Enhancing the Bearing Capacity of Rigid Footing Using Limited Life Kenaf Geotextile Reinforcement

References

• Artidteang, S., D. Bergado, T. Tanchaisawat, and J. Saowapakpiboon. 2012. Investigation of tensile and soil-geotextile interface strength of kenaf woven limited life geotextiles (LLGs). Lowland Technology International. International Association of Lowland Technology 14 (2):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D4595-11. 2011. Standard test method for tensile properties of geotextiles by the wide-width strip method. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• Bazne, M. O., F. Vahedifard, and S. Shahrokhabadi. 2014. The effect of geonet reinforcement on bearing capacity of low-compacted soft clay. Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology 2:47–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-014-0017-0.
   Google Scholar
• Bergado, D. T., P. V. Long, and B. S. Murthy. 2002. A case study of geotextile-reinforced embankment on soft ground. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 20:343–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(02)00032-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BS 1377-2. 1990. Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes: Classification tests. London, United Kingdom: British Standards Institution.
   Google Scholar
• BS 1377-5. 1990. Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes. Compressibility, permeability and durability tests. London, United Kingdom: British Standards Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Chaiyaput, S., D. T. Bergado, and S. Artidteang. 2014. Measured and simulated results of a Kenaf Limited Life Geosynthetics (LLGs) reinforced test embankment on soft clay. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 42:39–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2013.12.006.
   Google Scholar
• Cicek, E., E. Guler, and T. Yetimoglu. 2015. Effect of reinforcement length for different geosynthetic reinforcements on strip footing on sand soil. Soils and Foundations 55:661–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2015.06.001.
   Google Scholar
• Effendi, R. (2007). Modelling of the settlement interaction of neighbouring buildings on soft ground. PhD Thesis, University of Sheffield.
   Google Scholar
• Emmett, K. (2007). Movement of soil and groundwater around piles in layered ground. PhD Thesis, University of Sheffield.
   Google Scholar
• Gamal, A. M., Belal, A. M. & Elsoud, S. 2016. Numerical Modeling of Geogrid Reinforced Soil Bed under Strip Footings Using Finite Element Analysis. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 10(1):1–8
   Google Scholar
• Head, K. 1982. Manual of soil laboratory testing: Permeability, shear strength and compressibility tests. London, United Kingdom: Pentech Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horpibulsuk, S., N. Yangsukaseam, A. Chinkulkijniwat, and Y. J. Du. 2011. Compressibility and permeability of Bangkok clay compared with kaolinite and bentonite. Applied Clay Science 52:150–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2011.02.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horpibulsuk, S., S. Shibuya, K. Fuenkajorn, and W. Katkan. 2007. Assessment of engineering properties of Bangkok clay. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 44 (2):173–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/t06-101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur, H., G. Singh, and K. Singh. 2017. Numerical analysis of multilayer reinforced pond ash slope. International Journal of Advanced Research and Development 2:598–601.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., C. Solanki, and B. D. Wabhitkar. 2015. Study on embedded square footing resting on geotextile reinforced sand. International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering 5:243–51.
   Google Scholar
• Mandal, J., and H. Sah. 1992. Bearing capacity tests on geogrid-reinforced clay. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 11 (3):327–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-1144(92)90007-W.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal, J., and H. Sah. 1993. Model square footing on geotextile reinforced clay foundation. Transactions of the institution of engineers, Australia. Civil Engineering 35 (2):165–69.
   Google Scholar
• Mathew, A., and A. Sasikumar. 2017. Performance of soft soil reinforced with bamboo and geonet. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) 4:11.
   Google Scholar
• Moseley, V. J. (1998). Effects of smear during vertical penetration of layered soils. PhD Thesis, University of Sheffield.
   Google Scholar
• Naeini, S., B. K. Rabe, and E. Mahmoodi. 2012. Bearing capacity and settlement of strip footing on geosynthetic reinforced clayey slopes. Journal of Central South University 19 (4):1116–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noorzad, R., and E. Manavirad. 2014. Bearing capacity of two close strip footings on soft clay reinforced with geotextile. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 7 (2):623–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-012-0771-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omar, M., B. Das, V. Puri, and S. Yen. 1993. Ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundations on sand with geogrid reinforcement. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 30:545–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/t93-046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, F. F. R., J. P. S. de Almeida, F. C. R. Bezerra, and C. J. de Araújo. (2013). Simultaneous measurement of thermophysical properties of shape memory alloys using a periodic temperature field. 22nd International Congress of Mechanical Engineering (COBEM), Ribeirao Preto, Brazil, 7506–13.
   Google Scholar
• Potts, D. M., and L. Zdravkovic. 2001. Finite element analysis in geotechnical engineering: Application. London, United Kingdom: Thomas Telford Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rajagopal, K., and S. Ramakrishna. (2009). Coir geotextiles as separation and filtration layer for low intensity road bases, Indian Geotechnical Conference (IGC-2009). Allied Publishers, Guntur, India, 941–46.
   Google Scholar
• Ranganathan., S. R. 1994. Development of potential jute geotextiles. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 13:6–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-1144(94)90006-X.
   Google Scholar
• Rashid, A. S. A., M. Gharehzadeh Shirazi, H. Mohamad, and F. Sahdi. 2017. Bearing capacity of sandy soil treated by Kenaf fibre geotextile. Environmental Earth Sciences 76:431. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6762-y.
   Google Scholar
• Rashid, A. S. A., M. G. Shirazi, R. Nazir, H. Mohamad, F. Sahdi, and S. Horpibulsuk. 2020. Bearing capacity performance of soft cohesive soil treated by kenaf limited life geotextile. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology , 38(6): 755-760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakti, J. P., and B. M. Das. 1987. Model tests for strip foundation on clay reinforced with geotextile layers. Transportation Research Record 1153: 40-45.
   Google Scholar
• Sayeed, M. A., P. Shubhra, and M. M. Sazzad. 2012. Plane strain behavior of granular materials under extremely low to high confining pressures. Global Engineers & Technologist Review 2(1): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Sheeran, D., and R. Krizek. 1971. Preparation of homogeneous soil samples by slurry consolidation. Journal Mater. 6:356–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirazi, M. G., A. S. A. Rashid, R. Nazir, A. H. Abdul Rashid, H. Moayedi, S. Horpibulsuk, and W. Samingthong. 2020. Sustainable soil bearing capacity improvement using natural limited life geotextile reinforcement—A review. Minerals 10 (5):479. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/min10050479.
   Google Scholar
• Shirazi M.G., Rashid A.S.A., Nazir R., Rashid A.H.A., Kassim A., Horpibulsuk S. (2019).Investigation of tensile strength on alkaline treated and untreated kenaf geotextile under dry and wet conditions. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 47(4): 522-529.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegel, R., and D. Meadows. 2010. Green building materials: A guide to product selection and specification. 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Sridhar, R., and M. T. Prathapkumar. 2017. Behaviour of model footing resting on sand reinforced with number of layers of coir geotextile. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions 2:50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-017-0099-y.
   Google Scholar
• Subaida, E., S. Chandrakaran, and N. Sankar. 2009. Laboratory performance of unpaved roads reinforced with woven coir geotextiles. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 27 (3):204–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suddeepong, A., N. Sari, S. Horpibulsuk, C. Chinkulkijniwat, and A. Arulrajah. 2018. Interface shear behaviors between recycled concrete aggregate and geogrid for pavement applications. International Journal of Pavement Engineering 21 (2):228–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2018.1453609.
   Google Scholar
• Suksiripattanapong, C., A. Chinkulkijniwat, S. Horpibulsuk, C. Rujikiatkamjorn, and T. Tangsuttinon. 2012. Numerical analysis of bearing reinforcement earth (BRE) wall. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 32:28–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2012.01.002.
   Google Scholar
• Tanchaisawat, T., D. T. Bergado, and S. Artidteang (2013). Measured and simulated interactions between Kenaf geogrid limited life geosynthetics (LLGs) and silty sand backfill. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris, 821–24.
   Google Scholar