Development and Characterization of Self -assembled Bacterial Cellulose Nonwoven Film

References

• Borysiak, S., and J. Garbarczyk. 2003. Applying the WAXS method to estimate the supermolecular structure of cellulose fibres after mercerization. Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe 11 (5):104–06.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawla, P. R., I. B. Bajaj, S. A. Survase, and R. S. Singhal. 2009. Microbial cellulose: Fermentative production and applications. Food Technology Biotechnology 47 (2):107–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Z., R. Yang, and X. Liu. 2017. Production of bacterial cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum through utilizing acetic acid hydrolysate of bagasse as low-cost carbon source. BioResources 12 (1):1190–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciolacu, D., F. Ciolacu, and V. I. Popa. 2011. Amorphous cellulose – structure and characterization. Cellulose Chemistry and Technology 45:13–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahman, Y. 2009. Nanostructured biomaterials and biocomposites from bacterial cellulose nanofibers. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 9:5105–22. doi:10.1166/jnn.2009.1466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dayal, M. S., N. Goswami, A. Sahai, V. Jain, G. Mathur, and A. Mathur. 2013. Effect of media components on cell growth and bacterial cellulose production from Acetobacter aceti MTCC 2623. Carbohydrate Polymers 94:12–16. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontana, J.D., V.C. Franco, S.J. Desouza, I.N. Lyra, and A.M. DeSouza. 1991. Nature of plant stimulators in the production of acetobacter xylinum (tea fungus) biofilm used in skin therapy. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 28 28 28-29 (9 1):341–351. doi:10.1007/BF02922613.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gao, C., Y. Wan, C. Yang, K. Dai, T. Tang, H. Luo, and J. Wang. 2011. Preparation and characterization of bacterial cellulose sponge with hierarchical pore structure as tissue engineering scaffold. Journal of Porous Materials 18:139–45. doi:10.1007/s10934-010-9364-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatenholm, P., and D. Klemm. 2010. Bacterial nanocellulose as a renewable material for biomedical applications. Mrs Bulletin 35 (3):208–13. doi:10.1557/mrs2010.653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gayathry, G., and G. Gopalaswamy. 2014. Production and characterisation of microbial cellulosic fibre from Acetobacter xylinum. Indian Journal of Fibre & Textile Research 39:93–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, J., K. V. Ramana, S. N. Sabapathy, J. H. Jagannath, and A. S. Bawa. 2005. Characterization of chemically treated bacterial (Acetobacter xylinum) biopolymer: Some thermo-mechanical properties. International. Journal of Biological Macro Molecules 37 (4):189–94. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2005.10.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guhados, G., W. Wan, and J. L. Hutter. 2005. Measurement of the elastic modulus of single bacterial cellulose fibers using atomic force microscopy. Langmuir 21:6642–46. doi:10.1021/la0504311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, E. A., H. M. Abdelhady, S. S. Abd El-Salam, and S. M. Abdulla. 2015. The characterization of bacterial cellulose produced by Acetobacter xylinum and komgataeibacter saccharovorans under optimized fermentation conditions. British Microbiology Research Journal 9 (3):1–13. doi:10.9734/BMRJ/2015/18223.
   Google Scholar
• Hima Bindu, T. V. L., M. Vidyavathi, K. Kavitha, T. P. Sastry, and R. V. Suresh Kumar. 2010. Preparation and evaluation of chitosan-gelatin composite films for wound healing activity. Trends Biomaterial and Artificial Organs 24 (3):123–30.
   Google Scholar
• Horii, F., H. Yamamoto, and A. Hirai. 1997. Micro structural analysis of microfibrils of bacterial cellulose. Macromolecular Symposia 120:197–205. doi:10.1002/masy.19971200120.
   Google Scholar
• Jia, Y., X. Wang, M. Huo, X. Zhai, F. Li, and C. Zhong. 2017. Preparation and characterization of a novel bacterial cellulose/chitosan bio-hydrogel. Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology 7:1–8. doi:10.1177/1847980417707172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaewnopparat, S., K. Sansernluk, and D. Faroongsarng. 2008. Behavior of freezable bound water in the bacterial cellulose produced by Acetobacter xylinum: An approach using thermoporosimetry. American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists 9:701–07.
   Google Scholar
• Keshk, S., and K. Sameshima. 2006. Influence of lignosulfonate on crystal structure and productivity of bacterial cellulose in a static culture. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 40 (1):4–8. doi:10.1016/j.enzmictec.2006.07.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lina, W. C., C. C. Lienb, H. J. Yehb, C. M. Yub, and S. H. Hsua. 2013. Bacterial cellulose and bacterial cellulose–Chitosan membranes for wound dressing applications. Carbohydrate Polymers 94:603–11. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohite, B. V., and S. V. Patil. 2014. Physical, structural, mechanical and thermal characterization of bacterial cellulose by G. hansenii NCIM 2529. Carbohydrate Polymers 106:132–41. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.02.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, F. M. C., and P. W. Wang. 2016. Natural self-grown fashion from bacterial cellulose: A paradigm shift design approach in fashion creation. The Design Journal 19 (6):837–55. doi:10.1080/14606925.2016.1208388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niwa, M. 1968. Water vapor permeability of underwear. Journal of Japan Research Association Textile End-Uses 9:446.
   Google Scholar
• Phisalaphong, M., and N. Jatupaiboon. 2008. Biosynthesis and characterization of bacteria cellulose–chitosan film. Carbohydrate Polymers 74:482–488. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiss, J. 1994. Influence of different sugars on the metabolism of the tea fungus. Journal of Food Examination and Research 198 (3):258–61.
   Google Scholar
• Roma, M., and M. T. Winter. 2004. Effect of sulfate groups from sulfonic acid hydrolysis on the thermal degradation behaviour of bacterial cellulose. Biomacromolecules 5:1671–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slusarska, B. S., S. Presler, and D. Danielewicz. 2008. Characterization of bacterial cellulose obtained from Acetobacter xylinum for application in papermaking. Fibres and Textile in Eastern Europe 16 (4):108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, W., S. Jia, Y. Jia, and H. Yang. 2010. The influence of fermentation conditions and post-treatment methods on porosity of bacterial cellulose membrane. World Journal Microbiology Biotechnology 26:125–31. doi:10.1007/s11274-009-0151-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, B. 2011. The do’s and don’ts of wettability characterization in textiles. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology 25 (16):2005–21. doi:10.1163/016942410X544811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ul-Islam, M., T. Khan, and J. K. Park. 2012. Water holding and release properties of bacterial cellulose obtained by in situ and ex situ modification. Carbohydrate Polymers 88 (2):596–603. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usha Rani, M., K. Udayasankar, and K. A. Anu Appaiah. 2011. Properties of bacterial cellulose produced in grape medium by native isolate gluconacetobacter Sp. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 120:2835–41. doi:10.1002/app.33307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandamme, E. J., S. De Baets, A. Vanbaelen, K. Joris, and P. DeWulf. 1998. Improved production of bacterial cellulose and its application potential. Polymer Degradation and Stability 59:93–99. doi:10.1016/S0141-3910(97)00185-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wada, M., J. Suciyama, and T. Okano. 1993. Native celluloses on the basis of two crystalline phase (la/1ß) system. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 49:1491–96. doi:10.1002/app.1993.070490817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wada, M., and T. Okano. 2001. Localization of Iα and Iβ phases in algal cellulose revealed by acid treatments. Cellulose 8:183–88. doi:10.1023/A:1013196220602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wada, M., T. Okano, and J. Sugiyama. 2001. Allomorphs of native crystalline cellulose I evaluated by two equatorial d-spacings. Journal of Wood Science 47:124–28. doi:10.1007/BF00780560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S. S., Y. H. Han, Y. X. Ye, X. X. Shi, P. Xiang, D. L. Chen, and M. Li. 2017. Physicochemical characterization of high-quality bacterial cellulose produced by Komagataeibacter sp. strain W1 and identification of the associated genes in bacterial cellulose production. RSC Advance 7:45145–55. doi:10.1039/C7RA08391B.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wonga, S-S.., S. Kasapis, and Y.M. Tan. 2009. Bacterial and plant cellulose modification using ultrasound irradiation. Carbohydrate Polymers 77:280–287. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.12.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yassine, F., N. Bassil, A. Chokr, A. E. Samrani, A. Serghei, G. Boiteux, and M. E. Tahchi. 2016. Two-step formation mechanism of Acetobacter cellulosic biofilm: Synthesis of sparse and compact cellulose. Cellulose 23:1087–100. doi:10.1007/s10570-016-0884-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar