Midlife Outcomes of Educationally Underachieving Swedish Adolescents With Above Average Generalized Intelligence

REFERENCES

• Anastasi, A. (1976). Psychological testing. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, J. A., Bridger, R., & Evans, K. (1998). Models of underachievement among gifted preadolescents: The role of personal, family, and school factors. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 5–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backteman, G., & Magnusson, D. (1981). Longitudinal stability of personality-characteristics. Journal of Personality, 49, 148–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bask, M., Ferrer-Wreder, L., Salmela-Aro, K., & Bergman, L. R. (in press). Pathways to educational attainment in middle adulthood: The role of gender and parental educational expectations in adolescence. In I. Schoon & J. Eccles (Eds.), Gender differences in aspirations and attainment: A life course perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck-Domzalska, M. (2007). The narrowing education gap between women and men. Eurostat Statistics in Focus: Population and Social Conditions, 130, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, L. R. (2000). Women’s health, work, and education in a life-span perspective: Technical report 1: Theoretical background and overview of the data collection (Individual Development and Adaptation Report series, No. 70). Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm University, Department of Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, L. R., Corovic, J., Ferrer-Wreder, L., & Modig, K. (2014). High IQ in early adolescence and career success in adulthood: Findings from a Swedish longitudinal study. Research in Human Development, 11, 165–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman, L. R., & Magnusson, D. (1997). A person-oriented approach in research on developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 9(2), 291–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinapah, E. (2000). Tonårsnormer i förändring [Are adolescent norms changing?] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Stockholm University, Department of Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Colangelo, N., Kerr, B., Christensen, P., & Maxey, J. (1993). A comparison of gifted underachievers and gifted high achievers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 155–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S. (2007). Families, schools, and developing achievement-related motivations and engagement. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 665–691). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles (Parsons) J., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Emerick, L. J. (1992). Academic underachievement among the gifted: Students’ perceptions of factors that reverse the pattern. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 140–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firkowska-Mankiewicz, A. (2011). Adult careers: Does childhood IQ predict later life outcome? Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 8, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, J., & Hayes, A. (1988). Psychosocial aspects of the development of gifted underachievers: Review and implications. The Exceptional Child, 35, 39–51.
   Google Scholar
• Härnqvist, K. (1962). Manual till DBA [Manual to DBA]. Stockholm, Sweden: Skandinaviska Testförlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Husén, T. (2002). Begåvningsreserven då och nu [The talent reserve then and now]. Pedagogisk Forskning i Sverige, 7, 164–167.
   Google Scholar
• Husén, T., & Härnqvist, K. (2000). Begåvningsreserven: En återblick på ett halvsekels forskning och debatt [The talent reserve: A retrospection of a half- century’s research and debate]. Uppsala, Sweden: Föreningen för Svensk Undervisningshistoria.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, R. N., & Reschly, A. L. (2013). Reexamining gifted underachievement and dropout through the lens of student engagement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36, 220–249.
   Google Scholar
• Little, R. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198–1202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubinski, D., & Humphreys, L. G. (1990). A broadly based analysis of mathematical giftedness. Intelligence, 14, 327–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, D. (1988). Individual development from an interactional perspective: A longitudinal study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson, D., Dunér, A., & Zetterblom, G. (1975). Adjustment: A longitudinal study. Stockholm, Sweden and New York, NY: Almqvist & Wiksell, Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Mandelman, S. D., Tan, M., Aljughaiman, A. M., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2010). Intellectual giftedness: Economic, political, cultural, and psychological considerations. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 287–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2003). Factors that differentiate underachieving gifted students from high-achieving gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 144–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow, W. R., & Wilson, R. C. (1961). Family relations of bright high-achieving and under-achieving high school boys. Child Development, 32, 501–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overton, W. F. (2010). Life-span development: Concepts and issues. In W. F. Overton (Eds.), The handbook of life-span development (pp. 1–30). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M. (2003). Gifted girls, twenty-five years later: Hopes realized and new challenges found. Roeper Review, 25, 154–158.
   Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 152–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, R. A. (2002). Understanding giftedness and underachievement: At the edge of possibility. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 193–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statens Offentliga Utredningar. (2004). Den könsuppdelade arbetsmarknaden [The gender segregated labor market]. (Rapport 2004:43). Stockholm, Sweden: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Strenze, T. (2007). Intelligence and socioeconomic success: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal research. Intelligence, 35, 401–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. (2006). Gender differences in goal fulfillment and education choices (Report 287). Stockholm, Sweden: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. (2009). Vad påverkar resultaten i Svensk grundskola? [What affects the results in Swedish comprehensive school?] Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish National Agency for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. (2012). Högpresterande elever, höga prestationer och undervisningen [High performing students, high performance and teaching] (Report No. 379). Stockholm, Sweden: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Higher Education. (2008). Vilka är studenterna? En undersökning av studenterna i Sverige [Who are the students? A screening of the students in Sweden] (Report 2008:33 R). Stockholm, Sweden: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Terman, L. M. (1947). The gifted child grows up, twenty-five years follow up of a superior group: Genetic studies of genius (Vol. IV). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terman, L. M. (1954). The discovery and encouragement of exceptional talent. American Psychologist, 9, 221–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorndike, R. L. (1963). The concepts of over and underachievement. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A., (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, D. J., Dawis, R. V., England, G. W., & Lofquist, L. H. (1967). Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Industrial Relations Center.
   Google Scholar
• Westrin, P. A. (1969). WIT III manual. Stockholm, Sweden: Skandinaviska Testförlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Wirthwein, L., & Rost, D. H. (2011). Giftedness and subjective well-being: A study with adults. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 182–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfle, J. A. (1991). Underachieving gifted males: Are we missing the boat? Roeper Review, 13, 181–184.
   Google Scholar
• Wulff, C., Bergman, L. R., & Sverke, M. (2009). General mental ability and satisfaction with school and work: A longitudinal study from ages 13 to 48. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 398–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zettergren, P., & Bergman, L. R. (2014). Adolescents with high IQ and their adjustment in adolescence and midlife. Research in Human Development, 11, 186–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, A., Ziegler, A., & Stoeger, H. (2012). Shortcomings of the IQ-based construct of underachievement. Roeper Review, 34, 123–132.
   Google Scholar