https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7940-3472
References
- Chapelle, C. A. (2008). The TOEFL validity argument. In C. Chapelle, M. Enright, & J. Jamieson (Eds.), Building a validity argument for the test of English as a Foreign language (pp. 319–352). London, UK: Routledge.
- Chapelle, C. A., Enright, M. K., & Jamieson, J. M. (Eds.). (2008). Building a validity argument for the test of English as a Foreign language. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Educational Testing Service. (2020). Reliability and comparability of TOEFL iBT® scores. Retrieved from www.ets.org/toefl/research/insight-series
- Isbell, D. R., & Kremmel, B. (2020). Test review: Current options in at-home language proficiency tests for making high-stakes decisions. Language Testing, 37(4), 600–619. doi:10.1177/0265532220943483
- Norris, J. M. (2018). Task-based language assessment: Aligning designs with intended uses and consequences. JLTA Journal, 21, 3–20. doi:10.20622/jltajournal.21.0_3
- Wall, D., & Horák, T. (2011). The impact of changes in the TOEFL exam on teaching in a sample of countries in Europe: Phase 3, the role of the coursebook. Phase 4, describing change (TOEFL iBT Research Report No. 17). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2011.tb02277.x