References
- Bielak, A. A. M., Hatt, C. R., & Diehl, M. (2017). Cognitive performance in adults’ daily lives: Is there a lab-life gap? Research in Human Development, 14(3), 219–233.
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513–531. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.32.7.513
- Brunswik, E. (1943). Organismic achievement and environmental probability. Psychological Review, 50, 255–272. doi:10.1037/h0060889
- Brunswik, E. (1955). Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychological Review, 62, 193–217. doi:10.1037/h0047470
- Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
- Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
- Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
- Dirk, J., & Schmiedek, F. (2017). Variability in children’s working memory is coupled with perceived disturbance: An ambulatory assessment study in the school and out-of-school context. Research in Human Development, 14(3), 200–218.
- Fiedler, K. (2011). Voodoo correlations are everywhere—Not only in neuroscience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 163–171. doi:10.1177/1745691611400237
- Freund, A. M., & Isaacowitz, D. M. (2013). Beyond age comparisons: A plea for the use of a modified Brunswikian approach to experimental designs in the study of adult development and aging. Human Development, 56, 351–371. doi:10.1159/000357177
- Kunzmann, U., & Isaacowitz, D. (2017). Emotional aging: Taking the immediate context seriously. Research in Human Development, 14(3), 182–199.
- Lerner, R. M. (2012). Developmental science: Past, present and future. International Journal of Developmental Science, 6, 29–36.
- Mehl, M. R., & Connor, T. S. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of research methods for studying daily life. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- Ram, N., Brinberg, M., Pincus, A. L., & Conroy, D. E. (2017). The questionable ecological validity of ecological momentary assessment: Considerations for design and analysis. Research in Human Development, 14(3), 253–270.
- Reis, H. T. (2012). Why researchers should think “real-world”: A conceptual rationale. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Connor (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 3–21). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008). Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 1–32. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415
- Whitley, B. E. (1996). The external validity of research. In B. E. Whitley (Ed.), Principles of research in behavioral science (pp. 465–491). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing.
- Wilkinson, L. R., Ferraro, K. F., & Kemp B. R. (2017). Contextualization of survey data: What do we gain and does It matter? Research in Human Development, 14(3), 234–252.
- Wrzus, C., & Mehl, M. R. (2015). Lab and/or field? Measuring personality processes and their social consequences. European Journal of Personality, 29, 250–271. doi:10.1002/per.1986