A stochastic fuzzy chance-constrained programming model for energy–environment system planning and management in the City of Beijing

References

• Abu-Khader, M. M., and J. G. Speight. 2004. The concepts of energy, environment, and cost for process design. International Journal of Green Energy 1(2):137–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beijing Municipal Bureau of Statistics. (2012). Beijing statistic yearbook. Beijing, China: National Bureau of Statistics Survey Office.
   Google Scholar
• Bekele, G., and G. Tadesse. 2012. Feasibility study of small hydro/PV/wind hybrid system for off-grid rural electrification in Ethiopia. Applied Energy 97(9):5–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, Y. P., G. H. Huang, Z. F. Yang, and Q. Tan. 2009a. Identification of optimal strategies for energy management systems planning under multiple uncertainties. Applied Energy 86:480–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, Y. P., G. H. Huang, Q. Tan, and Z. F. Yang. 2009b. Planning of community-scale renewable energy management systems in a mixed stochastic and fuzzy environment. Renewable Energy 34:1833–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, Y. P., G. H. Huang, Z. F. Yang, Q. G. Lin, and Q. Tan. 2009c. Community-scale renewable energy systems planning under uncertainty-an interval chance-constrained programming approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13:721–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, Y. P., G. H. Huang, Q. Tan, and Z. F. Yang. 2011. An integrated approach for climate-change impact analysis and adaptation planning under multi-level uncertainties. Part I: Methodology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15(6):2779–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, D. 2002. Redefining chance-constrained programming in fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 125:327–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., and W. W. Cooper. 1983. Response to decision problems under risk and chance constrained programming: Dilemmas in the transitions. Management Science 29:750–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, D., K. R. Rao, and R. N. Tiwani. 1994. Interactive decision making in mixed fuzzy stochastic environment. Operational Research 31:89–107.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, G. H., G. H. Huang, Y.P. Li, M. F. Cao, and Y. R. Fan. 2009. Planning of municipal solid waste management systems under dual uncertainties: A hybrid interval stochastic programming approach. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 23:707–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenfack, J., F. P. Neira, T. Tatietse, D. Mayer, M. Fogue, and A. Lejeune. 2009. Microhydro-PV-hybrid system: Sizing a small hydro-PV-hybrid system for rural electrification in developing countries. Renewable Energy 34(10):2259–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koroneos, C., G. Xydis, and A. Polyzakis. 2013. The optimal use of renewable energy sources. The case of Lemnos Island. International Journal of Green Energy 10(8):860– 75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, H. N., E. S. Qi, H. Li, G. Li, and X. Zhang 2010. An MILP model for optimization of byproduct gases in the integrated iron and steel plant. Applied Energy 87(7):2156–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krey, V., D. Martinsen, and H. J. Wagner. 2007. Effects of stochastic energy prices on long-term energy-economic scenarios. Energy 32(12):2340–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krukanont, P., and T. Tezuka. 2007. Implications of capacity expansion under uncertainty and value of information: The near-term energy planning of Japan. Energy 32(10):1809–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kursad, A., and G. Hadi. 2007. A chance-constrained approach to stochastic line balancing problem. European Journal of Operational Research 180:1098–1115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, F. F., and J.Qiu. 2016. Multi-objective optimization for integrated hydro-photovoltaic power system. Applied Energy 167(1):377–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Q. G., and G. H. Huang. 2008. IPEM: An interval-parameter energy systems planning model. Energy Sources 30(14):1382–99.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Q. G., and G. H. Huang. 2009. Planning of energy system management and GHG-emission control in the municipality of Beijing—An inexact-dynamic stochastic programming model. Energy Policy 37(11):4463–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L., G. H. Huang, G. A. Fuller, A. Chakma, and H. C. Guo. 2000. A dynamic optimization approach for non-renewable energy resources management in a regional system under uncertainty. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 26(2):301–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., G. H. Huang, Y. P. Cai, and C. Dong. 2014. An inexact dynamic optimization model for CO2 emission reduction in Subei Region, Northeast China. International Journal of Green Energy 11(10):1013–1052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z. F., G. H. Huang, and N. Li. 2008. A dynamic optimization approach for power generation planning under uncertainty. Energy Sources 30(14):1413–31.
   Google Scholar
• Luhandjula, M. K. 1996. Fuzziness and randomness is an optimization framework. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 77:291–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhandjula, M. K. 2004. Optimization under hybrid uncertainty. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 146:187–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhandjula, M. K. 2006. Fuzzy stochastic linear programming: Survey and future research directions. European Journal of Operational Research 174:1353–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavrotas, G., H. Demertzis, A. Meintani, and D. Diakoulaki. 2003. Energy planning in buildings under uncertainty in fuel costs: The case of a hotel unit in Greece. Energy Conversion and Management 44(8):1303–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohan, C., and H. T. Nguyen. 2001. An interactive satisfying method for solving mixed fuzzy stochastic programming problems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 117:67–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muela, E., G. Schweickardt, and F. Garces. 2007. Fuzzy possibilistic model for medium-term power generation planning with environmental criteria. Energy Policy 35:5643–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nürnberg, R., and W. Römisch. 2002. A two-stage planning model for power scheduling in a hydro-thermal system under uncertainty. Optimization and Engineering 3:355–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, M. V. F., and L. M. V. G. Pinto. 1991. Multi-stage stochastic optimization applied to energy planning. Mathematical Programming 52(2):359–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, X. S. 2012. Assessing environmental risks through fuzzy parameterized probabilistic analysis.. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 266(1):43–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, M. A. 2004. Energy considerations in design for environment: Appropriate energy selection and energy efficiency. International Journal of Green Energy 1(1):21–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, M., and H. M. Hosseini. 2006. Energy supply planning in Iran by using fuzzy linear programming approach (regarding uncertainties of investment costs). Energy Policy 34(9):993–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolis, A., A. Doukelis, and I. Tatsiopoulos. 2010. Stochastic interest rates in the analysis of energy investments: Implications on economic performance and sustainability. Applied Energy 87:2479–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vineetha, C. P., C. A. Babu, and T. N. P. Nambiar. 2016. Optimization of grid tied hybrid power system in smart premises. International Journal of Green Energy 13(2):191–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. W., G. H. Huang, Z. F. Liu, and C. Dai. 2012. Hybrid inexact optimization approach with data envelopment analysis for environment management and planning in the city of Beijing, China. Environmental Engineering Science 29(5):313–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xi, B. D., J. Su, G. H. Huang, X. S. Qin, Y. H. Jiang S. L. Huo D. F. Ji, and B. Yao. 2010. An integrated optimization approach and multi-criteria decision analysis for supporting the waste-management system of the City of Beijing, China. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 23(4):620–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., G. H. Huang, and X. S. Qin. 2010. An inexact fuzzy-chance-constrained air quality management model. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 60(7):805–819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zdenek, Z.2005. Value at risk methodology under soft conditions approach (fuzzy-stochastic approach). European Journal of Operational Research 161:337–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, H., G. H. Huang, P. Guo, and X. S. Qin. 2009. A fuzzy robust nonlinear programming model for stream water quality management. Water Resources Management 23(14): 2913–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar