Evaluation of Modified Organic Cotton Fibers Based Absorbent Article Applicable to Feminine Hygiene

References

• Ahmadi, F., Z. Oveisi, S. M. Samani, and Z. Amoozgar. 2015. Chitosan based hydrogels: Characteristics and pharmaceutical applications. Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences 10 (1):1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atay, H. Y., and E. Çelik. 2017. Investigations of antibacterial activity of chitosan in the polymeric composite coatings. Progress in Organic Coatings 102:194–200. doi:10.1016/j.porgcoat.2016.10.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barman, A., P. M. Katkar, and S. D. Asagekar. 2018. Natural and sustainable raw materials for sanitary napkin. Man-Made Textiles in India 46 (12):408–11.
   Google Scholar
• Célino, A., S. Fréour, F. Jacquemin, and P. Casari. 2014. The hygroscopic behavior of plant fibers: A review. Frontiers in Chemistry Article 43:1–12. doi:10.3389/fchem.2013.00043.
   Google Scholar
• DeVito, M. J., and A. Schecter. 2002. Exposure assessment to dioxins from the use of tampons and diapers. Environmental Health Perspectives 110 (1):23–28. doi:10.1289/ehp.0211023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinand, E., M. Vignon, H. Chanzy, and L. Heux. 2002. Mercerization of primary wall cellulose and its implication for the conversion of cellulose I→ cellulose II. Cellulose 9 (1):7–18. doi:10.1023/A:1015877021688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elieh-Ali-Komi, D., and M. R. Hamblin. 2016. Chitin and chitosan: Production and application of versatile biomedical nanomaterials. International Journal of Advanced Research 4 (3):411–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flinčec Grgac, S., A. Tarbuk, T. Dekanić, W. Sujka, and Z. Draczyński. 2020. The Chitosan implementation into cotton and polyester/cotton blend fabrics. Materials 13 (7):1616. doi:10.3390/ma13071616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fras, L., Z. But, K. Stana-Kleinschek, V. Ribitsch, and A. Zabret, 2007, “Tampon which contains pH regulating, antibacterial, and antimycotic active formulation and the procedure of its production”, Patent, WO2007142609A22007
   Google Scholar
• Goy, R. C., S. T. Morais, and O. B. Assis. 2016. Evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of chitosan and its quaternized derivative on E. coli and S. aureus growth. Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia 26 (1):122–27. doi:10.1016/j.bjp.2015.09.010.
   Google Scholar
• Hashim, M. Y., A. M. Amin, O. M. F. Marwah, M. H. Othman, M. R. M. Yunus, and N. C. Huat. 2017, October. The effect of alkali treatment under various conditions on physical properties of kenaf fiber. ( IOP Publishing) Journal of Physics: Conference Series 914 (1):012030–45. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/914/1/012030.
   Google Scholar
• He, X., R. Tao, T. Zhou, C. Wang, and K. Xie. 2014. Structure and properties of cotton fabrics treated with functionalized dialdehyde chitosan. Carbohydrate Polymers 103:558–65. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.12.076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarwo, D., Sulardjaka, and S. Agus. 2020. the effect of fiber pretreatment on physical and mechanical properties in water hyacinth fiber composite. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research 8 (7):4799–805. doi:10.30534/ijeter/2020/117882020.
   Google Scholar
• Kaczmarek, M. B., K. Struszczyk-Swita, X. Li, M. Szczęsna-Antczak, and M. Daroch. 2019. Enzymatic modifications of chitin, chitosan, and chitooligosaccharides. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 7:243. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2019.00243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur, R., K. Kaur, and R. Kaur. 2018. Menstrual hygiene, management, and waste disposal: Practices and challenges faced by girls/women of developing countries. Journal of Environmental and Public Health 2018:1–9. Article ID 1730964. doi:10.1155/2018/1730964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdavinia, G. R., M. J. Zohuriaan‐Mehr, and A. Pourjavadi. 2004. Modified chitosan III, superabsorbency, salt‐and pH‐sensitivity of smart ampholytic hydrogels from chitosan‐g‐PAN. Polymers for Advanced Technologies 15 (4):173–80. doi:10.1002/pat.408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteiro, S. N., V. Calado, R. J. S. Rodriguez, and F. M. Margem. 2012. Thermogravimetric behavior of natural fibers reinforced polymer composites—An overview. Materials Science and Engineering: A 557:17–28. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2012.05.109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naebe, M., Q. Li, A. Onur, Amp, and R. Denning. 2016. Investigation of chitosan adsorption onto cotton fabric with atmospheric helium/oxygen plasma pre-treatment. Cellulose 23 (3):2129–42. doi:10.1007/s10570-016-0915-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicole, W. 2014. A question for women’s health: Chemicals in feminine hygiene products and personal lubricants. Environmental Health Perspectives 122 (3):A70–A75 . doi:10.1289/ehp.122-A70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okano, T., and A. Sarko. 1985. Mercerization of cellulose II. Alkali–cellulose intermediates and a possible mercerization mechanism. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 30 (1):325–32. doi:10.1002/app.1985.070300128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parikh, D. V., D. P. Thibodeaux, N. D. Sachinvala, J. P. Moreau, K. Q. Robert, A. P. S. Sawhney, and W. R. Goynes. 2006. Effect of cotton fiber mercerization on the absorption properties of cotton Nonwovens. AATCC Review 6 (4):38–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil, S., A. Mahapatra, V. D. Gotmare, P. G. Patil, A. K. Bharimalla, and A. Arputharaj. 2019. Effect of different mercerization techniques on tactile comfort of cotton fabric. Indian Journal of Fibre & Textile Research (IJFTR) 44 (2):217–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinera, A. C. R., and C. J. Bayani. 2020. Investigating which natural materials can be used to create an environmentally friendly sanitary pad. Academia Self-Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Piotrowska-Kirschling, A., and J. Brzeska. 2020. The effect of chitosan on the chemical structure, morphology, and selected properties of polyurethane/chitosan composites. Polymers 12 (5):1205. doi:10.3390/polym12051205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan, S., S. Mohanty, and S. K. Nayak. 2018. In-situ aerobic biodegradation study of epoxy-acrylate film in compost soil environment. Journal of Polymers and the Environment 26 (3):1133–44. doi:10.1007/s10924-017-1021-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragoubi, M., D. Bienaimé, S. Molina, B. George, and A. Merlin. 2010. Impact of Corona treated hemp fibres onto mechanical properties of polypropylene composites made thereof. Industrial Crops and Products 31 (2):344–49. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2009.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romainor, A. N., S. F. Chin, S. C. Pang, and L. M. Bilung. 2014. Preparation and characterization of chitosan nanoparticles-doped cellulose films with antimicrobial property. Article ID 710459. Journal of Nanomaterials 2014:130–40.
   Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, A., F. Moztarzadeh, and J. A. Mohandesi. 2019. Investigating the effect of chitosan on hydrophilicity and bioactivity of conductive electrospun composite scaffold for neural tissue engineering. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 121:625–32. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha, M., and A. M. Afsar. 2018. Thermo-mechanical and morphological properties of water hyacinth reinforced polypropylene composites. International Journal of Engineering Materials and Manufacture 3 (3):151–61. doi:10.26776/ijemm.03.03.2018.04.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, C. S., S. Yadav, T. Rastogi, and I. M. Pujitha, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, 2016. “Cellulose acetate based non-woven nanofiber matrix with high absorbency properties for female hygiene products” Patent, WO2016016704A2.
   Google Scholar
• Sivakami, M., A. M. van Eijk, H. Thakur, N. Kakade, C. Patil, S. Shinde, N. Surani, A. Bauman, G. Zulaika, and Y. Kabir. 2018. Effect of menstruation on girls and their schooling, and facilitators of menstrual hygiene management in schools: Surveys in government schools in three states in India, 2015. Journal of Global Health 9 (1):010408–18. doi:10.7189/jogh.09.010408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, S. J., and A. G. Supri. 2016. Properties of low-density polyethylene/natural rubber/water hyacinth fiber composites: The effect of alkaline treatment. Polymer Bulletin 73 (2):539–57. doi:10.1007/s00289-015-1508-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varghese, A. M., and V. Mittal. 2017 Surface modification of natural fibers. In Biodegradable and biocompatible polymer composites: processing, properties and applications, ed. N, Shimpi. Duxford, United Kingdom: Elsevier. Chapter 5: Surface modification of natural fibers:115.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, X., Y. Zhao, H. Mussana, M. Tessema, and L. Liu. 2018. Characteristics of cotton fabric modified with chitosan (CS)/cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) nanocomposites. Materials Letters 211:300–03. doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2017.09.075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, Y., G. Han, and Q. Wu. 2013. Transitional properties of cotton fibers from cellulose I to cellulose II structure. BioResources 8 (4):6460–71. doi:10.15376/BIORES.8.4.6460-6471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar