Effects of Presentation Mode and Computer Familiarity on Summarization of Extended Texts

REFERENCES

• Alderson , J. C. 2000 . Assessing reading , Cambridge, , UK : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Bachman , L. F. 2000 . Modern language testing at the turn of the century: Assuring that what we count counts . Language Testing , 17 ( 1 ) : 1 – 42 .
   Google Scholar
• Baggaley , A. R. 1982 . Deciding on the ratio of number of subjects to number of variables in factor analysis . Multivariate Experimental Clinical Research , 6 : 81 – 85 .
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett , M. S. 1954 . A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations . Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series B: Methodological) , 16 : 296 – 298 .
   Google Scholar
• Belcher , D. and Hirvela , A. , eds. 2001 . Linking literacies: Perspectives on L2 reading-writing connections , Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press .
   Google Scholar
• Brown , A. L. and Day , J. D. 1983 . Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise . Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior , 22 ( 1 ) : 1 – 14 .
   Google Scholar
• Brown , J. D. 1997 . Computers in language testing: Present research and some future directions . Language Learning and Technology , 1 ( 1 ) : 44 – 59 .
   Google Scholar
• Cattell , R. B. 1952 . Factor analysis: An introduction and manual for the psychologist and social scientist , New York : Harper & Brothers .
   Google Scholar
• Chalhoub-Deville , M. B. and Deville , C. 1999 . Computer adaptive testing in second language contexts . Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , 19 : 273 – 299 .
   Google Scholar
• Child , D. 1990 . The essentials of factor analysis , 2nd , London : Cassell Educational Limited .
   Google Scholar
• Choi , I.-C. , Kim , K. S. and Boo , J. 2003 . Comparability of a paper-based language test and a computer-based language test . Language Testing , 20 : 295 – 320 .
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach , L. J. , Linn , R. L. , Brennan , R. L. and Haertel , E. 1995 . Generalizability analysis for educational assessment , Los Angeles : UCLA's Center for the Study of Evaluation & National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing .
   Google Scholar
• Dillon , A. 1992 . Reading from paper versus screens: A critical review of the empirical literature . Ergonomics , 35 : 1297 – 1326 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas , D. and Hegelheimer , V. 2007 . Assessing language using computer technology . Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , 27 : 115 – 132 .
   Google Scholar
• Dyson , M. C. and Haselgrove , M. 2000 . The effects of reading speed and reading patterns on the understanding of text read from screen . Journal of Research in Reading , 23 : 210 – 223 .
   Google Scholar
• Eignor , D. , Taylor , C. , Kirsch , I. and Jamieson , J. 1998 . Development of a scale for assessing the level of computer familiarity of TOEFL examinees. TOEFL research report 60 , Princeton, NJ : Educational Testing Service .
   Google Scholar
• Henning , G. , Anbar , M. , Helm , C. E. and D'Arcy , S. J. 1993 . “ Computer-assisted testing of reading comprehension: Comparisons among multiple-choice and open-ended scoring methods ” . In A new decade of language testing research , Edited by: Douglas , D. and Chappelle , C. 123 – 131 . Alexandria, VA : TESOL Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Hidi , S. and Anderson , V. 1986 . Producing written summaries: Task demands, cognitive operations, and implications for instruction . Review of Educational Research , 56 : 473 – 493 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson , J. 2005 . Trends in computer-based second language assessment . Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , 25 : 228 – 242 .
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser , H. 1970 . A second generation little jiffy . Psychometrika , 35 : 401 – 415 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser , H. 1974 . An index of factorial simplicity . Psychometrika , 39 : 31 – 36 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuckartz , U. 1998 . winMAX: Scientific text analysis for the social sciences (Version 98 Pro) , Berlin : VERBI Software-Consult-Research GmbH (Germany) .
   Google Scholar
• O'Sullivan , B. , Weir , C. J. and Jin , Y. 2004 . Does the computer make a difference? An investigation into the differences between writing on computer and on paper (Report on IELTS research project) , London : University of Roehampton .
   Google Scholar
• Pedhazur , E. and Schmelkin , L. 1991 . Measurement, design, and analysis , Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Penny , J. , Johnson , R. L. and Gordon , B. 2000 . The effect of rating augmentation on inter-rater reliability: An empirical study of a holistic rubric . Assessing Writing , 7 : 143 – 164 .
   Google Scholar
• Russell, M. (1999). Testing writing on computers: A follow-up study comparing performance on computer and on paper. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 7(20). http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v7n20/
   Google Scholar
• Russell, M., & Haney, W. (1997). Testing writing on computers: An experiment comparing student performance on tests conducted via computer and via paper-and-pencil. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 5(3). http://olam.ed.asu.edu/epaa/v5n3.html
   Google Scholar
• Russell, M., & Haney, W. (2000). Bridging the gap between testing and technology in schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(19). http://escholarship.bc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1007&context=intasc
   Google Scholar
• Sawaki , Y. 2001 . Comparability of conventional and computerized tests of reading in second language . Language Learning and Technology , 5 ( 2 ) : 38 – 59 .
   Google Scholar
• Shermis , M. D. and Lombard , D. 1998 . Effects of computer-based test administrations on test anxiety and performance . Computers in Human Behavior , 14 : 111 – 123 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens , J. 2002 . Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences , 4th , Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick , B. G. and Fidell , L. S. 2003 . Using multivariate statistics , 4th , Boston : Allyn & Bacon .
   Google Scholar
• Taylor , C. , Jamieson , J. and Eignor , D. 2000 . Trends in computer use among international students . TESOL Quarterly , 34 : 575 – 585 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor , C. , Kirsch , I. , Eignor , D. R. and Jamieson , J. 1999 . Examining the relationship between computer familiarity and performance on computer-based language tasks . Language Learning , 49 : 219 – 274 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trites , L. and McGroarty , M. 2005 . Reading to learn and reading to integrate: New tasks for reading comprehension tests? . Language Testing , 22 : 174 – 210 .
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk , T. A. and Kintsch , W. 1983 . Strategies of discourse comprehension , New York : Academic Press .
   Google Scholar
• Wenger , E. 1998 . Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity , Cambridge, MA : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Young , R. , Shermis , M. D. , Brutten , S. R. and Perkins , K. 1996 . From conventional to computer-adaptive testing of ESL reading comprehension . System , 24 : 23 – 40 .
   Google Scholar
• Yu , G. ( 2005 ). Towards a model of using summarization tasks as a measure of reading comprehension . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK .
   Google Scholar
• Yu , G. 2007 . Students' voices in the evaluation of their written summaries: Empowerment and democracy for test takers? . Language Testing , 24 : 539 – 572 .
   Google Scholar
• Yu , G. 2008 . Reading to summarize in English and Chinese: A tale of two languages? . Language Testing , 25 : 521 – 551 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu , G. 2009 . The shifting sands in the effects of source text summarizability on summary writing . Assessing Writing , 14 : 116 – 137 .
   Google Scholar