Developments in LSP Testing 30 Years On? The Case of Aviation English

REFERENCES

• Air Accident Investigation Branch. (1992). Report on the accident to BAC One-Eleven, G-BJRT, over Didcot, Oxfordshire on 10 June 1990 (Report No: 1/1992). Retrieved from http://www.aaib.gov.uk/publications/formal_reports/1_1992__g_bjrt.cf/m
   Google Scholar
• Alderson, J. C. (1981). Report of the discussion on the testing of English for Specific Purposes. In J. C. Alderson & A. Hughes ( Eds.), Issues in language testing ( pp. 66–134). London, UK: The British Council.
   Google Scholar
• Alderson, J. C. (1988). New procedures for validating proficiency tests of ESP? Theory and practice. Language Testing, 5(2), 220–232.
   Google Scholar
• Alderson, J. C., & Hughes, A. (1981). Issues in language testing. London, UK: The British Council.
   Google Scholar
• Alderson, J. C., & Urquhart, A. H. (1985a). The effect of students’ academic discipline on their performance on ESP reading tests. Language Testing, 2(2), 192–204.
   Google Scholar
• Alderson, J. C., & Urquhart, A. H. (1985b). This test is unfair: I’m not an economist. In P. C. Hauptman, R. Le Blanc, & M. B. Wesche ( Eds.), Second language performance testing ( pp. 25–44). Ottawa, Canada: University of Ottawa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barshi, I., & Farris, C. (2013). Misunderstandings in ATC communication: Language cognition and experimental methodology. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Bürki-Cohen, J. (1995). An analysis of tower (ground) controller—Pilot voice communications (DOT/FA/4AR-9619 DOT-VNTSC-FAA-95-41). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration. Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a307868.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cardozi, K. (1993). An analysis of en route controller-pilot voice communications (DOT/FAA/RD-93/11). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration. Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a264784.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cardozi, K. (1994). An analysis of tower (local) controller-pilot voice communications (DOT/FAA/RD-93/11DOT/FAA/RD-94/15). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration. Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a283718.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cardozi, K., Brett, B., & Han, S. (1996). An analysis of TRACON (Terminal Radar Approach Control) controller-pilot voice communications (DOT-VNTSC-FAA-96-7). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration. Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a313942.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, B. (1981). Specifications for an English Language Testing Service. In J. C. Alderson & A. Hughes ( Eds.), Issues in language testing ( pp. 66–110). London, UK: The British Council.
   Google Scholar
• Clapham, C. (1996). The development of IELTS. A study of the effect of background knowledge on reading comprehension. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cushing, S. (1994). Fatal words: Communication clashes and aircraft crashes. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, A. (2001). The logic of testing Languages for Specific Purposes. Language Testing, 18(2), 133–147.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, D. (2000). Assessing languages for specific purposes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• EUROCONTROL. (n.d.). AIRIAL. Air navigation Inter-Site Acronym List. Retrieved from http://www.eurocontrol.int/airial/definitionList.do;jsessionid=2805120594A0AEEE441732EAE555994E?skipLogon=true
   Google Scholar
• EUROCONTROL. (2003). Guidelines for controller training in the handling of unusual/emergency situations. Brussels, Belgium: Author. Retrieved from http://www.skybrary.aero/bookshelf/books/15.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Aviation Safety Agency. (2011). Acceptable means of compliance and guidance material to part-FCL. Cologne, Germany: Author. Retrieved from http://www.easa.europa.eu/agency-measures/docs/agency-decisions/2011/2011-016-R/AMC%20and%20GM%20to%20Part-FCL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, B. (2010). Say again, please: Guide to radio communications (4th ed.). Newcastle, Washington: Aviation Supplies & Academics.
   Google Scholar
• Global Aviation Information Network. (2004). The other end of the radio: Identifying and overcoming common pilot/controller misconceptions—An interim report. Retrieved from http://flightsafety.org/files/pilot_controller_miscon.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Civil Aviation Organization. (2001). Procedures for air navigation services—Air traffic management (14th ed., Doc 4444 ATM/501). Montreal, Canada: Author.
   Google Scholar
• International Civil Aviation Organization. (2004). Manual on the implementation of ICAO Language Proficiency Requirements (Doc 9835 AN/453). Montreal, Canada: Author.
   Google Scholar
• International Civil Aviation Organization. (2008). Language testing criteria for global harmonisation (Cir 318-AN/180). Montreal, Canada: Author.
   Google Scholar
• International Civil Aviation Organization. (2010). Manual on the implementation of ICAO Language Proficiency Requirements (2nd ed., Doc 9835 AN/453). Montreal, Canada: Author.
   Google Scholar
• International Civil Aviation Organization. (2012). ICAO rated speech samples training aid. Retrieved from http://cfapp.icao.int/rssta/index.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Knoch, U. (2009). Collaborating with ESP stakeholders in rating scale validation: The case of the ICAO rating scale. Spaan Fellow Working Papers in Second or Foreign Language Assessment, 7, 21–46.
   Google Scholar
• Leech, C. (2006). The pilot’s RT handbook. Wiltshire, UK: The Crowood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez, S., Condamines, A., Jesselin-Leray, A., O’Donoghue, M., & Salmon, R. (2013). Linguistic analysis of English phraseology and plain language in air-ground communications. Journal of Air Transport Studies, 4(1), 44–60.
   Google Scholar
• Mackay, R., & Mountford, A. (1978). English for Specific Purposes. London, UK: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, M. (2011). Defining a grammar of radio telephony and emergencies. Journal of Aeronautical Sciences, 2(1), 30–49.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, T. F. (1996). Measuring second language performance. London, UK: Addison Wesley Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Mell, J. (1992). Étude des communications verbales entre pilote et contrôleur en situation standard et non-standard (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Toulouse le Mirail, France.
   Google Scholar
• Midkiff, A. H., Hansman, R. J., & Reynolds, T. G. (2004). Air carrier flight operations (Report No. ICAT-2004-3). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved from http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/35725/FlightOpsICATfinal2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mitsutomi, M., & O’Brien, K. (2004). Fundamental aviation language issues addressed by new proficiency requirements. ICAO Journal, 59(1), 7–9.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, D., Lee, A., & Rodvold, M. (1993). Analysis of problems in routine controller—pilot communication. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(4), 285–302.
   Google Scholar
• National Transportation Safety Board. (2010). Loss of thrust in both engines after encountering a flock of birds and subsequent ditching on the Hudson River (Aircraft Accident Report NTSB/AAR-10/03 PB2010-910403 Notation 8082A). Retrieved from http://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/reports/2010/AAR1003.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nübold, P., & Turner, J. F. (1983). Linguistic redundancy in English aeronautical radiotelephony. A case study. Braunschweiger Anglistische Arbeiten, 8. Braunschweig, Germany: Technische Universität Carolo-Wilhelmina.
   Google Scholar
• Prinzo, O. V. (1996). An analysis of approach control/pilot voice communications (DOT/FAA/AM-96/26). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration. Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA317528
   Google Scholar
• Prinzo, O. V., & Thomson, A. C. (2009). The ICAO English Language Proficiency Rating Scale applied to enroute voice communications of U.S. and foreign pilots (DOT/FAA/AM-09/10). Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration. Retrieved from www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a500318.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, F. (2009). Airspeak. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubenbauer, F. (2009). Linguistics and flight safety: Aspects of oral English communication in aviation. Aachen, Germany: Shaker Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, C. (2005). Linguistic dimensions of crisis talk: Formalising structures in a controlled language. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Skehan, P. (1984). Issues in the testing of English for Specific Purposes. Language Testing, 1(2), 202–220.
   Google Scholar
• Thom, T. (2003). Radiotelephony. The air pilot’s manual 7. Shoreham, UK: Air Pilot.
   Google Scholar
• Van Es, G. (2004). Air-ground communication safety study: An analysis of pilot-controller occurrences (EUROCONTROL DAP/SAF Ed. 1.0). Brussels, Belgium: EUROCONTROL. Retrieved from http://www.skybrary.aero/bookshelf/books/119.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Es, G., Wever, R., & Verbeek, M. (2006). Air-ground communication safety study: Causes and recommendations (DAP/SAF 2006-09 EUROCONTROL). Brussels, Belgium: EUROCONTROL. Retrieved from http://www.skybrary.aero/bookshelf/books/162.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ward, H. C. (2006). Aviation radio communications made easy. Newcastle, WA: Aviation Supplies & Academics.
   Google Scholar