In-situ Production and Collection of Bacterial Cellulose on Jute and Flax Mats by Static Cultivation

References

• Ashori, A., S. Sheykhnazari, T. Tabarsa, A. Shakeri, and M. Golalipour. 2012. Bacterial cellulose/silica nanocomposites: preparation and characterization. Carbohydrate Polymers 90 (1):413–18. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atwa, N. A., A. I. El-Diwany, H. El-Saied, and A. F. Basta. 2015. Improvement in bacterial cellulose production using Gluconacetobacter xylinus ATCC 10245 and characterization of the cellulose pellicles produced. Egyptian Pharmaceutical Journal 14 (2):123–29. doi:10.4103/1687-4315.161286.
   Google Scholar
• Belay, M., R. K. Nagarale, and V. Verma. 2017. Preparation and characterization of graphene-agar and graphene oxide-agar composites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 134 (33):1–12. doi:10.1002/app.45085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A. F. S., F. C. G. Almeida, G. M. Vinhas, and L. A. Sarubbo. 2017. Production of bacterial cellulose by gluconacetobacter hansenii using corn steep liquor as nutrient sources. Frontiers in Microbiology 8:1–12. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.02027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontana, J. D., A. M. de Souza, C. K. Fontana, I. L. Torriani, J. C. Moreschi, B. J. Gallotti, S. J. de Souza, G. P. Narcisco, J. A. Bichara, and L. F. Farah. 1991. Acetobacter cellulose pellicle as a temporary skin substitute. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 24–25:253–64. doi:10.1007/BF02920250
   Google Scholar
• Fontana, J. D., V. C. Franco, S. J. de Souza, I. N. Lyra, and A. M. de Souza. 1991. Nature of plant stimulators in the production of Acetobacter xylinum (“tea fungus”) biofilm used in skin therapy. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 28-29 (1):341–51. doi:10.1007/BF02922613.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gunduz, G., E. Erbas Kiziltas, A. Kiziltas, A. Gencer, D. Aydemir, and N. Asik. 2019. Production of bacterial cellulose fibers in the presence of effective microorganism. Journal of Natural Fibers 16 (4):567–75. doi:10.1080/15440478.2018.1428847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iguchi, M., S. Yamanaka, and A. Budhiono. 2000. Bacterial cellulose-a masterpiece of nature’s arts. Journal of Materials Science 35 (2):261–70. doi:10.1023/A:1004775229149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, V. F., A. Mechoor, R. K. Rathnan, and P. A. Soloman. 2013. Production of bacterial cellulose and cellulase enzyme using wastepaper hydrolysate and coconut water as dual cheap carbon sources. ICMF 2013. Proceedings of International Conference on Materials for the Future - Innovative Materials, Processes, Products and Applications, Kerala, India.pp. 674–676.
   Google Scholar
• Keshk, S. M. A. S. 2014. Bacterial cellulose production and its industrial applications. Journal of Bioprocessing & Biotechniques 4 (2):150. doi:10.4172/2155-9821.1000150.
   Google Scholar
• Kojima, Y., A. Seto, N. Tonouchi, T. Tsuchida, and F. Yoshinaga. 1997. High rate production in static culture of bacterial cellulose from sucrose by a newly isolated acetobacter strain. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry 61 (9):1585–86. doi:10.1271/bbb.61.1585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouda, T., T. Naritomi, H. Yano, and F. Yoshinaga. 1998. Inhibitory effect of carbon dioxide on bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter in agitated culture. Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering 85 (3):318–21. doi:10.1016/S0922-338X(97)85682-6.
   Google Scholar
• Kubvosky, I., D. Kacikova, and F. Kacik. 2020. Structural changes of oak wood main components caused by thermal modification. Polymers 12 (2), pp 1-12, Article id 485. doi:10.3390/polym12020485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, R., P. Kumari, S. Priyaragini, and K. D. Kumar. 2019. Fabrication of poly lactic acid incorporated bacterial cellulose adhered flax fabric biocomposites. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 21:101277. doi:10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. C., and X. Zhao. 1999. Effects of mixing conditions on the production of microbial cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering 4 (1):41–45. doi:10.1007/BF02931912.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. T., M. W. Kim, Y. S. Song, T. J. Kang, and J. R. Youn. 2010. Mechanical properties of denim fabric reinforced poly(lactic acid). Fibers and Polymers 11 (1):60–66. doi:10.1007/s12221-010-0060-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathur, G., A. Dua, A. R. Das, H. Kaur, S. Kukal, P. Sharma, N. Goswami, A. Sahai, and A. Mathur. 2015. Bacteria cellulose: biopolymer from gluconacetobacter xylinus. Gluconacetobacterxylinus. Macromolecular Symposia 347 (1):27–31. doi:10.1002/masy.201400041.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty, A. K., M. Misra, and L. T. Drzal. 2002. Sustainable bio-composites from renewable resources: Opportunities and challenges in the green materials world. Journal of Polymers and the Environment 10 (1/2):19–26. doi:10.1023/A:1021013921916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina-Ramírez, C., M. Castro, M. Osorio, M. Torres-Taborda, B. Gómez, R. Zuluaga, C. Gómez, P. Gañán, O. J. Rojas, and C. Castro. 2017. Effect of different carbon sources on bacterial nanocellulose production and structure using the low ph resistant strain komagataeibacter medellinensis. Komagataeibacter Medellinensis. Materials 10 (6):639. doi:10.3390/ma10060639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osorio, M. A., D. Estrepo, J. A. Elásquez-Cock, R. O. Uluaga, U. Ontoya, O. Ojas, P. F. Añán, D. Arin, and C. I. Astro. 2014. Synthesis of thermoplastic starch-bacterial cellulose nanocomposites via in situ fermentation. Journal of Brazilian Chemical Society 25:1607–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panaitescu, D. M., A. N. Frone, and I. Chiulan. 2016a. Nanostructured biocomposites from aliphatic polyesters and bacterial cellulose. Industrial Crops and Products 93:251–66. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panaitescu, D. M., A. N. Frone, I. Chiulan, A. Casarica, C. A. Nicolae, M. Ghiurea, R. Trusca, and C. M. Damian. 2016b. Structural and morphological characterization of bacterial cellulose nano-reinforcements prepared by mechanical route. Materials & Design 110:790–801. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2016.08.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panaitescu, D. M., A. N. Frone, I. Chiulan, R. A. Gabor, I. C. Spataru, and A. Casarica. 2017. Biocomposites from polylactic acid and bacterial cellulose nanofibers obtained by mechanical treatment. BioResources 12:662–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pommet, M., J. Juntaro, Y. Heng, A. Mantalaris, A. A. F. Lee, K. Wilson, G. Kalinka, M. S. P. Shaffer, and A. Bismarck. 2008. Surface modification of natural fibers using bacteria: depositing bacterial cellulose onto natural fibers to create hierarchical fiber reinforced nanocomposites. Biomacromolecules 9 (6):1643–51. doi:10.1021/bm800169g.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashid, T., C. F. Kait, and T. Murugesan. 2016. A “fourier transformed infrared” compound study of lignin recovered from a formic acid process. Procedia Engineering 148:1312–19. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.547.
   Google Scholar
• Schramm, M., and S. Hestrin. 1954. Factors affecting Production of Cellulose at the Air/ Liquid Interface of a Culture of Acetobacter xylinum. Journal of General Microbiology 11 (1):123–29. doi:10.1099/00221287-11-1-123.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shirai, A., M. Takahashi, H. Kaneko, S.-I. Nishimura, M. Ogawa, N. Nishi, and S. Tokura. 1994. Biosynthesis of a novel polysaccharide by Acetobacter xylinum. Acetobacter Xylinum. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 16 (6):297–300. doi:10.1016/0141-8130(94)90059-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tercjak, A., J. Gutierrez, H. S. Barud, R. R. Domeneguetti, and S. J. L. Ribeiro. 2015. Nano- and Macroscale Structural and Mechanical Properties of in Situ Synthesized Bacterial Cellulose/PEO-b-PPO-b-PEO Biocomposites. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 7 (7):4142–50. doi:10.1021/am508273x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torriani, L., J. C. Moreschi, B. J. Gallotti, S. J. de Souza, G. P.Narcisco, J. A.Bichara, and L. F. X. Farah. 1990. Acetobacter cellulose pellicle as temporary skin substitute. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 24: 253–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuchida, T., and F. Yoshinaga. 1997. Production of bacterial cellulose by agitation culture systems. Pure and Applied Chemistry 69 (11):2453–58. doi:10.1351/pac199769112453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velásquez-Cock, J., E. Ramírez, S. Betancourt, J.-L. Putaux, M. Osorio, C. Castro, P. Gañán, and R. Zuluaga. 2014. Influence of the acid type in the production of chitosan films reinforced with bacterial nanocellulose. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 69:208–13. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.05.040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viet, D. Q., and V. D. S. Tho. 2017. Study on characteristics of acacia wood by FTIR and thermogravimetric analysis. Vietnam Journal of Chemistry 55:259–64.
   Google Scholar
• Zywicka, A., D. Peitler, R. Rakoczy, M. Konopacki, M. Kordas, and K. Fijałkowski. 2015. The effect of different agitation modes on bacterial cellulose synthesis by Gluconacetobacterxylinus strains. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Zootechnica 14:137–50.
   Google Scholar