852
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Analyzing the Effect of Various Sizing Machine Settings on Abrasion Resistance and Size Pick-Up of Polyester/Cotton Blend Sized Yarn Using Box-Behnken Design

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Devare, M. D., R. N. Turukmane, S. S. Gulhane, and L. M. Patil. 2016. Effect of yarn stretch in sizing on loom performance. International Journal of Textile Engineering and Processes 2 (4):19–12.
  • Fernando, E. A. S. K., and T. S. S. Jayawardana. 2015. Development of mathematical model to select best technological parameters in sizing. Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology (JMEST) 2 (6): 1314–1322.
  • Friedman, H. L., B. Miller, S. Kepka, and J. P. Moreau. 1989. Abrasion studies of sized cotton yarns before and after weaving. Textile Research Journal 59 (10):622–29. doi:10.1177/004051758905901011.
  • Goswami, B. C., R. D. Anandjiwala, and D. Hall. 2004. Textile sizing. CRC press. doi:10.1201/9780203913543.
  • Hari, P. K., B. K. Behera, J. Prakash, and K. Dhawan. 1989. High pressure squeezing in sizing: Performance of cotton yarn. Textile Research Journal 59 (10):597–600. doi:10.1177/004051758905901007.
  • Iwundu, M. P. 2015. Optimal partially replicated cube, star and center runs in face-centered central composite designs. International Journal of Statistics and Probability 4 (4):1–19. v4n4p1. doi:10.5539/ijsp.v4n4p1.
  • Jia, Y., and M. Zhang. 2010. A new control strategy of sizing percentage based on analysis of key factors. In 2010 International Conference on Computer and Information Application, pp. 266–69, IEEE, doi: 10.1109/ICCIA.2010.6141588.
  • Kovačević, S., and D. Gordoš. 2009. Impact of the level of yarn twist on sized yarn properties. work 7:11.
  • Kovačević, S., and Ž. Penava. 2004. Impact of sizing on physico-mechanical properties of yarn. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe 48 (4):32–36.
  • Kovačević, S., I. Schwarz, and S. Brnada. 2008. Analysis of size pick-up and mechanical and surface properties of multicolored warps. Textile Research Journal 78 (2):158–67. doi:10.1177/0040517507079782.
  • Krupincová, G., and J. Hatipoglu. 2013. Testing of yarn abrasion. AUTEX Research Journal 13 (1):22–27. doi:10.2478/v10304-012-0019-3.
  • Maatoug, S., N. Ladhari, and F. Sakli. 2007. Evaluation of the weavability of sized cotton warps. AUTEX Research Journal 8 (4):239–44.
  • Mazharul, I. K. 2013. Parameters for the process control in sizing of warp yarn. Textile Learner Accessed December 9/2022.
  • Montgomery, D. C. 2017. Design and analysis of experiments. New York: John Wiley & sons.
  • Özdil, N., G. Özçelik Kayseri, and G. Süpüren Mengüç. 2012. Analysis of abrasion characteristics in textiles. Abrasion Resistance of Materials 119–46.
  • Patil, P., R. Turukmane, and P. P. Raichurkar. 2017. Comparative analysis of sizing machine parameters on weaving performance. International Journal on Textile Engineering and Processes 3 (3):31–35.
  • Sabır, E. C., and Ç. Sarpkaya. 2016. Optimization of sizing parameters with Taguchi method. Indian Journal of Fibre and Textile Research 41:73–77.
  • Salama, M., M. El-Missery, S. Ibrahim, and H. Behes. 2021. An investigation to the influence of sizing machine settings on thread properties. MEJ Mansoura Engineering Journal 15 (2):111–24. doi:10.21608/BFEMU.2021.171559.
  • Turukmane, R., S. Gulhane, and R. B. Patil. 2019. Impact of process parameters on sizing machine performance: A review. Melliand International 25 (3):182–83.
  • Walker, A. C., and P. S. Olmstead. 1945. Textile yarn abrasion test. Textile Research 15 (6):201–22. doi:10.1177/004051754501500601.
  • Zhao, Y., X. Helan, and Y. Yang. 2017. Development of biodegradable textile sizes from soymeal: A renewable and cost-effective resource. Journal of Polymers and the Environment 25 (2):349–58. doi:10.1007/s10924-016-0811-6.