Old Corrugated Container (OCC) Cardboard Material: An Alternative Source for Obtaining Microfibrillated Cellulose

References

• Alemdar, A., and M. Sain. 2008. Isolation and characterization of nanofibers from agricultural residues - Wheat straw and soy hulls. Bioresource Technology 99:1664–71. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.04.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo, M. A. B. 2011. Diferentes processos de branqueamento da celulose e seus efeitos nas propriedades físicas e cristalinidade [Different cellulose bleaching processes and their effects on physical properties and crystallinity]. PhD thesis, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, G. S. 2015. Modificação das fibras recicladas de papelão ondulado por tratamento enzimático [Modification of recycled corrugated fibers by enzyme treatment]. PhD thesis, Universidade Federal do Paraná.
   Google Scholar
• Claro, F. C., C. Jordão, B. M. Viveiros, L. J. E. Isaka, J. A. V. Junior, and W. L. E. Magalhães. 2020. Low cost membrane of wood nanocellulose obtained by mechanical defibrillation for potential applications as wound dressing. Cellulose 27:10765–79. doi:10.1007/s10570-020-03129-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielewicz, D., and B. Surma-Ślusarska. 2015. Properties of bleached pulps from low and high kappa number old corrugated containers (OCC). Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe 5 (113):129–35. doi:10.5604/12303666.1161769.
   Google Scholar
• Dufresne, A. 2012. Preparation of microfibrillated cellulose. In Nanocellulose: From nature to high performance tailored materials, 1st ed., 43–81. Grenoble, France: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, Y. H., T. Y. Cheng, W. G. Yang, P. T. Ma, H. Z. He, X. C. Yin, and X. Yu. 2018. Characteristics and environmentally friendly extraction of cellulose nanofibrils from sugarcane bagasse. Industrial Crops and Products 111:285–91. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fibre Box Association. 2020. Corrugated packaging - Because boxes are so much more than ordinary. Accessed February 2021. https://www.corrugated.org/corrugated-packaging/.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, A. S., S. Panthapulakkal, S. K. Konar, M. Sain, L. Bufalino, J. Raabe, I. P. A. Miranda, M. A. Martins, and G. H. D. Tonoli. 2019. Improving Cellulose nanofibrillation of non-wood fiber using alkaline and bleaching pre-treatments. Industrial Crops and Products 131:203–12. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.01.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Hoyos, C., P. Mazo-Márquez, L. Penagos-Vélez, A. Serpa-Guerra, A. Eceiza, L. Urbina, J. Velásquez-Cock, P. Gañán-Rojo, L. Vélez-Acosta, and R. Zuluaga. 2020. Cocoa shell: An industrial by-product for the preparation of suspensions of holocellulose nanofibers and fat. Cellulose 27:10873–84. doi:10.1007/s10570-020-03222-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrick, F. W., R. L. Casebier, J. K. Hamilton, and K. R. Sandberg. 1983. Microfibrillated cellulose: Morphology and accessibility. In Applied Polymer Symposium: Proceedings of the Cellulose conference 37:797–813. Syracuse, New York: Journal of Applied Polymer Science.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbe, M. A., R. A. Venditti, and O. J. Rojas. 2007. What happens to cellulosic fibers during papermaking and recycling? A review. BioResources 2 (4):739–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INEGI (National Institute of Statistics and Geography). 2017. Anuario estadístico y geográfico de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos 2016 [Statistical and geographic yearbook of the United Mexican States 2016]. México: National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI).
   Google Scholar
• Kalia, S., S. Boufi, A. Celli, and S. Kango. 2014. Nanofibrillated cellulose: Surface modification and potential applications. Colloid and Polymer Science 292 (1):5–31. doi:10.1007/s00396-013-3112-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandhola, G., A. Djioleu, K. Rajan, N. Labbé, J. Sakon, D. J. Carrier, and J. W. Kim. 2020. Maximizing production of cellulose nanocrystals and nanofibers from pre-extracted loblolly pine kraft pulp: a response surface approach. Bioresources and Bioprocessing 7 (19):1–16. doi:10.1186/s40643-020-00302-0
   Google Scholar
• Klemm, D. F. K., S. Moritz, T. Lindström, M. Ankerfors, D. Gray, and A. Dorris. 2011. Nanocelluloses: A new family of nature-based materials. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 50:5438–66. doi:10.1002/anie.201001273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavoine, N., I. Desloges, A. Dufresne, and J. Bras. 2012. Microfibrillated cellulose - Its barrier properties and applications in cellulosic materials: A review. Carbohydrate Polymers 90:735–64. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyytikäinen, K., E. Saukkonen, I. Kajanto, and J. Käyhkö. 2011. The effect of hemicellulose extraction on fiber charge properties and retention behavior of kraft pulp fibers. BioResources 6 (1):219–31. doi:10.15376/biores.6.1.219-231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magalhães, W. L. E., F. C. Claro, M. Matos, and E. C. Lengowski. 2017. Produção de nanofibrilas de celulose por desfibrilação mecânica em moinho coloidal [Cellulose nanofibrils production by mechanical defibrillation in a colloid mill], Technical Report No. 404, Embrapa Florestas, Colombo, PR, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Mandal, A., and D. Chakrabarty. 2011. Isolation of nanocellulose from waste sugarcane bagasse (SCB) and Its characterization. Carbohydrate Polymers 86 (3):1291–99. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, J. I., V. A. Alvarez, V. P. Cyras, and A. Vázquez. 2008. Extraction of cellulose and preparation of nanocellulose from sisal fibers. Carbohydrate Polymers 15 (1):149–59. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.030.
   Google Scholar
• Motaung, T. E., and L. Z. Linganiso. 2018. Critical review on agrowaste cellulose applications for biopolymers. International Journal of Plastics Technology 22 (2):185–216. doi:10.1007/s12588-018-9219-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulinari, D. R., H. J. C. Voorwald, M. O. H. Cioffi, M. L. C. P. Silva, and S. M. Luz. 2009. Preparation and properties of HDPE/sugarcane bagasse cellulose composites obtained for thermokinetic mixer. Carbohydrate Polymers 75:317–21. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.07.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nascimento, P., R. Marim, G. Carvalho, and S. Mali. 2016. Nanocellulose produced from rice hulls and its effect on the properties of biodegradable starch films. Materials Research 19 (1):167–74. doi:10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2015-0423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nechyporchuk, O., M. N. Belgacem, and J. Bras. 2016. Production of cellulose nanofibrils: A review of recent advances. Industrial Crops and Products 93:2–25. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pääkko, M., M. Ankerfors, H. Kosonen, A. Nykänen, S. Ahola, M. Österberg, J. Ruokolainen, J. Laine, P. T. Larsson, O. Ikkala, et al. 2007. Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Biomacromolecules 8 (6):1934–41. doi:10.1021/bm061215p.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S., J. O. Baker, M. E. Himmel, P. A. Parilla, and D. K. Johnson. 2010. Cellulose crystallinity index: Measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance. Biotechnology for Biofuels 3 (10):1–10. doi:10.1186/1754-6834-3-10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Potulski, D. C. 2016. Influência da nanocelulose nas propriedades físicas e mecânicas de papel primário e reciclado de Pinus e Eucalyptus [nanocellulose influence on the physical and mechanical properties of primary and recycled paper of Pinus and Eucalyptus]. PhD thesis, Universidade Federal do Paraná.
   Google Scholar
• Scatolino, M. V., L. Bufalino, L. M. Mendes, M. Guimarães-Júnior, and G. H. D. Tonoli. 2017. Impact of nanofibrillation degree of Eucalyptus and Amazonian hardwood sawdust on physical properties of cellulose nanofibril films. Wood Science and Technology. doi:10.1007/s00226-017-0927-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal, L., J. J. Creely, A. E. Martin, and C. M. Conrad. 1959. An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-Ray diffractometer. Textile Research Journal 29 (10):786–94. doi:10.1177/004051755902901003.
   Google Scholar
• Shafiei, M., and A. J. Latibari. 2015. Alkaline-sulfite/anthraquinone (AS/AQ) pulping of old corrugated container and elemental chlorine free (ECF) bleaching of the pulp. Cellulose Chemistry and Technology 49 (9–10):841–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sixta, H. 2006. Pulp properties and applications. In Handbook of Pulp, ed. H. Sixta, Vol. 1, 1st ed., 1009–68. Austria: Wiley-VCH.
   Google Scholar
• Solala, I., A. Volperts, A. Andersone, T. Dizhbite, N. Mironova-Ulmane, A. Vehniäinen, J. Pere, and T. Vuorinen. 2012. Mechanoradical formation and its effects on Birch kraft pulp during the preparation of nanofibrillated cellulose with Masuko refining. Holzforschung 66 (4):477–83. doi:10.1515/HF.2011.183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, K. L., R. A. Venditti, O. J. Rojas, Y. Habibi, and J. J. Pawlak. 2010b. The effect of chemical composition on microfibrillar cellulose films from wood pulps: Water interactions and physical properties for packaging applications. Cellulose 17 (4):835–48. doi:10.1007/s10570-010-9424-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, K. L., R. A. Venditti, Y. Habibi, O. J. Rojas, and J. J. Pawlak. 2010a. The effect of chemical composition on microfibrillar cellulose films from wood pulps: Mechanical processing and physical properties. Bioresource Technology 101 (15):5961–68. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanya, R., K. G. Satyanarayana, and B. S. Pilar. 2017. Evaluation of structural, tensile and thermal properties of banana fibers. Journal of Natural Fibers 14 (4):485–97. doi:10.1080/15440478.2016.1212771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajvidi, M., M. Bahrami, and M. H. Ekhtera. 2010. Physical and mechanical properties of a highly filled old corrugated container (OCC) fiber/polyethylene composite. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites 29 (8):1166–72. doi:10.1177/0731684409103084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viana, L. C., D. C. Potulski, G. I. B. Muniz, A. S. Andrade, and E. L. Silva. 2018. Nanofibrillated Cellulose as an Additive for Recycled Paper. Cerne 24 (2):140–48. doi:10.1590/01047760201824022518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q. Q., J. Y. Zhu, R. Gleisner, T. A. Kuster, U. Baxa, and S. E. McNeil. 2012. Morphological development of cellulose fibrils of a bleached Eucalyptus pulp by mechanical fibrillation. Cellulose 19 (5):1631–43. doi:10.1007/s10570-012-9745-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, T., N. Bordeanu, and E. Strub. 2010. Properties of nanofibrillated cellulose from different raw materials and its reinforcement potential. Carbohydrate Polymers 79 (4):1086–93. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.10.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar