Why Should Cognitive Developmental Psychology Remember that Individuals Are Different?

REFERENCES

• Atlan, H. (1999). La fin du “tout génétique”? Vers de nouveaux paradigmes en biologie [Is it the end of “all genetics”? Toward new paradigms in biology]. Paris, France: INRA Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Baltes, P. B., Lindenberger, U., & Staudinger, U. M. (2006). Life-span theory in developmental psychology. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 569–664). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671–684. doi:10.1037/h0043943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Ribaupierre, A. (2015). Pourquoi faut-il étudier la variabilité intra-individuelle lorsqu’on s’intéresse au développement cognitif? [ Why should intraindividual variability be studied when when one is interested in cognitive development]. In I. J. Juhel & G. Rouxel (Eds.), Différences et variabilités en psychologie [Differences and variability in psychology] (pp. 159–178). Rennes, France: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
   Google Scholar
• de Ribaupierre, A., Chicherio, C., Fagot, D., Dirk, J., Lecerf, T., & Ghisletta, P. (2013). Variabilité inter-et intra-individuelle dans le fonctionnement cognitif au travers du cycle de vie [Inter- and intraindividual variability in cognitive functioning across the lifespan]. In P. Y. Gilles, & M. Carlier (Eds.), Vive(nt) les différences. Psychologie différentielle fondamentale et applications [Long live the differences. Fundamental differential psychology and applications] (pp. 97–102). Aix-en-Provence, France: Presses Universitaires de Provence.
   Google Scholar
• Grégoire, J. (2006). L’examen clinique de l’intelligence de l’enfant: Fondements et pratique du WISC-IV [The clinical assessment of the child's intelligence: Basis and practive of the WISC IV]. Bruxelles, Belgium: Editions Mardaga.
   Google Scholar
• Hultsch, D. F., & MacDonald, S. W. S. (2004). Intraindividual variability in performance as a theoretical window into cognitive aging. In R. A. Dixon, L. Bäckman, & L. G. Nilsson (Eds.), New frontiers in cognitive aging (pp. 65–88). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. R. (2006). Clocking the mind: Mental chronometry and individual differences. Oxford, England: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, A. S. (1979). Intelligent testing with the WISC-R. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Li, S. C., Lindenberger, U., Hommel, B., Aschersleben, G., Prinz, W., & Baltes, P. B. (2004). Transformations in the couplings among intellectual abilities and constituent cognitive processes across the life span. Psychological Science, 15(3), 155–163. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.01503003.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, D. (1985). Implications of an interactional paradigm for research on human development. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 8, 115–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntosh, A. R., Kovacevic, N., Lippe, S., Garrett, D. D., Grady, C. L., & Jirsa, V. (2010). The development of a noisy brain. Archives Italiennes de Biologie, 148, 323–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mella, N., de Ribaupierre, S., Eagleson, R., & De Ribaupierre, A. (2013). Cognitive intraindividual variability and white matter integrity in aging. Scientific World Journal, 2013, 16. Article ID 350623. doi:10.1155/2013/350623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mella, N., Fagot, D., & de Ribaupierre, A. (under revision). Dispersion in cognitive functioning: Age differences over the lifespan.
   Google Scholar
• Molenaar, P. C. M. (2002). Variabilité interindividuelle et intra-individuelle dans le développement cognitif [Inter- and intraindividual variability in cognitive development]. In J. Lautrey, B. Mazoyer, & P. Van Geert (Eds.), Invariants et variabilités dans les sciences cognitives [Invariants and variability in cognitive science] (pp. 355–369). Paris, France: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’homme.
   Google Scholar
• Molenaar, P. C. M., Huizenga, H. M., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2003). The relationship between the structure of interindividual and intraindividual variability: A theoretical and empirical vindication of developmental systems theory. In U. M. Staudinger & U. Lindenberger (Eds.), Understanding human development. Dialogues with lifespan psychology (pp. 339–360). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Nesselroade, J. R. (1991). The warp and woof of the developmental fabric. In R. M. Downs, L. S. Liben, & D. S. Palermo (Eds.), Views of development, the environment, and aesthetics: The legacy of Joachim F. Wohlwill (pp. 213–240). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Nesselroade, J. R., & Ram, N. (2004). Studying intraindividual variability: What we have learned that will help us understand lives in context. Research in Human Development, 1(1), 9–29. doi:10.1080/15427609.2004.9683328
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1971). The theory of stages in cognitive development. In D. R. Green, M. P. Ford, & G. B. Flamer (Eds.), Measurement and Piaget (pp. 1–11). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Rabbitt, P., Osman, P., Moore, B., & Stollery, B. (2001). There are stable individual differences in performance variability, both from moment to moment and from day to day. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 54(4), 981–1003. doi:10.1080/713756013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuchlin, M. (1981). Apports de la méthode différentielle à la psychologie générale [The contribution of the differential method to general psychology]. Journal De Psychologie, 4, 377–395.
   Google Scholar
• Reuchlin, M., & Bacher, F. (1989). Les différences individuelles dans le développement cognitif [Individual differences in cognitive development]. Paris, France: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Rieben, L., de Ribaupierre, A., & Lautrey, J. (1990). Structural invariants and individual modes of processing: On the necessity of a minimally structuralist approach of development for education. Archives de Psychologie, 58, 29–53.
   Google Scholar
• Schaie, K. W. (1983). What can we learn from the longitudinal study of adult psychological development. In K. W. Schaie (Ed.), Longitudinal studies of adult psychological development (pp. 64–135). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schaie, K. W. (1990). Intellectual development in adulthood. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (3rd edition). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Schaie, K. W. (1996). Intellectual development in adulthood. The Seattle longitudinal study. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siegler, R. S. (1996). Emerging minds. The process of change in children’s thinking. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Linden, M., & Juillerat, A.-C. (2012). Penser autrement la maladie d’Alzheimer [Think differently about Alzheimer’s disease]. In G. Arfeux-Vaucher & L. Ploton (Eds.), Les démences au croisement des non-savoirs. Chemins de la complexité [The dementias at the crossing of non-knowledge. Paths of complexity] (pp. 127–139). Paris, France: Editions de l’Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Santé Publique.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Maas, H. L. J., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (1992). Stagewise cognitive development: An application of catastrophe theory. Psychological Review, 99(3), 395–417. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.3.395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Geert, P. (1994). Dynamic systems of development. New York, NY: Harvester.
   Google Scholar
• Van Geert, P. (2011). The contribution of complex dynamic systems to development. Child Development Perspectives, 5(4), 273–278. doi:10.1111/cdep.2011.5.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Geert, P., & Van Dijk, M. (2002). Focus on variability: New tools to study intra-individual variability in developmental data. Infant Behavior and Development, 25, 340–374. doi:10.1016/S0163-6383(02)00140-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehouse, P. J., & George, D. (2008). The myth of Alzheimer’s: What you aren’t being told about today’s most dreaded diagnosis. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wohlwill, J. (1973). The study of behavioral development. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar