Cognitive Dissonance as an Explanation of Goodwill Write-Offs

References

• Anantharaman, D. Has SFAS 142 Diminished the Reliability of Goodwill Write-off? Columbia University, Working Paper, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. J. Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing. Chicago: Markham Publishing Co., 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Baiman, S. “Agency Research in Managerial Accounting: A Second Look.” Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15, (1990), pp. 341–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, A. and J. Weber. “Accounting Discretion in Fair Value Estimates: An Examination of SFAS 142 Goodwill Impairments.” Journal of Accounting Research, 44, (2006), pp. 257–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benston, G. J. “The Shortcomings of Fair-Value Accounting Described in SFAS 157.” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27, (2008), pp. 101–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnberg, J. G., J. Luft, and M. D. Shields. “Psychology Theory in Management Accounting Research.” In C. S. Chapman, A. G. Hopwood, and M. D. Shields (eds.), Handbook of Management Accounting Research, Volume 1 (pp. 113–136). Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. L., J. E. Evans III, and D. V. Moser. “Agency Theory and Participative Budgeting Experiments.” Journal of Management Accounting Research, 21, (2009), pp. 317–345.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. “Advantageous Comparison and Rationalization of Earnings Management.” Journal of Accounting Research, 52, (2014), pp. 849–876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgstahler, D. and I. Dichev. “Earnings Management to Avoid Earnings Decreases and Losses.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24, (1997), pp. 99–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camerer, C. F. and G. Loewenstein. “Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, Future.” In C. F. Camerer, G. Loewenstein, and Matthew Rabin (eds.), Advances in Behavioral Economics, (pp. 3–51.) New York: Princeton University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, J. Cognitive Dissonance: Fifty Years of a Classic Theory. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, W. H. and M. Venkatesan. “Cognitive Dissonance and Consumer Behavior: A Review of the Evidence.” Journal of Marketing Research, 13, (1976), pp. 303–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. “Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review.” The Academy of Management Review, 14, (1989), pp. 57–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. A. and W. H. Shaw. “Write-offs as Accounting Procedures to Manage Perceptions.” Journal of Accounting Research, 26, (1988), pp. 91–119.
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121: Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of. Norwalk: FASB, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142: Goodwill and Other Intangibles. Norwalk: FASB, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157: Fair Value Measurements. Norwalk: FASB, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159: The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. Norwalk: FASB, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J., J. D. Hanna, and L. Vincent. “Causes and Effects of Discretionary Asset Write-offs.” Journal of Accounting Research, 34, (1996), pp. 117–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilad, B., S. Kaish, and P. D. Loeb. “Cognitive Dissonance and Utility Maximization.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 8, (1987), pp. 61–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J. R., C. R. Harvey, and S. Rajgopal. “The Economic Implications of Corporate Financial Reporting.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40, (2005), pp. 3–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamberg, M., M. Paananen, and J. Novak. “The Adoption of IRFS 3: The Effects of Managerial Discretion and Stock Market Reactions.” European Accounting Review, 20, (2011), pp. 263–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayn, C. and P. Hughes. “Leading Indicator of Goodwill Impairment.” Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 21, (2006), pp. 223–265.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, P. “The Effect of Bonus Schemes on Accounting Decisions.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7, (1985), pp. 85–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, D. and D. Kopecki. “The Snag in Accounting-made-simple; Companies May be Exploiting New Standards for More Accurately Valuing Assets.” Business Week, (June 4, 2004), pp. 82.
   Google Scholar
• Holthausen, R. and R. L. Watts. “The Relevance of the Value-relevance Literature for Financial Accounting Standard Setting.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31, (2001), pp. 3–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics, 3, (1976), pp. 305–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jermias, J. “Cognitive Dissonance and Resistance to Change: The Influence of Commitment Confirmation and Feedback on Judgment Usefulness of Accounting System.” Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26, (2001), pp. 141–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, J. J. “Earnings Management During Import Relief Investigations.” Journal of Accounting Research, 29, (1991), pp. 193–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kachelmeier, S. J. “Introduction to a Forum on Individual Differences in Accounting Behavior.” The Accounting Review, 85, (2010), pp. 1127–1128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konow, J. “Fair Shares: Accountability and Cognitive Dissonance in Allocation Decisions.” The American Economic Review, 90, (2000), pp. 1072–1091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koonce, L. and M. Mercer. “Using Psychology Theories in Archival Financial Accounting Research.” Journal of Accounting Literature, 24, (2005), pp. 175–214.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, R. A. “Contracting Theory and Accounting.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32, (2001), pp. 3–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, R. L. Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Quagli, A. and F. Avallone. “Fair Value or Cost Model? Drivers of Choice for IAS 40 in the Real Estate Industry.” European Accounting Review, 19, (2010), pp. 461–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramanna, K. “The Implications of Unverifiable Fair-value Accounting: Evidence from the Political Economy of Goodwill Accounting.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45, (2008), pp. 253–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramanna, K. and R. L. Watts. “Evidence on the Use of Unverifiable Estimates in Required Goodwill Impairment.” Review of Accounting Studies, 17, (2012), pp. 749–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennekamp, K., K. Rupar, and N. Seybert. “Impaired Judgment: The Effects of Asset Impairment Reversibility and Cognitive Dissonance on Future Investment.” The Accounting Review, 90, (2015), pp. 739–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riedl, E. J. “An Examination of Long-lived Asset Impairments.” The Accounting Review, 79, (2004), pp. 823–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockness, J. W., H. O. Rockness, and S. H. Ivancevich. “The M&A Game Changes.” Financial Executives, 17, (2001), pp. 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Shiller, R. J. “Form Efficient Markets Theory to Behavioral Finance.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17, (2003), pp. 83–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strong, J. S. and J. R. Meyer. “Asset Writedowns: Managerial Incentives and Security Returns.” The Journal of Finance, 42, (1987), pp. 643–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vroom, V. H. and E. L. Deci. “The Stability of Post-decision Dissonance: A Follow-up Study of the Job Attitudes of Business School Graduates.” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6, (1971), pp. 26–49.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, R. L. “Conservatism in Accounting Part I: Explanations and Implications.” Accounting Horizons, 17, (2003), pp. 207–221.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, R. L. “What Has the Invisible Hand Achieved?” Accounting and Business Research, 36, (2006), pp. 51–61.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, R. L., and J. L. Zimmerman. Positive Accounting Theory. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Weil, J. “FASB Backs Down on Goodwill Accounting Rules.” The Wall Street Journal, (December 7, 2000), A2.
   Google Scholar
• Wicklund, R. A., and J. W. Brehm. Perspectives on Cognitive Dissonance. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. “On the Theory of Syndicates.” Econometrica, 36, (1968), pp. 119–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucca, L. J., and D. R. Campbell. “A Closer Look at Discretionary Writedowns of Impaired Assets.” Accounting Horizons, 6, (1992), pp. 31–41.
   Google Scholar