Extraction of Nanofibrillated Cellulose from Water Hyacinth Using a High Speed Homogenizer

References

• Abdul Khalil, H. P. S., Y. Davoudpour, M. N. Islam, A. Mustapha, K. Sudesh, R. Dungani, and M. Jawaid. 2014. Production and modification of nanofibrillated cellulose using various mechanical processes: A review. Carbohydrate Polymers 99:649–65. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.08.069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almgren, K. M., E. K. Gamstedt, P. Nygard, F. Malmberg, J. Lindblad, and M. Lindstrom. 2009. Role of fibre-fibre and fibre-matrix adhesion in stress transfer in composites made from resin-impregnated paper sheets. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 29 (5):551–57. doi:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alzate-Arbeláez, A. F., E. Dorta, C. López-Alarcón, F. B. Cortés, and B. A. Rojano. 2019. Immobilization of Andean berry (Vaccinium meridionale) polyphenols on nanocellulose isolated from banana residues: A natural food additive with antioxidant properties. Food Chemistry 294 (1):503–17. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.05.085.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amiralian, N., P. K. Annamalai, P. Memmott, and D. J. Martin. 2015. Isolation of cellulose nanofibrils from Triodia pungens via different mechanical methods. Cellulose 22 (4):2483–98. doi:10.1007/s10570-015-0688-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arana-Cuenca, A., X. Tovar-Jiménez, E. Favela-Torres, I. Perraud-Gaime, A. E. González-Becerra, A. Martínez, C. L. Moss-Acosta, Y. Mercado-Flores, and A. Téllez-Jurado. 2019. Use of water hyacinth as a substrate for the production of filamentous fungal hydrolytic enzymes in solid-state fermentation. 3 Biotech 9 (1):21. doi:10.1007/s13205-018-1529-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Asrofi, M., H. Abral, A. Kasim, A. Pratoto, M. Mahardika, and F. Hafizulhaq. 2018. Mechanical properties of a water hyacinth nanofiber cellulose reinforced thermoplastic starch bionanocomposite: Effect of ultrasonic vibration during processing. Fibers 6 (2):40. doi:10.3390/fib6020040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berglund, L., M. Noël, Y. Aitomäki, T. Öman, and K. Oksman. 2016. Production potential of cellulose nanofibers from industrial residues: Efficiency and nanofiber characteristics. Industrial Crops and Products 92:84–92. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bian, H., Y. Gao, R. Wang, Z. Liu, W. Wu, and H. Dai. 2018. Contribution of lignin to the surface structure and physical performance of cellulose nanofibrils film. Cellulose 25 (2):1309–18. doi:10.1007/s10570-018-1658-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boufi, S., and A. Chaker. 2016. Easy production of cellulose nanofibrils from corn stalk by a conventional high speed blender. Industrial Crops and Products 93:39–47. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.05.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brebu, M., and C. Vasile. 2010. Thermal degradation of lignin – A review. Cellulose Chemistry Technology 44 (9):353–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronzato, G. R. F., S. M. Ziegler, R. C. Silva, I. Cesarino, and A. L. Leão. 2017. Characterization of the pre-treated biomass of Eichhornia crassipes (water hyacinth) for the second generation ethanol production. Molecular Crystals and Liquid Crystals 655 (1):224–35. doi:10.1080/15421406.2017.1360696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronzato, G. R. F., S. M. Ziegler, R. D. C. D. Silva, I. Cesarino, and A. L. Leão. 2019. Water hyacinth second-generation ethanol production: A mitigation alternative for an environmental problem. Journal of Natural Fibers 16 (8):1201–08. doi:10.1080/15440478.2018.1458000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaker, A., P. Mutjé, M. R. Vilar, and S. Boufi. 2014. Agriculture crop residues as a source for the production of nanofibrillated cellulose with low energy demand. Cellulose 21 (6):4247–59. doi:10.1007/s10570-014-0454-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., Y. Wang, Q. Wu, Z. Wan, D. Li, and Y. Jin. 2020. Highly strong and flexible composite hydrogel reinforced by aligned wood cellulose skeleton via alkali treatment for muscle-like sensors. Chemical Engineering Journal 400:125876. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.125876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H., X. Wang, J. J. Bozell, X. Feng, J. Huang, Q. Li, A. J. Ragauskas, S. Wang, and C. Mei. 2019. Effect of solvent fractionation pretreatment on energy consumption of cellulose nanofabrication from switchgrass. Journal of Materials Science 54 (10):8010–22. doi:10.1007/s10853-019-03413-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W. S., H. P. Yu, Y. X. Liu, Y. F. Hai, M. X. Zhang, and P. Chen. 2011. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from four plant cellulose fibers using a chemical-ultrasonic process. Cellulose 18 (2):433–42. doi:10.1007/s10570-011-9497-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherian, B. M., A. L. Leão, S. F. De Souza, S. Thomas, L. A. Pothan, and M. Kottaisamy. 2010. Isolation of nanocellulose from pineapple leaf fibres by steam explosion. Carbohydrate Polymers 81 (3):720–25. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.03.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chirayil, C. J., J. Joy, L. Mathew, M. Mozetic, J. Koetz, and S. Thomas. 2014. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibrils from Helicteres isora plant. Industrial Crops and Products 59:27–34. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.04.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciftci, D., R. A. Flores, and M. D. A. Saldaña. 2018. Cellulose fiber isolation and characterization from sweet blue lupin hull and canola straw. Journal of Environmental Polymer Degradation 26 (7):2773–81. doi:10.1007/s10924-017-1164-5.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, S., I. Rugiero, C. Larenas Uria, P. Pedrini, and E. Tamburini. 2018. Lignin degradation efficiency of chemical pre-treatments on banana rachis destined to bioethanol production. Biomolecules 8 (4):141. doi:10.3390/biom8040141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deepa, B., E. Abraham, B. M. Cherian, A. Bismarck, J. J. Blaker, L. A. Pothan, A. L. Leao, S. F. De Souza, and M. Kottaisamy. 2011. Structure, morphology and thermal characteristics of banana nano fibers obtained by steam explosion. Bioresource Technology 102 (2):1988–97. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado-Aguilar, M., I. González, Q. Tarrés, M. À. Pèlach, M. Alcalà, and P. Mutjé. 2016. The key role of lignin in the production of low-cost lignocellulosic nanofibres for papermaking applications. Industrial Crops and Products 86:295–300. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.04.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djafari Petroudy, S. R. 2017. 3 - Physical and mechanical properties of natural fibers. In Advanced High Strength Natural Fibre Composites in Construction, ed. F. Fan, 59–83. Woodhead Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ehman, N. V., F. E. Felissia, Q. Tarrés, M. E. Vallejos, M. Delgado-Aguilar, P. Mutjé, and M. C. Area. 2020. Effect of nanofiber addition on the physical–mechanical properties of chemimechanical pulp handsheets for packaging. Cellulose. doi:10.1007/s10570-020-03207-5.
   Google Scholar
• Eichhorn, S. J., and W. W. Sampson. 2005. Statistical geometry of pores and statistics of porous nanofibrous assemblies. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 2 (4):309–18. doi:10.1098/rsif.2005.0039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Achaby, M., M. Ruesgas-Ramón, N.-E. H. Fayoud, M. C. Figueroa-Espinoza, V. Trabadelo, K. Draoui, and H. Ben Youcef. 2019. Bio-sourced porous cellulose microfibrils from coffee pulp for wastewater treatment. Cellulose 26 (6):3873–89. doi:10.1007/s10570-019-02344-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fareez, I. M., N. A. Ibrahim, W. Yaacob, N. A. M. Razali, A. H. Jasni, and F. A. Aziz. 2018. Characteristics of cellulose extracted from Josapine pineapple leaf fibre after alkali treatment followed by extensive bleaching. Cellulose 25 (8):4407–21. doi:10.1007/s10570-018-1878-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco, T. S., D. C. Potulski, L. C. Viana, E. Forville, A. S. De Andrade, and G. I. B. De Muniz. 2019. Nanocellulose obtained from residues of peach palm extraction (Bactris gasipaes). Carbohydrate Polymers 218:8–19. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.04.035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, A. D., and M. Santiago Cintrón. 2013. Cellulose polymorphy, crystallite size, and the Segal crystallinity index. Cellulose 20 (1):583–88. doi:10.1007/s10570-012-9833-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guna, V., M. Ilangovan, M. G. Anantha Prasad, and N. Reddy. 2017. Water hyacinth: A unique source for sustainable materials and products. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 5 (6):4478–90. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao, W., M. Wang, F. Zhou, H. Luo, X. Xie, F. Luo, and R. Cha. 2020. A review on nanocellulose as a lightweight filler of polyolefin composites. Carbohydrate Polymers 243::116466. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksson, M., L. A. Berglund, P. Isaksson, T. Lindstrom, and T. Nishino. 2008. Cellulose nanopaper structures of high toughness. Biomacromolecules 9 (6):1579–85. doi:10.1021/bm800038n.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Y., L. Tang, Q. Lu, S. Wang, X. Chen, and B. Huang. 2014. Preparation of cellulose nanocrystals and carboxylated cellulose nanocrystals from borer powder of bamboo. Cellulose 21 (3):1611–18. doi:10.1007/s10570-014-0236-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isogai, A., T. Saito, and H. Fukuzumi. 2011. TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. Nanoscale 71 (3):71–85. doi:10.1039/C0NR00583E.
   Google Scholar
• Jain, D., H. Sekhon, T. K. Bera, and R. Jain. 2020. Comparison of different hydrophobic treatments for the durability improvement of palmyra natural fiber composites under hydrothermal ageing environments. Journal of Natural Fibers 17 (11):1668–82. doi:10.1080/15440478.2019.1588828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., X. Liu, Q. Yang, X. Song, C. Qin, S. Wang, and K. Li. 2019. Effects of residual lignin on composition, structure and properties of mechanically defibrillated cellulose fibrils and films. Cellulose 26 (3):1–17. doi:10.1007/s10570-018-02229-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johar, N., I. Ahmad, and A. Dufresne. 2012. Extraction, preparation and characterization of cellulose fibres and nanocrystals from rice husk. Industrial Crops and Products 37 (1):93–99. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.12.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kępa, K., C. M. Chaléat, N. Amiralian, W. Batchelor, L. Grøndahl, and D. J. Martin. 2019. Evaluation of properties and specific energy consumption of spinifex-derived lignocellulose fibers produced using different mechanical processes. Cellulose 26 (11):6555–69. doi:10.1007/s10570-019-02567-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khawas, P., and S. C. Deka. 2016. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from culinary banana peel using high-intensity ultrasonication combined with chemical treatment. Carbohydrate Polymers 137:608–16. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.11.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, R., N. R. J. Hynes, P. Senthamaraikannan, S. Saravanakumar, and M. R. Sanjay. 2018. Physicochemical and thermal properties of ceiba pentandra bark fiber. Journal of Natural Fibers 15 (6):822–29. doi:10.1080/15440478.2017.1369208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, V., P. Pathak, and N. K. Bhardwaj. 2020. Facile chemo-refining approach for production of micro-nanofibrillated cellulose from bleached mixed hardwood pulp to improve paper quality. Carbohydrate Polymers 238: 116118.
   Google Scholar
• Laluce, C., I. U. Roldan, E. Pecoraro, L. I. Igbojionu, and C. A. Ribeiro. 2019. Effects of pretreatment applied to sugarcane bagasse on composition and morphology of cellulosic fractions. Biomass& Bioenergy 126:231–38. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., X. Wei, Q. Wang, J. Chen, G. Chang, L. Kong, J. Su, and Y. Liu. 2012. Homogeneous isolation of nanocellulose from sugarcane bagasse by high pressure homogenization. Carbohydrate Polymers 90 (4):1609–13. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.07.038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, P., Y. Yang, R. Liu, X. Liu, J. Ma, M. Wu, and S. Wang. 2020. Preparation of sugarcane bagasse nanocellulose hydrogel as a colourimetric freshness indicator for intelligent food packaging. Carbohydrate Polymers 116831. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malucelli, L. C., M. Matos, C. Jordão, D. Lomonaco, L. G. Lacerda, M. A. S. Carvalho Filho, and W. L. E. Magalhães. 2019. Influence of cellulose chemical pretreatment on energy consumption and viscosity of produced cellulose nanofibers (CNF) and mechanical properties of nanopaper. Cellulose 26 (3):1667–81. doi:10.1007/s10570-018-2161-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megashah, L. N., H. Ariffin, M. R. Zakaria, M. A. Hassan, Y. Andou, and F. N. M. Padzil. 2020. Modification of cellulose degree of polymerization by superheated steam treatment for versatile properties of cellulose nanofibril film. Cellulose 27 (13):7417–29. doi:10.1007/s10570-020-03296-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motta Neves, R., K. Silveira Lopes, M. G. V. Zimmermann, M. Poletto, and A. J. Zattera. 2020. Cellulose nanowhiskers extracted from TEMPO-oxidized curaua fibers. Journal of Natural Fibers 17 (9):1355–65. doi:10.1080/15440478.2019.1568346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naderi, A., T. Lindström, and J. Sundström. 2015. Repeated homogenization, a route for decreasing the energy consumption in the manufacturing process of carboxymethylated nanofibrillated cellulose? Cellulose 22 (2):1147–57. doi:10.1007/s10570-015-0576-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naduparambath, S., and E. Purushothaman. 2016. Sago seed shell: Determination of the composition and isolation of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC). Cellulose 23 (3):1803–12. doi:10.1007/s10570-016-0904-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naeem, M. A., Q. Siddiqui, M. Mushtaq, A. Farooq, Z. Pang, and Q. Wei. 2020. Insitu self-assembly of bacterial cellulose on banana fibers extracted from peels. Journal of Natural Fibers 17 (9):1317–28. doi:10.1080/15440478.2018.1563580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazir, M. S., B. A. Wahjoedi, A. W. Yussof, and M. A. Abdullah. 2013. Eco-friendly extraction and characterization of cellulose from oil palm empty fruit bunches. Bioresources 8 (2):2161–72. doi:10.15376/biores.8.2.2161-2172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nechyporchuk, O., M. N. Belgacem, and J. Bras. 2016. Production of cellulose nanofibrils: A review of recent advances. Industrial Crops and Products 93:2–25. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobuta, K., H. Teramura, H. Ito, C. Hongo, H. Kawaguchi, C. Ogino, A. Kondo, and T. Nishino. 2016. Characterization of cellulose nanofiber sheets from different refining processes. Cellulose 23 (1):403–14. doi:10.1007/s10570-015-0792-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang, S., J. Shi, H. Qiao, Z. Zheng, J. Ouyang, and C. Lai. 2021. The key role of delignification in overcoming the inherent recalcitrance of Chinese fir for biorefining. Bioresource Technology 319::124154. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, D. H. 1969. A theory for the tensile strength of paper. Tappi Journal 52 (4):674–81.
   Google Scholar
• Page, D. H., R. S. Seth, and J. H. Degrace. 1979. The elastic modulus of paper 1. The controlling mechanisms. Tappi Journal 62 (9):99–102.
   Google Scholar
• Pakutsah, K., and D. Aht-Ong. 2020. Facile isolation of cellulose nanofibers from water hyacinth using water-based mechanical defibrillation: Insights into morphological, physical, and rheological properties. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 145:64–76. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelissari, F. M., P. J. D. A. Sobral, and F. C. Menegalli. 2014. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from banana peels. Cellulose 21 (1):417–32. doi:10.1007/s10570-013-0138-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phanthong, P., P. Reubroycharoen, X. Hao, G. Xu, A. Abudula, and G. Guan. 2018. Nanocellulose: Extraction and application. Carbon Resources Conversion 1 (1):32–43. doi:10.1016/j.crcon.2018.05.004.
   Google Scholar
• Prithivirajan, R., P. Narayanasamy, N. A. Al-Dhabi, P. Balasundar, R. Shyam Kumar, K. Ponmurugan, T. Ramkumar, and S. Senthil. 2020. Characterization of Musa paradisiaca L. cellulosic natural fibers from agro-discarded blossom petal waste. Journal of Natural Fibers 17 (11):1640–53. doi:10.1080/15440478.2019.1588826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal, L., J. J. Creely, A. E. Martin Jr, and C. M. Conrad. 1959. An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Textile Research Journal 29 (10):786–94. doi:10.1177/004051755902901003.
   Google Scholar
• Senthamaraikannan, P., M. R. Sanjay, K. S. Bhat, N. H. Padmaraj, and M. Jawaid. 2019. Characterization of natural cellulosic fiber from bark of Albizia amara. Journal of Natural Fibers 16 (8):1124–31. doi:10.1080/15440478.2018.1453432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, A., and N. R. Bishnoi. 2013. Comparative study of various pretreatment techniques for ethanol production from water hyacinth. Industrial Crops and Products 44:283–89. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.11.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sofla, R. K., M. W. Batchelor, J. Kosinkova, R. Pepper, R. Brown, and T. Rainey. 2019. Cellulose nanofibres from bagasse using a high speed blender and acetylation as a pretreatment. Cellulose 26 (8):4799–814. doi:10.1007/s10570-019-02441-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, K. L., R. A. Venditti, O. J. Rojas, Y. Habibi, and J. J. Pawlak. 2011. A comparative study of energy consumption and physical properties of microfibrillated cellulose produced by different processing methods. Cellulose 18 (4):1097–111. doi:10.1007/s10570-011-9533-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudiarto, S. I. A., A. Renggaman, and H. L. Choi. 2019. Floating aquatic plants for total nitrogen and phosphorus removal from treated swine wastewater and their biomass characteristics. Journal of Environmental Management 231:763–69. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, D., A. J. Onyianta, D. O’Rourke, G. Perrin, C.-M. Popescu, L. H. Saw, Z. Cai, and M. Dorris. 2020. A process for deriving high quality cellulose nanofibrils from water hyacinth invasive species. Cellulose 27 (7):3727–40. doi:10.1007/s10570-020-03038-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundari, M., and A. Ramesh. 2012. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from the aquatic weed water hyacinth Eichhornia crassipes. Carbohydrate Polymers 87:1701–05.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syafri, E., S. Jamaluddin, A. Wahono, M. Irwan, A. H. Sari, and A. Fudholi. 2019a. Characterization and properties of cellulose microfibers from water hyacinth filled sago starch biocomposites. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 137:119–25. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syafri, E., A. Kasim, H. Abral, and A. Asben. 2019b. Cellulose nanofibers isolation and characterization from ramie using a chemical-ultrasonic treatment. Journal of Natural Fibers 16 (8):1145–55. doi:10.1080/15440478.2018.1455073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanpichai, S. 2020. Facile preparation of cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 773::012001. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/773/1/012001.
   Google Scholar
• Tanpichai, S., S. K. Biswas, S. Witayakran, and H. Yano. 2019a. Water Hyacinth: A sustainable lignin-poor cellulose source for the production of cellulose nanofibers. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 7 (23):18884–93. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b04095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanpichai, S., S. K. Biswas, S. Witayakran, and H. Yano. 2020a. Optically transparent tough nanocomposites with a hierarchical structure of cellulose nanofiber networks prepared by the Pickering emulsion method. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 132::105811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanpichai, S., W. W. Sampson, and J. S. Eichhorn. 2014. Stress transfer in microfibrillated cellulose reinforced poly(vinyl alcohol) composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 65:186–91. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.06.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanpichai, S., W. W. Sampson, and S. J. Eichhorn. 2012. Stress-transfer in microfibrillated cellulose reinforced poly(lactic acid) composites using Raman spectroscopy. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 43 (7):1145–52. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanpichai, S., and S. Witayakran. 2017. All-cellulose composite laminates prepared from pineapple leaf fibers treated with steam explosion and alkaline treatment. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites 36 (16):1146–55. doi:10.1177/0731684417704923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanpichai, S., and S. Witayakran. 2018. All-cellulose composites from pineapple leaf microfibers: Structural, thermal, and mechanical properties. Polymer Composite 39 (3):895–903. doi:10.1002/pc.24015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanpichai, S., S. Witayakran, and A. Boonmahitthisud. 2019. Study on structural and thermal properties of cellulose microfibers isolated from pineapple leaves using steam explosion. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 7 (1):102836. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2018.102836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanpichai, S., S. Witayakran, Y. Srimarut, W. Woraprayote, and Y. Malila. 2019b. Porosity, density and mechanical properties of the paper of steam exploded bamboo microfibers controlled by nanofibrillated cellulose. Journal of Materials Research and Technology 8 (4):3612–22. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.05.024.
   Google Scholar
• Tanpichai, S., S. Witayakran, J. Wootthikanokkhan, Y. Srimarut, W. Woraprayote, and Y. Malila. 2020. Mechanical and antibacterial properties of the chitosan coated cellulose paper for packaging applications: Effects of molecular weight types and concentrations of chitosan. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 155:1510–19. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.11.128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanpichai, S., and J. Wootthikanokkhan. 2018. Reinforcing abilities of microfibers and nanofibrillated cellulose in poly(lactic acid) composites. Science and Engineering of Composite Materials 25 (2):395–401. doi:10.1515/secm-2016-0113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsalagkas, D., L. Zhai, A. Kafy, J. W. Kim, H. C. Kim, and J. Kim. 2020. Production of micro- and nanofibrillated cellulose through an aqueous counter collision system followed by ultrasound: Effect of mechanical pretreatments. Journal of Natural Fibers 17 (8):1099–110. doi:10.1080/15440478.2018.1558144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uetani, K., and H. Yano. 2011. Nanofibrillation of wood pulp using a high-speed blender. Biomacromolecules 12 (2):348–53. doi:10.1021/bm101103p.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varanasi, S., L. Henzel, S. Sharman, W. Batchelor, and G. Garnier. 2018. Producing nanofibres from carrots with a chemical-free process. Carbohydrate Polymers 184:307–14. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.12.056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, Y., Z. Yuan, J. Qu, C. Wang, and A. Wang. 2020. Evaluation of ultraviolet light and hydrogen peroxide enhanced ozone oxidation treatment for the production of cellulose nanofibrils. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 8 (7):2688–97. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b06028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, M., Z. Sun, and X. Zhao. 2020. Effects of different modification methods on the properties of sisal fibers. Journal of Natural Fibers 17 (7):1048–57. doi:10.1080/15440478.2018.1554517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J., E. F. Krietemeyer, V. M. Boddu, S. X. Liu, and W.-C. Liu. 2018. Production and characterization of cellulose nanofibril (CNF) from agricultural waste corn stover. Carbohydrate Polymers 192:202–07. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.03.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, K., Z. Shi, J. Lyu, Q. Zhang, T. Zhong, G. Du, and S. Wang. 2020. Effects of hydrothermal pretreatment on nano-mechanical property of switchgrass cell wall and on energy consumption of isolated lignin-coated cellulose nanofibrils by mechanical grinding. Industrial Crops and Products 149:112317. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, X., S. K. Biswas, J. Han, S. Tanpichai, M.-C. Li, C. Chen, S. Zhu, A. K. Das, and H. Yano. In-press. Surface and interface engineering for nanocellulosic advanced materials. Advanced Materials.2020: 2002264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, Y., J. Han, G. Han, G. M. Aita, and Q. Wu. 2015a. Cellulose fibers isolated from energycane bagasse using alkaline and sodium chlorite treatments: Structural, chemical and thermal properties. Industrial Crops and Products 76:355–63. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, Y., J. Han, G. Han, Q. Zhang, A. D. French, and Q. Wu. 2015b. Characterization of cellulose I/II hybrid fibers isolated from energycane bagasse during the delignification process: Morphology, crystallinity and percentage estimation. Carbohydrate Polymers 133:438–47. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.07.058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, G., J. Du, W. Chen, M. Pan, and D. Chen. 2019. Preparation and thermostability of cellulose nanocrystals and nanofibrils from two sources of biomass: Rice straw and poplar wood. Cellulose 26 (16):8625–43. doi:10.1007/s10570-019-02683-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., and J. Li. 2014. Excellent chemical and material cellulose from tunicates: Diversity in cellulose production yield and chemical and morphological structures from different tunicate species. Cellulose 21 (5):3427–41. doi:10.1007/s10570-014-0348-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, K., Y. Li, M. Zhu, X. Yu, M. Zhang, L. Shi, and J. Cheng. 2017. The porous carbon derived from water hyacinth with well-designed hierarchical structure for supercapacitors. Journal of Power Sources 366:270–77. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.09.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar