Extraction and Characterization of Agave gigantea Fibers with Alkali Treatment as Reinforcement for Composites

References

• Abraham, E., B. Deepa, L. A. Pothan, M. Jacob, S. Thomas, U. Cvelbar, and R. Anandjiwala. 2011. Extraction of nanocellulose fibrils from lignocellulosic fibres: A novel approach. Carbohydrate Polymers 86 (4):1468–75. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abral, H., J. Ariksa, M. Mahardika, D. Handayani, I. Aminah, N. Sandrawati, and S. D. Rosanti. 2020a. Effect of heat treatment on thermal resistance, transparency and antimicrobial activity of sonicated ginger cellulose film. Carbohydrate Polymers 116287. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abral, H., N. Fajri, M. Mahardika, D. Handayani, E. Sugiarti, and H. J. Kim. 2020b. A simple strategy in enhancing moisture and thermal resistance and tensile properties of disintegrated bacterial cellulose nanopaper. Journal of Materials Research and Technology 9 (4):8754–65. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.06.023.
   Google Scholar
• Asrofi, M., H. Abral, A. Kasim, A. Pratoto, M. Mahardika, J. W. Park, and H. J. Kim. 2018. Isolation of nanocellulose from water hyacinth fiber (WHF) produced via digester-sonication and its characterization. Fibers and Polymers 19 (8):1618–25. doi:10.1007/s12221-018-7953-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asrofi, M., E. Syafri, S. M. Sapuan, and R. A. Ilyas. 2020. Improvement of biocomposite properties based tapioca starch and sugarcane bagasse cellulose nanofibers. In Key engineering materials, Vol. 849, 96–101. Trans Tech Publications Ltd. .
   Google Scholar
• Boonterm, M., S. Sunyadeth, S. Dedpakdee, P. Athichalinthorn, S. Patcharaphun, R. Mungkung, and R. Techapiesancharoenkij. 2016. Characterization and comparison of cellulose fiber extraction from rice straw by chemical treatment and thermal steam explosion. Journal of Cleaner Production 134:592–99. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borchani, K. E., C. Carrot, and M. Jaziri. 2015. Untreated and alkali treated fibers from alfa stem: Effect of alkali treatment on structural, morphological and thermal features. Cellulose 22 (3):1577–89. doi:10.1007/s10570-015-0583-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganapathy, T., R. Sathiskumar, P. Senthamaraikannan, S. S. Saravanakumar, and A. Khan. 2019. Characterization of raw and alkali treated new natural cellulosic fibres extracted from the aerial roots of banyan tree. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 138:573–81. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.07.136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopinath, R., K. Ganesan, S. S. Saravanakumar, and R. Poopathi. 2016. Characterization of new cellulosic fiber from the stem of sida rhombifolia. International Journal of Polymer Analysis and Characterization 21 (2):123–29. doi:10.1080/1023666X.2016.1117712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herlina Sari, N., I. N. G. Wardana, Y. S. Irawan, and E. Siswanto. 2018. Characterization of the chemical, physical, and mechanical properties of NaOH-treated natural cellulosic fibers from corn husks. Journal of Natural Fibers 15 (4):545–58. doi:10.1080/15440478.2017.1349707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilyas, R. A., S. M. Sapuan, R. Ibrahim, H. Abral, M. R. Ishak, E. S. Zainudin, and R. Jumaidin. 2019. Effect of sugar palm nanofibrillated cellulose concentrations on morphological, mechanical and physical properties of biodegradable films based on agro-waste sugar palm (arenga pinnata (wurmb.) merr) starch. Journal of Materials Research and Technology 8 (5):4819–30. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.08.028.
   Google Scholar
• Kassab, Z., E. Syafri, Y. Tamraoui, H. Hannache, and M. El Achaby. 2020. Characteristics of sulfated and carboxylated cellulose nanocrystals extracted from Juncus plant stems. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 154:1419–25. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.11.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, A., R. Vijay, D. L. Singaravelu, G. R. Arpitha, S. Siengchin, and A. M. Asiri. 2020. Extraction and characterization of vetiver grass (Chrysopogon zizanioides) and kenaf fiber (Hibiscus cannabinus) as reinforcement materials for epoxy based composite structures. Journal of Materials Research and Technology 9 (1):773–78. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.11.017.
   Google Scholar
• Madhu, P., M. Jawaid, A. Khan, and C. I. Pruncu. 2020. A new study on effect of various chemical treatments on Agave Americana fiber for composite reinforcement: Physico-chemical, thermal, mechanical and morphological properties. Polymer Testing 85:106437. doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhu, P., M. R. Sanjay, P. Senthamaraikannan, S. Pradeep, S. S. Saravanakumar, and B. Yogesha. 2018. A review on synthesis and characterization of commercially available natural fibers: Part-I. Journal of Natural Fibers 16 (8):1132–44. doi:10.1080/15440478.2018.1453433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahardika, M., H. Abral, A. Kasim, S. Arief, and M. Asrofi. 2018. Production of nanocellulose from pineapple leaf fibers via high-shear homogenization and ultrasonication. Fibers 6 (2):28. doi:10.3390/fib6020028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahardika, M., H. Abral, A. Kasim, S. Arief, F. Hafizulhaq, and M. Asrofi. 2019. Properties of cellulose nanofiber/bengkoang starch bionanocomposites: Effect of fiber loading. LWT 108554. doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manimaran, P., P. Senthamaraikannan, M. R. Sanjay, M. K. Marichelvam, and M. Jawaid. 2018. Study on characterization of furcraea foetida new natural fiber as composite reinforcement for lightweight applications. Carbohydrate Polymers 181:650–58. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariano, M., R. Cercená, and V. Soldi. 2016. Thermal characterization of cellulose nanocrystals isolated from sisal fibers using acid hydrolysis. Industrial Crops and Products 94:454–62. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.09.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mtibe, A., L. Z. Linganiso, A. P. Mathew, K. Oksman, M. J. John, and R. D. Anandjiwala. 2015. A comparative study on properties of micro and nanopapers produced from cellulose and cellulose nanofibres. Carbohydrate Polymers 118:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.10.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, S., A. D. French, B. D. Condon, and M. Concha. 2016. Segal crystallinity index revisited by the simulation of x-ray diffraction patterns of cotton cellulose iβ and cellulose II. Carbohydrate Polymers 135:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayanasamy, P., P. Balasundar, S. Senthil, A. Khan, and A. M. Asiri. 2020. Characterization of a novel natural cellulosic fiber from Calotropis gigantea fruit bunch for ecofriendly polymer composites. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 150:793–801. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neto, J. S. S., R. A. A. Lima, D. K. K. Cavalcanti, J. P. B. Souza, R. A. A. Aguiar, and M. D. Banea. 2019. Effect of chemical treatment on the thermal properties of hybrid natural fiber‐reinforced composites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 136 (10):47154. doi:10.1002/app.47154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramasamy, R., K. O. Reddy, and A. V. Rajulu. 2018. Extraction and characterization of calotropis gigantea bast fibers as novel reinforcement for composites materials. Journal of Natural Fibers 15 (4):527–38. doi:10.1080/15440478.2017.1349019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanjay, M. R., P. Madhu, M. Jawaid, P. Senthamaraikannan, S. Senthil, and S. Pradeep. 2018. Characterization and properties of natural fiber polymer composites: A comprehensive review. Journal of Cleaner Production 172:566–81. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanjay, M. R., S. Siengchin, J. Parameswaranpillai, M. Jawaid, C. I. Pruncu, and A. Khan. 2019. A comprehensive review of techniques for natural fibers as reinforcement in composites: Preparation, processing and characterization. Carbohydrate Polymers 207:108–21. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senthamaraikannan, P., and M. Kathiresan. 2018. Characterization of raw and alkali treated new natural cellulosic fiber from coccinia grandis. l. Carbohydrate Polymers 186:332–43. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.01.072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senthamaraikannan, P., M. R. Sanjay, K. S. Bhat, N. H. Padmaraj, and M. Jawaid. 2018. Characterization of natural cellulosic fiber from bark of Albizia amara. Journal of Natural Fibers 16 (8):1124–31. doi:10.1080/15440478.2018.1453432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syafri, E., A. Kasim, H. Abral, and A. Asben. 2018. Cellulose nanofibers isolation and characterization from ramie using a chemical-ultrasonic treatment. Journal of Natural Fibers 16 (8):1145–55. doi:10.1080/15440478.2018.1455073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syafri, E., S. Wahono, A. Irwan, M. Asrofi, N. H. Sari, and A. Fudholi. 2019. Characterization and properties of cellulose microfibers from water hyacinth filled sago starch biocomposites. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 137:119–25. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.06.174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijay, R., D. L. Singaravelu, A. Vinod, S. Siengchin, M. Jawaid, J. Parameswaranpillai, and K. Anish. 2019. Characterization of raw and alkali treated new natural cellulosic fibers from Tridax procumbens. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 125:99–108. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.12.056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., J. Li, J. P. Barford, K. Hellgradt, and G. McKay. 2016. A comparison of chemical treatment methods for the preparation of rice husk cellulosic fibers. International Journal of Environmental & Agriculture Research 2 (1):1850–2454.
   Google Scholar