Properties of Kenaf Cellulose Nanofiber (CNF) as Potential Larvicide Nanocarrier and Its Acute Ecotoxicity against Daphnia Magna and Dania rerio

References

• Abdul Khalil, H. P. S., A. F. Ireana Yusra, A. H. Bhat, and M. Jawaid. 2010. Cell wall ultrastructure, anatomy, lignin distribution, and chemical composition of Malaysian cultivated kenaf fiber. Industrial Crops and Products 31 (1):113–21. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2009.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsharef, J. M. A., M. R. Taha, and T. A. Khan. 2017. Physical dispersion of nanocarbons in composites. A review. Jurnal Teknologi 79 (5):69–81. doi:10.11113/jt.v79.7646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, E. P., L. G. Joyner, and P. P. Halenda. 1951. The determination of pore volume and area distributions in porous substances. I. Computations from nitrogen isotherms. Journal of the American Chemical Society 73 (1):373–80. doi:10.1021/ja01145a126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandari, J., H. Mishra, P. K. Mishra, R. Wimmer, F. J. Ahmad, and S. Talegaonkar. 2017. Cellulose nanofiber aerogel as a promising biomaterial for customized oral drug delivery. International Journal of Nanomedicine 12:2021–31. doi:10.2147/IJN.S124318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, A., M. Chen, M. Couillard, Z. J. Jakubek, T. Leng, and L. J. Johnston. 2016. Correlating cellulose nanocrystal particle size and surface area. Langmuir 32 (24):6105–14. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b01376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunauer, S., P. H. Emmett, and E. Teller. 1938. Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. Journal of the American Chemical Society 60 (2):309–19. doi:10.1021/ja01269a023.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W., H. He, H. Zhu, M. Cheng, Y. Li, and S. Wang. 2018. Thermo-responsive cellulose-based material with switchable wettability for controllable oil/water separation. Polymers 10 (6):592. doi:10.3390/polym10060592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De France, K. J., T. Hoare, and E. D. Cranston. 2017. Review of hydrogels and aerogels containing nanocellulose. Chemistry of Materials 29 (11):4609–31. doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufresne, A. 2013. Nanocellulose: A new ageless bionanomaterial. Materials Today 16 (6):220–27. doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2013.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duong, T. V., and G. V. Mooter. 2016. The role of the carrier in the formulation of pharmaceutical solid dispersions. Part II: Amorphous carriers. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery 13 (12):1681–94. doi:10.1080/17425247.2016.1198769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasso, D., K. Subramaniam, M. Butkus, K. Strevett, and J. Bergendahl. 2002. A review of non-DLVO interactions in environmental colloidal systems. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology 1 (1):17–38. doi:10.1023/A:1015146710500.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, S., and A. Mihranyan. 2016. Strategies for tailoring the pore-size distribution of virus retention filter papers. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 8 (22):13759–67. doi:10.1021/acsami.6b03093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, B. J., A. Clendaniel, F. Sinche, D. Way, M. Hughes, J. Schardt, J. Simonsen, A. B. Stefaniak, and S. L. Harper. 2016. Impacts of chemical modification on the toxicity of diverse nanocellulose materials to developing zebrafish. Cellulose 23 (3):1763–75. doi:10.1007/s10570-016-0947-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israelachvili, J. N. 2011. Solvation, structural, and hydration Forces. In Intermolecular and Surface Forces, 3rd ed., 341–80. Oxford: Elsevier Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, H., T. Wang, L. Wang, C. Sun, T. Jiang, G. Cheng, and S. Wang. 2012. Development of an amorphous mesoporous TiO2 nanosphere as a novel carrier for poorly water-soluble drugs: Effect of different crystal forms of TiO2 carriers on drug loading and release behaviors. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 153:124–30. doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.12.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jog, R., and D. J. Burgess. 2017. Pharmaceutical amorphous nanoparticles. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 106 (1). doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2016.09.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juère, E., and F. Kleitz. 2018. On the nanopore confinement of therapeutic drugs into mesoporous silica materials and its implications. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 270:109–19. doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2018.04.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karavelidis, V., D. Bikiaris, and K. Avgoustakis. 2015. New thermosensitive nanoparticles prepared by biocompatible pegylated aliphatic polyester block copolymers for local cancer treatment. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 67 (2):215–30. doi:10.1111/jphp.12337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kargarzadeh, H., I. Ahmad, I. Abdullah, A. Dufresne, S. Y. Zainudin, and R. M. Sheltami. 2012. Effects of hydrolysis conditions on the morphology, crystallinity, and thermal stability of cellulose nanocrystals extracted from kenaf bast fibers. Cellulose 19 (3):855–66. doi:10.1007/s10570-012-9684-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi, S., P. M. Tahir, A. Karimi, A. Dufresne, and A. Abdulkhani. 2014. Kenaf bast cellulosic fibers hierarchy: A comprehensive approach from micro to nano. Carbohydrate Polymers 101 (1):878–85. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.09.106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kulasinski, K., S. Keten, S. V. Churakov, R. Guyer, J. Carmeliet, and D. Derome. 2014. Molecular mechanism of moisture-induced transition in amorphous cellulose. ACS Macro Letters 3 (10):1037–40. doi:10.1021/mz500528m.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., and C. K. Dixit. 2017. Methods for characterization of nanoparticles. In Advances in nanomedicine for the delivery of therapeutic nucleic acids, ed. N. Surendra, R. Chandra, and N. Gupta, 44–58. Duxford: Elsevier Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Lead, J. R., G. E. Batley, P. J. J. Alvarez, M. N. Croteau, R. D. Handy, M. J. McLaughlin, J. D. Judy, and K. Schirmer. 2018. Nanomaterials in the environment: Behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects. An updated review. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 37 (8):2029–63. doi:10.1002/etc.4147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry, G. V., R. J. Hill, S. Harper, A. F. Rawle, C. O. Hendren, F. Klaessig, U. Nobbmann, P. Sayre, and J. Rumble. 2016. Guidance to improve the scientific value of Zeta-potential measurements in NanoEHS. Environmental Science: Nano 3 (5):953–65. doi:10.1039/c6en00136j.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luu, T. D., B. J. Lee, P. H. L. Tran, and T. T. D. Tran. 2019. Modified sprouted rice for modulation of curcumin crystallinity and dissolution enhancement by solid dispersion. Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation 49 (1):127–34. doi:10.1007/s40005-018-0393-5.
   Google Scholar
• Md Abu, T., K. A. Zahan, M. A. Rajaie, C. R. Leong, S. Ab Rashid, N. S. Mohd Nor Hamin, W. N. Tan, and W. Y. Tong. 2020. Nanocellulose as drug delivery system for honey as antimicrobial wound dressing. Materials Today: Proceedings. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.076.
   Google Scholar
• Mtibe, A., T. H. Mokhothu, M. J. John, T. C. Mokhena, and M. J. Mochane. 2018. Fabrication and characterization of various engineered nanomaterials. In Handbook of nanomaterials for industrial applications, ed. C. M. Hussain, 151–71. 1st ed. United Kingdom: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Ning, L., C. You, Y. Zhang, X. Li, and F. Wang. 2020. Synthesis and biological evaluation of surface-modified nanocellulose hydrogel loaded with Paclitaxel. Life Sciences 241:117137. doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2019.117137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). 1992. Test no. 203: Fish acute toxicity testing. OECD guideline for testing of chemicals. Section 2. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). 2004. Test No. 202: Daphnia sp. acute immobilization test. OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals. Section 2. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development). 2017. Test no. 318: Dispersion stability of nanomaterials in simulated environmental media. OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals. Section 3. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ogonowski, M., U. Edlund, E. Gorokhova, M. Linde, K. Ek, B. Liewenborg, O. Konnecke, J. R. G. Navarro, and M. Breitholtz. 2018. Multi-level toxicity assessment of engineered cellulose nanofibrils. Daphnia Magna. Nanotoxicology 1–13. doi:10.1080/17435390.2018.1464229.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, K. J., J. A. Shatkin, K. Nelson, J. D. Ede, and T. Retsina. 2017. Establishing the safety of novel bio-based cellulose nanomaterials for commercialization. NanoImpact 6:19–29. doi:10.1016/j.impact.2017.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panchal, P., E. Ogunsona, and T. Mekonnen. 2019. Trends in advanced functional material applications of nanocellulose. Processes 7 (10):1–27. doi:10.3390/pr7010010.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. A., W. S. Rasband, and K. W. Eliceiri. 2012. NIH image to imagej: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods 9 (7):671–75. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, M. 2019. Behavioral responses in effect to chemical stress in fish: A review. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Studies 7:(1).1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Sing, K. S. W., D. H. Everett, R. A. W. Haul, L. Moscou, R. A. Pierotti, J. Rouquerol, and T. Siemienieska. 1985. International union of pure commission on colloid and surface chemistry including catalysis. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid system with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity. Pure and Applied Chemistry 57 (4):603–19. doi:10.1351/pac198557040603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thommes, M., K. Kaneko, A. V. Neimark, J. P. Olivier, F. Rodriguez-Reinoso, J. Rouquerol, and K. S. W. Sing. 2015. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure and Applied Chemistry 87 (9–10):1051–69. doi:10.1515/pac-2014-1117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trache, D., A. F. Tarchoun, M. Derradji, T. S. Hamidon, N. Masruchin, N. Brosse, and M. H. Hussin. 2020. Nanocellulose: From fundamentals to advanced applications. Frontiers in Chemistry. doi:10.3389/fchem.2020.00392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troedec, M. L., D. Sedan, C. Peyratout, J. P. Bonnet, A. Smith, R. Guinebretiere, V. Gloaguen, and P. Krausz. 2008. Influence of various chemical treatments on the composition and structure of hemp fibers. Composites. Part A, Applied Science and Manufacturing 39 (3):514–22. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuerxun, D., T. Pulingam, N. I. Nordin, Y. W. Chen, J. Kamaldin, N. Muhd Julkapli, H. V. Lee, B. F. Leo, and M. R. Johan. 2019. Synthesis, characterization and cytotoxicity studies of nanocrystalline cellulose from the production waste of rubber-wood and kenaf-bast fibers. European Polymer Journal 116:352–60. doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.04.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN (United Nations). 2019. Globally harmonized system (GHS) of classification and labelling of chemicals. Vol. 10. 8th ed. New York and Geneva: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• US EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 2019. Basic information about pesticide ingredients. Ingredients used in pesticide products. US EPA. Accessed on September 18, 2020. https://www.epa.gov/ingredients-used-pesticide-products/basic-information-about-pesticide-ingredients.
   Google Scholar
• Valo, H., S. Arola, P. Laaksonen, M. Torkkeli, L. Peltonen, M. B. Linder, R. Serimaa, S. Kuga, J. Hirvonen, and T. Laaksonen. 2013. Drug release from nanoparticles embedded in four different nanofibrillar cellulose aerogels. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 50 (1):69–77. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2013.02.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO (World Health Organisation). 2005. Guidelines for laboratory and field testing of mosquito larvicides. Geneva: World Health Organization. WHO/CDS/WHOPES/GCDPP/2005.11
   Google Scholar
• Wong, S. T. S., A. Kamari, S. N. M. Yusoff, J. Jumadi, M. M. Abdulrasool, S. Kumaran, and S. Ishak. 2019. Brief review on materials used as carrier agents for larvicide formulations. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1397:012025. 10.1088/1742-6596/1397/1/012025.
   Google Scholar
• Yue, Y., X. Wang, J. Han, L. Yu, J. Chen, Q. Wu, and J. Jiang. 2019. Effects of nanocellulose on sodium alginate/polyacrylamide hydrogel: Mechanical properties and adsorption-desorption capacities. Carbohydrate Polymers 206:289–301. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.10.105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, H. K., X. Y. Wei, Y. M. Xie, and Q. H. Feng. 2019. Preparation of nanocellulose and lignin-carbohydrate complex composite biological carriers and culture of heart coronary artery endothelial cells. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 137:1161–68. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.07.062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar