References
- A roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050. 2011. European Commission. [COM(2011) 112/F].
- Ahmadi, N., and M. Kõrgesaar. 2020. Analytical approach to investigate the effect of gas channel draft angle on the performance of PEMFC and species distribution. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 152:119529. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.119529.
- Ahmadi, N., S. Rezazadeh, A. Dadvand, and I. Mirzaee. 2015. Numerical investigation of the effect of gas diffusion layer with semicircular prominences on polymer exchange membrane fuel cell performance and species distribution. Journal of Renewable Energy and Environment 2 (2):36–46.
- Ahmadi, N., and S. Rostami. 2019. Enhancing the performance of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell by optimizing the operating parameter. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering 41 (5):1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1720-0.
- Bensmann, B., R. Hanke-Rauschenbach, I. K. P. Arias, and K. Sundmacher. 2013. Energetic evaluation of high pressure PEM electrolyzer systems for intermediate storage of renewable energies. Electrochimica Acta 110:570–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2013.05.102.
- Bessarabov, D., H. Wang, H. Li, and N. Zhao. 2016. PEM electrolysis for hydrogen production: Principles and applications. CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL
- Carmo, M., D. L. Fritz, J. Mergel, and D. Stolten. 2013. A comprehensive review on PEM water electrolysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 38 (12):4901–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.01.151.
- Chan, S. H., K. A. Khor, and Z. T. Xia. 2001. A complete polarization model of a solid oxide fuel cell and its sensitivity to the change of cell component thickness. Journal of Power Sources 93 (1–2):130–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(00)00556-5.
- Costamagna, P., and K. Honegger. 1998. Modeling of solid oxide heat exchanger integrated stacks and simulation at high fuel utilization. Journal of the Electrochemical Society 145 (11):3995–4007. doi:https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1838904.
- Grigoriev, S. A., V. I. Porembsky, and V. N. Fateev. 2006. Pure hydrogen production by PEM electrolysis for hydrogen energy. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 31 (2):171–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.04.038.
- Hansen, M. K., D. Aili, E. Christensen, C. Pan, S. Eriksen, J. O. Jensen, J. H. von Barner, Q. Li, and N. J. Bjerrum. 2012a. PEM steam electrolysis at 130° C using a phosphoric acid doped short side chain PFSA membrane. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 37 (15):10992–1000. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.125.
- Hansen, M. K., N. Bjerrum, E. Christensen, and J. O. Jensen. 2012b. PEM water electrolysis at elevated temperatures. Ph.D. thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Department of Chemistry Institut.
- He, Q., J. Yu, H. Xu, D. Zhao, T. Zhao, and M. Ni. 2020. Thermal effects in H2O and CO2 assisted direct carbon solid oxide fuel cells. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 45 (22):12459–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.02.169.
- Jabbary, A., S. Rostami Arnesa, H. Samanipour, and N. Ahmadi. 2021. Numerical investigation of 3D rhombus designed PEMFC on the cell performance. International Journal of Green Energy 18 (5):425–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2020.1865361.
- Kakaç, S., A. Pramuanjaroenkij, and X. Y. Zhou. 2007. A review of numerical modeling of solid oxide fuel cells. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 32 (7):761–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.11.028.
- Li, H., A. Inada, T. Fujigaya, H. Nakajima, K. Sasaki, and K. Ito. 2016. Effects of operating conditions on performance of high-temperature polymer electrolyte water electrolyzer. Journal of Power Sources 318:192–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.03.108.
- Li, H., H. Nakajima, A. Inada, and K. Ito. 2018. Effect of flow-field pattern and flow configuration on the performance of a polymer-electrolyte-membrane water electrolyzer at high temperature. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 43 (18):8600–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.02.171.
- Linkous, C. A., H. R. Anderson, R. W. Kopitzke, and G. L. Nelson. 1998. Development of new proton exchange membrane electrolytes for water electrolysis at higher temperatures. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 23:525–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3199(97)00113-4.
- Luo, Y., Y. Shi, W. Li, and N. Cai. 2014. Comprehensive modeling of tubular solid oxide electrolysis cell for co-electrolysis of steam and carbon dioxide. Energy 70:420–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.04.019.
- Nafchi, F. M., E. Baniasadi, E. Afshari, and N. Javani. 2018. Performance assessment of a solar hydrogen and electricity production plant using high temperature PEM electrolyzer and energy storage. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 43 (11):5820–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.09.058.
- Ni, M. 2012a. 2D thermal modeling of a solid oxide electrolyzer cell (SOEC) for syngas production by H2O/CO2 co-electrolysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 37 (8):6389–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.01.072.
- Ni, M. 2012b. An electrochemical model for syngas production by co- electrolysis of H2O and CO2. Journal of Power Sources 202:209–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.11.080.
- Nikiforov, A., E. Christensen, I. Petrushina, J. O. Jensen, and N. J. Bjerrum. 2012. Advanced construction materials for high temperature steam PEM electrolysers. INTECH Open Access Publisher. London, UK, 2012: 61–86
- Ruiz, D. D. H., A. P. Sasmito, and T. Shamim. 2013. Numerical investigation of the high temperature PEM electrolyzer: Effect of flow channel configurations. ECS Transactions 58 (2):99–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.1149/05802.0099ecst.
- Santarelli, M., P. Medina, and M. Calì. 2009. Fitting regression model and experimental validation for a high-pressure PEM electrolyzer. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 34 (6):2519–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.11.036.
- Suwanwarangkul, R., E. Croiset, M. W. Fowler, P. L. Douglas, E. Entchev, and M. A. Douglas. 2003. Performance comparison of Fick’s, dusty-gas and StefaneMaxwell models to predict the concentration overpotential of a SOFC anode. Journal of Power Sources 122:9–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00724-3.
- Tijani, A. S., and A. H. A. Rahim. 2016. Numerical modeling the effect of operating variables on Faraday efficiency in PEM electrolyzer. Procedia Technology 26:419–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2016.08.054.
- Tijani, A. S., D. Barr, and A. H. A. Rahim. 2015. Computational modelling of the flow field of an electrolyzer system using CFD. Energy Procedia 79:195–203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.462.
- Todd, B., and J. B. Young. 2002. Thermodynamic and transport properties of gases for use in solid oxide fuel cell modelling. Journal of Power Sources 110 (1):186–200. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00277-X.
- Toghyani, S., E. Afshari, E. Baniasadi, S. A. Atyabi, and G. F. Naterer. 2018. Thermal and electrochemical performance assessment of a high temperature PEM electrolyzer. Energy 152:237–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.03.140.
- Toghyani, S., E. Baniasadi, and E. Afshari. 2019. Numerical simulation and exergoeconomic analysis of a high temperature polymer exchange membrane electrolyzer. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 44 (60):31731–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.10.087.
- Xu, H., B. Chen, H. Zhang, W. Kong, B. Liang, and M. Ni. 2017. The thermal effect in direct carbon solid oxide fuel cells. Applied Thermal Engineering 118:652–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.03.027.
- Xu, H., B. Chen, J. Irvine, and M. Ni. 2016. Modeling of CH4-assisted SOEC for H2O/CO2 co-electrolysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 41 (47):21839–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.10.026.
- Xu, W., K. Scott, and S. Basu. 2011. Performance of a high temperature polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolyser . Journal of Power Sources 196 (21):8918–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.12.039.
- Yu, J., Q. He, G. Yang, W. Zhou, Z. Shao, and M. Ni. 2019. Recent advances and prospective in ruthenium-based materials for electrochemical water splitting. Acs Catalysis 9 (11):9973–10011. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b02457.
- Yu, J., R. Ran, Y. Zhong, W. Zhou, M. Ni, and Z. Shao. 2020. Advances in porous perovskites: synthesis and electrocatalytic performance in fuel cells and metal–air batteries. Energy & Environmental Materials 3 (2):121–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/eem2.12064.
- Yu, J., Y. Zhong, X. Wu, J. Sunarso, M. Ni, W. Zhou, and Z. Shao. 2018. Bifunctionality from synergy: CoP nanoparticles embedded in amorphous CoOx nanoplates with heterostructures for highly efficient water electrolysis. Advanced Science 5 (9):1800514. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201800514.
- Zhao, D., Q. He, J. Yu, J. Jiang, X. Li, and M. Ni. 2020. Dynamic behaviour and control strategy of high temperature proton exchange membrane electrolyzer cells (HT-PEMECs) for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 45 (51):26613–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.07.155.