Advancing L2 Dynamic Assessment: Innovations in Chinese Contexts

References

• Ableeva, R. (2018). Understanding learner L2 development through reciprocity. In J. P. Lantolf & M. E. Poehner M. Swain, (Edited by), The Routledge handbook of sociocultural theory and second language development (pp. 266–281). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alderson, J. C., & Wall, D. (1993). Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/14.2.115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 465–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02064.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andujar, A. (2020). Mobile-mediated dynamic assessment: A new perspective for second language development. ReCALL, 32(2), 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344019000247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antón, M. (2003). Dynamic assessment of advanced foreign language learners. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Antón, M. (2009). Dynamic assessment of advanced second language learners. Foreign Language Annals, 42(3), 576–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2009.01030.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachman, L. F., & Cohen, A. D. (Eds.). (1998). Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barrs, M. (2022). Vygotsky the teacher: A companion to his psychology for teachers and other practitioners. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L., & Ferrara, R. A. (1985). Diagnosing zones of proximal development. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 273–305). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Budoff, M. (1968). Learning potential as a supplementary testing procedure. In J. Hellmuth (Ed.), Learning Disorders (Vol. 3). Special Child (pp. 295–343).
   Google Scholar
• Budoff, M., & Friedman, M. (1964). ”Learning potential” as an assessment approach to the adolescent mentally retarded. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 28(5), 434–439. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040631
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dafermos, M. (2018). Rethinking cultural-historical theory. A dialectical perspective to Vygotsky. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Darhower, M. (2014). Synchronous computer-mediated dynamic assessment: A case study of L2 Spanish past narration. CALICO Journal, 31(2), 221–243. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.31.2.221-243
   Google Scholar
• DaSilva Iddings, A. C. (2014). Understanding the potential in elementary classrooms through dynamic assessment. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 1(1), 49–73. https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.v1i1.49
   Google Scholar
• Davies, A. (2004). Introduction: Language testing and the golden rule. Language assessment quarterly, 1(2–3), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2004.9671778
   Google Scholar
• Davin, K., & Donato, R. (2013). Student collaboration and teacher-directed classroom dynamic assessment: A complementary pairing. Foreign Language Annals, 46(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davin, K. J., & Herazo, J. D. (2020). Reconceptualizing classroom dynamic assessment: Lessons from teacher practice. In M. E. Poehner & O. Inbar-Lourie (Eds.), Toward a reconceptualization of L2 classroom assessment: Praxis and research-teacher partnership (pp. 197–220). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Erben, T., Ban, R., & Summers, R. (2008). Changing examination structures within a college of education: The application of dynamic assessment in pre-service ESOL endorsement courses in Florida. In J. P. Lantolf & M. E. Poehner (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 87–114). Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Feuerstein, R., Feuerstein, R., & Falik, L. H. (2015). Beyond smarter: Mediated learning and the brain’s capacity for change. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Hoffman, M. B. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments, and techniques. University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Rynders, J. E. (1988). Don’t accept me as I am. Helping retarded performers excel. Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Galaczi, E., & Taylor, L. (2018). Interactional competence: Conceptualisations, operationalisations, and outstanding questions. Language assessment quarterly, 15(3), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2018.1453816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, P. N. (2019). Dynamic assessment: Promoting in-service teachers’ conceptual development and pedagogical beliefs in the L2 classroom. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 6, 32–62. https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.38915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haywood, H. C., & Lidz, C. S. (2006). Dynamic assessment in practice: Clinical and educational applications. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herazo, J. D., Davin, K. J., & Sagre, A. (2019). L2 dynamic assessment: An activity theory perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 103(2), 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, K., Sabet, M., HILL, K., & SABET, M. (2009). Dynamic speaking assessments. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 537–545. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00251.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirci, N., & Pisanski Peterlin, A. (2020). Face-to-face and Wiki revision in translator training: Exploring the advantages of two modes of collaboration. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 14(1), 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2019.1688066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzman, L. (2009). Vygotsky at work and play. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kinard, J. T., & Kozulin, A. (2008). Rigorous mathematical thinking: Conceptual formation in the mathematics classroom. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kozulin, A. (1998). Psychological tools: A sociocultural approach to education. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kozulin, A. (2003). Psychological tools and mediated learning. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 15–38). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kozulin, A., & Garb, E. (2002). Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension. School Psychology International, 23(1), 112–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034302023001733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozulin, A., & Levi, T. (2018). EFL learning potential: General or modular? Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 17(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.17.1.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P. (Ed.). (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Appel, G. (Eds.). (1994). Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Ablex Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2004). Dynamic assessment of L2 development: Bringing the past into future. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.1.1.49.55872
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2013). The unfairness of equal treatment: Objectivity in L2 testing and dynamic assessment. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19, 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2013.767616
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural Theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education. Vygotskian praxis and the research/practice divide. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. Swain, M. (Eds.), (2018). The Routledge handbook of sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, I., & Mak, P. (2018). Metacognition and metacognitive instruction in second language writing classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 52(4), 1085–1097. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leontjev, D. (2016). ICanDoIt: The impact of computerised adaptive corrective feedback on L2 English learners [ Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The University of Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Lidz, C. S., & Elliott, J. G. (2000). Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Luria, A. (1961). Study of the abnormal child. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry: A Journal of Human Behavior, 31(1), 1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzotta, M., & Belcher, D. (2018). Social-emotional outcomes of corrective feedback as mediation on second language Japanese writing. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 17(1), 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.17.1.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, T. (1997). Interaction’ in second language performance assessment: Whose performance? Applied Linguistics, 18(4), 446–466. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/18.4.446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organizations in the classrooms. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Novack, G. (1971). An introduction to the logic of Marxism (5th ed.). Pathfinder.
   Google Scholar
• Ollman, B. (2003). Dance of the dialectic. Steps in Marx’s method. University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E. (2005). Dynamic Assessment of oral proficiency among advanced L2 learners of French [ Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
   Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E. (2007). Beyond the test: L2 dynamic assessment and the transcendence of mediated learning. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00583.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting second language development. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E. (2009). Group dynamic assessment: Mediation for the L2 classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 43(3), 471–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00245.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E., Infante, P., & Takamiya, Y. (2018). Mediation processes in support of learner L2 writing development: Individual, peer, and group contexts. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 17(1), 112–132. https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.17.1.112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2003). Dynamic Assessment of L2 development: Bringing the past into the future. In Annual Meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics. University of Leeds.
   Google Scholar
• Poehner, M. E., & Wang, Z. (2021). Dynamic assessment and second language development. Language Teaching, 54, 472–490. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, D. D., & Cumming, A. (2017). Researching English language assessment in China: Focusing on high-stakes testing. Language assessment quarterly, 14(2), 97–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2017.1295969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, T. (2018). Computerized Dynamic Assessment of L2 Chinese implicature comprehension [ Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Carnegie Mellon University.
   Google Scholar
• Qin, T., & van Compernolle, R. A. (2021). Computerized dynamic assessment of implicature comprehension in L2 Chinese. Language Learning & Technology, 25(2), 55–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassaei, E. (2020). Effects of mobile‐mediated dynamic and nondynamic glosses on L2 vocabulary learning: A sociocultural perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 104(1), 284–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratner, C., & Nunes, D. (Eds.). (2017). Vygotksy and Marx: Toward a Marxist psychology. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Rea Dickins, P. (2001). Mirror, mirror on the wall: Identifying processes of classroom assessment. Language Testing, 18(4), 429–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220101800407
   Google Scholar
• Scocchera, G. (2020). The competent reviser: A short-term empirical study on revision teaching and revision competence acquisition. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 14(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2019.1639245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seikmann, S., & Charles, W. (2011). Upingakuneng (when they are ready): Dynamic assessment in a third semester Yugtun class. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(2), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2011.565463
   Google Scholar
• Shohamy, E. (2001). The power of tests. A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Shrestha, P. N. (2020). Dynamic assessment of students’ academic writing. Vygotskian and systemic functional linguistic perspectives. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing. The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (1998). Investigating formative assessment: Teaching, learning and assessment in the classroom. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tzuriel, D., & Shamir, A. (2007). The effects of peer mediation with young children (PMYC) on children’s cognitive modifiability. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(1), 143–165. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X84279
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Compernolle, R. A. (2013). Interactional competence and the dynamic assessment of L2 pragmatic abilities. In S. J. Ross & G. Kasper (Eds.), Assessing second language pragmatics (pp. 327–353). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Veresov, N. N. (2017). ZBR and ZPD: Is there a difference? Cultural-Historical Psychology, 13(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2017130102
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 3. Problems of the theory and history of psychology. Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). The problem of age. In R. W. Rieber (Ed.), The collected works of L. s. Vygotsky. Vol. 5: Child psychology (pp. 187–206). Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (2011). The dynamics of the schoolchild’s mental development in relation to teaching and learning. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 10, 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.10.2.198
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (2012). Thought and language. MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., & Qian, D. D. (2017). Assessing English reading comprehension by Chinese EFL learners in computerized dynamic assessment. Language Testing in Asia, 7(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-017-0042-3
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., & Lu, X. (2019). Measuring and supporting second language development using computerized dynamic assessment. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 6, 92–115. https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.31710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar