Beliefs about Research and Social Work Practice: A Systematic Psychometric Review of Scales

References

• AaronsG. A., GlissonC., HoagwoodK., KelleherK., LandsverkJ., & CafriG. (2010). Psychometric properties and U.S. national norms of the evidence-based practice attitudes scale (EBPAS). Psychological Assessment, 22, 356–365. doi:10.1037/a0019188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AdamsK. B., LeCroyC. W., & MattoH. C. (2009). Limitations of evidence-based practice for social work education: Unpacking the complexity. Journal of Social Work Education, 45, 165–186. doi:10.5175/JSWE.2009.200700105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AisenbergE. (2008). Evidence-based practice in mental health care to ethnic minority communities: Has its practice fallen short of its evidence?Social Work, 53, 297–306. doi:10.1093/sw/53.4.297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BloomM., FischerJ., & OrmeJ. G. (2006). Evaluating practice: Guidelines for the accountable professional (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• BrownT. A. (2006). Confirmatory factory analysis for applied research. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• BryantF. B. (2000). Assessing the validity of measurement. In L. G.Grimm & P. R.Yarnold (Eds.). Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics (pp. 99–146). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• BryantF. B., & BaxterW. J. (1997). The structure of positive and negative automatic cognition. Cognition and Emotion, 11, 225–258. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1080/026999397379908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BryantF. B., & YarnoldP. R. (1995). Principal–components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In L. G.Grimm & P. R.Yarnold (Eds.). Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 99–136). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• CarminesE. G., & ZellerR. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• ChoiY., GolderS., GillmoreM. R., & MorrisonD. M. (2005). Analysis with missing data in social work research. Journal of Social Service Research, 31, 23–48. doi:10.1300/J079v31n03_02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CortinaJ. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council on Social Work Education. (2008). Educational policy and accreditation standards. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.cswe.org/Accreditation/2008EPASDescription.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• CournoyerB. R. (2005). The future of evidence-based social work: An optimistic view?Advances in Social Work, 6, 68–78.
   Google Scholar
• CournoyerD. E., & KleinW. C. (2000). Research methods for social work. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• DeVellisR. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• EngelR. J., & SchuttR. K. (2009). The practice of research in social work (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• GregoryV. L.,Jr. (2010a). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for bipolar disorder: Implications for clinical social workers. Journal of Social Service Research, 36, 460–469. doi:10.1080/01488376.2010.510950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GregoryV. L.,Jr. (2010b). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression in bipolar disorder: A meta-analysis. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 7, 269–279. doi:10.1080/15433710903176088.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GregoryV. L.,Jr. (2010c). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for mania: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails. Social Work in Mental Health, 8, 483–494. doi:10.1080/15332981003744388.
   Google Scholar
• GregoryV. L.,Jr. (2010d). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for schizophrenia: Applications to social work practice. Social Work in Mental Health, 8, 140–159. doi:10.1080/15332980902791086.
   Google Scholar
• GregoryV. L.,Jr. (2010e). Gregory research beliefs scale: Factor structure and internal consistency. Research on Social Work Practice, 20, 641–650. doi:10.1177/1049731509353049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GregoryV. L.,Jr. (2011). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for comorbid bipolar and substance use disorders: A systematic review of controlled trials. Mental Health and Substance Use: Dual Diagnosis, 4, 302–313. doi:10.1080/17523281.2011.598463.
   Google Scholar
• GregoryV. L.,Jr., & PikeC. K. (2012). Missing data: A comparison of online and classroom data collection methods with social work students. Journal of Social Service Research, 38, 351–365. doi:10.1080/01488376.2011.641076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GuoB., PerronB. E., & GillespieD. F. (2009). A systematic review of structural equation modeling in social work research. British Journal of Social Work, 39, 1556–1574. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcn101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HarderD. H., & ZalmaA. (1990). Two promising shame and guilt scales: A construct validity comparison. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 729–745. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1080/00223891.1990.9674108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HodgeD. R., JacksonK. F., & VaughnM. G. (2010). Culturally sensitive interventions and health and behavioral health youth outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Social Work in Health Care, 49, 401–423. doi:10.1080/00981381003648398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HoldenG., BarkerK., MeenaghanT., & RosenbergG. (1999). Research self-efficacy: A new possibility for educational outcomes assessment. Journal of Social Work Education, 35, 463–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HoloskoM. J. (2010). What types of designs are we using in social work research and evaluation?Research on Social Work Practice, 20, 665–673. doi:10.1177/1049731509339586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JuddC. M., JessorR., & DonovanJ. E. (1986). Structural equation models and personality research. Journal of Personality, 54, 149–198. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1986.tb00392.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JuliusdottirS., & KarlssonT. (2007). Some indications for professional development in social work: A study of theoretical interest and attitudes toward research among Icelandic social workers. European Journal of Social Work, 10(1), 21–37.
   Google Scholar
• KimJ. S. (2008). Examining the effectiveness of solution-focused brief therapy: A meta-analysis. Research on Social Work Practice, 18, 107–116. doi:10.1177/1049731507307807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KirkS. A., McNeelyR., & RosenblattA. (1979). Race and research orientation: A survey of Black and White social work students. Albany, NY: State University of New York at Albany.
   Google Scholar
• KirkS. A., & RosenblattA. (1981). Research knowledge and orientation among social work students. In S.Briar, H.Weissman, & A.Rubin (Eds.), Research utilization in social work education (pp. 29–39). New York, NY: Council on Social Work Education.
   Google Scholar
• LalayantsM., TripodiT., & JungS. Y. (2009). Trends in domestic and international social work research: A 10-year review of American research journals. Journal of Social Service Research, 35, 209–219. doi:10.1080/01488370902900642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LazarA. (1991). Faculty, practitioner, and student attitudes toward research. Journal of Social Work Education, 27, 34–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeeS., & AosS. (2011). Using cost-benefit analysis to understand the value of social interventions. Research on Social Work Practice, 21, 682–688. doi:10.1177/1049731511410551.
   Google Scholar
• LinnM. W., & GreenwaldS. R. (1974). Student attitudes, knowledge, and skill related to research training. Journal of Education for Social Work, 10, 48–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LongJ. S. (1983). Confirmatory factor analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• LundahlB., & YaffeJ. (2007). Use of meta-analysis in social work and applied disciplines. Journal of Social Service Research, 33, 1–11. doi:10.1300/J079v33n03_01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnonD. P. (2011). Integrating mediators and moderators in research design. Research on Social Work Practice, 21, 675–681. doi:10.1177/1049731511414148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeeceC. A., & ThyerB. A. (2004). Evidence-based practice and social work. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 1, 7–25. doi:10.1300/J394v01n01_02.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MontgomeryK. L., KimJ. S., & FranklinC. (2011). Acceptance and commitment therapy for psychological and physiological illnesses: A systematic review for social workers. Health & Social Work, 36, 169–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MorgenshternM., FreymondN., AgyapongS., & GreesonC. (2011). Graduate social work students' attitudes toward research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 31, 552–568. doi:10.1080/08841233.2011.615287.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Social Workers. (2008). Code of ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.socialworkers.org/pubs/code/code.asp.
   Google Scholar
• NunnallyJ. C., & BernsteinI. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw–Hill.
   Google Scholar
• OlsenL. (1990). Integrating a practice orientation into the research curriculum: The effect on knowledge and attitudes. Journal of Social Work Education, 26, 155–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PapanastasiouE. C. (2005). Factor structure of the “attitudes toward research scale.”Statistics Education Research Journal, 4, 16–26.
   Google Scholar
• RiceK., HwangJ., Abrefa-GyanT., & PowellK. (2010). Evidence-based practice questionnaire: A confirmatory factor analysis in a social work sample. Advances in Social Work, 11, 158–173.
   Google Scholar
• RoseR. A., & FraserM. W. (2008). A simplified framework for using multiple imputation in social work research. Social Work Research, 32, 171–178. doi:10.1093/swr/32.3.171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RosenA., & MutschlerE. (1982). Social work students' and practitioners' orientation to research. Journal of Education for Social Work, 18, 62–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RosenblattA., & KirkS. A. (1981). Cumulative effect of research courses on knowledge and attitudes of social work students. Journal of Education for Social Work, 17, 26–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RoyseD. (1999). Research methods in social work (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
   Google Scholar
• RozasL. W., & KleinW. C. (2010). The value and purpose of the traditional qualitative literature review. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 7, 387–399. doi:10.1080/15433710903344116.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• RubinA., & BabbieE. R. (1997). Research methods for social work (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• RubinA., & ParrishD. (2007). Views of evidence-based practice among faculty in master of social work programs: A national survey. Research on Social Work Practice, 17, 110–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RubinA., & ParrishD. E. (2010). Development and validation of the evidence-based practice process assessment scale: Preliminary findings. Research on Social Work Practice, 20, 629–640. doi:10.1177/1049731508329420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RubinA., & ParrishD. E. (2011). Validation of the evidence-based practice process assessment scale. Research on Social Work Practice, 21, 106–118. doi:10.1177/1049731509347851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SheaforB. W., HorejsiC. R., & HorejsiG. A. (2000). Techniques and guidelines for social work practice (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• SiegelD. H. (1983). Can research and practice be integrated in social work education?Journal of Education for Social Work, 19, 12–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SiegelD. H. (1985). Effective teaching of empirically based practice. Social Work Research and Abstracts, 21, 40–48.
   Google Scholar
• SoydanH. (2008). Applying randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews in social work research. Research on Social Work Practice, 18, 311–318. doi:10.1177/1049731507307788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StameyJ., SherrM. E., & WilliamsN. J. (2011). Bayesian analysis for evidence-based practice in social work. Social Work Research, 35, 46–52. doi:10.1093/swr/35.1.46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StarkR. B., & CohenB. E. (2007). Promoting positive student attitudes toward social work research using course web sites. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 27, 181–198.
   Google Scholar
• ThompsonB. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• ThyerB. A. (2002a). Evidence-based practice and clinical social work. Evidence-Based Mental Health, 5, 6–7. doi:10.1136/ebmh.5.1.6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ThyerB. A. (2002b). Principles of evidence-based practice and treatment development. In A. R.Roberts & G. J.Greene (Eds.), Social worker's desk reference (pp. 739–742). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• WallaceW. (1971). The logic of science in sociology. Chicago, IL: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar