Prediction of the emergence of solid-state battery technology in the post-lithium ion battery era: a patent-based approach

References

• Aaldering, L. J., and C. H. Song. 2019. Tracing the technological development trajectory in post-lithium-ion battery technologies: A patent-based approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 241:118343. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn, S.-J., and H. Y. Yoon. 2020. ‘Green chasm’ in clean-tech for air pollution: patent evidence of a long innovation cycle and a technological level gap. Journal of Cleaner Production 272:272. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albertus, P., V. Anandan, C. Ban, N. Balsara, I. Belharouak, J. Buettner-Garrett, and N. J. Dudney. 2021. Challenges for and pathways toward Li-metal-based all-solid-state batteries. In: ACS Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Altuntas, S., T. Dereli, and A. Kusiak. 2015. Forecasting technology success based on patent data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 96:202–14. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ampah, J. D., C. Jin, I. M. Rizwanul Fattah, I. Appiah-Otoo, S. Afrane, Z. Geng, and A. A. Yusuf, T. Li, T. M. I. Mahlia, H. Liu. 2022. Investigating the evolutionary trends and key enablers of hydrogen production technologies: A patent-life cycle and econometric analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.07.258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, B. 1999. The hunt for S-shaped growth paths in technological innovation: A patent study. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 9 (4):487–526. doi:10.1007/s001910050093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asche, G. 2017. 80% of technical information found only in patents”–Is there proof of this? World Patent Information 48:16–28. doi:10.1016/j.wpi.2016.11.004.
   Google Scholar
• Bajolle, H., M. Lagadic, and N. Louvet. 2022. The future of lithium-ion batteries: exploring expert conceptions, market trends, and price scenarios. Energy Research & Social Science 93:102850. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2022.102850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann, M., T. Domnik, M. Haase, C. Wulf, P. Emmerich, C. Rösch, and P. Zapp, T. Naegler, M. Weil. 2021. Comparative patent analysis for the identification of global research trends for the case of battery storage, hydrogen and bioenergy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 165:120505. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, A., and C. H. Song. 2022. Exploring the characteristics of technological knowledge interaction dynamics in the field of solid-state batteries: A patent-based approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 353:131689. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, P. V., J. Cho, J. H. Pikul, W. P. King, and H. Zhang. 2012. High power rechargeable batteries. Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science 16 (4):186–98. doi:10.1016/j.cossms.2012.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bregonje, M. 2005. Patents: A unique source for scientific technical information in chemistry related industry? World Patent Information 27 (4):309–15. doi:10.1016/j.wpi.2005.05.003.
   Google Scholar
• Bürklin, B., T. Latz, L. Schenk, F. Degen, M. Diehl, O. Krätzig, and N. Lackner. 2022. Umfeldbericht zum europäischen Innovationssystem Batterie 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, S.-H., and C.-Y. Fan. 2015. Telematics technology development forecasting: The patent analysis and technology life cycle perspective. Paper presented at the Industrial Engineering, Management Science and Applications 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, S.-H., and C.-Y. Fan. 2016. Identification of the technology life cycle of telematics: A patent-based analytical perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 105:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, S.-B., K.-K. Lai, and S.-M. Chang. 2009. Exploring technology diffusion and classification of business methods: using the patent citation network. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 76 (1):107–17. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2008.03.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J. 2013. Recent progress in advanced materials for lithium ion batteries. Materials 6 (1):156–83. doi:10.3390/ma6010156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-H., C.-Y. Chen, and S.-C. Lee. 2011. Technology forecasting and patent strategy of hydrogen energy and fuel cell technologies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 36 (12):6957–69. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.03.063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, Y.-J., and T.-M. Ying. 2012. A novel method for technology forecasting and developing R&D strategy of building integrated photovoltaic technology industry. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2012:1–24. doi:10.1155/2012/273530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J., B. Jeong, J. Yoon, B.-Y. Coh, and J.-M. Lee. 2020. A novel approach to evaluating the business potential of intellectual properties: A machine learning-based predictive analysis of patent lifetime. Computers & Industrial Engineering 145:106544. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2020.106544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, D., Y. Kwon, and Z. Kim. 2023. Technology life cycle and commercialization readiness of hydrogen production technology using patent analysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 48 (33):12139–54. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, N. S. 2018. The basics of patent searching. World Patent Information, 54, S4–S10.
   Google Scholar
• Dehghani Madvar, M., A. Aslani, M. H. Ahmadi, and N. S. Karbalaie Ghomi. 2019. Current status and future forecasting of biofuels technology development. International Journal of Energy Research 43 (3):1142–60. doi:10.1002/er.4344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehghanimadvar, M., R. Shirmohammadi, M. Sadeghzadeh, A. Aslani, and R. Ghasempour. 2020. Hydrogen production technologies: attractiveness and future perspective. International Journal of Energy Research 44 (11):8233–54. doi:10.1002/er.5508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, L., A. L. Porter, J. Wang, S. Fang, X. Zhang, T. Ma, and L. Huang. 2013. Technology life cycle analysis method based on patent documents. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80 (3):398–407. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha, S. H., W. Liu, H. Cho, and S. H. Kim. 2015. Technological advances in the fuel cell vehicle: patent portfolio management. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 100:277–89. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B. H., A. Jaffe, and M. Trajtenberg. 2005. Market value and patent citations. The RAND Journal of Economics 36 (1):16–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harhoff, D., F. M. Scherer, and K. Vopel. 2003. Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research Policy 32 (8):1343–63. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00124-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamali, M. Y., A. Aslani, B. F. Moghadam, M. Naaranoja, and M. D. Madvar. 2016. Analysis of photovoltaic technology development based on technology life cycle approach. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy 8 (3):035905. doi:10.1063/1.4952763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalthaus, M. 2020. Knowledge recombination along the technology life cycle. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 30 (3):643–704. doi:10.1007/s00191-020-00661-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Z., I. Morley, and Y. Chung. 2023. Factors influencing the technology transfer fee: evidence from the public energy sector. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 35 (1):30–44. doi:10.1080/09537325.2021.1964464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C., J. Kim, O. Kwon, and H.-G. Woo. 2016. Stochastic technology life cycle analysis using multiple patent indicators. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 106:53–64. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, K., and S. Lee. 2013. Patterns of technological innovation and evolution in the energy sector: A patent-based approach. Energy Policy 59:415–32. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M., and S. Lee. 2017. Identifying new business opportunities from competitor intelligence: an integrated use of patent and trademark databases. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 119:170–83. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lezama-Nicolás, R., M. Rodríguez-Salvador, R. Río-Belver, and I. Bildosola. 2018. A bibliometric method for assessing technological maturity: The case of additive manufacturing. Scientometrics 117 (3):1425–52. doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2941-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, H.-D., J.-H. Park, H.-J. Shin, J. Jeong, J. T. Kim, K.-W. Nam, and K. Y. Chung. 2020. A review of challenges and issues concerning interfaces for all-solid-state batteries. Energy Storage Materials 25:224–50. doi:10.1016/j.ensm.2019.10.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J. S., C.-H. Kuan, S.-C. Cha, W.-L. Chuang, G. J. Gau, and J.-Y. Jeng. 2011. Photovoltaic technology development: A perspective from patent growth analysis. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 95 (11):3130–36. doi:10.1016/j.solmat.2011.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C., Z.-Y. Wang, Z.-J. He, Y.-J. Li, J. Mao, K.-H. Dai, and J.-C. Zheng. 2021. An advance review of solid-state battery: challenges, progress and prospects. Sustainable Materials and Technologies 29:e00297. doi:10.1016/j.susmat.2021.e00297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Y. Wu, T. Ma, Z. Wang, Q. Gao, J. Xu, and L. Chen, H. Li, F. Wu. 2022. Long‐life sulfide all‐solid‐state battery enabled by substrate‐modulated dry‐process binder. Advanced Energy Materials 12 (37):2201732. doi:10.1002/aenm.202201732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., J. A. Alonso, Q. Yi, L. Lu, Z. L. Wang, and C. Sun. 2019. A high‐performance monolithic solid‐state sodium battery with Ca2+ doped Na3Zr2Si2PO12 electrolyte. Advanced Energy Materials 9 (28):1901205. doi:10.1002/aenm.201901205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, H. 2023. The dynamics of china’s collaborative innovation network in agricultural biotechnology: a spatial-topological perspective. Systems 11 (2):73. doi:10.3390/systems11020073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madavar, M. D., M. G. Nezhad, A. Aslani, and M. Naaranoja. 2017. Analysis of generations of wind power technologies based on technology life cycle approach. Distributed Generation & Alternative Energy Journal 32 (3):52–79. doi:10.1080/21563306.2017.11878945.
   Google Scholar
• Mendizabal, M., E. Feliu, C. Tapia, M. A. Rajaeifar, A. Tiwary, J. Sepúlveda, and O. Heidrich. 2021. Triggers of change to achieve sustainable, resilient, and adaptive cities. City and Environment Interactions 12:100071. doi:10.1016/j.cacint.2021.100071.
   Google Scholar
• Nagaoka, S., K. Motohashi, and A. Goto. 2010. “Patent statistics as an innovation indicator.” Handbook of the economics of innovation, Vol. 2, 1083–127. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/S0169-7218(10)02009-5.
   Google Scholar
• Pang, M.-C., K. Yang, R. Brugge, T. Zhang, X. Liu, F. Pan, and S. Yang, A. Aguadero, B. Wu, M. Marinescu. 2021. Interactions are important: linking multi-physics mechanisms to the performance and degradation of solid-state batteries. Materials Today 49:145–83. doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2021.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, Z., Y. Wang, J. Ren, H. Chen, Y. Lu, Y. Wang, and L. Ping, C. Yang. 2022. Volatile organic compounds pollution control technologies: past, current and future analysis based on patent text mining and technology life cycle analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production 379:134760. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, Y., and J. Yoon. 2017. Application technology opportunity discovery from technology portfolios: use of patent classification and collaborative filtering. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 118:170–83. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajaeifar, M. A., P. Ghadimi, M. Raugei, Y. Wu, and O. Heidrich. 2022. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 180:106144. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106144.
   Google Scholar
• Rotolo, D., D. Hicks, and B. R. Martin. 2015. What is an emerging technology? Research Policy 44 (10):1827–43. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmaltz, T., T. Wicke, L. Weymann, P. Voß, C. Neef, and A. Thielmann. 2022. Solid-State Battery Roadmap 2035+.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, H.-S., W. Jeong, M.-H. Ryu, S. W. Lee, K.-N. Jung, and J.-W. Lee. 2022. Electrode-to-electrode monolithic integration for high-voltage bipolar solid-state batteries based on plastic-crystal polymer electrolyte. Chemical Engineering Journal 433:133753. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2021.133753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinigaglia, T., M. Eduardo Santos Martins, and J. Cezar Mairesse Siluk. 2022. Technological evolution of internal combustion engine vehicle: A patent data analysis. Applied Energy 306:118003. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, C. H., and L. J. Aaldering. 2019. Strategic intentions to the diffusion of electric mobility paradigm: the case of internal combustion engine vehicle. Journal of Cleaner Production 230:898–909. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squicciarini, M., H. Dernis, and C. Criscuolo. 2013. Measuring Patent Quality: Indicators of Technological and Economic Value. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers. 3rd ed. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/5k4522wkw1r8-en.
   Google Scholar
• Stucki, T., and M. Woerter. 2019. The private returns to knowledge: A comparison of ICT, biotechnologies, nanotechnologies, and green technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 145:62–81. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, P., R. Bisschop, H. Niu, and X. Huang. 2020. A review of battery fires in electric vehicles. Fire Technology 56 (4):1361–410. doi:10.1007/s10694-019-00944-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, C., J. Liu, Y. Gong, D. P. Wilkinson, and J. Zhang. 2017. Recent advances in all-solid-state rechargeable lithium batteries. Nano Energy 33:363–86. doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.01.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suominen, A., H. Toivanen, and M. Seppänen. 2017. Firms’ knowledge profiles: mapping patent data with unsupervised learning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 115:131–42. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuo, K., C. Sun, and S. Liu. 2023. Recent progress in and perspectives on emerging halide superionic conductors for all-solid-state batteries. Electrochemical Energy Reviews 6 (1):17. doi:10.1007/s41918-023-00179-5.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., C.-W. Sun, Y.-D. Gong, H.-R. Zhang, J. A. Alonso, M. T. Fernández-Díaz, and J. B. Goodenough. 2018. Imaging the diffusion pathway of Al3+ ion in NASICON-type (Al0. 2Zr0. 8) 20/19Nb (PO4) 3 as electrolyte for rechargeable solid-state Al batteries. Chinese Physics B 27 (12):128201. doi:10.1088/1674-1056/27/12/128201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., C. Sun, L. Lu, and L. Jiao. 2023. Recent progress and perspectives of solid state Na-CO2 batteries. Batteries 9 (1):36. doi:10.3390/batteries9010036.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.-H., A. J. Trappey, and C. V. Trappey. 2015. Life cycle analysis of the optical disc industry market innovation and development. The Innovation 17 (2):196–216. doi:10.1080/14479338.2015.1011061.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., K. Yang, S. Sun, Q. Ma, G. Yi, X. Chen, and Q. Wang, W. Yan, X. Liu, Q. Cai. 2023. Advances in thermal‐related analysis techniques for solid‐state lithium batteries. InfoMat 5 (4):e12401. doi:10.1002/inf2.12401.
   Google Scholar
• Whittingham, M. S. 2004. Lithium batteries and cathode materials. Chemical Reviews 104 (10):4271–302. doi:10.1021/cr020731c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, D., and F. Wu. 2023. Toward better batteries: solid-state battery roadmap 2035+. eTransportation 16:100224. doi:10.1016/j.etran.2022.100224.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, L., Y. Lu, C. Z. Zhao, H. Yuan, G. L. Zhu, L. P. Hou, and J. Q. Huang. 2021. Toward the scale‐up of solid‐state lithium metal batteries: The gaps between lab‐level cells and practical large‐format batteries. Advanced Energy Materials 11 (4):2002360. doi:10.1002/aenm.202002360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, J., B. Jeong, W. H. Lee, and J. Kim. 2018. Tracing the evolving trends in electronic skin (e-skin) technology using growth curve and technology position-based patent bibliometrics. IEEE Access 6:26530–42. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2834160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, X., and Y. Cai. 2021. Forecasting the development trend of low emission vehicle technologies: based on patent data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 166:120651. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., T. Daim, and Y. P. Zhang. 2021. Integrating patent analysis into technology roadmapping: A latent Dirichlet allocation based technology assessment and roadmapping in the field of blockchain. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 167:120729. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar