Enhancing EFL Learners’ Reading Proficiency through Dynamic Assessment

References

• Alderson, J. C., Haapakangas, E., Huhta, A., Nieminen, L., & Ullakonoja, R. (2015). The diagnosis of reading in second or foreign language. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 465–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02064.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuerstein, R., Feuerstein, R. S., Falik, L. H., & Rand, Y. (2002). The dynamic assessment of cognitive modifiability. The ICELP Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freedle, R., & Kostin, I. (1993). The prediction of TOEFL reading comprehension item difficulty for expository prose passages for three item types: Main idea, inference, and supporting idea items. TOEFL Research Reports No. 44. Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jang, E. E. (2009). Demystifying a Q-matrix for making diagnostic inferences about L2 reading skills. Language Assessment Quarterly, 6(3), 210–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300903071817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. E. (1995). Understanding communication in second language classrooms. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kozulin, A., & Garb, E. (2002). Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension. School Psychology International, 23(1), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034302023001733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Appel, G. (1994). Theoretical framework: An introduction to Vygotskian approaches to second language research. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 1–32). Ablex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2004). Dynamic assessment: Bringing the past into the future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 49–74. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v1i1.647
   Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2013). Bringing the ZPD into the equation: Capturing L2 development during computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA). Language Teaching Research, 17(3), 323–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813482935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E., & van Compernolle, R. A. (2013). L2 development around tests: Learner response processes and dynamic assessment. IRAL, 51(4), 353–377. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2013-0015
   Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E., & Wang, Z. (2021). Dynamic assessment and second language development. Language Teaching, 54(4), 472–490. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E., Zhang, J., & Lu, X. (2014). Computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA): Diagnosing L2 development according to learner responsiveness to mediation. Language Testing, 32(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214560390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schedl, M., Gordon, A., Carey, P. A., & Tang, K. L. (1996). An analysis of the dimensionality of TOEFL reading comprehension items. TOEFL Research Reports No. 53. Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Teo, A. (2012). Promoting EFL students’ inferential reading skills through computerized dynamic assessment. Language Learning & Technology, 16(3), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.125/44292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1998). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (Vol. 5). Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., & Qian, D. D. (2017). Assessing English reading comprehension by Chinese EFL learners in computerized dynamic assessment. Language Testing in Asia, 7(11), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-017-0042-3
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., & Qian, D. D. (2020). Promoting L2 English learners’ reading proficiency through computerized dynamic assessment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5–6), 628–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1585882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar