Pod yield performance and stability of peanut genotypes under differing soil water and regional conditions

References

• Adomou, M., B. R. Ntare, and J. H. Williams. 1997. Stability of pod yields and parameters of a simple physiological model for yield among peanut lines in northern Benin. Peanut Science 24:107–12. doi:10.3146/i0095-3679-24-2-10.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, R. G., L. S. Pereira, D. Raes, and M. Smith. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56:1–300.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, W. F., R. W. Mozingo, and J. C. Wynne. 1989. Comparisons of stability statistics as criteria for cultivar development in peanut. Peanut Science 16:21–25. doi:10.3146/i0095-3679-16-1-5.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. H. D. 1989. Core collections: A practical approach to genetic resources management. Genome / National Research Council Canada = Genome / Conseil National De Recherches Canada 31:818–24. doi:10.1139/g89-144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattivelli, L., F. Rizza, F. W. Badeck, E. Mazzucotelli, A. M. Mastrangelo, E. Francia, C. Maré, A. Tondelli, and A. M. Stanca. 2008. Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: An integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crops Research 105:1–14. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2007.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dang, P. M., C. Y. Chen, and C. C. Holbrook. 2013. Evaluation of five peanut (Arachis hypogaea) genotypes to identify drought responsive mechanisms utilising candidate-gene approach. Functional Plant Biology 40:1323–33. doi:10.1071/FP13116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlay, K. W., and G. N. Wilkinson. 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agriculutural Research 14:742–54. doi:10.1071/AR9630742.
   Google Scholar
• Frutos, E., M. P. Galindo, and V. Leiva. 2013. An interactive biplot implementation in R for modeling genotype-by-environment interaction. Stoch Environment Researcher Risk Assessment. doi:10.1007/s00477-013-0821-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, C. C., W. F. Anderson, and R. N. Pittman. 1993. Selection of a core collection from the U.S. germplasm collection of peanut. Crop Science 33:859–61. doi:10.2135/cropsci1993.0011183X003300040044x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isleib, T. G., C. C. Holbrook, and D. W. Gorbet. 2001. Use of plant introductions in peanut cultivar development. Peanut Science 28:96–113. doi:10.3146/i0095-3679-28-2-11.
   Google Scholar
• Isleib, T. G., S. R. Milla-Lewis, W. B. Dong, S. C. Copeland, B. B. Shew, and C. Arellano. 2013. Stability analysis of incidence of tomato spotted wilt in Virginia-type peanut cultivars and breeding lines. Peanut Science 40:24–30. doi:10.3146/PS12-17.1.
   Google Scholar
• Kempthorne, O. 1969. An introduction to genetic statistics. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ketring, D. L., P. I. Erickson, and J. F. Stone. 1990. Applied sap velocity in peanut genotypes under control and stress conditions. Peanut Science 17:38–44. doi:10.3146/i0095-3679-17-1-13.
   Google Scholar
• Knauft, D. A., and D. W. Gorbet. 1989. Genetic diversity among peanut cultivars. Crop Science 29:1417–22. doi:10.2135/cropsci1989.0011183X002900060017x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kottapalli, K. R., R. Rakwal, J. Shibato, G. Burow, D. Tissue, J. Burke, N. Puppala, M. Burow, and P. Payton. 2009. Physiology and proteomics of the water-deficit stress response in three contrasting peanut genotypes. Plant, Cell & Environment 32:380–407. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01933.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krapovickas, A., and W. C. Gregory. 2007. Taxonomy of the genus Arachis (Leguminosae). Translated by D.E. Williams and C.E. Simpson. Bonplandia 16:1–205.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, M. C., D. L. Rowland, R. B. Sorenson, C. L. Butts, W. H. Faircloth, and R. C. Nuti. 2007. Economic returns of irrigated and non-irrigated peanut based cropping systems. Peanut Science 34:10–16. doi:10.3146/0095-3679(2007)34[10:EROIAN]2.0.CO;2.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, M. C., Jr., J. I. Davidson, J. W. Childre Jr., and N. R. Martin. 1997. Comparison of peanut yield, quality, and net returns between nonirrigated and irrigated production. Peanut Science 24:97–101. doi:10.3146/i0095-3679-24-2-7.
   Google Scholar
• Monteith, J. L. 1965. Evaporation and environment. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology 19:205–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mothilal, A. 2012.  Groundnut. In  Technological innovations in major world oil crops, ed. S.K. Gupta, 323–95. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Narh, S., K. J. Boote, J. B. Naab, M. Abudulai, Z. M’Bi Bertin, P. Sankara, M. D. Burow, B. L. Tillman, R. L. Brandenburg, and D. L. Jordan. 2014. Yield improvement and genotype × environment analyses of peanut cultivars in multilocation trials in West Africa. Crop Science 54:2413. doi:10.2135/cropsci2013.10.0657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2014. Farm ranch and irrigation survey. 2012 Census of Agriculture 3:1–206.
   Google Scholar
• National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2015. Acreage, 1–41. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agricultural.
   Google Scholar
• Padmavathi, T. A. V., and D. M. Rao. 2013. Differential accumulation of osmolytes in 4 cultivars of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under drought stress.  Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology 16:151-159.
   Google Scholar
• Pasupuleti, J., and S. N. Nigam. 2013. Phenotyping for groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Improvement. In Phenotyping for plant breeding: Applications of phenotyping methods for crop improvement, eds. J. Panguluri, and K. K. Kumar, 129–67. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, B. P., and S. B. Gangavani. 1990. Effects of water stress imposed at various stages on yield of groundnut and sunflower. Journal Maharashtra Agricultural University 15:322–24.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, M. S., and B. A. Golakiya. 1988. Effect of water stress on yield attributes and yield of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Indian Journal Agricultural Sciences 58:701–03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rao Nageswara, R. C., S. Singh, M. V. K. Sivakumar, K. L. Srivastava, and J. H. Williams. 1985. Effect of water deficit at different growth phases of peanut. I. Yield Responses. Agronomy Journal 77:782–86.
   Google Scholar
• Ratnakumar, P., V. Vadez, S. N. Nigram, and L. Krishnamurthy. 2009. Assessment of transpiration efficiency in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under drought using a lysemtric system. Plant Biology (Stuttgart, Germany) 1:124–30. doi:10.1111/j.1438-8677.2009.00260.x.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, T. Y., V. R. Reddy, and V. Anbumozhi. 2003. Physiological responses of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) to drought stress and its amelioration: A critical review. Plant Growth Regulation 41:75–88. doi:10.1023/A:1027353430164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS Institute. 2013. SAS 9.3. Cary, NC: SAS Inst.
   Google Scholar
• Selvaraj, M. G., G. Burow, J. J. Burke, V. Belamkar, N. Puppala, and M. D. Burrow. 2011. Heat stress screening of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) seedling for acquired thermotolerance. Plant Growth Regulation 65:83–91. doi:10.1007/s10725-011-9577-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tollenaar, M., and E.A. Lee. 2002. Yield potential, yield stability and stress tolerance in maize. Field Crops Research 75:161-169. doi:10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00024-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upadhyaya, H. D., B. P. M. Swamy, P. V. K. Goudar, B. Y. Kullaiswamy, and S. Singh. 2005. Identification of diverse groundnut germplasm through multienvironment evaluation of a core collection for Asia. Field Crops Research 93:293–99. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2004.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upadhyaya, H. D., L. J. Reddy, C. L. L. Gowda, and S. Singh. 2006. Identification of diverse groundnut germplasm: Sources of early maturity in a core collection. Field Crops Research 97:261–71. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2005.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upadhyaya, H. D., P. J. Bramel, R. Ortiz, and S. Singh. 2002. Developing a mini core of peanut for utilization of genetic resources. Crop Science 42:2150–56. doi:10.2135/cropsci2002.2150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upadhyaya, H. D., R. Ortiz, P. J. Bramel, and S. Singh. 2003. Development of a groundnut core collection using taxonomical, geographical and morphological descriptors. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 50:139–48. doi:10.1023/A:1022945715628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward, J. E., S. A. Russell, M. R. Baring, J. M. Cason, and T. A. Baughman. 2015. Effects of fungicides, time of application, and application method on control of sclerotinia blight in peanut. International Journal of Agronomy 2015:1–8. doi:10.1155/2015/323465.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, W., and M. S. Kang. 2003. GGE biplot analysis: A graphical tool for breeders, geneticist, and agronomist, 1–271. Boca Raton,FL: CRC Press LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, W., M. S. Kang, B. Ma, S. Woods, and P. L. Cornelius. 2007. GGE bipplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-by-environment data. Crop Science 47:641–53. doi:10.2135/cropsci2006.06.0374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurweller, B. A., D. L. Rowland, B. L. Tillman, P. P. Payton, K. Migliaccio, D. Wright, and J. Erickson. 2018. Assessing above- and belowground traits of disparate peanut genotypes for determining adaptability to soil hydrologic conditions. Field Crops Research 219:98–105. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2018.01.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar