Fostering Self-Regulated Young Writers: Dynamic Assessment of Metacognitive Competence in Secondary School EFL Class

References

• Ableeva, R. (2010). Dynamic assessment of listening comprehension in L2 French [ Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
   Google Scholar
• Anson, C., & Moore, J. (Eds.). (2016). Critical transitions: Writing and the question of transfer. The WAC Clearinghouse.
   Google Scholar
• Antón, M. (2018). Dynamic diagnosis of second language abilities. In J. P. Lantolf, M. E. Poehner, & M. Swain (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of sociocultural theory and second language development (pp. 310–323). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, L. (1989). Metacognition, comprehension monitoring, and the adult reader. Educational Psychology Review, 1(1), 3–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, R. A., & Campione, J. C. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In J. H. Flavell & E. M. Markman (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (4th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 420–494). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. D. (2014). Strategies in learning and using a second language (2nd ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabarera, C., Renandya, W. A., & Zhang, L. J. (2014). The impact of metacognitive scaffolding and monitoring on reading comprehension. System, 42(1), 462–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.12.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, J. (1993). The role of metacognition in second language reading and writing. In J. G. Carson & I. Leki (Eds.), Reading in the composition classroom: Second language perspectives (pp. 105–127). Heinle and Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process? Educational Research Review, 1(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2005.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Efklides, A., & Misailidi, P. (eds.). (2010). Trends and Prospects in Metacognition Research. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–235). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker, D. J., Keener, M. C., & Kircher, J. C. (2009). Writing is applied metacognition. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 154–172). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hawthorne, K. A., Bol, L., & Pribesh, S. (2017). Can providing rubrics for writing tasks improve developing writers’ calibration accuracy? The Journal of Experimental Education, 85(4), 689–708. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2017.1299081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, M., & Lee, H. K. (2017). Development and validation of the English writing strategy inventory. System, (68), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.06.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2004). Dynamic assessment of L2 development: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 49–74. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.1.1.49.55872
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2010). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810383328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., Poehner, M. E., & Swain, M. (2018). The Routledge handbook of sociocultural theory and second language development. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, I., & Mak, P. (2018). Metacognition and metacognitive instruction in second language writing classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 52(4), 1085–1097. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, S. (2011). Understanding learner agency as a complex dynamic system. System, 39(4), 427–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negretti, R. (2012). Metacognition in student academic writing: A longitudinal study of metacognitive awareness and its relation to task perception, self-regulation and evaluation of performance. Written Communication, 29(2), 142–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312438529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negretti, R. (2017). Calibrating genre: Metacognitive judgments and rhetorical effectiveness in academic writing by L2 graduate students. Applied Linguistics, 38(4), 512–539. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negretti, R., & Kuteeva, M. (2011). Fostering metacognitive genre awareness in L2 academic reading and writing: A case study of pre-service English teachers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(2), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negretti, R., & McGrath, L. (2018). Scaffolding genre knowledge and metacognition: Insights from an L2 doctoral research writing course. Journal of Second Language Writing, 40, 12–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (2001). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford, R. L. (2017). Teaching and researching language learning strategies (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Papaleontiou-Louca, E. (2008). Metacognition and theory of mind. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E. (2007). Beyond the test: L2 dynamic assessment and the transcendence of mediated learning. Modern Language Journal, 91(3), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00583.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development. Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2005). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 9(3), 233–265. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr166oa
   Google Scholar
• Poehner, M., & van Compernolle, R. (2011). Frames of interaction in dynamic assessment: Developmental diagnosis of second language learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 18(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2011.567116
   Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E., & Wang, Z. (2020). Dynamic Assessment and second language development. Language Teaching, 54(4), 472-490. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000555
   Google Scholar
• Rahimi, M., Kushki, A., & Nassaji, H. (2015). Diagnostic and developmental potentials of dynamic assessment for L2 writing. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 2(2), 185–208. https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.v2i2.25956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, M., & Loewen, S. (2018). Metacognitive instruction enhances the effectiveness of corrective feedback: Variable effects of feedback types and linguistic targets. Language Learning, 68(2), 507–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoonen, R., Snellings, P., Stevenson, M., & van Gelderen, A. (2009). Towards a blueprint of the foreign language writer: The linguistic and cognitive demands of foreign language writing. In R. M. Manchon (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research (pp. 77–101). Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, G. (2002). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. In H. J. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction: Theory, research and practice (pp. 3–16). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36(1), 111–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng, L. S., & Zhang, J. L. (2016). Fostering strategic learning: The development and validation of the Writing Strategies for Motivational Regulation Questionnaire (WSMRQ). The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(1), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-015-0243-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng, L. S., & Zhang, J. L. (2020). Empowering learners in the second/foreign language classroom: Can self-regulated learning strategies-based writing instruction make a difference? Journal of Second Language Writing, 48(100701), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 1: Problems of general psychology. (R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton, Eds.). Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, H. S., & Schneider, W. (2010). Metacognition, strategy use, and instruction. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenden, A. L. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied Linguistics, 19(4), 515–537. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.4.515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H. C., & Plakans, L. (2012). Second language writers’ strategy use and performance on an integrated reading-listening-writing task. TESOL Quarterly, 46(1), 80–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, H. (2015). Facilitating metacognitive processes of academic genre-based writing using an online writing system. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(6), 479–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.881384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. J. (2001). Awareness in reading: EFL students’ metacognitive knowledge of reading strategies in an acquisition-poor environment. Language Awareness, 10(4), 268–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410108667039
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. J. (2010). A dynamic metacognitive systems account of Chinese university students’ knowledge about EFL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 44(2), 320–353. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.223352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, C. G., & Liao, L. (2021). Metacognitive strategy use in l2 writing assessment. System, 98, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar