A study on transformation of multi-purpose dams into pumped storage hydroelectric power plants by using GIS model

References

• Bakış, R. 2006. Electricity production opportunities from multipurpose dams (case study). Renewable Energy 32 (10):1723–38. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2006.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakış, R. 2011. An investigation of small hydro power potential from multipurpose dams in the Porsuk River Basin. Energy Education Science and Technology Part A-Energy Science and Research 27 (1):105–22.
   Google Scholar
• Bakış, R., Y. Bayazıt, and C. Koç. 2018. Investigation of hydropower generation from irrigation dams. Anadolu University, Journal of Science and Technology-A Applied Sciences and Engineering 19 (2):443–53.
   Google Scholar
• Bayazıt, Y., R. Bakış, and C. Koç. 2017. An investigation of small-scale hydropower plants using the geographic information system. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 67:289–94. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canyon Hydro. 2020. Planning your system. Guide to hydropower. Accessed October 2, 2020. http://www.canyonhydro.com/guide/HydroGuide11.html
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, D., S. McLaughlin, and M. Leahy. 2010. Development of a computer program to locate potential sites for pumped hydroelectric energy storage. Energy 35 (1):375–81. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2009.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CORINE Land Cover Change. 2020. Dataset. Electronic dataset. Accessed March 30, 2020. https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/land-cover-flows-based-on;
   Google Scholar
• Deane, J. P., B. P. Ó Gallachóir, and E. J. McKeogh. 2010. Techno-economic review of existing and new pumped hydroenergy storage plant. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14 (4):1293–302. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.11.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DSI (General Directorate for State Hydraulic Works). 2011. Database of dams. Ankara. Accessed July 20, 2019. http://www2.dsi.gov.tr/baraj/aramaeng
   Google Scholar
• Dudhani, S., A. K. Sinha, and S. S. Inamdar. 2006. Assessment of small hydropower potential using remote sensing data for sustainable development in India. Energy Policy 34 (17):3195–205. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2005.06.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EMRA (Republic of Turkey Energy Market Regulatory Authority). 2020. Electricity tariff tables. Accessed October 3, 2020. https://www.epdk.gov.tr/Detay/Icerik/3-1327/elektrik-faturalarina-esas-tarife-tablolari
   Google Scholar
• Erdin, C., and G. Ozkaya. 2019. Turkey’s 2023 Energy Strategies and Investment Opportunities for Renewable Energy Sources: Site Selection Based on ELECTRE. Sustainability 11:1–23. doi:10.3390/su11072136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESRI. 2019. GIS mapping software is the most powerful mapping&spatial data analytics technology. California, USA. Accessed December 18, 2019. https://www.esri.com/en-us/home;.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, N., R. L. Arántegui, E. McKeogh, and P. Leahy. 2012. A GIS-based model to calculate the potential for transforming conventional hydropower schemes and non-hydroreservoirs to pumped hydropower schemes.  Energy 41 (1):483–90.
   Google Scholar
• Gimeno-Gutiérrez, M., and R. Lacal-Arántegui. 2013. Assessment of the European potential for pumped hydropower energy storage: a GIS-based assessment of pumped hydropower storage potential. Joint Research Centre Scientific and Policy Reports, European Commissions. doi:10.2790/86815.
   Google Scholar
• Hajkowicz, S., and A. Higgins. 2008. A comparison of multi criteria analysis techniques for water resource management. European Journal of Operational Research 184:255–65. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.10.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICOLD (International Commission on Large Dams). 2009. World register of dams. Version updates 1998-2009. Paris: International Commission on Large Dams. Accessed March 12, 2019. http://www.icold-cigb.net/;.
   Google Scholar
• IEA (International Energy Agency). 2019. Snapshot of global photovoltaic markets. Accessed October 18, 2019. https://iea-pvps.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/IEA-PVPS_T1_35_Snapshot2019-Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kaijuka, E. 2007. GIS and rural electricity planning in Uganda. Journal of Cleaner Production15 (1):203–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.057
   Google Scholar
• Koç, C., Y. Bayazıt, and R. Bakış. 2016. A study on determining the hydropower potential of çine dam in Turkey. Computational Water, Energy and Environmental Engineering 5 (2):79–85. doi:10.4236/cweee.2016.52008.
   Google Scholar
• Kozak, M., and Ş. Kozak. 2012. Energy storage methods. SDU International Technologic Science 4 (2):17–29.
   Google Scholar
• Larentis, D. G., W. Collischonn, F. Olivera, and T. Cem. 2010. Gis-based procedures for hydropower potential spotting. Energy 35 (10):4237–43. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2010.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malczewski, J. 1999. GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• MENR (Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources). 2018. Republic of Turkey, pumped storage hydroelectric power plants (PHS) roadmap workshop report. Ankara, Turkey: General Directorate of Renewable Energy.
   Google Scholar
• MENR (Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources). 2019. Republic of Turkey, strategic plan. Accessed October 26, 2019. www.enerji.gov.tr/tr-TR/Stratejik-Plan
   Google Scholar
• OFGEM. 2006. Electricity generation: Facts and figures. Ofgem factsheets. Accessed May 21, 2020]. https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/ofgem-publications/76160/13537-elecgenfactsfspdf
   Google Scholar
• REN21 (Renewables Now Community). 2019. Renewables 2019 global status report. Paris: REN21 Secretariat. ISBN: 978-39818911-7-1.
   Google Scholar
• Táczi, I. 2016. Pumped storage hydroelectric power plants: Issues and applications. Research paper to assit the ERRA Licensing and Competition Committee, Budapest, Hungry.
   Google Scholar
• Torrealba, P. J. R. 2016. The benefits of pumped storage hydro to the UK. Scottish Renewables Technical Report. Doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18778.13768/1
   Google Scholar
• Turkish Ministry of Environment and Urbanization. 2020. Construction and installation unit prices, higher board of science. Accessed October 1, 2020. https://yfk.csb.gov.tr/2020-yili-yayinlarimiz-i-91515
   Google Scholar
• Wegner, N., E. Mercante, I. de Souza Mendes, D. Ganascini, M. Metri Correa, M. Furlan Maggi, M. AntonioVilas Boas, S. Costa Wrublack, and S. J. Antonio Cruz. 2019. HydroEnergy potential considering environmental variables and water availability in paranáh hydrographic basin 3. Journal of Hydrology. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WEI (Wind Energy International). 2019. Global total installed capacity, global statistics report&graphs, 2019. Accessed December, 21 2019. https://library.wwindea.org/global-statitistics-1980/
   Google Scholar
• Yaman, A., A. Yakın, and R. Behçet. 2019. The potential of solar and hydroelectric energy in van province and its contribution to the economy of the province. BEU Journal of Science 8 (1):243–50.
   Google Scholar
• Yanmaz, A. M., and M. R. Beşer. 2005. On the reliability-based safety analysis of the Porsuk Dam. Turkish Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences 29:309–20.
   Google Scholar
• Yi, C. S., K. H. Kim, J. H. Lee, and M. P. Shim. 2007. Location analysis for developing small hydropower Using geo-spatial information system. Journal of Korea Water Resources Association 40:985–94. doi:10.3741/JKWRA.2007.40.12.985.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, B., and N. B. Harmancioglu. 2010. Multi-criteria decision making for water resource management: A case study of the Gediz River Basin, Turkey. Water SA 36 (5):563–76. doi:10.4314/wsa.v36i5.61990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, K. P., and C. L. Hwang. 1995. Multiple attribute decision making: An introduction. London: Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Yuksek, O., M. I. Komurcu, I. Yuksel, and K. A. Kaygusuz. 2006. The role of hydropower in meeting Turkey’s electric energy demand. Energy Policy 34 (17):3093–103. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2005.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaidi, A. Z., and M. Khan. 2018. Identifying high potential locations for run-of-the-river hydroelectric powerplants using GIS and digital elevation models. Renewable and Sustainable Energy 89:106–16. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.02.025.
   Google Scholar
• Zardari, N. H., K. Ahmed, S. M. Shirazi, and Z. B. Yusop. 2015. Weighting methods and their effects on multi-criteria decision making model outcomes in water resources management. SpringerBriefs in Water Science and Technology. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12586-2.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, B., S. Liu, S. Lu, X. Cao, and W. Zhao. 2017. Cost-benefit analysis of pumped hydro storage using improved probabilistic production simulation method. The 6th International conference on renewable power generation (RPG). Japan Engine 13:2146–51.
   Google Scholar