Comparative Analysis of Production Processes and Quality Parameters of Two Different Semi-Combed Yarns

References

• Adamu, B. F., D. Atalie, and E. Zelalem Liyew. 2021. Quality evaluation of Ethiopian 100% cotton carded ring spun yarn with respect to USTER Standards. Journal of Engineering (United Kingdom) 2021:4286957. doi:10.1155/2021/4286957.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad, S., I. Ahmad, and S. Baig. 2008. The effect of nipper guage and drafting zone guages at combing machine on yarn quality parameters. Journal of Quality and Technology Management IV (1):21–16.
   Google Scholar
• Amutha, K. 2017. Sustainable practices in textile industry: Standards and Certificates, 79–107. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-2639-3_5.
   Google Scholar
• Atalie, D., and G. Ashagre. 2021. Performance properties of half-bleached weft knitted fabrics made of 100% cotton ring yarns with different parameters. Tekstilec 64 (3):188–96. doi:10.14502/Tekstilec2021.64.188-196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandopadhyay, S. P., A. Akade, and P. M. Pachhade. 2011. To study effect of comber noil percentage on yarn quality. Fiber2fashion. https://www.fiber2fashion.com/industry-article/6023/to-study-effect-of-comber-noil-percentage-on-yarn-quality.
   Google Scholar
• Bhowmick, N., and S. Ghosh. 2007. Fiber shedding from cotton spun yarn -A serious indoor air pollution in knitting industry, 414–19.
   Google Scholar
• BSI. (n.d.). BS EN ISO 139:2005+A1:2011 - Textiles. Standard atmospheres for conditioning and testing. BSI Standards Publication. Accessed November 17, 2022. https://www.standardsuk.com/products/BS-EN-ISO-139-2005-A1-2011
   Google Scholar
• Chaudhari, B., P. P. Kolte, A. M. Daberao, and S. Mhaske. 2017. Performance of card and comb sliver blended yarn. International Journal on Textile Engineering and Processes 3 (1):30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Elhawary, I. A. 2015. Fiber to Yarn: Staple-Yarn Spinning A2 - Sinclair, Rose. Textiles and Fashion. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/B978-1-84569-931-4.00009-3.
   Google Scholar
• Elmogahzy, Y. E. 2020. “Yarns.” engineering Textiles, 223–48. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-08-102488-1.00009-5.
   Google Scholar
• Goyal, A., and R. Nayak. 2020. Sustainability in Yarn Manufacturing. In Sustainable Technologies for Fashion and Textiles, 33–55. Woodhead Publishing. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-102867-4.00002-5.
   Google Scholar
• Günaydin, G. K., A. Serkan Soydan, and S. Palamutçu. 2018. Evaluation of cotton fibre properties in compact yarn spinning processes and investigation of fibre and yarn properties. FIBRES & TEXTILES in Eastern Europe 26 (3(129):23–34. doi:10.5604/01.3001.0011.7299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasanuzzaman, P. K. D., and S. Basu. 2015. Optimization of ring-spinning process parameters using response surface methodology. The Journal of the Textile Institute 106 (5):510–22. doi:10.1080/00405000.2014.929250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO. 1988. “ISO 6939:1988(en), Textiles — Yarns from Packages — Method of test for breaking strength of yarn by the Skein Method.” https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:6939:ed-2:v1:en.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2004. “ISO 16549:2004(en), Textiles — Unevenness of textile strands — Capacitance Method.” https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:16549:ed-1:v1:en.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2009. “ISO 2062:2009(en), Textiles — Yarns from Packages — Determination of single-end breaking force and elongation at break using Constant Rate of Extension (CRE) tester.” https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:2062:ed-3:v1:en.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, C. A. 2010. Overview of developments in yarn spinning technology. In Advances in Yarn Spinning Technology, 3–41. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1533/9780857090218.1.3.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, E. 1961. Manual of cotton spinning. Vol. 2. Part 1., The characteristics of raw cotton. https://www.worldcat.org/title/manual-of-cotton-spinning-vol-2-part-1-the-characteristics-of-raw-cotton/oclc/222366795?referer=di&ht=edition.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, P. R. 2003. Handbook of yarn production : Technology, science and economics. Woodhead Pub. https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9781855736962/handbook-of-yarn-production.
   Google Scholar
• Malik, M. H., and T. Hussain. 2011. Effect of percentage of short fibers removed from cotton during spinning on the properties of dyed polyester/cotton-blended knitted fabrics. The Journal of the Textile Institute 102 (1):70–76. doi:10.1080/00405000903495241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messiry, M. E., N. Hosny, and G. Esmat. 2013. Optimization of the combing noil percentage for quality single and ply compact spun yarn. Alexandria Engineering Journal 52 (3):307–11. doi:10.1016/j.aej.2013.01.004.
   Google Scholar
• Mishuk, A. I., T. Saha, A. S., Sina, M. G., Mostafa, and A. S., Sharek. 2015. Carded and Combed Yarn Effect on finished fabric quality. European Scientific Journal 11 (27): 276–87.
   Google Scholar
• Oxtoby, E. 1987. Spun Yarn Technology. doi:10.1016/c2013-0-04078-9.
   Google Scholar
• Patil, K. P., P. P. Kolte, and S. S. Gulhane. 2019. Role of Comber Noil for Improving Yarn Quality, no. June.
   Google Scholar
• Rengasamy, R. S. 2010. Fundamental principles of ring spinning of yarns. In Advances in yarn spinning technology, 42–78. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1533/9780857090218.1.42.
   Google Scholar
• Subramanian, S., S. Vaidheeswaran, S. Pradeep, and P. Uthaman. 2015. Comparison of polyester-cotton blended yarns produced by blending of polyester with semi-combed and super-carded cotton fibres. Indian Journal of Fibre & Textile Research 40:31–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USTER AFIS PRO. 2020. U AFIS PRO 2: The fiber process control system: technical data. https://www.uster.com/fileadmin/user_upload/customer/Products/Fiber_Testing/AVIS_Pro/AFIS_PRO_2_techdata_en_202003.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• USTER HVI. 2020. U HVI 1000: The fiber classification and analysis system: Technical data. https://www.uster.com/fileadmin/user_upload/customer/Products/Fiber_Testing/HVI/HVI_1000_techdata_en_202003.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Walle, G. A., D. Atalie, E. Tarekegn, A. Wudneh, and A. Desalegn. 2022. Prediction of mechanical, evenness and imperfection properties of 100% cotton ring spun yarns with different twist levels. Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering and Technology 41 (1):14–22. doi:10.22581/MUET1982.2201.02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuksekkaya, M. E. 2008. A study of fly generation during raising. The Journal of the Textile Institute 99 (2):169–76. doi:10.1080/00405000701476336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuksekkaya, M. E. 2009. Fiber fly generation of 100% cotton yarns during warp preparation. The Journal of the Textile Institute 101 (3):270–75. doi:10.1080/00405000802377292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, J. B., Y. Wang, Z. Feng, and W. Li Gang. 2011. Effect of comb preparation processing and carding component on finish yarn quality. CNKI. http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-MFJS201104014.htm.
   Google Scholar