Isolation and Characterization of Muntingia Calabura Cellulose Nanofibers

References

• Andoko, A., F. Gapsari, K. Diharjo, M. R. Sanjay, and S. Siengchin. 2022. Isolation of microcellulose from timoho fiber using the process of delinigfication and maceration: Evaluation of physical, chemical, structural, and thermal properties. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 14 (22):8130–10. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.10.225.
   Google Scholar
• Darder, B. M., P. Aranda, and E. Ruiz-Hitzky. 2007. Bionanocomposites: A new concept of ecological, bioinspired, and functional hybrid materials. Advanced Materials 19 (10):1309–19. doi:10.1002/adma.200602328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajiha, H., M. Sain, and L. H. Mei. 2014. Modification and characterization of hemp and sisal fibers. Journal of Natural Fibers 11 (2):144–68. doi:10.1080/15440478.2013.861779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashim, M. Y., M. N. Roslan, O. M. F. Marwah, S. Mahzan, M. Zin, and S. Ariffin. 2016. The effect of alkali treatment conditions on tensile strength of kenaf fiber. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 11 (14):8658–62.
   Google Scholar
• Herlina Sari, N., I. N. G. Wardana, Y. S. Irawan, and E. Siswanto. 2018. Characterization of the chemical, physical, and mechanical properties of NaOH-treated natural cellulosic fibers from corn husks. Journal of Natural Fibers 15 (4):545–58. doi:10.1080/15440478.2017.1349707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilyas, R. A., S. M. Sapuan, and M. R. Ishak. 2018. Isolation and characterization of nanocrystalline cellulose from sugar palm fibres (Arenga Pinnata). Carbohydrate Polymers 181:1038–51. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.11.045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indran, S., and R. E. Raj. 2015. Characterization of new natural cellulosic fiber from Cissus quadrangularis stem. Carbohydrate Polymers 117:392–99. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.09.072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isnarianti, R., I. A. Wahyudi, and R. M. Puspita. 2013. Muntingia calabura L leaves extract inhibits glucosyltransferase activity of Streptococcus mutans. Journal of Dentistry Indonesia 20 (3):59–63. doi:10.14693/jdi.v20i3.195.
   Google Scholar
• Jayaramudu, J., B. R. Guduri, and A. V. Rajulu. 2010. Characterization of new natural cellulosic fabric Grewia tilifolia. Carbohydrate Polymers 79 (4):847–51. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.10.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonoobi, M., J. Harun, A. P. Mathew, and K. Oksman. 2010. Mechanical properties of cellulose nanofiber (CNF) reinforced polylactic acid (PLA) prepared by twin screw extrusion. Composites Science and Technology 70 (12):1742–47. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonoobi, M., A. P. Mathew, and K. Oksman. 2012. Producing low-cost cellulose nanofiber from sludge as new source of raw materials. Industrial Crops and Products 40 (1):232–38. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.03.018.
   Google Scholar
• Kakroodi, A. R., S. Cheng, M. Sain, and A. Asiri. 2014. Mechanical, thermal, and morphological properties of nanocomposites based on polyvinyl alcohol and cellulose nanofiber from Aloe vera rind. Journal of Nanomaterials 2014 (i):12–18. doi:10.1155/2014/903498.
   Google Scholar
• Loganathan, T. M., M. T. H. Sultan, M. Jawaid, Q. Ahsan, J. Naveen, and V. Perumal. 2022. Characterization of new cellulosic Cyrtostachys renda and Ptychosperma macarthurii fibers from landscaping plants. Journal of Natural Fibers 19 (2):669–84. doi:10.1080/15440478.2020.1758865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, X. J., S. L. Cao, X. F. Yang, L. Lin, L. H. Chen, and L. L. Huang. 2014. Lignin removal and benzene-alcohol extraction effects on lignin measurements of the hydrothermal pretreated bamboo substrate. Bioresource Technology 151:244–48. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2013.10.078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahardika, M., H. Abral, A. Kasim, S. Arief, and M. Asrofi. 2018. Production of nanocellulose from pineapple leaf fibers via high-shear homogenization and ultrasonication. Fibers 6 (2):1–12. doi:10.3390/fib6020028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouhoubi, S., M. E. H. Bourahli, H. Osmani, and S. Abdeslam. 2017. Effect of alkali treatment on alfa fibers behavior. Journal of Natural Fibers 14 (2):239–49. doi:10.1080/15440478.2016.1193088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naili, H., A. Jelidi, O. Limam, and R. Khiari. 2017. Extraction process optimization of Juncus plant fibers for its use in a green composite. Industrial Crops and Products 107:172–83. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nechyporchuk, O., M. N. Belgacem, and J. Bras. 2016. Production of cellulose anofibrils: A review of recent advances. Industrial Crops and Products 93:2–25. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey, J. K., J. W. Lee, W. S. Chu, C. S. Kim, S. H. Ahn, and C. S. Lee. 2008. Cellulose nano whiskers from grass of Korea. Macromolecular Research 16 (5):396–98. doi:10.1007/BF03218535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, M. M., M. S. A. Fakir, and M. M. Rahman. 2010. Fruit growth of China Cherry (Muntingia calabura). Botany Research International 3 (2):56–60.
   Google Scholar
• Santana, J. S., J. M. Do Rosário, C. C. Pola, C. G. Otoni, N. de Fátima Ferreira Soares, G. P. Camilloto, and R. S. Cruz. 2017. Cassava starch-based nanocomposites reinforced with cellulose nanofibers extracted from sisal. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 134 (12):1–9. doi:10.1002/app.44637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal, L., J. J. Creely, A. E. Martin, and C. M. Conrad. 1959. An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Textile Research Journal 29 (10):786–94. doi:10.1177/004051755902901003.
   Google Scholar
• Sood, M., and G. Dwivedi. 2018. Effect of fiber treatment on flexural properties of natural fiber reinforced composites: A review. Egyptian Journal of Petroleum 27 (4):775–83. doi:10.1016/j.ejpe.2017.11.005.
   Google Scholar
• Sulaiman, S., N. S. Sahat, F. N. Omar, M. N. Mokhtar, M. N. Naim, A. S. Baharuddin, and M. A. M. Salleh. 2020. Chemical-physical treatment for production of cellulose nanofiber from Kenaf Bast fiber. Journal of Natural Fibers 19 (12):4403–14. doi:10.1080/15440478.2020.1863288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supramaniam, J., S. Kiat Wong, B. Fen Leo, L. Teng Hern Tan, B. Hing Goh, and S. Ying Tang. 2020. Unravelling the swelling behaviour and antibacterial activity of palm cellulose nanofiber-based metallic nanocomposites. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 778 (1):012027. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/778/1/012027.
   Google Scholar
• Suryanto, H., E. Marsyahyo, Y. S. Irawan, and R. Soenoko. 2014. Morphology, Structure, and Mechanical Properties of Natural Cellulose Fiber from Mendong Grass (Fimbristylis globulosa). Journal of Natural Fibers. doi:10.1080/15440478.2013.879087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syafri, E., N. H. Sari, M. Mahardika, P. Amanda, and R. A. Ilyas. 2022. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from Agave gigantea by chemical-mechanical treatment. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 200:25–33. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.12.111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinod, A., T. G. Yashas Gowda, R. Vijay, M. R. Sanjay, M. K. Gupta, M. Jamil, V. Kushvaha, and S. Siengchin. 2021. Novel Muntingia Calabura bark fiber reinforced green-epoxy composite: A sustainable and green material for cleaner production. Journal of Cleaner Production 294:126337. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visakh, P. M., S. Thomas, K. Oksman, and A. P. Mathew. 2012. Effect of cellulose nanofibers isolated from bamboo pulp residue on vulcanized natural rubber. BioResources 7 (2):2156–68. doi:10.15376/biores.7.2.2156-2168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wali, M., F. Haneda, and N. Maryana. 2014. Identifikasi Kandungan Kimia Bermanfaat pada Daun Jabon Merah dan Putih (Anthocephalus spp.). Jurnal Silvikultur Tropika Agustus 05 (2):77–83.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, K. J., B. F. Yousif, and K. O. Low. 2010. The effects of alkali treatment on the interfacial adhesion of bamboo fibres. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications. doi:10.1243/14644207JMDA304
   Google Scholar
• Xu, X., F. Liu, L. Jiang, J. Y. Zhu, D. Haagenson, and D. P. Wiesenborn. 2013. Cellulose nanocrystals vs. Cellulose nanofibrils: A comparative study on their microstructures and effects as polymer reinforcing agents. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 5 (8):2999–3009. doi:10.1021/am302624t.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, B., M. Zhang, Z. Lu, J. Tan, J. J. Luo, S. Song, X. Ding, L. Wang, P. Lu, and Q. Zhang. 2019. Comparative study of aramid nanofiber (ANF) and cellulose nanofiber (CNF). Carbohydrate polymers 208:372–81. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.12.086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar