Evaluation of Interface Shear Strength of Natural Kenaf Geogrid and Recycled Concrete Aggregate for Sustainable Pavement Applications

References

• Abu-Farsakh, M., J. Coronel, and M. Tao. 2007. Effect of soil moisture content and dry density on cohesive soil–geosynthetic interactions using large direct shear tests. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 19 (7):540–49. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:7(540).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artidteang, S., D. Bergado, T. Tanchaisawat, and J. Saowapakpiboon. 2012. Investigation of tensile and soil-geotextile interface strength of kenaf woven limited life geotextiles (LLGs). Lowland Technology International 14 (2):1–8. Dec.
   Google Scholar
• Arulrajah, A., S. Horpibulsuk, F. Maghoolpilehrood, W. Samingthong, Y.-J. Du, and S.-L. Shen. 2015. Evaluation of interface shear strength properties of geogrid reinforced foamed recycled glass using a large-scale direct shear testing apparatus. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering (2015:235424. doi:10.1155/2015/235424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arulrajah, A., M. Rahman, J. Piratheepan, M. Bo, and M. Imteaz. 2013. Interface shear strength testing of geogrid-reinforced construction and demolition materials. Advances in Civil Engineering Materials 2 (1):189–200. doi:10.1520/ACEM20120055.
   Google Scholar
• Arulrajah, A., M. A. Rahman, J. Piratheepan, M. W. Bo, and M. A. Imteaz. 2014. Evaluation of interface shear strength properties of geogrid-reinforced construction and demolition materials using a modified large-scale direct shear testing apparatus. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 26 (5):974–82. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM-D5321. (2020)./D5321M-20, Standard test method for determining the shear strength of soil-geosynthetic and geosynthetic-geosynthetic interfaces by direct shear, In: ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020, www.astm.org.
   Google Scholar
• Bortz, B. S., M. Hossain, I. Halami, and A. J. Gisi. 2012. Low-volume paved road improvement with geocell reinforcement.
   Google Scholar
• Chaiyaput, S., D. Bergado, and S. Artidteang. 2014. Measured and simulated results of a Kenaf Limited Life Geosynthetics (LLGs) reinforced test embankment on soft clay. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 42 (1):39–47. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2013.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, B., and E. Shin. 1994. Strip foundation on geogrid-reinforced clay: Behavior under cyclic loading. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 13 (10):657–67. doi:10.1016/0266-1144(94)90066-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Disfani, M. M., A. Arulrajah, M. W. Bo, and R. Hankour. 2011. Recycled crushed glass in road work applications. Waste Management 31 (11):2341–51. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2011.07.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DOH. (2001). Standard No. DH-S 201/2544, Standard of crusher rock base, Department of Highways, Thailand. In.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, Y., J. Han, and X. Bai. 2010. A numerical study on stress-strain responses of biaxial geogrids under tension at different directions. In GeoFlorida 2010: Advances in Analysis, 2551–60. Modeling & Design, Orlando, Florida, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Elsaid, A., M. Dawood, R. Seracino, and C. Bobko. 2011. Mechanical properties of kenaf fiber reinforced concrete. Construction and Building Materials 25 (4):1991–2001. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giroud, J. P., and J. Han. 2006. Closure to “Design Method for Geogrid-Reinforced Unpaved Roads. I: Development of Design Method” by JP Giroud and Jie Han. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 132 (4):549–51. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:4(549).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Góngora, I., and E. Palmeira. 2012. Influence of fill and geogrid characteristics on the performance of unpaved roads on weak subgrades. Geosynthetics International 19 (2):191–99. doi:10.1680/gein.2012.19.2.191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, A., Z. Sun, and J. Satyavolu. 2020. Impact of modified kenaf fibers on shrinkage and cracking of cement pastes. Construction and Building Materials 264:120230. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammood, R. A., and S. M. S. Mohsin. 2018. Study on the Performance of Kenaf Fiber to Strengthening of Reinforced Concrete Beams: Review Paper. AASCIT Journal of Environment 3 (2):29–32.
   Google Scholar
• Han, B., J. Ling, X. Shu, H. Gong, and B. Huang. 2018. Laboratory investigation of particle size effects on the shear behavior of aggregate-geogrid interface. Construction and Building Materials 158:1015–25. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, J., S. K. Pokharel, X. Yang, C. Manandhar, D. Leshchinsky, I. Halahmi, and R. L. Parsons. 2011. Performance of geocell-reinforced RAP bases over weak subgrade under full-scale moving wheel loads. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 23 (11):1525–34. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, J., and J. K. Thakur. 2015. Sustainable roadway construction using recycled aggregates with geosynthetics. Sustainable Cities and Society 14:342–50. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2013.11.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horpibulsuk, S., and A. Niramitkornburee. 2010. Pullout resistance of bearing reinforcement embedded in sand. Soils and Foundations 50 (2):215–26. doi:10.3208/sandf.50.215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indraratna, B., and W. Salim. 2003. Deformation and degradation mechanics of recycled ballast stabilised with geosynthetics. Soils and Foundations 43 (4):35–46. doi:10.3208/sandf.43.4_35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indraratna, B., M. A. Shahin, and W. Salim (2005). Use of geosynthetics for stabilizing recycled ballast in railway track substructures.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, R. M., and M. Mackiewicz-Talarczyk. 2020. Handbook of natural fibres: Volume 2: Processing and applications, Vol. 2. Woodhead Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, T. F., and J. M. Yatim. 2015. Mechanical properties of kenaf fiber reinforced concrete with different fiber content and fiber length. Journal of Asian Concrete Federation 1 (1):11–21. doi:10.18702/acf.2015.09.1.11.
   Google Scholar
• Leão, A. L., B. M. Cherian, S. F. De Souza, R. M. Kozłowski, S. Thomas, and M. Kottaisamy. 2012. 9 - Natural fibres for geotextiles. Handbook of Natural Fibres, R. M. Kozłowski. ed. Vol. 2. 280–311. Woodhead Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818782-1.00015-8
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K. M., and V. R. Manjunath. 2000. Soil-geotextile interface friction by direct shear tests. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 37 (1):238–52. doi:10.1139/t99-124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C.-N., J. G. Zornberg, T.-C. Chen, Y.-H. Ho, and B.-H. Lin. 2009. Behavior of Geogrid-Sand Interface in Direct Shear Mode. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 135 (12):1863–71. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., A. Scarpas, J. Blaauwendraad, and D. Genske. 1998. Geogrid reinforcing of recycled aggregate materials for road construction: Finite element investigation. Transportation Research Record 1611 (1):78–85. doi:10.3141/1611-10.
   Google Scholar
• Ludvíková, M., and M. Griga. 2019. Chapter 16 - Transgenic Fiber Crops for Phytoremediation of Metals and Metalloids. In Transgenic Plant Technology for Remediation of Toxic Metals and Metalloids, ed. M. N. V. Prasad, 341–58. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814389-6.00016-X
   Google Scholar
• McCartney, J. S., J. G. Zornberg, and R. H. Swan. 2009. Analysis of a Large Database of GCL-Geomembrane Interface Shear Strength Results. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 135 (2):209–23. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2009)135:2(209).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty, A. K., M. Misra, and L. T. Drzal. 2005. Natural fibers, biopolymers, and biocomposites. Boca Raton, FL: CRC press.
   Google Scholar
• Qian, Y., J. Han, S. K. Pokharel, and R. L. Parsons. 2011. Stress analysis on triangular-aperture geogrid-reinforced bases over weak subgrade under cyclic loading: An experimental study. Transportation Research Record 2204 (1):83–91. doi:10.3141/2204-11.
   Google Scholar
• Qian, Y., J. Han, S. K. Pokharel, and R. L. Parsons. 2013. Performance of triangular aperture geogrid-reinforced base courses over weak subgrade under cyclic loading. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 25 (8):1013–21. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajagopal, K., N. Krishnaswamy, and G. M. Latha. 1999. Behaviour of sand confined with single and multiple geocells. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 17 (3):171–84. doi:10.1016/S0266-1144(98)00034-X.
   Google Scholar
• Rashid, A. S. A., M. G. Shirazi, H. Mohamad, and F. Sahdi. 2017. Bearing capacity of sandy soil treated by Kenaf fibre geotextile. Environmental Earth Sciences 76 (12):431. doi:10.1007/s12665-017-6762-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashid, A. S. A., M. G. Shirazi, R. Nazir, H. Mohamad, F. Sahdi, and S. Horpibulsuk. 2020. Bearing capacity performance of soft cohesive soil treated by kenaf limited life geotextile. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology 38 (6):755–60. doi:10.1080/1064119X.2019.1616861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirazi, M. G., A. S. A. Rashid, R. B. Nazir, A. H. A. Rashid, A. Kassim, and S. Horpibulsuk. 2019. Investigation of tensile strength on alkaline treated and untreated geotextile under dry and wet conditions. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 47 (4):522–29. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.01.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirazi, M. G., A. S. A. Rashid, R. B. Nazir, R. H. B. A. Rashid, H. Moayedi, S. Horpibulsuk, and W. Samingthong. 2020b. Sustainable soil bearing capacity improvement using natural limited life geotextile reinforcement – A review. Minerals 10 (5):1–22. doi:10.3390/min10050479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirazi, M. G., R. S. A. Rashid, R. Nazir, A. H. A. Rashid, and S. Horpibulsuk. 2020a. Enhancing the bearing capacity of rigid footing using limited life kenaf geotextile reinforcement. Journal of Natural Fibers 1–17. doi:10.1080/15440478.2020.1830330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soleimanbeigi, A., B. F. Tanyu, A. H. Aydilek, P. Florio, A. Abbaspour, A. Y. Dayioglu, and W. J. Likos. 2019. Evaluation of recycled concrete aggregate backfill for geosynthetic-reinforced MSE walls. Geosynthetics International 26 (4):396–412. doi:10.1680/jgein.19.00025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suddeepong, A., N. Sari, S. Horpibulsuk, A. Chinkulkijniwat, and A. Arulrajah. 2020. Interface shear behaviours between recycled concrete aggregate and geogrids for pavement applications. International Journal of Pavement Engineering 21 (2):228–35. doi:10.1080/10298436.2018.1453609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukmak, K., J. Han, P. Sukmak, and S. Horpibulsuk. 2016. Numerical parametric study on behavior of bearing reinforcement earth walls with different backfill material properties. Geosynthetics International 23 (6):435–51. doi:10.1680/jgein.16.00008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suksiripattanapong, C., S. Horpibulsuk, A. Chinkulkijniwat, and J. C. Chai. 2013. Pullout resistance of bearing reinforcement embedded in coarse-grained soils. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 36:44–54. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2012.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanchaisawat, T., D. Bergado, and S. Artidteang (2013). Measured and simulated interactions between Kenaf geogrid limited life geosynthetics (LLGs) and silty sand backfill.
   Google Scholar
• Thakur, J. K., J. Han, and R. L. Parsons. 2013. Creep behavior of geocell-reinforced recycled asphalt pavement bases. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 25 (10):1533–42. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakur, J. K., J. Han, S. K. Pokharel, and R. L. Parsons. 2012. Performance of geocell-reinforced recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) bases over weak subgrade under cyclic plate loading. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 35:14–24. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2012.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutumluer, E., H. Huang, and X. Bian. 2012. Geogrid-Aggregate Interlock Mechanism Investigated through Aggregate Imaging-Based Discrete Element Modeling Approach. International Journal of Geomechanics 12 (4):391–98. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udomchai, A., S. Horpibulsuk, C. Suksiripattanapong, N. Mavong, R. Rachan, and A. Arulrajah. 2017. Performance of the bearing reinforcement earth wall as a retaining structure in the Mae Moh mine, Thailand. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 45 (4):350–60. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar