Prediction of solar irradiance with machine learning methods using satellite data

References

• Adedeji, P. A., S. A. Akinlabi, N. Madushele, and O. O. Olatunji. 2021. Beyond site suitability: Investigating temporal variability for utility-scale solar-PV using soft computing techniques. Renewable Energy Focus 39:72–89. doi:10.1016/J.REF.2021.07.008.
   Google Scholar
• Alizamir, M., S. Kim, O. Kisi, and M. Zounemat-Kermani. 2020. A comparative study of several machine learning based non-linear regression methods in estimating solar radiation: Case studies of the USA and Turkey regions. Energy 197:117239. doi:10.1016/J.ENERGY.2020.117239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• And EAD-IJ of C, 2019 undefined. n.d. Comparison between XGBoost, LightGBM and CatBoost using a home credit dataset. PublicationsWasetOrg.
   Google Scholar
• Anggraina, A., and RP-J of P, n.d undefined. 2019. The combination of logistic regression and gradient boost tree for email spam detection. Journal of Physics Conference Series 1196:012013. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1196/1/012013.
   Google Scholar
• Angstrom, A. 1924. Solar and terrestrial radiation. Report to the international commission for solar research on actinometric investigations of solar and atmospheric radiation. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 50 (210):121–26. doi:10.1002/QJ.49705021008.
   Google Scholar
• Berrar, D. n.d. Cross-validation call for papers for machine learning journal: Machine learning for soccer view project cross-validation. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-809633-8.20349-X.
   Google Scholar
• Bounoua, Z., L. Ouazzani Chahidi, and A. Mechaqrane. 2021. Estimation of daily global solar radiation using empirical and machine-learning methods: A case study of five Moroccan locations. Sustainable Materials and Technologies 28:e00261. doi:10.1016/J.SUSMAT.2021.E00261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamber of Mechanıcal Engineers. 2022. Türkiye’nin Enerji Görünümü 2022 (In Turkish). Ankara: UCTEA.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, T., and C. Guestrin. 2016. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proc. ACM SIGKDD int. Conf. Knowl. Discov. Data min, Vols. 13-17- August-2016, 785–94. Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/2939672.2939785.
   Google Scholar
• Chicco, D., M. J. Warrens, and G. Jurman. 2021. The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation. PeerJ Computer Science 7:1–24. doi:10.7717/PEERJ-CS.623.
   Google Scholar
• Cornejo-Bueno, L., C. Casanova-Mateo, J. Sanz-Justo, and S. Salcedo-Sanz. 2019. Machine learning regressors for solar radiation estimation from satellite data. Solar Energy 183:768–75. doi:10.1016/J.SOLENER.2019.03.079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir, V., and H. Citakoglu. 2023. Forecasting of solar radiation using different machine learning approaches. Neural Computing & Applications 35 (1):887–906. doi:10.1007/S00521-022-07841-X/TABLES/4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duman, S., A. Elewi, and Z. Yetgin. 2022. Distance estimation from a monocular camera using face and body features. Arabian Journal for Science & Engineering 47 (2):1547–57. doi:10.1007/S13369-021-06003-W/TABLES/3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durgam, S., A. Bhosale, V. Bhosale, R. Deshpande, P. Sutar, and S. Kamble. 2021. Temperature prediction of heat sources using machine learning techniques. Heat Transfer 50 (8):7817–38. doi:10.1002/HTJ.22255.
   Google Scholar
• Ercan, U. 2021. The determinants of Turkey household catastrophic health expenditures: A different approach by data mining. Alphanumeric Journal 9 (2):229–46. doi:10.17093/alphanumeric.940744.
   Google Scholar
• Ercan, U. 2022a. Determining airline customer satisfaction with ensemble learning methods. Alanya Akademik Bakış 6 (3):2763–74. doi:10.29023/ALANYAAKADEMIK.1095574.
   Google Scholar
• Ercan, U. 2022b. Konut Kira Fiyatlarının Makine Öğrenmesi Yöntemleriyle Tahmin Edilmesi: Destek Vektör Regresyonu ve Yapay Sinir Ağları Karşılaştırması. Ampirik Yöntemlerle İktisadi ve Finansal Çözümlemeler. 373–90.
   Google Scholar
• ERCAN, U., and S. IRMAK. 2022. TUrizm endüstrisinde otel rezervasyon iptallerinin makine öğrenmesi yöntemleri ile tahmini (hotel bookings cancellation prediction with machine learning methods in tourism industry). Journal of Gastronomy Hospitality and Travel (JOGHAT). doi:10.33083/joghat.2022.112.
   Google Scholar
• Ertekin, C., and O. Yaldiz. 2000. Comparison of some existing models for estimating global solar radiation for Antalya (Turkey). Energy Conversion and Management 41 (4):311–30. doi:10.1016/S0196-8904(99)00127-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, J., L. Wu, F. Zhang, H. Cai, W. Zeng, X. Wang, and H. Zou. 2019. Empirical and machine learning models for predicting daily global solar radiation from sunshine duration: A review and case study in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 100:186–212. doi:10.1016/J.RSER.2018.10.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, V.V., Keith, B. 2019, Gradient boosted trees predictive models for surface roughness in high-speed milling in the steel and aluminum metalworking industry. Complexity.
   Google Scholar
• GEPA. Turkiye Solar Energy Potential Atlas 2023. https://gepa.enerji.gov.tr/MyCalculator/ (accessed June 2, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Giudici, P., and S. Figini. 2009. Applied Data Mining for Business and Industry. Second Edition. John John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Gogas, P., and T. Papadimitriou. 2021. Machine learning in economics and finance. Computational Economics 57 (1):1–4. doi:10.1007/S10614-021-10094-W.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güner, N., E., Çomak. 2011.Mühendislik Öğrencilerinin Matematik IDerslerindeki Başarısının Destek Vektör Makineleri Kullanılarak Tahmin Edilmesi . Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi .17 (2). 87–96 .
   Google Scholar
• Gungor, A., M. Gokcek, F. Yalcin, A. Kocer, I. F. Yaka, and G. T. Sardogan. 2015. Determining the best model for estimation the monthly mean daily global solar radiation on a horizontal surface – a case study in Nigde, Turkey. World Journal of Engineering 12 (3):307–12. doi:10.1260/1708-5284.12.3.307.
   Google Scholar
• Guyon, I., and A. Elisseefl. 2006. An introduction to feature extraction. Stud Fuzziness Soft Comput 207:1–25. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-35488-8_1.
   Google Scholar
• Hagan, M. T., H. B. Demuth, and M. Beale. 1996. Neural network design. Boston, MA, USA: PWS Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Halde, R. R. Application of machine learning algorithms for betterment in education system. Int. Conf. Autom. Control Dyn. Optim. Tech. 9-10 September 2016 Pune, India, 2016, p. 1110–14.
   Google Scholar
• Haykin, S. 2008. Neural networks and learning machines. Third edition. New Jersey: Pearson, Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Horvat, T., and Mining JJ-WIRD, 2020 undefined. 2020. The use of machine learning in sport outcome prediction: A review. Wiley Online Libr 10. 10.1002/widm.1380.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, M., S. Mekhilef, M. Danesh, L. Olatomiwa, and S. Shamshirband. 2017. Application of extreme learning machine for short term output power forecasting of three grid-connected PV systems. Journal of Cleaner Production 167:395–405. doi:10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.08.081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantardzic, M. 2020. Data mining concepts, models, methods, and algorithms. Third Edition. New Jersey, USA: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kayakus, M., B. Tutcu, M. Terzioglu, H. Talas, and F. G. Uyar. 2023. ROA and ROE forecasting in iron and steel industry using machine learning techniques for sustainable profitability. Sustainability 15 (9):1–14. doi:10.3390/su15097389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, G., and Science HM-PC, 2016 U. 2016. Generalized regression neural network based wind speed prediction model for western region of India. Procedia Computer Science 93:26–32. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.177.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, Y., V. Spandana, V. Vaishnavi, K. Neha, V. G. R. Devi Supervised machine learning approach for crop yield prediction in agriculture sector. Proc. Fifth Int. Conf. Commun. Electron. Syst. (ICCES 2020) 10-12 June 2020 Coimbatore, India, 2020, p. 736–41.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, G., S. Yadav, and Letters VP-IS, n.d undefined. 2022. Machine learning-based framework to predict finger movement for prosthetic hand. IEEE Sensors Letters 6 (6):1–4. doi:10.1109/LSENS.2022.3147518.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C. 1982. Industrial and business forecasting methods: A practical guide to exponential smoothing and curve fitting. Butterworth-Heinemann
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., J. K. Ward, J. Tong, L. Collins, and G. Platt. 2016. Machine learning for solar irradiance forecasting of photovoltaic system. Renew Energy 90:542–53. doi:10.1016/J.RENENE.2015.12.069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mecibah, M. S., T. E. Boukelia, R. Tahtah, and K. Gairaa. 2014. Introducing the best model for estimation the monthly mean daily global solar radiation on a horizontal surface (case study: Algeria). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 36:194–202. doi:10.1016/J.RSER.2014.04.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mert, M. 2016. SPSS STATA Yatay Kesit Veri Analizi. Ankara: Detay.
   Google Scholar
• NASA. Prediction of worldwide energy resources 2023. https://power.larc.nasa.gov/data-access-viewer/ (accessed June 2, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Oprea, S. V., and A. Bâra. 2023. A stacked ensemble forecast for photovoltaic power plants combining deterministic and stochastic methods. Applied Soft Computing 147:110781. doi:10.1016/J.ASOC.2023.110781.
   Google Scholar
• Qin, J., H. Jiang, N. Lu, L. Yao, and C. Zhou. 2022. Enhancing solar PV output forecast by integrating ground and satellite observations with deep learning. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 167:112680. doi:10.1016/J.RSER.2022.112680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, Y., J. Zhou, M. Khandelwal, H. Yang, P. Yang, and C. Li. 2022. Performance evaluation of hybrid WOA-XGBoost, GWO-XGBoost and BO-XGBoost models to predict blast-induced ground vibration. Engineering with Computers 38 (S5):4145–62. doi:10.1007/S00366-021-01393-9.
   Google Scholar
• Ramadhan, R. A. A., Y. R. J. Heatubun, S. F. Tan, and H. J. Lee. 2021. Comparison of physical and machine learning models for estimating solar irradiance and photovoltaic power. Renew Energy 178:1006–19. doi:10.1016/J.RENENE.2021.06.079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şevik, S., A. Koçer, H. İnce, and F. E. Tombuş. 2022. Determination of optimum tilt angle of the solar collector and evaluation of the position of the existing buildings in terms of solar potential. Architectural Engineering and Design Management 18 (6):812–28. doi:10.1080/17452007.2021.1926899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, A., and A. Kakkar. 2018. Forecasting daily global solar irradiance generation using machine learning. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 82:2254–69. doi:10.1016/J.RSER.2017.08.066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taki, M., A. Rohani, and H. Yildizhan. 2021. Application of machine learning for solar radiation modeling. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 143 (3–4):1599–613. doi:10.1007/S00704-020-03484-X/TABLES/6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamilarasi, P., Rani, R. U. 2020. Diagnosis of crime rate against women using k-fold cross validation through machine learning. Fourth International Conference on Computing Methodologies and Communication (ICCMC 2020). Erode, India.
   Google Scholar
• Tranmer, M., J. Murphy, M. Elliot, and M. Pampaka Multiple Linear Regression. Cathie Marsh Institute Working Paper; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Tütüncü, T. 2022. Makine öğrenmesi Algoritmaları ile Kredi Temerrüt Riskini Tahmin Etme. doi:10.6002/ect.2022.0027.
   Google Scholar
• Ercan, U. 2021. Investigation of determinants of household health expenditures in Turkey using simultaneous quantile regression method. 5(1): 14–172. doi:10.33399/biibfad.835976.
   Google Scholar
• Witt, S., and C. Witt. 1992. Modeling and forecasting demand in tourism. doi:10.1007/BF00400250.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, G. P. 2010. Neural networks for data mining. In Data mining and knowledge discovery handbook, ed. O. Maimon and L. Rokach, M. Data, 419–44. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zulfiqar, H., S., Yuan, Q., Huang, Z., Sun, Dao, F., Yu, X., Lin, H. 2021 .Identification of cyclin protein using gradient boost decision tree algorithm Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal. 19: 4123–4131 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar