Optimal estimation of proton exchange membrane fuel cell model parameters based on an improved chicken swarm optimization algorithm

References

• Aghajani, G., and N. Ghadimi. 2018. Multi-objective energy management in a micro-grid. Energy Reports 4:218–25. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2017.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora, D., C. Bonnet, M. Mukherjee, S. Raël, and F. Lapicque. 2019. Direct hybridization of PEMFC and supercapacitors: effect of excess hydrogen on a single cell fuel cell durability and its feasibility on fuel cell stack. Electrochimica Acta 310:213–20. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2019.04.073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askarzadeh, A., and A. Rezazadeh. 2013. A new heuristic optimization algorithm for modeling of proton exchange membrane fuel cell: Bird mating optimizer. International Journal of Energy Research 37 (10):1196–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.2915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao, S., A. Ebadi, M. Toughani, J. Dalle, A. Maseleno, Baharuddin, and A. Yıldızbası. 2020. A new method for optimal parameters identification of a PEMFC using an improved version of monarch butterfly optimization algorithm. Journal of Hydrogen Energy 45:17882–92. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Y., Y. Li, G. Zhang, K. Jermsittiparsert, and M. Nasseri. 2020. An efficient terminal voltage control for PEMFC based on an improved version of whale optimization algorithm. Energy Reports 6:530–42. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2020.02.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ci, Y., H. Wu, Y. Sun, and L. Wu. 2022. A prediction model with wavelet neural network optimized by the chicken swarm optimization for on-ramps metering of the urban expressway. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems 26 (3):356–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450.2021.1890070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahimian, H., S. Barmayoon, M. Mohammadi, and N. Ghadimi. 2018. The price prediction for the energy market based on a new method. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 31 (1):313–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1429291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Hay, E. A., M. A. El-Hameed, and A. A. El-Fergany. 2018. Performance enhancement of autonomous system comprising proton exchange membrane fuel cells and switched reluctance motor. Energy 163:699–711. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.08.104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eslami, M., H. A. Moghadam, H. Zayandehroodi, and N. Ghadimi. 2019. A new formulation to reduce the number of variables and constraints to expedite SCUC in bulky power systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section A: Physical Sciences 89:311–21. doi:10.1007/s40010-017-0475-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fathy, A., M. A. Elaziz, and A. G. Alharbi. 2020. A novel approach based on hybrid vortex search algorithm and differential evolution for identifying the optimal parameters of PEM fuel cell. Renewable Energy 146:1833–45. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, Z., J. Duan, W. Niu, Z. Jiang, and Y. Liu. 2022. Enhanced sine cosine algorithm using opposition learning, adaptive evolution and neighborhood search strategies for multivariable parameter optimization problems. Applied Soft Computing 119:108562. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2022.108562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, J., F. Gao, Z. Ma, N. Huang, and Y. Yang. 2021. Multi-objective optimization of smart community integrated energy considering the utility of decision makers based on the Lévy flight improved chicken swarm algorithm. Sustainable Cities and Society 72:103075. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.103075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gheydi, M., A. Nouri, and N. Ghadimi. 2018. Planning in microgrids with conservation of voltage reduction. IEEE Systems Journal 12:2782–90. doi:10.1109/JSYST.2016.2633512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouda, E. A., M. F. Kotb, and A. A. El-Fergany. 2021. Investigating dynamic performances of fuel cells using pathfinder algorithm. Energy Conversion and Management 237:114099. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Y., X. Dai, K. Jermsittiparsert, and N. Razmjooy. 2020. An optimal configuration for a battery and PEM fuel cell-based hybrid energy system using developed Krill herd optimization algorithm for locomotive application. Energy Reports 6:885–94. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2020.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, J., J. Feng, T. Hou, W. Chen, and X. Peng. 2021. Numerical and experimental study on gas-water separators for a PEMFC system. International Journal of Green Energy 18 (5):490–502. doi:10.1080/15435075.2020.1865370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huy, T. H. B., P. Nallagownden, K. H. Truong, R. Kannan, D. N. Vo, and N. Ho. 2022. Multi-objective search group algorithm for engineering design problems. Applied Soft Computing 126:109287. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ijaodola, O. S., Z. El- Hassan, E. Ogungbemi, F. N. Khatib, T. Wilberforce, J. Thompson, and A. G. Olabi. 2019. Energy efficiency improvements by investigating the water flooding management on proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC). Energy 179:246–67. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irudayaraj, A. X. R., N. I. A. Wahab, M. Premkumar, M. A. M. Radzi, N. B. Sulaiman, V. Veerasamy, R. A. Farade, and M. Z. Islam. 2022. Renewable sources-based automatic load frequency control of interconnected systems using chaotic atom search optimization. Applied Soft Computing 119:108574. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2022.108574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., Z. Yang, K. Jiao, and Q. Du. 2018. Sensitivity analysis of uncertain parameters based on an improved proton exchange membrane fuel cell analytical model. Energy Conversion and Management 164:639–54. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2018.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandidayeni, M., A. Macias, A. Khalatbarisoltani, L. Boulon, and S. Kelouwani. 2019. Benchmark of proton exchange membrane fuel cell parameters extraction with metaheuristic optimization algorithms. Energy 183:912–25. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2019.06.152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, J., and R. Eberhart. 1995. Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Network 11:111–17.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, R. F., J. C. Amphlett, M. A. I. Hooper, H. M. Jensen, B. A. Peppley, and P. R. Roberge. 2000. Development and application of a generalized steady-state electrochemical model for a PEM fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources 86 (1–2):173–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(99)00484-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, X., Y. Liu, X. Gao, and H. Zhang. 2014. A new bio-inspired algorithm:Chicken swarm optimization. Lecture notes in Computer Science (including Subser. Lecture Notes Artificial Intelligence Lecture Notes Bioinformatics) 8794:86–94. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11857-4_10.
   Google Scholar
• Mirjalili, S., A. H. Gandomi, S. Z. Mirjalili, S. Saremi, H. Faris, and S. M. Mirjalili. 2017. Salp swarm algorithm: A bio-inspired optimizer for engineering design problems. Advance in Engineering Software 114:163–91. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirjalili, S., and A. Lewis. 2016. The whale optimization algorithm. Advance in Engineering Software 95:51–67. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mo, Z., X. Zhu, L. Wei, and G. Cao. 2006. Parameter optimization for a PEMFC model with a hybrid genetic algorithm. International Journal of Energy Research 30:585–97. doi:10.1002/er.1170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanadegani, F. S., E. N. Lay, A. Iranzo, J. A. Salva, and B. Sunden. 2020. On neural network modeling to maximize the power output of PEMFCs. Electrochimica Acta 348:136345. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2020.136345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newborough, M., and G. Cooley. 2020. Developments in the global hydrogen market: The spectrum of hydrogen colours. Fuel Cells Bulletin 11:16–22. doi:10.1016/S1464-2859(20)30546-0.
   Google Scholar
• Özdemir, M. T. 2021. Optimal parameter estimation of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells model with chaos embedded particle swarm optimization. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 46:16465–80. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.12.203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahon, E., D. Bouquain, D. Hissel, A. Rouet, and C. Vacquier. 2021. Performance analysis of proton exchange membrane fuel cell in automotive applications. Journal of Power Sources 510:230385. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezk, H., S. Ferahtia, A. Djeroui, A. Chouder, A. Houari, M. Machmoum, and M. A. Abdelkareem. 2022. Optimal parameter estimation strategy of PEM fuel cell using gradient-based optimizer. Energy239:122096. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.122096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritzberger, D., M. Striednig, C. Simon, C. Hametner, and S. Jakubek. 2018. Online estimation of the electrochemical impedance of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells using broad-band current excitation. Journal of Power Sources 405:150–61. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.08.082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizk-Allah, R. M., and A. A. El-Fergany. 2021. Artificial ecosystem optimizer for parameters identification of proton exchange membrane fuel cells model. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 46:37612–27. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokni, M. 2017. Addressing fuel recycling in solid oxide fuel cell systems fed by alternative fuels. Energy 137:1013–25. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeedi, M., M. Moradi, M. Hosseini, A. Emamifar, and N. Ghadimi. 2019. Robust optimization based optimal chiller loading under cooling demand uncertainty. Applied Thermal Engineering 148:1081–91. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.11.122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shangguan, X., Y. Li, Y. Qin, S. Cao, J. Zhang, and Y. Yin. 2021. Effect of the porosity distribution on the liquid water transport in the gas diffusion layer of PEMFC. Electrochimica Acta 371. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2021.137814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simari, C., E. Lufrano, A. Brunetti, G. Barbieri, and I. Nicotera. 2021. Polysulfone and organo-modified graphene oxide for new hybrid proton exchange membranes: A green alternative for high-efficiency PEMFCs. Electrochimica Acta 380:138214. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2021.138214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singla, M. K., P. Nijhawan, and A. S. Oberoi. 2021. Parameter estimation of proton exchange membrane fuel cell using a novel meta-heuristic algorithm. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28 (26):34511–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13097-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singla, M. K., P. Nijhawan, and A. S. Oberoi. 2022. A novel hybrid particle swarm optimization rat search algorithm for parameter estimation of solar PV and fuel cell model. COMPEL. The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering Vol. ahead Vol. aheadofprint No. ahead No. aheadofprint. 41 (5):1505–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/COMPEL-07-2021-0257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava, R. K., N. P. Shetti, K. R. Reddy, and T. M. Aminabhavi. 2020. Sustainable energy from waste organic matters via efficient microbial processes. The Science of the Total Environment 722:137927. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, S., Y. Su, C. Yin, and K. Jermsittiparsert. 2020. Optimal parameters estimation of PEMFCs model using converged moth search algorithm. Energy Reports 6:1501–09. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2020.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taner, T. 2018. Energy and exergy analyze of PEM fuel cell: A case study of modeling and simulations. Energy 143:284–94. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.10.102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsukamoto, T., T. Aoki, H. Kanesaka, T. Taniguchi, T. Takayama, H. Motegi, R. Takayama, S. Tanaka, K. Komiyama, and M. Yoneda. 2021. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of full-scale proton exchange membrane fuel cells at high current densities. Journal of Power Sources 488:229412. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.229412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., M. Su, R. Li, and P. Ponce. 2019. The effects of energy prices, urbanization and economic growth on energy consumption per capita in 186 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production 225:1017–32. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Z., Q. Liu, L. Zhang, J. Dai, and N. Razmjooy. 2020. Model parameter estimation of the PEMFCs using improved barnacles mating optimization algorithm. Energy 212:118738. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.118738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, X., J. Sun, S. Sun, H. Yu, and Z. Shao. 2021. Study on the temperature distribution and its effect on self-start of large-area proton exchange membrane fuel cells at subzero temperatures. Electrochimica Acta 396:139183. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2021.139183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., X. Zhou, F. Tang, B. Li, P. Ming, and C. Zhang. 2021. Failure behavior of gas diffusion layer in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Journal of Power Sources 515:230655. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, D., and N. Ghadimi. 2019. Reliability constraint stochastic UC by considering the correlation of random variables with Copula theory. IET Renewable Power Generation 13:2587–93. doi:10.1049/iet-rpg.2019.0485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, D., T. Zhang, G. He, S. Nojavan, K. Jermsittiparsert, and N. Ghadimi. 2020.Energy management of wind-PV-storage-grid based large electricity consumer using robust optimization technique. Journal of Energy Storage 27: 27.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2019.101054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, Z., W. Wang, H. Wang, and N. Razmjooy. 2020. A new technique for optimal estimation of the circuit-based PEMFCs using developed Sunflower optimization algorithm. Energy Reports 6:662–71. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2020.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, G., and K. Jiao. 2018. Three-dimensional multi-phase simulation of PEMFC at high current density utilizing Eulerian-Eulerian model and two-fluid model. Energy Conversion and Management 176:409–21. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2018.09.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, G., Z. Li, X. Li, and Y. Xu. 2020. Learning synthetic aperture radar image despeckling without clean data. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 14 (02):1. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jrs.14.026518.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, G., C. Xiao, and N. Razmjooy. 2020. Optimal parameter extraction of PEM Fuel Cells by meta-heuristics. International Journal of Ambient Energy 43:2510–19. doi:10.1080/01430750.2020.1745276.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, D., Q. He, X. Wu, Y. Xu, J. Jiang, and X. Li. 2021. Modeling and optimization of high temperature proton exchange membrane electrolyzer cells. International Journal of Green Energy 1–12. doi:10.1080/15435075.2021.1974450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar