Investigating Second Language (L2) Reading Subskill Associations: A Cognitive Diagnosis Approach

References

• Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Akbay, L., & de la Torre, J. (2020). Estimation approaches in cognitive diagnosis modeling when attributes are hierarchically structured. Psicothema, 32(1), 122–129. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2019.182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alderson, J. C., & Lukmani, Y. (1989). Cognition and reading: Cognitive levels as embodied in test questions. Reading in a Foreign Language, 5(2), 253–270.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, E. B. (2005). Process and procrastination in second language reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190505000073
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, E. B. (2011). Understanding advanced second-language reading. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: Cognitive domain. Longmans, Green.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, Y. (2020). Examining the interaction among components of English for specific purposes ability in reading: The triple-decker model. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, Y., & Kunnan, A. J. (2019). Detecting the language thresholds of the effect of background knowledge on a language for specific purposes reading performance: A case of the island ridge curve. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 42, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J. (2017). A residual-based approach to validate Q-matrix specifications. Applied Psychological Measurement, 41(4), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621616686021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H., & Chen, J. (2013). Validating G-DINA model in language test diagnosis. Journal of Psychological Science [Chinese], 36, 1470–1475.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H., & Chen, J. (2016a). Exploring reading comprehension skill relationships through the G-DINA model. Educational Psychology, 36(6), 1049–1064. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1076764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H., & Chen, J. (2016b). Retrofitting non-cognitive-diagnostic reading assessment under the generalized DINA model framework. Language Assessment Quarterly, 13(3), 218–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2016.1210610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., de la Torre, J., & Zhang, Z. (2013). Relative and absolute fit evaluation in cognitive diagnosis modeling. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2012.00185.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davey, B. (1988). Factors affecting the difficulty of reading comprehension items for successful and unsuccessful readers. The Journal of Experimental Education, 56(2), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1988.10806468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. B. (1968). Research in comprehension in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 3(4), 499–545. https://doi.org/10.2307/747153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Torre, J. (2011). The generalized DINA model framework. Psychometrika, 76(2), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-011-9207-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Torre, J., van der Ark, L. A., & Rossi, G. (2018). Analysis of clinical data from a cognitive diagnosis modeling framework. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 51(4), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1327286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson, E., & Adelson, J. (2016). Choosing among multiple achievement measures: Applying multitrait–multimethod confirmatory factor Analysis to State Assessment, ACT, and student GPA data. Journal of Advanced Academics, 27(1), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X15621905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, W., & Ma, X. (2021). Probing what’s behind the test score: Application of multi-CDM to diagnose EFL learners’ reading performance. Reading and Writing, 34(6), 1441–1466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10124-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English Major Division of National Foreign Languages Advisory Board. (2000). English teaching syllabus for English majors [Chinese]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, T., & Yan, X. (2020). Diagnosing English reading ability in Chinese senior high schools. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 67, 100931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierl, M. J., Leighton, J. P., & Hunka, S. M. (2000). An NCME instructional module on exploring the logic of Tatsuoka’s rule‐space model for test development and analysis. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 19(3), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2000.tb00036.x
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N. (1993). Analyzing tabular data: Loglinear and logistic models for social researchers. UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, K. S. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Literacy Research and Instruction, 6(4), 126–135 https://doi.org/10.1080/19388076709556976.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B. (1972). One second of reading. Visible Language, 6(4), 291–320.
   Google Scholar
• Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartz, S. M. (2002). A Bayesian framework for the unified model for assessing cognitive abilities: Blending theory with practicality [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Hartz, S., & Roussos, L. (2008). The fusion model for skills diagnosis: Blending theory with practicality. ETS Research Report Series, 2(2), i–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2008.tb02157.x
   Google Scholar
• Heaton, J. B. (1991). Writing English language tests. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, H., Wang, C., Lim, Y. S., & Douglas, J. (2015). Efficient models for cognitive diagnosis with continuous and mixed-type latent variables. Applied Psychological Measurement, 39(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621614524981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00401799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huckin, T., & Bloch, J. (1993). Strategies for inferring word-meanings in context: A cognitive model. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes, & J. Coady (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 153–178). Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jang, E. E. (2009). Cognitive diagnostic assessment of L2 reading comprehension ability: Validity arguments for fusion model application to LanguEdge assessment. Language Testing, 26(1), 031–073. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532208097336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javidanmehr, Z., & Anani Sarab, M. R. (2019). Retrofitting non-diagnostic reading comprehension assessment: Application of the G-DINA model to a high stakes reading comprehension test. Language Assessment Quarterly, 16(3), 294–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2019.1654479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon, E. H., & Yamashita, J. (2014). L2 reading comprehension and its correlates: A meta‐analysis. Language Learning, 64(1), 160–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, A. H. (2015). Exploring ways to provide diagnostic feedback with an ESL placement test: Cognitive diagnostic assessment of L2 reading ability. Language Testing, 32(2), 227–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214558457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kincaid, J. P., Fishburne, R. P., Rogers, R. L., & Chissom, B. S. (1975). Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count, and Flesch reading ease formula) for Navy enlisted personnel. Research Branch Report, 8–75. Chief of Naval Technical Training: Naval Air Station Memphis.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse processing: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (2005). An overview of top-down and bottom-up effects in comprehension: The CI perspective. Discourse Processes, 39(2), 125–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2005.9651676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koda, K. (1996). L2 word recognition research: A critical review. Modern Language Journal, 80(4), 450–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1996.tb05465.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y., & Sawaki, Y. (2009). Application of three cognitive diagnosis models to StyleL reading and listening assessments. Language Assessment Quarterly, 6(3), 239–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300903079562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leighton, J. P., Gierl, M. J., & Hunka, S. M. (2004). The attribute hierarchy method for cognitive assessment: A variation on Tatsuoka’s rule‐space approach. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41(3), 205–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2004.tb01163.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, F. (2008). A modified higher-order DINA model for detecting differential item functioning and differential attribute functioning [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Georgia.
   Google Scholar
• Liao, C., Kuo, B., Deenang, E., & Mok, M. (2016). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses in reading-related cognitive component among grade four students in Thailand. Educational Psychology: Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment, 36(6), 1102–1114. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1058342
   Google Scholar
• Li, H., Hunter, C. V., & Lei, P. W. (2016). The selection of cognitive diagnostic models for a reading comprehension test. Language Testing, 33(3), 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532215590848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., & Wu, S. (2019). Research on inventory of China standards of English [Chinese]. Higher Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lohman, D. F., & Ippel, M. J. (1993). Cognitive diagnosis: From statistically based assessment toward theory-based assessment. In N. Frederiksen, R. J. Mislevy, & I. I. Bejar (Eds.), Test theory for a new generation of tests (pp. 41–71). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Luebke, S., & Lorié, J. (2013). Use of Bloom’s taxonomy in developing reading comprehension specifications. Journal of Applied Testing Technology, 14, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, L. (2012). Extending the compensatory model of second language reading. System, 40(1), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2012.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, B., & Stanley, T. (2013). Critical thinking and formative assessments: Increasing the rigor in your classroom. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Muijselaar, M., Swart, N., Steenbeek-Planting, E., Droop, M., Verhoeven, L., & De Jong, P. (2017). Developmental relations between reading comprehension and reading strategies. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(3), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1278763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassaji, H. (2002). Schema theory and knowledge‐based processes in second language reading comprehension: A need for alternative perspectives. Language Learning, 52(2), 439–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassaji, H. (2007). Schema theory and knowledge‐based processes in second language reading comprehension: A need for alternative perspectives. Language Learning, 57, 79–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00413.x
   Google Scholar
• Paltridge, B. (1996). Genre, text type, and, and the language learning classroom. ELT Journal, 50(3), 237–243. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/50.3.237
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., & Raphael, T. E. (1990). Reading comprehension as a dimension of thinking. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 209–240). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227–247). Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, M., Katzir, T., Wolf, M., & Noam, G. (2010). Examining the construct of reading among dysfluent urban children: A factor analysis approach. Journal of Literacy Research, 42(2), 124–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862961003796140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravand, H., & Robitzsch, A. (2018). Cognitive diagnostic model of best choice: A study of reading comprehension. Educational Psychology, 38(10), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1489524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revision Team of TEM8 Syllabus. (2004). Test syllabus of TEM8 [Chinese]. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Introduction to human information processing. John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33–58). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Shermis, M. D., & Long, S. K. (2009). Multitrait-multimethod analysis of FCAT reading and writing or is it writing and reading? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27(4), 296–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282908328639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, F. (1977). Making sense of reading—and of reading instruction. Harvard Educational Review, 47(3), 386–395. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.47.3.3508w0540gug23q5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• song, M. Y. (2008). Do divisible subskills exist in second language (L2) comprehension? A structural equation modeling approach. Language Testing, 25(4), 435–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532208094272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16(1), 32–71. https://doi.org/10.2307/747348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, D. (2008). A study of content validity of reading comprehension of TEM-8 from 2005-2007 [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Yangzhou University.
   Google Scholar
• Urquhart, A. H., & Weir, C. J. (2014). Reading in a second language: Process, product and practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Steensel, R., Oostdam, R., & van Gelderen, A. (2013). Assessing reading comprehension in adolescent low achievers: Subskills identification and task specificity. Language Testing, 30(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532212440950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Davier, M. (2005). A general diagnostic model applied to language testing data. ETS Research Report Series, 2, i–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.2005.tb01993.x
   Google Scholar
• von Davier, M. (2008). A general diagnostic model applied to language testing data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61(2), 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711007X193957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., & Gierl, M. J. (2011). Using the attribute hierarchy method to make diagnostic inferences about examinees’ cognitive skills in critical reading. Journal of Educational Measurement, 48(2), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2011.00142.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir, C., & Khalifa, H. (2008). A cognitive processing approach towards defining reading comprehension. Cambridge ESOL: Research Notes, 31, 2–10.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, M., & Liu, J. (2019). China’s standards of English language ability and business English testing and assessment [Chinese]. Foreign Languages in China, 16(3), 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Yi, Y.-S. (2016). Probing the relative importance of different attributes in L2 reading and listening comprehension items: An application of cognitive diagnostic models. Language Testing, 34(3), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532216646141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, S. (2012). Language testing [Chinese]. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zou, S., Zhang, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2002). The relationships among item types, reading strategies, and test scores in reading tests [Chinese]. Foreign Language and Their Teaching, 158(5), 19–22.
   Google Scholar