Interactional Competence in a Paired Speaking Test: Features Salient to Raters

REFERENCES

• Brooks , L. 2009 . Interacting in pairs in a test of oral proficiency: Co-constructing a better performance . Language Testing , 26 : 341 – 366 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalhoub-Deville , M. 2003 . Second language interaction: current perspectives and future trends . Language Testing , 20 : 369 – 383 .
   Google Scholar
• Davis , L. 2009 . The influence of interlocutor proficiency in a paired oral assessment . Language Testing , 26 : 367 – 396 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ducasse , A. and Brown , A. 2009 . Assessing paired orals: Rater's orientation to interaction . Language Testing , 26 : 423 – 443 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulcher , G. 2010 . Practical language testing , London : Hodder Education .
   Google Scholar
• Galaczi , E. 2004 . Peer–peer interaction in a speaking test: The case of the First Certificate in English , New York : Columbia University . Unpublished doctoral dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Galaczi , E. 2008 . Peer–peer interaction in a speaking test: The case of the First Certificate in English examination . Language Assessment Quarterly , 2 : 89 – 119 .
   Google Scholar
• Galaczi , E. Interactional competence across proficiency levels . Paper presented at the Language Testing Research Colloquium . April . Cambridge, , United Kingdom
   Google Scholar
• Gass , S. and Mackey , A. 2000 . Stimulated recall methodology in second language research , Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Green , A. 1998 . “ Verbal protocal analysis in language testing research: A handbook ” . In Studies in Language Testing 5 , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby , S. and Ochs , E. 1995 . Co-construction: An introduction . Research on Language and Social Interaction , 28 : 171 – 183 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramsch , C. 1986 . From language proficiency to interactional competence . The Modern Language Journal , 70 : 366 – 372 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazaraton , A. and Davis , L. 2008 . A microanalytic perspective on discourse, proficiency, and identity in paired oral assessment . Language Assessment Quarterly , 5 : 313 – 335 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May , L. 2006 . An examination of rater orientations on a paired candidate discussion task through stimulated verbal recall . Melbourne Papers in Language Testing , 11 ( 1 ) : 29 – 31 .
   Google Scholar
• May , L. 2009 . Co-constructed interaction in a paired speaking test: The rater's perspective . Language Testing , 26 : 397 – 422 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara , T. F. 1996 . Measuring second language performance , Harlow, , UK : Addison Wesley Longman .
   Google Scholar
• McNamara , T. F. 1997 . “Interaction” in second language performance assessment: whose performance? . Applied Linguistics , 18 : 444 – 446 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakatsuhara , F. 2004 . An investigation into conversational styles in paired speaking tests , Essex, , United Kingdom : University of Essex . Unpublished master's dissertation
   Google Scholar
• Orr , M. 2002 . The FCE Speaking test: Using rater reports to help interpret test scores . System , 30 : 143 – 154 .
   Google Scholar
• Swain , M. 2001 . Examining dialogue: Another approach to content specification and to validating inferences drawn from test scores . Language Testing , 18 : 275 – 302 .
   Google Scholar
• Taylor , L. 2001 . The paired speaking test format: Recent studies . Research Notes , 6 : 15 – 17 .
   Google Scholar
• Taylor , L. and Wigglesworth , G. 2009 . Are two heads better than one? Pair work in L2 assessment contexts . Language Testing , 26 : 325 – 339 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young , R. F. Interactional competence: Challenges for validity . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Applied Linguistics . March . Canada : Vancouver .
   Google Scholar
• Young , R. F. 2008 . Language and interaction , New York : Routledge .
   Google Scholar