Surface Modification Effects on the Mechanical Properties of Woven Jute Fabric Reinforced Laminated Composites

References

• Arrakhiz, F. Z., M. Elachaby, R. Bouhfid, S. Vaudreuil, M. Essassi, and A. Qaiss. 2012. Mechanical and thermal properties of polypropylene reinforced with alfa fiber under different chemical treatment. Materials & Design, New Rubber Materials, Test Methods and Processes 35 (March):318–22. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2011.09.023.
   Google Scholar
• De Rosa, I. M., J. M. Kenny, M. Maniruzzaman, M. Moniruzzaman, M. Monti, D. Puglia, C. Santulli, and F. Sarasini. 2011. Effect of chemical treatments on the mechanical and thermal behaviour of Okra (Abelmoschus Esculentus) fibres. Composites Science and Technology 71 (2):246–54. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.11.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gassan, J., and A. K. Bledzki. 1999. Possibilities for improving the mechanical properties of jute/epoxy composites by alkali treatment of fibres. Composites Science and Technology 59 (9):1303–09. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00169-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorjan, L., and A. Milan. 2012. Bend strength of alumina ceramics: A comparison of weibull statistics with other statistics based on very large experimental data set. Journal of the European Ceramic Society 32 (6):1221–27. doi:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.12.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, M., T. H. Zhang, B. W. Chen, and L. Cheng. 2014. Tensile strength analysis of palm leaf sheath fiber with weibull distribution. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 62 (July):45–51. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.03.018.
   Google Scholar
• Iarve, E. V., R. Kim, and D. Mollenhauer. 2007. Three-dimensional stress analysis and weibull statistics based strength prediction in open hole composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 38 (1):174–85. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, S. V., L. T. Drzal, A. K. Mohanty, and S. Arora. 2004. Are natural fiber composites environmentally superior to glass fiber reinforced composites? Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, AIChE 2002 35 (3):371–76. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.016.
   Google Scholar
• Kabir, M. M., H. Wang, K. T. Lau, and F. Cardona. 2013. Effects of chemical treatments on hemp fibre structure. Applied Surface Science 276 (July):13–23. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.02.086.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X. Y., and G. C. Dai. 2007. Surface modification and micromechanical properties of jute fiber mat reinforced polypropylene composites. eXPRESS Polymer Letters 1 (5):299–307. doi:10.3144/expresspolymlett.2007.43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahjoub, R., J. M. Yatim, A. R. Mohd Sam, and S. H. Hashemi. 2014. Tensile properties of kenaf fiber due to various conditions of chemical fiber surface modifications. Construction and Building Materials 55 (March):103–13. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.036.
   Google Scholar
• Mir, S. S., N. Nafsin, M. Hasan, N. Hasan, and A. Hassan. 2013. Improvement of physico-mechanical properties of coir-polypropylene biocomposites by fiber chemical treatment. Materials & Design 52 (December):251–57. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.062.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, D., S. A. Bijit Kumar, K. Rana, and N. R. Bose. 2001. Effect of alkali treated jute fibres on composite properties. Bulletin of Materials Science 24 (2):129–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokbi, M., H. Osmani, A. Imad, and N. Benseddiq. 2011. Effect of chemical treatment on flexure properties of natural fiber-reinforced polyester composite. Procedia Engineering 10:2092–97. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.346.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, A., S. Chakraborty, S. P. Kundu, R. K. Basak, S. Basu Majumder, and B. Adhikari. 2012. Improvement in mechanical properties of jute fibres through mild alkali treatment as demonstrated by utilisation of the weibull distribution model. Bioresource Technology 107 (March):222–28. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.073.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saha, P., S. Manna, S. R. Chowdhury, R. Sen, D. Roy, and B. Adhikari. 2010. Enhancement of tensile strength of lignocellulosic jute fibers by alkali-steam treatment. Bioresource Technology 101 (9):3182–87. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selmy, A., N. Azab, and M. A. El-Baky. 2014. Statistical analysis of monotonic mechanical properties for unidirectional glass fiber (u)/random glass fiber (r)/epoxy hybrid and non-hybrid polymeric composites. Journal of Composite Materials 48 (4):455–69. doi:10.1177/0021998312474046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sever, K., M. Sarikanat, Y. Seki, G. Erkan, and Ü. H. Erdoğan. 2010. The mechanical properties of γ-methacryloxypropyltrimethoxy silane-treated jute/polyester composites. Journal of Composite Materials 44 (15):1913–24. doi:10.1177/0021998309360939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stocchi, A., C. Bernal, A. Vázquez, J. Biagotti, and J. Kenny. 2007. A silicone treatment compared to traditional natural fiber treatments: effect on the mechanical and viscoelastic properties of jute—vinylester laminates. Journal of Composite Materials 41 (16):2005–24. doi:10.1177/0021998307074108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trujillo, E., M. Moesen, L. Osorio, A. W. Van Vuure, J. Ivens, and I. Verpoest. 2014. Bamboo fibres for reinforcement in composite materials: strength weibull analysis. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 61 (June):115–25. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.02.003.
   Google Scholar
• Xia, Z. P., J. Y. Yu, L. D. Cheng, L. F. Liu, and W. M. Wang. 2009. Study on the breaking strength of jute fibres using modified weibull distribution. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 40 (1):54–59. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar