Mechanical Evaluation of Vegetal Fibers Impregnated in Vacuum in the Cultivation of Pea (Pisum sativum L.)

References

• Álvarez-Sánchez, D. E., E. D. Gómez-López, and H. R. Ordóñez-Jurado. 2019. Tipología de fincas productoras de arveja (Pisum sativum L.) en la subregión Sur de Nariño, Colombia [Typology of pea-producing farms (Pisum sativum L.) in the southern subregion of Nariño, Colombia]. Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria 20 (3):659–77. doi:10.21930/rcta.vol20_num3_art:1593.
   Google Scholar
• American Society for Testing and Materials. 2007. ASTM D3822-07 standard test method for tensile properties of single textile fibers. ASTM.
   Google Scholar
• Arias, A., A. Ramirez, V. Fernandez, and N. Sanchez. 2016. The use of Common Duckweed (Lemna minor) in the treatment of wastewater from the washing of sisal fiber (Furcraea bedinghausii). Ingenieria y Competitividad 18 (2): 25–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arpitha, G. R., and B. Yogesha. 2017. An overview on mechanical property evaluation of natural fiber reinforced polymers. Materials Today: Proceedings 4 (2):2755–60. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2017.02.153.
   Google Scholar
• Bessadok, A., S. Marais, S. Roudesli, C. Lixon, and M. Métayer. 2008. Influence of chemical modifications on water-sorption and mechanical properties of agave fibres. Composites Part A: Applied Science Manufacturing 39 (1):29–45. doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betoret, E., N. Betoret, D. Vidal, and P. Fito. 2011. Functional foods development: Trends and technologies. Trends in Food Science Technology 22 (9):498–508. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2011.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blas-Sevillano, R. H., T. Veramendi, B. La Torre, C. E. Velezmoro-Sánchez, A. I. Oliva, M. E. Mena-Martínez, W. A. Herrera–Kao, J. Uribe-Calderon, and J. M. Cervantes-Uc. 2018. Physicochemical characterization of several types of naturally colored cotton fibers from peru. Carbohydrate Polymers 197:246–52. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.06.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centeno-Mora, O. 2016. Estimación de proteína en semolina de arroz, mediante aplicación de regresiones en el infrarrojo cercano [estimation of protein in semolina of rice, by application of regressions in the near infrared]. Agronomía Mesoamericana 27 (2):367–76. doi:10.15517/am.v27i2.21153.
   Google Scholar
• Chegdani, F., and M. El Mansori. 2018. Friction scale effect in drilling natural fiber composites. Tribology International 119:622–30. doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2017.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiralt, A., N. Martínez-Navarrete, J. Martínez-Monzó, P. Talens, G. Moraga, A. Ayala, and P. Fito. 2001. Changes in mechanical properties throughout osmotic processes: Cryoprotectant effect. Journal of Food Engineering 49 (2–3):129–35. doi:10.1016/S0260-8774(00)00203-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conalgodón(2007). Resultados de la cosecha algodonera Costa-Llanos 2006/2007. Recuperado de Url:http://www.Conalgodon.com/portal/02_cos-Tosprod
   Google Scholar
• Contreras, M. F., W. A. Hormaza, and A. Marañón. 2009. Fractografía de la fibra natural extraida del fique y de un material compuesto reforzado con tejido de fibra de fique y matriz resina poliester [Fractography of natural fiber extracted from the fique and a composite material reinforced with fiber fabric and polyester resin matrix]. Revista Latinoamericana De Metalurgia Y Materiales S1 (1):57–67.
   Google Scholar
• Córdoba, C., J. Mera, D. Martínez, and J. Rodríguez. 2010. Aprovechamiento de polipropileno y polietileno de alta densidad reciclados, reforzados con fibra vegetal, tetera (Stromanthe Stromathoides) [Use of recycled polypropylene and high-density polyethylene, reinforced with vegetable fiber, tetera (Stromanthe Stromthoides)]. Revista Iberoamericana de Polímeros 11 (7):417–27.
   Google Scholar
• Coreño-Alonso, J., and M. T. Méndez-Bautista. 2010. Relación estructura-propiedades de polímeros [relationship between structure and properties of polymers]. Educación Química 21 (4):291–99. doi:10.1016/S0187-893X(18)30098-3.
   Google Scholar
• De Silva, R., and N. Byrne. 2017. Utilization of cotton waste for regenerated cellulose fibres: influence of degree of polymerization on mechanical properties. Carbohydrate Polymers 174:89–94. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deaquiz-Oyola, Y. A., and B. L. M. Medina. 2016. Producción y biosíntesis de fibras vegetales. Una revisión [production and vegetable fibre biosynthesis. A review]. Conexión Agropecuaria JDC 6 (1):29–42.
   Google Scholar
• Dochia, M., C. Sirghie, R. M. Kozłowski, and Y. Roskwitalski, Z. 2012. Cotton fibres. In Handbook of natural fibres (pp. 11–23). Elsevier. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Elanchezhian, C., B. V. Ramnath, G. Ramakrishnan, M. Rajendrakumar, V. Naveenkumar, and M. K. Saravanakumar. 2018. Review on mechanical properties of natural fiber composites. Materials Today: Proceedings 5 (1):1785–90. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.276.
   Google Scholar
• Emadian, S. M., T. T. Onay, and B. Demirel. 2017. Biodegradation of bioplastics in natural environments. Waste Management 59:526–36. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faruk, O., A. K. Bledzki, H. P. Fink, and M. Sain. 2012. Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010. Progress in Polymer Science 37 (11):1552–96. doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiore, V., T. Scalici, and A. Valenza. 2014. Characterization of a new natural fiber from Arundo donax L. as potential reinforcement of polymer composites. Carbohydrate polymers 106: 77–83. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.02.016
   Google Scholar
• Fito, P., A. Andrés, A. Chiralt, and P. Pardo. 1996. Coupling of hydrodynamic mechanism and deformation-relaxation phenomena during vacuum treatments in solid porous food-liquid systems. Journal of Food Engineering 27 (3):229–40. doi:10.1016/0260-8774(95)00005-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fito, P., A. Chiralt, N. Betoret, M. Gras, M. Cháfer, J. Martinez-Monzó, A. Andrés, and D. Vidal. 2001. Vacuum impregnation and osmotic dehydration in matrix engineering: application in functional fresh food development. Journal of Food Engineering 49 (2–3):175–83. doi:10.1016/S0260-8774(00)00220-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forero, A. F., and G. A. Ligarreto. 2009. Evaluación de dos sistemas de tutorado para el cultivo de la arveja voluble (Pisum sativum L.) en condiciones de la Sabana de Bogotá [Evaluation of two training systems for indeterminate pea (Pisum sativum L.) culture in conditions of the Bogota Plateau]. Revista Colombiana De Ciencias Hortícolas 3 (1):81–94. doi:10.17584/rcch.2009v3i1.1201.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, M. 2012. Defects in natural fibres: Their origin, characteristics and implications for natural fibre-reinforced composites. Journal of Materials Science 47 (2):599–609. doi:10.1007/s10853-011-6025-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jmal, H., N. Bahlouli, C. Wagner-Kocher, D. Leray, F. Ruch, J.-N. Munsch, and M. Munsch. 2018. Influence of the grade on the variability of the mechanical properties of polypropylene waste. Waste Management 75:160–73. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.02.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, C., J. Bras, I. Mondragon, P. Nechita, D. Plackett, P. Simon, D. G. Svetec, S. Virtanen, M. G. Baschetti, C. Breen, et al. 2012. Renewable fibers and bio-based materials for packaging applications - A review of recent developments. BioResources 7(2):2506–52. doi:10.15376/biores.7.2.2506-2552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, M. J., and S. Thomas. 2008. Biofibres and biocomposites. Carbohydrate Polymers 71 (3):343–64. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.05.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kicińska-Jakubowska, A., E. Bogacz, and M. Zimniewska. 2012. Review of natural fibers. part I-vegetable fibers. Journal of Natural Fibers 9 (3):150–67. doi:10.1080/15440478.2012.703370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manna, S., P. Saha, D. Roy, R. Sen, B. Adhikari, and S. Das. 2013. Enhanced biodegradation resistance of biomodified jute fibers. Carbohydrate Polymers 93 (2):597–603. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.11.061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milošević, M., A. Krkobabić, M. Radoičić, Z. Šaponjić, T. Radetić, and M. Radetić. 2017. Biodegradation of cotton and cotton/polyester fabrics impregnated with Ag/TiO2 nanoparticles in soil. Carbohydrate Polymers 158:77–84. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.12.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, S., A. K. Mohanty, L. T. Drzal, M. Misra, and G. Hinrichsen. 2004. A review on pineapple leaf fibers, sisal fibers and their biocomposites. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering 289 (11):955–74. doi:10.1002/mame.200400132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz-velez, M. F., M. A. Hidalgo-Salazar, and J. H. Mina-Hernandez. 2014. Fique fiber an alternative for reinforced plastics. influence of surface modification. Biotecnología en el Sector Agropecuario y Agroindustrial 12 (2):60–70.
   Google Scholar
• NTC 3941. Textiles. Cordeles de cabuya.
   Google Scholar
• NTC 992. Textiles. Fibras naturales. Cabuya para hilados y tejidos.
   Google Scholar
• Ovalle-Serrano, S. A., C. Blanco-Tirado, and M. Y. Combariza. 2018. Exploring the composition of raw and delignified Colombian fique fibers, tow and pulp. Cellulose 25 (1):151–65. doi:10.1007/s10570-017-1599-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantoja, D., K. Muñoz, and O. Checa. 2014. Evaluation and correlation of yield components in advanced lines of pea Pisum sativum with afila gene. Revista De Ciencias Agrícolas 31 (2):24–39. doi:10.22267/rcia.143102.29.
   Google Scholar
• Pantoja, D. C., O. Osorio, D. F. Mejía, and H. A. Váquiro. 2016. Processing of peas (Pisum sativum L.). part 1: modelling of the thin layer drying kinetic of pea, varieties obonuco andina and sureña. Información Tecnológica 27 (1):69–80. doi:10.4067/S0718-07642016000100009.
   Google Scholar
• Puente-Díaz, L., E. Echegaray-Pacheco, E. Castro-Montero, and K. Di Scala. 2013. Application of mathemathical models to infrared assisted drying process of lemon waste (Citrus limon (L.) Burm. F. cv. Genova). Dyna 80 (181):91–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Restrepo, A. M., A. Arredondo, C. Morales, M. Tamayo, Y. L. Benavides, V. Bedoya, and C. Vélez. 2012. Application of the vacuum impregnation technique in the development of minimally processed orange peels, fortified with potassium, sodium and vitamins B1, B6 and B9. Journal of Engineering and Technolology 1 (1):8–16.
   Google Scholar
• Revelo, J. D., O. Osorio, O. Checa, and H. A. Vaquiro. 2019. Evaluation of the loss of mechanical quality of three natural fibers as alternative supports in the agricultural production of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Información Tecnológica 30 (5):101–10. doi:10.4067/S0718-07642019000500101.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, L. J., W. A. Sarache, and C. E. Orrego. 2014. Polyester composites reinforced with banana/plantain (musa paradisiaca) fiber chemically modified. Comparison with fiberglass and fique (furcraea andina). Información Tecnológica 25 (5):27–34. doi:10.4067/S0718-07642014000500005.
   Google Scholar
• Rong, M. Z., M. Q. Zhang, Y. Liu, G. C. Yang, and H. M. Zeng. 2001. The effect of fiber treatment on the mechanical properties of unidirectional sisal-reinforced epoxy composites. Composites Science and Technolology 61 (10):1437–47. doi:10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00046-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saravanakumar, S. S., A. Kumaravel, T. Nagarajan, P. Sudhakar, and R. Baskaran. 2013. Characterization of a novel natural cellulosic fiber from Prosopis juliflora bark. Carbohydrate Polymers 92 (2):1928–33. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.11.064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symington, M. C., W. M. Banks, O. D. West, and R. A. Pethrick. 2009. Tensile testing of cellulose based natural fibers for structural composite applications. Journal of Composite Materials 43 (9):1083–108. doi:10.1177/0021998308097740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapia, C., C. Paredes, A. Simbaña, and J. Bermúdez. 2006. Aplicación de las fibras naturales en el desarrollo de materiales compuestos y como biomasa [application of natural fibers in the development of composite materials and as biomass]. Revista Tecnológica-ESPOL 19 (1):113–20.
   Google Scholar
• Thakur, V. K., Ed. 2013. Green Composites from Natural Resources. 1st ed. Boca raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. 2014. Biotrade – Designer’s Toolkit 1, Materials, Sustainable Biodiversity, Fashion Industry Review, Community Impact. In Fique or Cabuya Furcraea spp (p. 12). Geneva: United Nations Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Valero-Valdivieso, M. F., Y. Ortegón, and Y. Uscategui. 2013. Biopolímeros: Avances y perspectivas [biopolymers: Progress and prospects]. Dyna 80 (181):171–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viel, M., F. Collet, and C. Lanos. 2018. Chemical and multi-physical characterization of agro-resources’ by-product as a possible raw building material. Industrial Crops and Products 120:214–37. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.04.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vignon, M. R., L. Heux, M.-E. Malainine, and M. Mahrouz. 2004. Arabinan-cellulose composite in opuntia ficus-indica prickly pear spines. Carbohydrate Research 339 (1):123–31. doi:10.1016/j.carres.2003.09.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousif, B. F., and N. S. M. El-Tayeb. 2009. Mechanical and wear properties of oil palm and glass fibres reinforced polyester composites. International Journal of Precision Technology 1 (2):213–22. doi:10.1504/IJPTECH.2009.02638.
   Google Scholar