Evaluation of Biogas Yield of Selected Ratios of Cattle, Swine, and Poultry Wastes

References

• Adelekan, B.A., and A.I. Bamgboye. 2009. Comparison of biogas productivity of cassava peels mixed in selected ratios with major livestock waste types. African Journal of Agricultural Research 4(7):571–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adeyemo, S.B., and A.A. Adeyanju. 2008. Improving biogas yield using media materials. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 3(2):207–10.
   Google Scholar
• Angelidaki, I., L. Ellegaard, and B.K. Ahring. 2003. Applications of the anaerobic digestion process. In Biomethanation II, ed. B.K. Ahring. Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Awosolu, M.O. 2007. Anaerobic digestion of ethanol distillery waste-stillage for biogas production, Master;s thesis, University College of Borås, School of Engineering, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Ayhan, D., and O. Temel. 2005. Anaerobic digestion of agricultural solid residues. International Journal of Green Energy 1(4):483–94, website: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1081/GE-200038719
   Google Scholar
• Azar, K.K. 2009. Application of various pretreatment methods to enhance biogas potential of waste chicken feathers, Master’s thesis, University College of Borås, School of Engineering, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, R. 2002. Potential of co-digestion. Website: http://www.novaenergie.ch/ieabioenergytask 37/Dokumente/final.PDF. Accessed on 31 July 31 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Budiyono, W.I.N., S. Johari, and Sunarso. 2010. The influence of total solid contents on biogas yield from cattle manure using rumen fluid inoculum. Energy Research Journal 1(1):6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo, R.T., P.L. Luengo, and J.M. Alvarez. 1995. Temperature effect on anaerobic of bedding manure in a one-phase system at different inoculums concentration. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 54:55–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centre for Energy Studies. 2001. Design concept and other parameters of biogas plants. In Advanced course in biogas technology. A. B. Karki (ed.). Tribhuwan, Nepal: Centre for Energy Studies, Institute of Engineering, Pulchowk Campus, Tribhuwan University, pp. 92–108.
   Google Scholar
• Dangaggo, S.M., M. Aliya, and A.T. Atiku. 1996. The effect of seeding with bacteria on biogas production rate. Renewable Energy 9(1–4):1045–1048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, D.B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F-test. Biometric 11:1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESCAP. 1996. The enviromental impact of production and uses of energy. UNO Enviromental Programme on Energy. Report Series, Part 111, FRS. Nairobi, Kenya: ESCAP, pp. 7–60
   Google Scholar
• Flavin, C., and M. Aeck. 2005. Energy for development: the potential role of renewable energy in meeting the millennium development goals. Washington, DC.: Worldwatch Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Flamos, A., P.G. Georgallis, H. Doukas, and J. Psarras. 2011. Using biomass to achieve European Union energy targets – a review of biomass status, potential, and supporting policies. International Journal of Green Energy 8(4):411–28. Website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2011.576292.
   Google Scholar
• Iyagba, E.T., A. Ibifuro, I.A. Mangibo, and Y.S. Mohammad. 2009. The study of cow dung as co-substrate with rice husk in biogas production. Scientific Research and Essay 4(9):861–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jingura, R.M., and R. Matengaifa. 2009. Optimization of biogas production by anaerobic digestion for sustainable energy development in Zimbabwe. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13:1116–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanwar, S.S., and R.L. Guleri. 1995. Biogas production from mixture of poultry litter and cattle dung with an acclimatised inoculum. Biogas Forum I 60: 21–23.
   Google Scholar
• Karapidakis, E.S., A.A. Tsave, and P.M. Soupios. 2003. Energy potential of biogas generation in landfills: experimental investigations. Website: http://soupios.chania.teicrete.gr/papers/ Pre8-Energy.pdf. Accessed on 14 May 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Kotsyurbenko, O.R., A.N. Nozhevnikova, S.V. Kalyuzhnyy, and G.A. Zavarzin. 1993. Methanogenic digestion of cattle manure at low temperature. Mikrobiolo Giya 62(4):761–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loctite. 2006. Design guide for bonding plastics, vol 4. Website: www.loctite.ph/php/content_data/LT2197_OEM_Plastic_Bonding_Guide.pdf. Accessed on 31 July 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Marchaim, U. 1992. Biogas for sustainable development. Kiryat Shmona, Israel: MIGAL, Galilee Technological Centre. Website: http://www.fao.org/docrep. Accessed on 13 June 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Maximiliano, O. 2009. Installation of a low cost polyethylene biodigester. Belmopan, Belize: Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture (IICA).
   Google Scholar
• Munda, U.S., L. Pholane, D.D. Kar, and B.C. Meikap. 2012. Production of bioenergy from composite waste materials made of corn waste, spent tea waste, and kitchen waste co-mixed with cow dung. International Journal of Green Energy, 9(4):361–75. Website: http://dx. doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2011.621492.
   Google Scholar
• Nopharatana, A., P.C. Pullammanappallil, and W.P. Clarke. 2007. Kinetics and dynamic modeling of batch anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste in a stirred reactor. Waste Management 27:595–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Technical Working Group on Energy Sector. 2009. Vision 2020, report of NTWG. Website: http://valuefronteiraonline.com/public_upload/file/Energy%20NTWG%20Report.pdf. Accessed on 13 Oct. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ofoefule, A.U., and E.O. Uzodinma. 2009. Biogas production from blends of cassava (Manihot utilissima) peels with some animal wastes. International Journal of Physical Sciences 4(7):398–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojolo, S.J., A.I. Bamgboye, B.S. Ogunsina, and S.A. Oke. 2008. Analytical approach for predicting biogas generation in a municipal solid waste anaerobic digester. Iranian Journal of Environmental Health, Science and Engineering 5(3):179–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojolo, S.J., S.A. Oke, K. Animasahun, and B.K. Adesuyi. 2007. Utilization of poultry, cow and kitchen wastes for biogas production: a comparative analysis. Journal of Environmental Health, Science and Engineering 4(4):223–28.
   Google Scholar
• Okuo, D.O. 2011. Evaluation of biogas yield of selected ratios of cattle, swine, and poultry wastes. Master’s thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria.
   Google Scholar
• Plastics International. 2010. Adhesive bonding of thermoplastic materials. Website: www.plasticsintl.com/documents/Adhesive%20Bonding%20of%20Thermoplastic%20Materials.pdf. Accessed on 12 May 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Renewable Energy Policy Network (REPN). 2005. Global status report, REN21. Washington, DC: REPN.
   Google Scholar
• Ronja, B. 2008. Enzymatic treatment of wastewater sludge in presence of a cation binding agent improved solubilisation and increased methane production. Master’s thesis, Linköping University.
   Google Scholar
• Sambo, S. 2009. The place of renewable energy in the Nigerian energy sector. In The world future council workshop on renewable energy policies, 10 October, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
   Google Scholar
• SAS. 1999. Software and services SAS^® language: reference version 6, 1st ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Sasse, L. 1988. Biogas plants – design and details of simple biogas plants. Eschborn, Germany: German Appropriate Technology Exchange (GATE).
   Google Scholar
• Solar Energy International (SEI). 2009. Energy Facts. Website: http://www.solarenergy.org/resources/energyfacts.html. Accessed 12 June 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Scientific Research Society (SRS). 2009. Overview of world energy. Sigma Xi, the Scientific Research Society. Website: http://energy.sigmaxi.org/?p=551. Accessed on 13 Aug. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Uzodinma, E.O., A.U. Ofoefule, J.I. Eze, I. Mbaeyi, and N.D. Onwuka. 2008. Effect of some organic wastes on the biogas yield from carbonated soft drink sludge. Scientific Research and Essay 3(9):401–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voegeli, Y., C. Lohri, G. Kassenga, U. Baier, and C. Zurbrügg. 2009. Technical and biological performance of the Arti compact biogas plant for kitchen waste – case Study from Tanzania. In Proceedings of Sardinia 2009, Twelfth International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium, ed. S. Margherita di Pula, Cagliari, Italy, 5–9. Italy: CISA.)
   Google Scholar
• Yadvika, A., A. Santosh, T.R. Sreekrishnan, S. Kohli, and V. Rana. 2004. Enhancement of biogas production from solid substrates using different technique-a review. Bioresource Technology 95:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y., P. Zhongli, Z. Ruihong, M.E. Hamed, P. Jinming, and M.J. Bryan. 2007. Anaerobic digestion of saline creeping wild ryegrass for biogas production and pretreatment of particleboard material. Bioresource Technology 100:1582–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar