Complementing Gender Analysis Methods

References

• Batliwala, S., & Pittman, A. (2010). Capturing change in women's realities: A critical overview of current monitoring and evaluation frameworks and approaches. Toronto, ON, Canada: Association for Women's Rights in Development.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, V. (1999). Feminist debates: Issues of theory and political practice (p. 2). Hong Kong: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. P. (2004). Undoing gender. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120. 10.1086/228943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch, F. M. (2007). Undoing gender. Gender and Society, 21, 106–127. 10.1177/0891243206293577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl, S., Carden, F., & Smutylo, T. (2001). Outcome mapping. Building learning and reflection into development programs. Ottawa, ON, Canada: IDRC.
   Google Scholar
• Elam, P. (2010). Patriarchy for dummies. The spearhead. Retrieved from http://www.the-spearhead.com/2010/07/25/patriarchy-for-dummies/.
   Google Scholar
• El-Bushra, J. (2000a). Rethinking gender and development practice for the twenty-first century. Gender and Development, 8, 55–62. 10.1080/741923413; PMid:12349639.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• El-Bushra, J. (2000b). Rethinking gender and development practice for the twenty-first century. In C. Sweetman (Ed.), Gender in the 21st century (pp. 55–62). Oxford, England: Oxfam.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, W. (2012). The myth of male power: Why men are the disposable sex, Part 1. New Male Studies: An International Journal, 1, 4–33.
   Google Scholar
• Friedl, E. (1975). Women and men: An anthropologist's view. NewYork, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. London, England: Hamish Hamilton.
   Google Scholar
• Gotschi, E., Njuki, J., & Delve, R. (2008). Gender equity and social capital in smallholder farmer groups in Central Mozambique. Development in Practice, 18, 650–657. 10.1080/09614520802181970.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. (1992). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, K., Sudarshan, R. M., & Mendez, E. (2012). Why a special issue on evaluating gender and equity? Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 19, 179–186. 10.1177/097152151201900201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaggar, A. (Ed.). (1994). Introduction: Living with contradictions: Controversies in feminist social ethics (pp. 1–12). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer, N. (1994). Reversed realities: Gender hierarchies in development thought. London, England: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Kabeer, N. (2005). Gender equality and women's empowerment: A critical analysis of the third millennium development goal 1. Gender & Development, 13, 13–24. 10.1080/13552070512331332273.
   Google Scholar
• Kittay, E. F. (1999). Love's labour: Essays on women, equality, and dependency. New York, NY; and London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Longwe, S. (1995). Gender awareness: The missing element in the third world development program. In C. March & T. Wallace (Eds.), Changing perception: New writings on gender and development. Oxford, England: Oxfam.
   Google Scholar
• Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2006). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195187526.001.0001; PMid:16435945.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, M. (1935). Sex and temperament in three primitive societies (pp. 279–288). New York, NY: William Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, M. (1949). Male and female: A study of the sexes in a changing world. New York, NY: William Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. (1984). The subjection of women. In J. M. Robson (Ed.), The collected works of John Stuart Mill, Vol. 21: Essays on equality, law and education. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, C. (1993). Gender planning and development: Theory, practice, and training. London, England: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203411940.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay, M., & Wong, F. (Eds.). (2007). Revisiting gender training. The making and remaking of gender knowledge. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: KIT.
   Google Scholar
• Overholt, C., Anderson, M. B., Cloud, K., & Austin, J. E. (Eds.). (1985). Gender roles in development projects: A case book. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, R. (1993). Another Point of View: A Manual on Gender Analysis Training for Grassroots Workers. New York, NY: UNIFEM.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1963). On the concept of political power. Proceeding of the American Philosophical Society, 107, 232–262. Retrieved from https://doi.org/http://www.jstor.org/stable/985582.
   Google Scholar
• Pease, B., & Pease, A. (2001). Why men don't listen and women can't read maps. Mona Vale, NSW, Australia: Pease Training International.
   Google Scholar
• Pilcher, J., & Whelehan, I. (2004). Fifty key concepts in gender studies. London, England: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Purkayastha, B., Subramaniam, M., Desai, M., & Bose, S. (2003). The study of gender in India: A partial review. Gender and Society, 17, 503–524. 10.1177/0891243203253793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raju, S., & Lahiri-Dutt, K. (2011). Doing gender, doing geography: Emerging reasearch in India. New Delhi, India: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, A., Anderson, M. B., & Overholt, C. (1991). Gender analysis in development planning: A case book. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.
   Google Scholar
• Risman, B. J. (2009). From doing to undoing: gender as we know it. Gender and Society, 23, 81–84. 10.1177/0891243208326874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scanzoni, J. (1968). A social system analysis of dissolved and existing marriages. Journal of Marriage and Family, 30, 452–461. 10.2307/349915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher, E. F. (1978). A guide for the perplexed. ABACUS edition. London, England: Spheres Book Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Serageldin, I. (1997). Foreword to social capital initiatives, Working paper no. 2: The initiative on defining, monitoring and measuring social capital. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Sommers, C. H (1994). Who stole feminism: How women have betrayed women. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Szapuova, M. (2006). Mill's liberal feminism: Its legacy and current criticism. Prolegomena: Časopis za filozofiju, 5, 179–191.
   Google Scholar
• Umberson, D., Chen, M. D., House, J. S., Hopkins, K., & Slaten, E. (1996). The effect of social relationships on psychological well-being: Are men and women really so different? American Sociological Review, 61, 837–857. 10.2307/2096456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, H. (2007). Using gender analysis frameworks: Theoretical and practical reflections. Gender and Development, 15, 187–198. 10.1080/13552070701391847.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1, 125–151. 10.1177/0891243287001002002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, S., Seed, J., & Mwau, A. (1995). The Oxfam gender training manual. Oxford, England: Oxfam.
   Google Scholar