Factors Affecting Mean Fiber Diameter in Selected Pakistani Sheep Breeds/Crosses

References

• Ahmad, S., A. Jalil, U. Pervaiz, and H. Khan. 2009. Morphological characterization of Kutta - the native sheep breed from Northern Pakistan. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 25 (2):279–84.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad, S., M. S. Khan, and M. F. U. Khan. 2010. Factors affecting wool characteristics of Kari sheep in Pakistan. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 34 (6):485–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akram, S., I. A. Butt, and M. Shabbir. 2016. Wool sector analysis for Pakistan. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal 3 (8):22–32.
   Google Scholar
• AKRSP. 1996. The wheel of fortune, a study of the Patti production system in Chitral, 70. Gilgit, Pakistan: Agha Khan Rural Support Program, Agha Khan Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Allden, W. G. 1979. Feed intake, diet composition and wool growth. In Physiological and environmental limitations to wool growth, ed. J. L. Black and P. J. Reis, 61–78. Armidale: University of New England Publishing Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Angel, C., S. Beare, and A. C. Zwart. 1990. Product characteristics and arbitrage in the Australian and New Zealand wool markets. Australian Journal Agricultral Economics 34:67–79. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8489.1990.tb00493.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, G. W., A. J. Charlick, and J. R. Eley. 1984. Effects of shearing time and time of lambing on wool growth and processing characteristics. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 24:337–43. doi:10.1071/EA9840337.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, G. W., W. R. McManus, and I. G. Bush. 1964. Studies in the wool production of sheep. 1: Seasonal variation in feed intake, liveweight and wool production. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 4:392–403. doi:10.1071/EA9640392.
   Google Scholar
• Aylan-Parker, J., and B. A. McGregor. 2002. Optimising sampling techniques and estimating sampling variance of fleece quality attributes in alpacas. Small Ruminant Research 44:53–64. doi:10.1016/S0921-4488(02)00038-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhasin, N. R., and R. N. Desai. 1965. Studies on factors affecting the characters concerning quality of wool fibre in a Chokla flock of sheep. The Indian Veterinary Journal 42 (10):782–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bidinost, F., D. L. Taddeo, A. M. Roldan, E. M. Dodero, H. R. Cano, J. P. Mueller, and M. A. Poli. 2008. Wool quantitative trait loci in Merino sheep. Small Ruminant Research 74:113–18. doi:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2007.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botha, A. F., and L. Hunter. 2010. The measurement of wool fibre properties and their effect on worsted processing performance and product quality. Part 1: The objective measurement of wool fibre properties. Textile Progress 42 (4):227–339.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, A. 2006. The effect of time of shearing on wool production and management of a spring-lambing merino flock. Doctoral dissertation. University of Melbourne. Australia
   Google Scholar
• Cilek, S. 2015. Determination of fleece qualities of malya sheep (11/16 akkaraman × 5/16 deutsches merinofleischschaf) and effect of age and sex on these qualities. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 52:533–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottle, D. J. 2010. Wool preparation and metabolism. In International sheep and wool handbook, ed. D. J. Cottle, 581–618. Nottingham, UK: Nottingham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dashab, G., M. A. Edriss, A. G. Aghaji, H. Movasagh, and M. A. Nilforooshan. 2006. Wool fiber quality of Naeini sheep. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 2:270–76.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, P. T., T. W. Plaisted, and R. A. Love. 1995. Supplementary feeding pattern and rate of liveweight gain in winter-spring affect wool production of young Merino sheep on the south coast of Western Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 35:1093–100. doi:10.1071/EA9951093.
   Google Scholar
• Economic Survey of Pakistan. 2018–19. Chapter 2, Agriculture. Ministry of Finance, Government of Pakistan.
   Google Scholar
• Edriss, M. A., G. Dashab, A. A. Ghareh Aghaji, M. A. Nilforoosha, and H. Movassagh. 2007. A study of some physical attributes of Naeini sheep wool for textile industry. Pakistan Journal of Biological Scineces 10:415–20. doi:10.3923/pjbs.2007.415.420.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• FAO. 1982. FAO production year book. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, A. D., L. Surraco, and L. Borsani. 1991. Effect of season of shearing on growth and wool production of sheep on unimproved basalt pasture. Technical Bulletin Biological Sciences 1:31–48.
   Google Scholar
• Freer, M., A. D. Moore, and J. R. Donnelly. 1997. Decision support systems for Australian grazing enterprises—II. The animal biology model for feed intake, production and reproduction and the Grazfeed DSS. Agricultural Systems 54 (1):77–126. doi:10.1016/S0308-521X(96)00045-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girna, T. V. 2017. The classification and grade of wool fibers and quality of wool. In Innovative tendencies of training of specialists in the conditions of multicultural and multi-lingual globalized world, 89–92. Ukraine: Kyiv National University of Technology and Design.
   Google Scholar
• Gouri, D., M. Lateef, M. I. Mustafa, G. Muhammad, and M. K. Bashir. 2014. Wool characterization of sheep breeds in different ecological zones. Nature and Science 12 (12):81–88.
   Google Scholar
• Greeff, J. C. 2006. Coefficient of variation of wool fibre diameter in Merino breeding programs. In Farmnote, 1–4. Perth: Western Australian Department of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Groenewald, P. G. J., J. J. Olivier, and W. J. Olivier. 1999. Heritability estimates for Merino sheep obtained from a national progeny test. South African Journal of Animal Science 29:174–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, N. P., D. B. Shakyawar, and R. D. Sinha. 1998. Influence of fibre diameter and medullation on woolen spun yarns and their products. Indian Journal of Fibre and Textile Research 23:32–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harizi, T., F. Abidi., R. Hamdaoui., and Y. B. Ameur. 2015. Variation in fleece characteristics of Tunisian sheep. International Journal of Textile Science 5:97–101.
   Google Scholar
• Hasnain, H. U. 1985. Sheep and Goats in Pakistan. Rome, Italy: FAO Animal Production and Health paper, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Hatcher, S., P. I. Hynd, K. J. Thornberry, and S. Gabb. 2010. Can we breed Merino sheep with softer, whiter, more photostable wool? Animal Production Science 50:1089–97. doi:10.1071/AN10095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, H. J., 2017. Analysis of the effects of sire and age on wool quality traits in Romney ewes. Bachelor Dissertation, Lincoln University, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Holman, B. W. B., and A. E. O. Malau-Aduli. 2012. A review of sheep wool quality traits. Annual Review and Research in Biology 2:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ingham, V. M., and R. W. Ponzoni. 2002. Genetic parameters for reproduction and fleece traits for South Australian Merino sheep. Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Montpellier, France, August 19–23, CD-ROM Communication No 12-04.
   Google Scholar
• IWTO. 1998. Specification IWTO-47-98, Measurement of the mean and distribution of fiber diameter of wool using an Optical Fibre Diameter Analyser (OFDA). Brussels (Belgium): International Wool Textile Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• IWTO. 2000. IWTO-57–2000. . Brussels (Belgium): International Wool Textile Organization.
   Google Scholar
• IWTO. 2007. IWTO 30-2007. . Brussels (Belgium): International Wool Textile Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C., F. Menezes, and F. Vella. 2004. Auction price anomalies: Evidence from wool auctions in Australia. Economic Record 80:271–88. doi:10.1111/ecor.2004.80.issue-250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M. J., A. A. Swan, and K. D. Atkins. 2007. Optimal use of on-farm fibre diameter measurement and its impact on reproduction in commercial Merino flocks. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47:525–34. doi:10.1071/EA06222.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, J. P., I. H. Auldist, S. J. Gray, and J. A. Reynolds. 1982. Influence of the timing of shearing and joining on productivity of sheep in the arid zone of western New South Wales. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 14:507–10.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, M. F., M. Rafique, and F. Ashfaq. 2007. Study of some important wool characteristics of selected sheep breeds in Pakistan. Proceedings of National Seminar on Sheep and Wool in Pakistan 44.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, M. J., A. Abbas, M. Ayaz, M. Naeem, M. S. Akhter, and M. H. Soomro. 2012. Factors affecting wool quality and quantity in sheep. African Journal of Biotechnology 11 (73):13761–66.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, M. S., S. Ahmad, M. S. Khan, and M. T. Zeb. 2014. Hormonal profile of Kari ewes with variable gestation length. Pakistan Veternary Journal 34 (4):548–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushwaha, B. P., B. S. Mehta, and S. Kumar. 1999. Survey of Chokla sheep in farmers’ flock. Indian Journal of Small Ruminants 5:14–19.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, C. J., B. A. Freking, and K. A. Leymaster. 2004. Evaluation of Dorset, Finnsheep, Romanov, Texel, And Montadale Breeds of sheep: III. Wool characteristics of F1 ewes. Journal of Animal Science 60:1327–32.
   Google Scholar
• Mackintosh, 1. B. 1993. Sheep production in Pakistan: A manual for students, teachers and research workers. Islamabad: PARC.
   Google Scholar
• Masters, D. G., G. Mata, S. M. Liu, and A. D. Peterson. 1998. Influence of liveweight, liveweight change and diet on wool growth, staple strength and fibre diameter in young sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49:269–77. doi:10.1071/A97093.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, J. D. 1965. The influence of seasonal pasture production and grazing management on seasonal wool growth. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 5:252–61. doi:10.1071/EA9650252.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, B. A., and K. L. Butler. 2004. Source of variation in fiber diameter attributes of Australian alpacas and implications for fleece evaluation and animal selection. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55:433–42. doi:10.1071/AR03073.
   Google Scholar
• McGuirk, B. J., J. R. Paynter, and R. B. Dun. 1966. The effect of frequency and time of shearing on the reproduction and wool growth of Bungaree South Australian Merino ewes. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 6:305–10. doi:10.1071/EA9660305.
   Google Scholar
• Moradi, S., X. Liu, C. Hurren, and X. Wang. 2015. Animal fibre diameter-length relationship and its effects on yarn properties. Proceedings of the 13th Asian Textile Conference, Geelong, Australia, 553–1108.
   Google Scholar
• Munir, M., N. A. Shah, and K. M. Aujla. 2010. Production of wool and hair in highland Baluchistan, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Agriculture, Agricultural Engineering Veterinary Sciences 26:75–87.
   Google Scholar
• NZS 8716. 1994. Measurement of the bulk of raw wool. Wellington: Standards Association of New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Olivier, J. J., S. W. P. Cloete, and A. G. Bezuidenhout. 1993. Differences in mean fibre diameter and fibre diameter variance in fine wool, strong wool, and fine × strong wool Merino sheep sampled at five body locations. South African Journal of Animal Science 23 (5):201–03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivier, W. J., and J. J. Olivier. 2005. The effect of nutritional stress on the wool production potential of strong and fine wool Merino sheep. South African Journal of Animal Science 35:273–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poppi, D. P., and S. R. McLennan. 2010. Nutritional research to meet future challenges. Animal Production Science 50:329–38. doi:10.1071/AN09230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purvis, I. W., and I. R. Franklin. 2005. Major genes and QTL influencing wool production and quality: A review. Genetics Selection Evolution 37:S97–S107. doi:10.1186/1297-9686-37-S1-S97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, J. B. 2010. The Australian sheep industry-undergoing transformation. Animal Production Science 50:991–97. doi:10.1071/AN10142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruegg, S. R., P. R. Torgerson, M. G. Doherr, and P. Deplazes. 2014. A comparative study of wool quality of sheep breeds in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 46 (3):873–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlink, T. 2009. Fibre diameter, staple strength, style, handle and curvature. The Australian Wool Education Trust, The University of New England. Accessed July 18, 2019. https://www.woolwise.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Wool-412-512-08-T-03.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Scobie, D. R., A. R. Bray, and N. C. Merrick. 1998. Medullation and average fibre diameter vary independently in the wool of Romney sheep. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 41 (1):101–10. doi:10.1080/00288233.1998.9513292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqi, K. A., 1982. Marketing and grading of wool in Pakistan. Proceeding. International Workshop on Sheep and Wool, Islamabad, Pakistan pp:114–36.
   Google Scholar
• Skarman, S., and E. Nommera. 1954. Seasonal variations in fineness and medullation in Cheviot wool. Annals of the Royal Agricultural College of Sweden 21:367–84.
   Google Scholar
• Sumner, R. M. W., I. M. Cuthbertson, and M. P. Upsdell. 2013. Evaluation of the relative significance of fibre diameter and fibre curvature when processing New Zealand Romcross type wool. Journal of the Textile Institute 104 (11): 1195–1205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swan, A., I. Purvis, and L. Piper. 2008. Genetic parameters for yearling wool production, wool quality and bodyweight traits in fine wool Merino sheep. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48:1168–76. doi:10.1071/EA07425.
   Google Scholar
• Swan, P. 2010. The future of wool as an apparel fibre. International sheep and wool handbook, 766. Nottingham. UK: Nottingham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teasdale, D. C. 1988. Wool testing and marketing handbook. New South Wales, Australia: Kensington. p. 48–61.
   Google Scholar
• Warn, L., K. Geenty, and S. McEachern. 2006. Wool meets meat: Tools for a modern sheep enterprise. Australian Sheep Industry Cooperative Research Centre Conference, Orange, Australia pp. 60–69.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, E. 2003. Textile properties of wool and other fibres. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 51:272–90.
   Google Scholar
• Wuliji, T., K. G. Dodds, J. T. J. Land, R. N. Andrews, and P. R. Turner. 1999. Response to selection for ultrafine Merino sheep in New Zealand: I. Wool production and wool characteristics of ultrafine fibre diameter selected and control Merino yearlings. Livestock Production Science 58 (1):33–44. doi:10.1016/S0301-6226(98)00195-X.
   Google Scholar
• Younas, M., and M. Yaqoob. 2019. Rural livestock production in Pakistan. Accessed June 12. http://www.pakissan.com/english/allabout/livestock/rural.livestock.pakistan.shtml.
   Google Scholar