Junior and Senior High School EFL Teachers’ Use of Formative Assessment: A Mixed-Methods Study

References

• Aldenderfer, M. S., & Blashfield, R. K. (1984). Cluster analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. L., & Cizek, G. J. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of formative assessment. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M. (2007). Expanding views about formative assessment: A review of the literature. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), Formative classroom assessment: Theory into practice (pp. 43–62). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M. (2010). Mixing it up: Combining sources of classroom achievement information for formative and summative purposes. In H. L. Andrade, & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 279–296). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(1), 3–12. doi:10.1111/emip.2011.30.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. (2013). Uses of language assessments. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 5979–5985). Chichester, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Chappuis, J., Stiggins, R. J., Chappuis, S., & Arter, J. (2012). Classroom assessment for student learning: Doing it right–using it well (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, L. (2011). Supporting student learning: Assessment of learning and assessment for learning. In D. Tsagari, & I. Csepes (Eds.), Classroom-based language assessment (pp. 191–203). Frankhurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, L., Rogers, T., & Hu, H. (2004). ESL/EFL instructors’ classroom assessment practices: Purposes, methods, and procedures. Language Testing, 21(3), 360–389. doi:10.1191/0265532204lt288oa
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, L., Rogers, T. W., & Wang, X. (2008). Assessment purposes and procedures in ESL/EFL classrooms. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(1), 9–32. doi:10.1080/02602930601122555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cizek, G. J. (2010). An introduction to formative assessment: History, characteristics, and challenges. In H. L. Andrade, & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 279–296). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, P., & Kubanek-German, A. (2004). Teacher assessment: The concept of “diagnostic competence”. Language Testing, 21(3), 259–283. doi:10.1191/0265532204lt284oa
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. P. (2007). Rating scale instrument quality criteria. Rasch Measurement: Transactions of the Rasch Measurement SIG, 21(1), 1095.
   Google Scholar
• Genesee, F., & Upshur, J. A. (1996). Classroom-based evaluation in second language education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenstein, L. (2010). What teachers really need to know about formative assessment. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (2010). Formative assessment: The contributions of Benjamin S. Bloom. In H. L. Andrade, & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 106–124). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, K., & McNamara, T. (2012). Developing a comprehensive, empirically based research framework for classroom-based assessment. Language Testing, 29(3), 395–420. doi:10.1177/0265532211428317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honda, T. (2003). Totatsumokuhyo ni muketeno sido to hyoka. [Teaching and assessment for achievement goals]. Tokyo, Japan: Kyoiku Shuppan.
   Google Scholar
• Huhta, A. (2008). Diagnostic and formative assessment. In B. Spolsky, & F. M. Hult (Eds.), The handbook of educational linguistics (pp. 469–482). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kingston, N., & Nash, B. (2011). Formative assessment: A meta-analysis and a call for research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(4), 28–37. doi:10.1111/emip.2011.30.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607–610. doi:10.1177/001316447003000308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, C. (2005). Classroom teacher assessment of second language development: Construct as practice. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 869–888). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, C., & Lewkowicz, J. (2006). Expanding horizons and unsolved conundrums: Language testing and assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 211–234. doi:10.2307/40264517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, C., & Mohan, B. (2004). Teacher formative assessment and talk in classroom contexts: Assessment as discourse and assessment of discourse. Language Testing, 21(3), 335–359. doi:10.1191/0265532204lt287oa
   Google Scholar
• Lewkowicz, J., & Zawadowska-Kittel, E. (2011). Classroom-based assessment: The Polish case. In D. Tsagari, & I. Csepes (Eds.), Classroom-based language assessment (pp. 147–167). Frankhurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, J. M. (2011). Facets (Version 3.68.1) [Computer program]. Chicago, IL: MESA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuo, M. (2003). Zettai hyoka donyuu ni jissai ni donoyouni torikundeiruka [how do I cope with the introduction of absolute evaluation], 12th JACET Spring English Education Seminar, Tokyo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• McCallum, B., McAlister, S., Brown, M., & Gipps, C. (1993). Teacher assessment at key stage one. Research Papers in Education, 8(3), 305–327. doi:10.1080/0267152930080303
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, J. H. (2010). The practical implications of educational aims and contexts for formative assessment. In H. L. Andrade, & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2011). All you need to know about action research (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, P. D., Meyers, J. L., & Burling, K. S. (2009). A framework for evaluating and planning assessments intended to improve student achievement. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 14–23. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.00150.x
   Google Scholar
• NIER (National Institute for Educational Policy Research). (2011). Hyokakijyun no sakusei, hyoka houhoutou no kuhuukaizen no tameno sannkou shiryo: Chuugakkou gaikokugo (Resources for constructing and improving evaluation criteria and assessment methods: Foreign languages in junior high school). Tokyo, Japan: Kyouiku Shuppan.
   Google Scholar
• Perie, M., Marion, S., & Gong, B. (2009). Moving toward a comprehensive assessment system: A framework for considering interim assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 5–13. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.00149.x
   Google Scholar
• Rea-Dickins, P., & Gardner, S. (2000). Snares and silver bullets: Disentangling the construct of formative assessment. Language Testing, 17(2), 215–243. doi:10.1177/026553220001700206
   Google Scholar
• Riazi, A. M., & Candlin, C. N. (2014). Mixed-methods research in language teaching and learning: Opportunities, issues and challenges. Language Teaching, 47(2), 135–173. doi:10.1017/S0261444813000505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky, P. (2008). The method section as conceptual epicenter in constructing social science research reports. Written Communication, 25(3), 389–411. doi:10.1177/0741088308317815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiggins, R. J. (2010). Essential formative assessment competencies for teachers and school leaders. In H. L. Andrade, & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 233–250). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stiggins, R. J. (2014). Revolutionize assessment: Empower students, inspire learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Teisyutsubutsu de seito to tsunagaru: sono fiidobakku to hyouka. [Connecting with students through submitted documents: Its feedback and assessment]. (2010, October). The English Teachers’ Magazine (Eigokyoiku). Tokyo, Japan: Taishukan.
   Google Scholar
• Tsagari, D. (2011). Investigating the “assessment literacy” of EFL state school teachers. In D. Tsagari, & I. Csepes (Eds.), Classroom-based language assessment (pp. 169–190). Frankhurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2010). An integrative summary of the research literature and implications for a new theory of formative assessment. In H. L. Andrade, & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 18–40). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2011). Embedded formative assessment. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D., & Leahy, S. (2007). A theoretical foundation for formative assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), Formative classroom assessment (pp. 29–42). New York, NY: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., & Liu, Y. (2009). Teacher assessment knowledge and practice: A narrative inquiry of a Chinese college EFL teacher’s experience. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 493–513. doi:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00246.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, M. (2010). Understanding classroom language assessment through teacher thinking research. Language Assessment Quarterly, 7, 175–194. doi:10.1080/15434300903447736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar