Critical Argument and Writer Identity: Social Constructivism as a Theoretical Framework for EFL Academic Writing

References

• Abasi, A. R., Akbari, N., & Graves, B. (2006). Discourse appropriation, construction of identities, and the complex issue of plagiarism: ESL students writing in graduate school. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(2), 102–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, D. (1997). A critical approach to critical thinking in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 31(1), 71–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, D. (2003). Writing and culture in the post-process era. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 49–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (M. Holquist, ed.; V.W. McGee, trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, E. L. (1995). Contrastive and non-contrastive connectives. Written Communication, 12(2), 219–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes: Theory, politics and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bizzell, P. L. (1978). The ethos of academic discourse. College Composition and Communication, 29(4), 351–355.
   Google Scholar
• Bizzell, P. L. (1982). Cognition, convention, certainty: Knowledge about writing. Pre/Text, 3, 213–243.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R., & IvaniČ, R. (1997). The politics of writing. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Costino, K. A., & Hyon, S. (2011). Sidestepping our “scare words”: Genre as a possible bridge between L1 and L2 compositionists. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 24–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotterall, S., & Cohen, R. (2003). Scaffolding for second language writers: Producing an academic essay. ELT Journal, 57(2), 158–166.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, W. (2003). A cautionary note about the teaching of critical reasoning. In Learning for an Unknown Future, Proceedings of the 26th HERDSA Annual Conference, Christchurch, New Zealand. Retrieved from http://www.herdsa.org.au/wp-content/uploads/conference/2003/papers/HERDSA70.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Westport, CT: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Eemeren, F. H. van, & Grootendorst, R. (1984). Speech acts in argumentative discussions: A theoretical model for the analysis of discussions directed towards solving conflicts of opinion. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Floris Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Eemeren, F. H. van, & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Elbow, P. (1973). Writing without teacher. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (2008). Social structure and individual agency in second language learning: Evidence from three life histories. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 5(4), 201–224.
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. A. (1994). Toward a pedagogy of critical thinking. In K. S. Walters (Ed.), Re-thinking reason: New perspectives in critical thinking (pp. 200–201). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Estern, B. M., Amián, J. G., Sánchez Medina, J. A., & Marco Macarro, M. J. (2010). Literacy and the formation of cultural identity. Theory Psychology, 20(2), 231–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, S., & Ackerman, J. M. (1995). Expanding the constructivist metaphor: A rhetorical perspective on literary practice. Review of Educational Research, 65(4), 383–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Meaning and the construction of reality in early childhood. In H. L. Pick & E. Salzman (Eds.), Modes of perceiving and processing of information (pp. 67–96). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). Language as social semiotic. In J. Maybin (Ed.), Language and literacy in social practice: A reader (pp. 23–43). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Hirvela, A., & Belcher, D. (2001). Coming back to voice: The multiple voices and identities of mature multilingual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(1–2), 83–106.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, H. L., & Hyun, E. (2010). East Asian international graduate students' epistemological experiences in an American university. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34, 340–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press/ELT.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2008). Writing Tteories and writing pedagogies. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 4(2), 91–110.
   Google Scholar
• IvaniČ, R. (2004). Discourses of writing and learning to write. Language and Education, 18(3), 220–245.
   Google Scholar
• IvaniČ, R., & Camps, D. (2001). I am how I sound: Voice as self-representation in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(1–2), 3–33.
   Google Scholar
• Kubota, R. (1999). Japanese culture constructed by discourses: Implications for applied linguistics research and ELT. TESOL Quarterly, 33(1), 9–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuda, P. K. (2001). Voice in Japanese written discourse Implications for second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 35–53.
   Google Scholar
• McKinley, J. (2012). A study of university students in Japan: Learning and application of academic English writing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• McKinley, J. (2013). Displaying critical thinking in EFL academic writing: A discussion of Japanese to English contrastive rhetoric. RELC Journal, 44(2), 195–208.
   Google Scholar
• McKinley, J. (2014). The impact of Western criticisms of Japanese rhetorical approaches on learners of Japanese. Language Learning in Higher Education, 4(2), 303–319.
   Google Scholar
• Noor, R. (2001). Contrastive rhetoric in expository prose: Approaches and achievements. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(2), 255–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelan, J. (2001). On teaching critical arguments: A matrix of understanding. Pedagogy, 1(3), 527–538.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, P. (2001). Voices in text, mind, and society: Sociohistoric accounts of discourse acquisition and use. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(1–2), 55–81.
   Google Scholar
• Ramanathan, V., & Atkinson, D. (1999). Individualism, academic writing, and ESL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 45–75.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, T. (1992). Ideology in composition: L1 and ESL. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(1), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Scollon, R. (1994). As a matter of fact: The changing ideology of authorship and responsibility in discourse. World Englishes, 13, 34–46.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, S. D. (2010). The principles of constructivism (9 pars.). Retrieved from www.des.emory.edu/mfp/502/502cons.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Sokol, M. (2005). Academic identity construction in E-discussion lists: A case study. In G. Cortese & A. Duszak (Eds.), Identity, community, discourse: English in intercultural settings (pp. 321–344). Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Stapleton, P. (2001). Assessing critical thinking in the writing of Japanese university students: Insights about assumptions and content familiarity. Written Communication, 18(4), 506–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapleton, P. (2002). Critiquing voice as a viable pedagogical tool in L2 writing: Returning the spotlight to ideas. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11, 177–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stetsenko, A., & Arievitch, I. (1997). Constructing and deconstructing the self: Comparing post-Vygotskian and discourse-based versions of social constructivism. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 4, 160–173.
   Google Scholar
• Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students' reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 153–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vianna, E., & Stetsenko, A. (2006). Embracing history through transforming it: Contrasting Piagetian versus Vygotskian (activity) theories of learning and development to expand constructivism within a dialectical view of history. Theory & Psychology, 16(1), 81–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological functions (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, eds.; M. Cole & M. Lopez-Morillas, trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (1993). Voices of the mind: Sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar