Cotton Fiber in Web of Science and Scopus: Mapping and Visualization of Research Topics and Publishing Patterns

References

• Bajwa, R. S., and K. Yaldram. 2013. Bibliometric analysis of biotechnology research in Pakistan. Scientometrics 95 (2):529–40. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0839-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartol, T., and M. Mackiewicz-Talarczyk. 2015. Bibliometric analysis of publishing trends in fiber crops in Google, Scopus, and Web of Science. Journal of Natural Fibers 12 (6):531–41. doi:10.1080/15440478.2014.972000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradow, J. M., and G. H. Davidonis. 2000. Quantitation of fiber quality and the cotton production-processing interface: A physiologist’s perspective. Journal of Cotton Science 4 (1):34–64.
   Google Scholar
• Cingolani, I., P. Panzarasa, and L. Tajoli. 2017. Countries’ positions in the international global value networks: Centrality and economic performance. Applied Network Science 2 (1):21. doi:10.1007/s41109-017-0041-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Costanza, R., R. B. Howarth, I. Kubiszewski, S. Liu, C. Ma, G. Plumecocq, and D. I. Stern. 2016. Influential publications in ecological economics revisited. Ecological Economics 123:68–76. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixit, S., and V. V. Katare. 2007. A bibliometric analysis of the ’Journal of the Indian Society for Cotton Improvement’1995–2004. Annals of Library and Information Studies 54 (2):119–23.
   Google Scholar
• Doğan, G., İ. Şencan, and Y. Tonta. 2016. Does dirty data affect google scholar citations? Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 53 (1):1–4. doi:10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301098.
   Google Scholar
• Du, L., and C. Rachul. 2012. Chinese newspaper coverage of genetically modified organisms. BMC Public Health 12 (1):Article number 326. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-326.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, Y., B. Jin, W. Shen, P. J. Sinko, X. Xie, H. Zhang, and L. Jia. 2016. China and the United States—Global partners, competitors and collaborators in nanotechnology development. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine 12 (1):13–19. doi:10.1016/j.nano.2015.09.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopalakrishnan, S., and A. L. Kumar. 2013. Global literature output on textile research: A bibliometric study. Journal of Advances in Library and Information Science 2 (2):94–99.
   Google Scholar
• Haigler, C. H., L. Betancur, M. R. Stiff, and J. R. Tuttle. 2012. Cotton fiber: A powerful single-cell model for cell wall and cellulose research. Frontiers in Plant Science 3:Article no. 104. doi:10.3389/fpls.2012.00104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harzing, A.-W., and S. Alakangas. 2016. Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison. Scientometrics 106 (2):787–804. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, W., Z. Sarwar, A. Khan, A. Hassan, A. Azeem, A. Nazir, H. Jamshaid, and U. Hussain. 2018. A novel study of comparison properties of pigment and reactive dye-printed cotton fabric. Journal of Natural Fibers, Published Online 1–11. doi:10.1080/15440478.2018.1440364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalpana, S., H. B. Rashmi, and J. Badri. 2011. Research and development perspectives of transgenic cotton: Evidence from patent landscape studies. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights 16 (2):139–53.
   Google Scholar
• Kicińska-Jakubowska, A., E. Bogacz, and M. Zimniewska. 2012. Review of natural fibers. Part I—Vegetable fibers. Journal of Natural Fibers 9 (3):150–67. doi:10.1080/15440478.2012.703370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, R. M., M. Mackiewicz-Talarczyk, M. Muzyczek, and J. Barriga-Bedoya. 2012. Future of natural fibers, their coexistence and competition with man-made fibers in 21st century. Molecular Crystals and Liquid Crystals 556 (1):200–22. doi:10.1080/15421406.2011.635962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima, F. D. C., A. J. A. Simões, I. M. M. Vieira, D. P. Silva, and D. S. Ruzene. 2018. An overview of applications in pineapple agroindustrial residues. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica 111 (2):445–62. doi:10.14720/aas.2018.111.2.18.
   Google Scholar
• López‐Cózar, E. D., N. Robinson‐García, and D. Torres‐Salinas. 2014. The Google scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65 (3):446–54. doi:10.1002/asi.23056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milanez, D. H., E. Noyons, and L. I. L. de Faria. 2016. A delineating procedure to retrieve relevant publication data in research areas: The case of nanocellulose. Scientometrics 107 (2):627–43. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1922-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morshed, M. N., X. Shen, H. Deb, S. A. Azad, X. Zhang, and R. Li. 2018. Sonochemical fabrication of nanocryatalline titanium dioxide TiO2 in cotton fiber for durable ultraviolet resistance. Journal of Natural Fibers, in Press:1–14. doi:10.1080/15440478.2018.1465506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2018–2027. 2019. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 1990–2027, by country. 2019. Retrieved from https://stats.oecd.org/
   Google Scholar
• Olawumi, T. O., and D. W. M. Chan. 2018. A scientometric review of global research on sustainability and sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production 183:231–50. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitiriciu, S. 2015. From the terminology of textile materials: Cotton. In The Proceedings of the International Conference Literature, Discourse and Multicultural Dialogue. Section: Language and Discourse, vol. 3, 44–51. Tîrgu-Mureş: Arhipelag XXI Press. http://www.diacronia.ro/en/indexing/details/V2008.
   Google Scholar
• Qin, Y.-M., and Y.-X. Zhu. 2011. How cotton fibers elongate: A tale of linear cell-growth mode. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 14 (1):106–11. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2010.09.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schober, A., C. Kittel, R. J. Baumgartner, and M. Füllsack. 2018. Identifying dominant topics appearing in the Journal of Cleaner Production. Journal of Cleaner Production 190:160–68. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjögårde, P., and P. Ahlgren. 2018. Granularity of algorithmically constructed publication-level classifications of research publications: Identification of topics. Journal of Informetrics 12 (1):133–52. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stankus, T. 2018. Economic entomology in the 21st century, as seen from a bibliometric analysis of its leading journal, 2000–2015. Part II: Lepidoptera, Coleoptera, and Hemiptera. Science and Technology Libraries 37 (1):71–85. doi:10.1080/0194262X.2017.1389570.
   Google Scholar
• Stopar, K., and T. Bartol. 2018. Digital competences, computer skills and information literacy in secondary education: Mapping and visualization of trends and concepts. Scientometrics. (First Online). doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2990-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Department of Agriculture. 2019. Cotton production by country worldwide in 2017/2018 (in 1,000 metric tons). In Statista - The Statistics Portal. https://www.statista.com/statistics/263055/cotton-production-worldwide-by-top-countries/.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eck, N. J., and L. Waltman. 2010. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84 (2):523–38. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltman, L., N. J. van Eck, and E. C. M. Noyons. 2010. A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics 4 (4):629–35. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, J. 2008. Bibliometric analysis of insect-resistant cotton literature in China. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin 7:100.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Q., J. Lv, Y. Ren, J. Chen, D. Gao, Z. Lu, and C. Wang. 2017. A green in situ synthesis of silver nanoparticles on cotton fabrics using Aloe vera leaf extraction for durable ultraviolet protection and antibacterial activity. Textile Research Journal 87 (19):2407–19. doi:10.1177/0040517516671124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar