Comparison of Physico-mechanical Properties of Fibre and Yarn Made of Alpaca, Sheep, and Goat Wool

References

• Ahumada, O., M. Cooca, G. Gentile, E. Martuscelli, and L. D’Orazio. 2004. Uniaxial tensile properties of yarns: Effects of moisture level on the shape of stress-strain curves. Textile Research Journal 74 (1):1001–06. doi:10.1177/004051750407401111.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, P. A. 2003. Measurment of fibres, NIOSH manual of analytical methods 143–161.
   Google Scholar
• Blakeman, N. E., C. J. Lupton, and F. A. Pfeiffer. 1991. Strength and resistance to compression of U.S. wools. Sheep Research Journal 7 (2):4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Czaplicki, Z. 2012. Properties and structure of Polish alpaca wool. Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe 20 (90):8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Fatahi, I. I., and A. Alamdar Yazdi. 2010. Assessment of the relationship between air permeability of woven fabrics and its mechanical properties. Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe 18 (83):68–71.
   Google Scholar
• Galbrait, H. 2010. Biology of fleece: Characterisation of fleece of sheep (Merino), Angora and Cashmere goats, alpacas and llamas, Angora rabbits and other species. Workshop: Use of animal natural fibres for the stimulation of the local small factories and local markets, Warsaw, Poland. 7–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ghali, L., M. T. Halimi, M. B. Hassen, and F. Sakli. 2014. Effect of blending ratio of fibers on the properties of nonwoven fabrics based of alfa fibers. Advances in Materials Physics and Chemistry 4:116–25. doi:10.4236/ampc.2014.46014.
   Google Scholar
• Holman, B. W. B., and A. E. O. Malau-Aduli. 2012. A review of sheep wool quality traits. Annual Review & Research in Biology 2 (1):1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Humphries, M. 2009. Fabric reference (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kowalski, K., B. Włodarczyk, and T. M. Kowalski. 2010. Probabilistic model of dynamic forces in thread in the knitting zone of weft knitting machines, allowing for the heterogeneity of visco-elasticity yarn properties. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe 18 (4):61–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak, A. S., J. Young Lee, D. Hoon Lee, and B. Soo Jeon. 2007. Mechanical properties of wool fiber in the stretch breaking process. Fibers and Polymers 8 (1):130–33. doi:10.1007/BF02908171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeder, J. D., B. A. Mc Gregor, and R. G. Steadman., Eds. 1998. Properties and performance of goat fiber. Australia: Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, C., J. Huston, J. Hruska, B. Craddock, F. Pfeiffer, and W. Polk. 2008. Comparison of three systems concurrent production of high quality mohair and meat from Angora male kids. Small Ruminant Research 74:64–71. doi:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2007.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, B. A., and K. L. Butler. 2004. Sources of variation in fibre diameter attributes of Australian alpacas and implications for fleece evaluation and animal selection. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55:433–42. doi:10.1071/AR03073.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, B. A., K. L. Butler, and M. B. Ferguson. 2013. Variation in mohair staple length over the lifetime of Angora goats. Animal Production Science 53 (6):479–86. doi:10.1071/AN12288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montes, M., I. Quicaño, R. Quispe, E. Quispe, and L. Alfonso. 2008. Quality characteristics of Huacaya alpaca fibre produced in the Peruvian Andean Plateau region of Huancavelica. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 6 (1):33–38. doi:10.5424/sjar/2008061-5258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustata, A. 2010. Mechanical behaviour in the wet and dry stage of Romanian yarns made from flax and hemp. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe 80 (3):7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu, H., and M. Ge. 2010. Evaluation of the significance of processing parameters for the characteristics of interlaced yarn. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe 4 (81):26–28.
   Google Scholar
• Ragaišiene, A., and J. Rusinavičiūte. 2012. Comparative investigation of mechanical indices of sheep’s wool and dog hair fibre. Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe 20 (94):43–47.
   Google Scholar
• Rincón, C. G., and J. M. Gómez Soberón. 2011. Ingenieria de la edificacion proyecto final degrado aplicacion de criterios de la bioconstruccion enuna vivienda unifamiliar entre medianeras y sus implicaciones constructivas. Universidad de Politecnica de Catalunya. https://upcommons.upc.edu/bitstream/handle/2099.1/16135/RESUMENPFGOK.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
   Google Scholar
• Rutkowski, J. 2011. Tenacity of cotton yarns joined during the rewinding process. Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe 19 (84):34–36.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, A., and S. Pant. 2013. Studies on camel hair - merino wool blended knitted fabrics. Indian Journal of Fibre & Textile Research 38:317–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stepanovic, J., D. Radivojevic, V. Petrovic, and S. Golubovic. 2010. Analysis of the breaking characteristics of twisted yarns. Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe 18 (78):36–40.
   Google Scholar
• Wuliji, T., G. Davis, K. Dodds, P. Turner, R. Andrews, and G. Bruce. 1999. Production performance, repeatability and heritability estimates for live weight, fleece weight and fiber characteristics of alpacas in New Zealand. Small Ruminant Research 37 (3):189–201. doi:10.1016/S0921-4488(00)00127-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Żak, K., and M. Kobielarz. 2010. The mechanical properties of fibres and yarns in different group of animals, 9th youth symposium on experimental solid mechanics, Trieste, Italy, 219–21.
   Google Scholar