Evidence from Social Service Enhancement Projects: Selected Cases from Norway's HUSK Project

References

• Aasmundsen, H., & Sagvaag, H. (2012). “Som å snakke til en vegg.” Personer med rusproblemer og deres erfaringer med brukermedvirkning [“It's like talking to a wall.” People with drug abuse and their experiences with user involvement]. In A. G.Jenssen & I. M.Tronvoll (Eds.), Brukermedvirkning. Likeverd og anerkjennelse [User involvement. Equality and recognition] (pp. 188–200). Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andreassen, T. A. (2009). Brukermedvirkning i NAV [User involvement in NAV]. Oslo, Norway: Gyldendal Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Andreassen, T. A. (in press). National reforms and local social services: Understanding the institutional context of the HUSK program. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work.
   Google Scholar
• Antonsen, E. B. (2008). Et stykke på vei, men likevel langt igjen? [On the road, but still a long way to go?]. Tidsskrift for psykisk helsearbeid [Journal of work with mental health], 5, 345–354.
   Google Scholar
• Askheim, O. P., & Starrin, B. (Eds.). (2007). Empowerment i teori og praksis. [Empowerment in theory and practice]. Oslo, Norway: Gyldendal Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Bildsten, C., Abdisamad, A. S., & Hansen, C. (2007). Moellamodellen—medvirkningsbaserte metoder med fokus på lokale ressurser. [The Mill model—Participatory based methods with focus on local resources]. In Somaliere i Norge, noen erfaringer. [Somalis in Norway, some experiences]. Oslo, Norway: The Directorate of Integration and Diversity (IMDi).
   Google Scholar
• Bjerke, E. (2011). Jeg har alltid oppfattet meg selv som … [“I have always considered myself as…]”. In T.Slettebo, E.Brodtkorb, & H.Dalen (Eds.), Bruker. Brukermedvirkning. Bruker med virkning. Tverrfaglig samarbeid. Partnerskap. En brukermedvirkningsprosess i HUSK. [User. User involvement. User with effect. Cross-disciplinary cooperation. Partnership. A user involvement process in HUSK][Booklet] (pp. 36–41). Skien, Norway: KREM. Retrieved from http://www.krem-norge.no/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/HUSK_brukermedvirkning_52s.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A. K. (2012). Moeteplassen, et sted å moetes. [The Meeting Place, a place to meet.]. In A. G.Jenssen & I. M.Tronvoll (Eds.), Brukermedvirkning. Likeverd og anerkjennelse. [User involvement. Equality and recognition] (pp. 76–84). Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, I. E., & Lichtwark, W. (2011). “Hvordan kan jeg ha planer om fremtiden, når jeg ikke klarer dagen”. [“How can I have plans for the future, when I'm not able to cope with the day to day?”]. In A.Johannessen, S.Natland, & A. M.Støkken (Eds.), Samarbeidsforskning i praksis. [Collaborative research in practice] (pp. 127–139). Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalen, H., & Natland, S. (Eds.). (2011). Eventyr fra virkeligheten. [Fairy tales from reality]. Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Dietrichson, V., & Ronbeck, L. H. (2012). Når brukere blir prosjektledere – erfaringsrapport fra et HUSK-prosjekt. [When users become project managers—Experiences from a HUSK project] [Booklet]. Skien, Norway: KREM.
   Google Scholar
• Dyhr-Nielsen, R., & Sagatun, S. (2010). Bruk av begreper om praksis I NAV/sosialtjenesten. [Use of concepts about practice in NAV/Social services (Paper, 151)]. Kristiansand, Norway: University of Agder.
   Google Scholar
• Eide, S. B. (2011). Metode for kunnskaps- og tjenesteutvikling ved samrefleksjon. [Method for knowledge- and services development]. In A.Johannessen, S.Natland, & A. M.Støkken (Eds.), Samarbeidsforskning i praksis. [Collaborative research in practice] (pp. 184–194). Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eliassen, E., & Seikkula, J. (Eds.). (2006). Reflekterende prosesser i praksis. Klientsamtaler, veiledning, konsultasjon og forskning. [Reflecting processes in practice. Client Converstaions, advice, consultation and research]. Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fehn, I. L. S. (in press). “Fagligheten sitter i veggene på Sagene”. Fra studentenes evalueringer av praksis på NAV Sagene. [“The professionalism is in the walls.” The students evaluation of having practice internship at NAV Sagene]. In M.Ranger, K.Rytter, & H.Dalen (Eds.), HUSK Sagene Høgskoleklinikk i sosialt arbeid. “Teoretisk kunnskap viser seg annerledes i praksis enn i boeker.” [The University Clinic in Social Work in the NAV Sagene District Office in Oslo, Norway. “Theoretical knowledge is different in practice than in books.”]. Oslo, Norway: Abstrakt forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, J., Jenkins, N., Bloor, M., Neale, J., & Bernley, L. (2007). Drug user involvement in treatment decision. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Gjernes, T., & Bliksvaer, T. (2011). Nye samarbeidsformer—nye læringsformer? [New forms of collaboration—And new forms of learning][Final Report from the Evaluation of HUSK, NF-report no 7]. Bodo, Norway: Nordlandsforskning. (Nordland Research Institute.).
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1968). Stigma. Harmindsworth, UK: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to action research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, R., & Bjerke, E. (2011). Dialogseminar som metode i evaluering av praksis. in. [Dialog seminar as a method for evaluation of practice]. In A.Johannessen, S.Natland, & A. M.Støkken (Eds.), Samarbeidsforskning i praksis. [Collaborative research in practice] (pp. 140–155). Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, G. (in press). Om praksisstudiet sett fra utdanningens side. [About the practice internship, seen from the educational staff]. In M.Ranger, K.Rytter, & H.Dalen (Eds.), HUSK Sagene Høgskoleklinikk i sosialt arbeid. “Teoretisk kunnskap viser seg annerledes i praksis enn i bøker.” [The University Clinic in Social Work in the NAV Sagene District Office in Oslo, Norway. “Theoretical knowledge is different in practice than in books.”]. Oslo, Norway: Abstrakt forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kjellevold, A. (2006). Idealet om brukerorientering i helse- og sosialtjenesten. [The ideal about user involvement in health- and social services]. Lov og rett [Journal of Law and Justice], 45, 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Kvammen, M. F. (2011, September). Field practice education at University of Agder, Norway. Paper presented at the Conference: Field Practice Education. Association of South African Social Work Education Institutions (ASAWEI), Gauteng South Africa, September 7 to 11, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kvammen, M. F. (2012, September). Møte mellom erfaringsveiledere og sosionomstudenter i praksis. [Meetings between mentors with user experiences and students of social work. Paper presented at the conference]. Nordisk nætverk for professionsforskning (NORPRO) [Nordic forum for studies on professions]. Aarhus September 25 to 26, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Loyland, B. (2013). Chronic pain, psychological distress, and health-related quality of life among long-term social assistance recipients in Norway (Doctoral dissertation)University of Oslo. Oslo, Norway: Unipub Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lyso, K., Samuelsen, R. M., & Tronvoll, I. M. (2012). Dialoggruppa—hvordan et brukerstyrt HUK-prosjekt utviklet seg. [The dialog group—How a user-controlled HUSK project developed]. In A. G.Jenssen & I. M.Tronvoll (Eds.), Brukermedvirkning. Likeverd og anerkjennelse. [User involvement. Equality and recognition] (pp. 85–97). Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rytter, K., Ranger, M., & Dalen, H. (in press). NAV Sagene, HiOA og KREM. Felles arena for kunnskapsutvikling, brukermedvirkning og undervisning. [NAV Sagene, OAUC and KREM. A joint arena for development of knowledge, user involvement and teaching.]. In M.Ranger, K.Rytter, & H.Dalen (Eds.), HUSK Sagene Høgskoleklinikk i sosialt arbeid. “Teoretisk kunnskap viser seg annerledes i praksis enn i bøker.” [The University Clinic in Social Work in the NAV Sagene District Office in Oslo, Norway. “Theoretical knowledge is different in practice than in Books.”]. Oslo, Norway: Abstrakt forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Schulte, S., Moring, J., Meier, P. S., & Barrowclough, C. (2007). User involvement and desired service developments in drug treatment: Service user and provider views. Drugs: Education, Prevention & Policy, 14, 277–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seim, S., & Slettebø, T. (2006). Brukermedvirkning i barnevernet. [User involvement in child care]. Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slettebo, T., Brodtkorb, E., Dietrichson, V., & Lyhne, K. (2009). KREMs kurs i endringsmetode. Beskrivelse og evaluering. [KREM's Courses for Changing Attiudes. Description and evaluation (Report No 6)]. Diakonhjemmet University College. Retrieved from http://brage.bibsys.no/diakon/bitstream/URN:NBN:no-bibsys_brage_10994/1/KREMS%20kurs%20endringsmetode.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Titmuss, R. (1974). Social policy: An Introduction. London, UK: George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Torstensen, T. B., & Dalen, H. (in press). Sosial oppfølgning slik brukerne på NAV Sagene vil ha det. [Follow up social work at NAV Sagene as the users want it]. In M.Ranger, K.Rytter, & H.Dalen (Eds.), HUSK Sagene Høgskoleklinikk i sosialt arbeid. “Teoretisk kunnskap viser seg annerledes i praksis enn i bøker.” [The University Clinic in Social Work in the NAV Sagene District Office in Oslo, Norway. “Theoretical knowledge is different in practice than in books.”]. Oslo, Norway: Abstrakt forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Vennesland, H., & Nordhagen, K. (in press). NAV Sagene som praksissenter. [NAV Sagene as a center of practice]. In M.Ranger, K.Rytter, & H.Dalen (Eds.), HUSK Sagene Høgskoleklinikk i sosialt arbeid. “Teoretisk kunnskap viser seg annerledes i praksis enn i bøker.” [The University Clinic in Social Work in the NAV Sagene District Office in Oslo, Norway. “Theoretical knowledge is different in practice than in books”]. Oslo, Norway: Abstrakt forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Vist, G., & Aasen, K. (2011). “Fagtekst”—et prosjekt om dokumentasjon og faglig arbeid. [“The Professional Text”—A project about documentation of professional work]. In A.Johannessen, S.Natland, & A. M.Støkken (Eds.), Samarbeidsforskning i praksis. [Collaborative research in practice] (pp. 156–170). Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wel, K. A. V. D., Dahl, E., Lodemel, I., Loyland, B., Naper, S. O., & Slagsvold, M. (2006). Funksjonsevne blant langtidsmottakere av sosialhjelp. [How the long term social assistance receivers function with everyday life (HiO-report 29)]. Oslo, Norway: Oslo University College.
   Google Scholar