Towards a New Synthesis for Development in Adulthood

REFERENCES

• Allport, F. H. (1937). Teleonomic description in the study of personality. Journal of Personality, 5, 202–214. doi:10.1111/jopy.1937.5.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Baltes, P. B., Lindenberger, U., & Staudinger, U. M. (2006). Life span theory in developmental psychology. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 569–664). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., & Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165–181. doi:10.1037/0003-066X54.3.165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, F. S., & Varmus, H. (2015). A new initiative on precision medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 372, 793–795. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1500523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diehl, M., Hooker, K., & Sliwinski, M. J. (2015). A brief historical overview of intraindividual variability research across the life span. In M. Diehl, K. Hooker, & M. J. Sliwinski (Eds.), Handbook of intraindividual variability across the life span (pp. 3–15). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freund, A. M., Li, K. Z. H., & Baltes, P. B. (1999). Successful development and aging: The role of selection, optimization, and compensation. In J. Brandtstädter & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Action and self-development: Theory and research through the life span (pp. 401–434). Thousand Oaks, CA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Freund, A. M., Nikitin, J., & Ritter, J. O. (2009). Psychological consequences of longevity. Human Development, 52, 1–37. doi:10.1159/000189213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry, C. L., Dickerson-Putman, J., Draper, P., Ikels, C., Keith, J., Glascock, P., & Harpending, H. C. (2007). Culture and the meaning of a good old age. In J. Sokolovsky (Ed.), The cultural context of aging: Worldwide perspectives (pp. 99–121). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
   Google Scholar
• Gerstorf, D., Hoppmann, C. A., & Ram, N. (2014). The promise and challenges of integrating multiple time-scales in adult developmental inquiry. Research in Human Development, 11, 75–90. doi:10.1080/15427609.2014.906725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampson, S. E. (2012). Personality processes: Mechanisms by which personality traits “get outside the skin.” Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 315–339. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckhausen, J., Wrosch, C., & Schulz, R. (2010). A motivational theory of life-span development. Psychological Review, 117, 32–60. doi:10.1037/a0017668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooker, K. (2002). New directions for research in personality and aging: A comprehensive model for linking levels, structures, and processes. Journal of Research in Personality (Special Issue on Aging), 36, 318–334. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00012-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooker, K., Choun, S., Mejía, S., Pham, T., & Metoyer, R. (2013). A microlongitudinal study of the linkages among personality traits, self-regulation, and stress in older adults. Research in Human Development, 10, 26–46. doi:10.1080/15427609.2013.760258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooker, K., Hoppmann, C. A., & Siegler, I. C. (2010). Personality: Lifespan compass for health. In K. E. Whitfield (Ed.), Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics: Vol. 30. Focus on biobehavioral perspectives on health in late life (pp. 199–230). New York, NY: Springer Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hooker, K., & McAdams, D. P. (2003). Personality reconsidered: A new agenda for aging research. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 58, P296–P304. doi:10.1093/geronb/58.6.P296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, S., & Calasanti, T. (2015). Critical perspectives on successful aging: Does it “appeal more than it illuminates”? The Gerontologist, 55, 26–33. doi:10.1093/geront/gnu027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko, H.-J., Mejía, S., & Hooker, K. (2014). Social possible selves, self-regulation, and social goal progress in older adulthood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 38, 219–227. doi:10.1177/0165025413512063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, R. M. (2006). Developmental science, developmental systems, and contemporary theories of human development. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Theoretical models of human development: Vol. 1. Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., pp. 1–17). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, R. M., Agans, J. P., DeSouza, L. M., & Hershberg, R. M. (2014). Developmental science in 2025: A predictive review. Research in Human Development, 11, 255–272. doi:10.1080/15427609.2014.967046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P., Kelly, N., Kahana, B., Kahana, E., Willcox, B. J., Willcox, D. C., & Poon, L. W. (2015). Defining successful aging: A tangible or elusive concept? The Gerontologist, 55, 14–25. doi:10.1093/geront/gnu044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molenaar, P. C. M. (2015). The future of the analysis of intraindividual variation. In M. Diehl, K. Hooker, & M. J. Sliwinski (Eds.), Handbook of intraindividual variability across the life span (pp. 343–356). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Molenaar, P. C. M., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2015). Systems methods for developmental research. In R. M. Lerner, W. F. Overton, & P. C. M. Molenaar (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Vol. 1: Theory and method (7th ed., pp. 652–682). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Neugarten, B. L. (1972). Personality and the aging process. The Gerontologist, 12, 9–15. doi:10.1093/geront/12.1_Part_1.9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noftle, E. E., & Fleeson, W. (2015). Intraindividual variability in adult personality development. In M. Diehl, K. Hooker, & M. Sliwinski (Eds.), Handbook of intraindividual variability across the life span (pp. 176–197). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Overton, W. F., & Müller, U. (2015). Metatheories, theories, and concepts in the study of development. In R. M. Lerner, W. F. Overton, & P. C. M. Molenaar (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Vol.1. Theory and method (7th ed., pp. 19–58). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Pepper, S. C. (1942). World hypotheses: A study in evidence. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ram, N., & Gerstorf, D. (2009). Time-structured and net intraindividual variability: Tools for examining the development of dynamic characteristics and processes. Psychology and Aging, 24, 778–791. doi:10.1037/a0017915
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reese, H. W., & Overton, W. F. (1970). Model of development and theories of development. In L. R. Goulet & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), Life-span developmental psychology: Research and theory (pp. 115–145). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vermeulen, R. (2015, April). The exposome: Decoding the environment through new investigative technologies. Paper presented as part of the College of Public Health and Human Sciences colloquium series, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
   Google Scholar
• Witherington, D. C. (2015). Dynamic systems in developmental science. In R. M. Lerner, W. F. Overton, & P. C. M. Molenaar (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Vol. 1. Theory and method (7th ed., pp. 63–112). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar