue. 1990. Soils: An introduction to soils and plant growth, 6th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Mizuno, S. 1959. Physiological studies on the fruitification of peanut. I. Distribution of radioactive calcium administered to the fruiting zone on the fruiting organ. Proceedings Crop Sciences Social Japan 28:83–85. doi:10.1626/jcs.28.83.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. M., W. J. Busscher, D. L. Laird, M. Ahmedna, D. W. Watts, and M. A. S. Niandou. 2009. Impact of biochar amendment on fertility of a southeastern coastal plain soil. Journal of Soil Science 174 (2):105–12. doi:10.1097/SS.0b013e3181981d9a.
   Google Scholar
• Nuti, R. C., M. C. Lamb, R. B. Sorensen, and C. C. Truman. 2009. Agronomic and economic response to furrow diking in irrigated and non-irrigated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Agricultural Water Management 96:1078–84. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2009.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogovska, N., D. A. Laird, and D. L. Karlen. 2016. Corn and soil response to biochar application and stover harvest. Field Crops Research. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2015.12.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, H., G. Dunst, and B. Glaser. 2014. No effect level of co-composted biochar on plant growth and soil properties in a greenhouse experiment. Agronomy Journal 4:34–51. doi:10.3390/agronomy4010034.
   Google Scholar
• Smal, H. C., C. S. Kvien, M. E. Sumner, and A. S. Csinos. 1989. Solution calcium concentration and application date effects on pod calcium uptake and distribution in Florunner and Tifton-8 peanut. Journal of Plant Nutrition 12:37–52. doi:10.1080/01904168909363934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sombroek, W. M., M. L. Ruivo, P. M. Fearnside, B. Glaser, and J. Lehmann. 2003. Amazonian dark earths as carbon stores and sinks. In: Amazonian dark earths: Origins, properties, management, ed. J. Lehmann, 125–39. Dordrecht: Kluwer Acad. Publ.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, R. B., and M. C. Lamb. 2016. Crop yield response to increasing biochar rates. Journal of Crop Improvement. doi:10.1080/15427528.2016.12317728.
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, R. B., R. C. Nuti, and M. C. Lamb. 2010. Yield and economics of shallow subsurface drip irrigation (S3DI) and furrow diking. Online. Crop Management. doi:10.1094/CM-2010-1220-01-RS.
   Google Scholar
• Spokas, K. A., K. B. Cantrell, J. M. Novak, D. W. Archer, J. A. Ippolito, H. P. Collins, A. A. Boateng, I. M. Lima, M. C. Lamb, A. J. McAloon, R. D. Lentz, and K. A. Nichols. 2012. Biochar: A synthesis of its agronomic impact beyond carbon sequestration. Journal of Environmental Quality 41:973–89. doi:10.2134/jeq2011.0069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilman, D., K. G. Cassman, P. A. Matson, R. Naylor, and S. Polasky. 2002. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671–77. doi:10.1038/nature01014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Department of Agriculture – National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA-NASS). 2015. Quick stats, 2015. https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/ .
   Google Scholar
• Williams, E. J., and J. S. Drexler. 1981. A non-destructive method for determining peanut pod maturity. Peanut Science 8:134–41. doi:10.3146/i0095-3679-8-2-15.
   Google Scholar