Influence of weft yarn diameter on runoff erosion control performance of woven geomesh

References

• Akila, R., and T. E. Abraham. 2007. Coir fiber–process and opportunities: Part 1. Journal of Natural Fibers 3:29–41. doi:10.1300/J395v03n04_03.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, S. R. 1996. Evaluation and standardization of rolled erosion control products. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 14:207–21. doi:10.1016/0266-1144(96)00011-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Society for Testing & Materials. 2008. Test method D 1388-2008: Standard test method for stiffness of fabrics. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• American Society for Testing & Materials. 2012. Test method D 698-2012: Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using standard effort. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• American Society for Testing & Materials. 2013. Test method D 7101-2013: Standard index test method for determination of unvegetated rolled erosion control product (recp) ability to protect soil from rain splash and associated runoff under bench-scale conditions. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• American Society for Testing & Materials. 2016. Test method D 7322-2016: Standard test method for determination of rolled erosion control product (recp) ability to encourage seed germination and plant growth under bench-scale conditions. West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• Balan, K. 2004. Coir geotextiles- an eco-friendly material & coir geotextiles in watershed management and soil conservation. In: Geosynthetic new horizons, ed. P. K. Banerjee, G. V. Ramana, J. T. Shahu, and G. V. Rao, 365–76. New Delhi: Asian books private limited.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatia, S. K., J. L. Smith, D. Lake, and D. Walowsky. 2002. A technical and economic evaluation of geosynthetic rolled erosion control products in highway drainage channels. Geosynthetics International 9 (2):125–48. doi:10.1680/gein.9.0213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blum, A. 2010. Plant breeding for water- limited environments, 12–44. New York, USA: Springer Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, J. E. 1996. Principle of textile testing, 353–80. New Delhi, India: CBS Publishers and distributors.
   Google Scholar
• Cazzuffi, D., A. Corneo, and E. Crippa. 2007. Slope stabilisation by perennial gramineae in Southern Italy: Plant growth and temporal performance. Eco-And Ground Bio- Engineering 103:112–24.
   Google Scholar
• Coir Development Board. 2010. Coir bhoovastra -some thoughts of marketing promotion. 1–30. Technical papers collected from authorized sources. India: Coir Development Board.
   Google Scholar
• Deb, M. K., and S. Chakrabarti 2010. Construction of an economic road using jute geo-textiles in flexible pavements- an experimental study. In: 6th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics, 8-12 November 2010, 879–86. New Delhi, India.
   Google Scholar
• Desai, A. N., and K. Ravi. 2016. Geotextile made from natural fibre. In: Geotextiles, ed M. K. Robert, 61–86. Cambridge, England: Woodhead publication.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, J. C., and M. F. Wu. 2001. Sustaining the global farm. In: Effect of soil strength, texture, slope steepness and rain fall intensity on interrill erosion of soils in Taiwan, ed. R. H. Mohtar, G. C. Steinhardt, and D. E. Stott, Scientific content, Selected papers from the 10th International Soil Conservation Organization Meeting, 24-29 May 1999, 588–93. Indiana, U.S.: Purdue University and the USDA- ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laborartory.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, C. M. K., K. B. Laryea, and P. W. Unger. 1999. Soil physical constraints to plant growth and crop production. Vol. 1999, 7–41. Bushland: US Department of Agriculture. Texas, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Geo-technical Engineering Directorate (GED). 2005. Guide lines on erosion control and drainage of railway formation. Lucknow: Geo-technical Engineering Directorate research design and standards organisation. February 2005, 8–12. Uttar Pradesh, India.
   Google Scholar
• Gosh, S. K., R. Bhattacharyya, and K. R. Gupta. 2015. Design and engineering of open weave jute soil saver for potential application in the field of soil erosion control and hill slope management. Journal of Natural Fibers 12 (6):561–73. doi:10.1080/15440478.2014.984047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosh, S. K., T. Sanyal, and R. Bhattacharyya. 2016. Designing and engineering of Jute Geotextile (JGT) for river bank protection and its subsequent implementation in river phulahar. Journal of Natural Fibers 13 (2):192–203. doi:10.1080/15440478.2015.1004393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hytiris, N., D. J. McKay, and P. S. Addison. 2001. A canopy flow equation for erosion control geosynthetics. Geosynthetics International 8 (3):221–32. doi:10.1680/gein.8.0193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, N. W. M. 1996. Geotextiles, 78–85. London, UK: Blackie academic and professional.
   Google Scholar
• Kalibová, J., L. A. Jacka, and J. Petr°u. 2016. The effectiveness of jute and coir blankets for erosion control in different field and laboratory conditions. Journal of Solid Earth 7:469–79. doi:10.5194/se-7-469-2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kothyari, U. C. 1996. Erosion and sedimentation problem in India. In Erosion and Sediment Yield: Global and Regional Perspectives, Proceedings of the symposium held in 15-19 July 1996, ed. D. E. Walling, and B. W. Webb, 531–40. Exeter, UK, IAHS Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Leopold, L. B. 1953. Downstream change of velocity in rivers. American Journal of Science 251:606–24. doi:10.2475/ajs.251.8.606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathi, P. M. 2005. Coir. In: Bast and other plant fibres Fibres, ed. R. R. Frank, 274–314. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Midha, V. K., and K. S. Suresh. 2013. Influence of woven structure on coir rolled erosion-control products. Geosynthetics International 20 (6):396–407. doi:10.1680/gein.13.00027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midha, V. K., K. S. Suresh, and A. Sharma. 2014. Performance of transesterified jute rolled erosion control products. Geosynthetics International 21 (5):301–09. doi:10.1680/gein.14.00017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, R. C. P. 2005. Soil erosion & conservation, 11–42. Victoria, Australia: Blackwell publishing ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Naemura, S., and H. Miki. 1996. Design and construction of geotextile reinforced soil structures for road earthworks in Japan. Geosynthetics International 3 (1):49–62. doi:10.1680/gein.3.0053.
   Google Scholar
• Ogbobe, O., K. S. Essien, and A. Adebayo. 1998. A study of biodegradable geotextiles used for erosion control. Geosynthetics International 5 (5):545–53. doi:10.1680/gein.5.0131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimentel, D. 2006. Soil erosion; A food and environmental threat. Journal of the Environment Development and Sustainability 8:117–19.
   Google Scholar
• Sanyal, T. 2006. Jute geotextiles in erosion control & strengthening of sub-grades two case studies. Indian Chapter of International Geosynthetic Society & CBIP 298:235–44.
   Google Scholar
• Sanyal, T., A. K. Khastagir., and P. K. Choudhry. 2013. Design and development of improved varieties of open weave jute geotextiles for erosion control. India Journal of Geosynthetic Ground Improvement 2:9–13.
   Google Scholar
• Sarsby, R. W. 2002. Use of limited life geotextiles (LLGs) for basal reinforcement of embankments built on soft clay. Geotextile Geomembranes 25:302–10. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2007.02.010.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, D. L., and A. V. Shroff. 2003. Soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. Japan: AA Balkema publisher.
   Google Scholar
• State of environment- Atlas of India. 2011. State of environment (SoE) reports. Accessed May 1, 2015. http://www.soeatlas.org/Reports.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, R. A. 1998a. A critical assessment of the research conducted at the hydraulics and erosion control laboratory- a focus on rolled erosion control systems applied to hillslopes. Geotextile and Geomembranes 16 (2):87–118. doi:10.1016/S0266-1144(98)00002-8.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, R. A. 1998b. Rolled erosion control systems for hillslope surface protection: A critical review, synthesis and analysis of available data. I. Background and formative years. Land Degradation & Development. 9:465–86. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-145X(199811/12)9:6<465::AID-LDR311>3.0.CO;2-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, R. A., and A. D. Ziegler. 2007. Effectiveness of coir- based rolled erosion control systems in reducing sediment transport from hillslopes. Applied Geography 27:150–64. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2007.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, J. C., and T. S. Ingold. 1986. Use of jute fabrics in erosion control. In: Report to the jute market promotion project. ed. International jute organization. Geneva: UNCTAD/GATT.
   Google Scholar
• Zuzel, J. F., and J. L. Pikul. 1993. Effects of straw mulch on runoff and erosion from small agricultural plots in northeastern Oregon. Soil Science 156:111–17. doi:10.1097/00010694-199308000-00007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar