Philosophy of Communication and Umberto Eco’s Infinity of Lists: The Interplay of the Poetic and Pragmatic

References

• Arneson, P. (2007). Jean Gebser’s cosmology: Poetic openings and dialogic possibilities. In P. Arneson (Ed.), Perspectives on philosophy of communication (pp. 195–212). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arneson, P. (2014). Communicative engagement and social liberation: Justice will be made. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnett, R. C. (2003). The responsive “I”: Levinas’ derivative argument. Argumentation and Advocacy, 40, 39–50.
   Google Scholar
• Arnett, R. C. (2013). Communication ethics in dark times: Hannah Arendt’s rhetoric of warning and hope. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnett, R. C., & Holba, A. (2012). An overture to philosophy of communication: The carrier of meaning. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Balducci, G., with Eco, U. (1976). Umberto Eco in New York: An interview. Communication Quarterly, 24(2), 35–38.
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, S., & Gorris, L., with Eco, U. (2009, 11 November). “We like lists because we don’t want to die.” Spiegel Online International. Retrieved from http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/spiegel-interview-with-umberto-eco-we-like-lists-because-we-don-t-want-to-die-a-659577.html
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi, C. (2015). Thresholds, boundaries, limits: Ideological analysis in the semiotics of Umberto Eco. Semiotica, 206, 109–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, C., & Vassallo, C. (2015). Introduction: Umberto Eco’s interpretative semiotics: Interpretation, encyclopedia, translation. Semiotica, 206, 5–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondanella, P. (1997). Umberto Eco and the open text: Semiotics, fiction, popular culture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bondanella, P. (2007). Umberto Eco (1932–). In G. Marrone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Italian literary studies (pp. 657–660). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Catt, I. E., & Eicher-Catt, D. (2010). Communicology: The new science of embodied discourse. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, B. G., & Butchart, B. C. (2012). Introduction. In B. G. Chang & G. C. Butchart (Eds.), Philosophy of communication (pp. 1–10). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Danesi, M. (2015). Preface: Umberto Eco and semiotics: An enduring legacy. Semiotica, 206, 1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, U. (1992). Interpretation and overinterpretation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, U. (2009). Infinity of lists (A. McEwen, Trans.). London, UK: MacLehose.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, U. (2011). Confessions of a young novelist. Cambridge, MA: President and Fellows of Harvard College.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, U., & Hay, J. (2013). Interview with Umberto Eco, between July 2012 and January 2013: Interview conducted through written correspondence: Interview edited by James Hay. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 10(1), 50–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. (1983). Martin Buber’s life and work: The middle years, 1923–1945. New York, NY: E. P. Dutton.
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H-G. (2004). Philosophical hermeneutics (D. E. Linge, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press. (Original work published 1976)
   Google Scholar
• Langsdorf, L. (2002). In defense of poiesis: The performance of self in communicative praxis. In M. B. Matustík & W. L. McBride (Eds.), Calvin O. Schrag and the task of philosophy after postmodernity (pp. 281–296). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langsdorf, L., & Smith, A. R. (1995). Recovering pragmatism’s voice: The classical tradition, Rorty, and the philosophy of communication. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lanigan, R. L. (1992). The human science of communicology: A phenomenology of discourse in Foucault and Merleau-Ponty. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University.
   Google Scholar
• Mullen, M. (1996). Umberto Eco. In T. Enos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of rhetoric and composition: Communication from ancient times to the information age (p. 203). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Petrilli, S. (2014). Sign studies and semioethics: Communication, translation, and values. Boston, MA: Walter de Gruyer.
   Google Scholar
• Petrilli, S., & Ponzio, A. (2011). Transcendence and alterity: On life, communication, and subjectivity. Semiotica, 184, 229–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisanty, V. (2015). From the model reader to the limits of interpretation. Semiotica, 206, 37–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proni, G. (2015). Umberto Eco and Charles Peirce: A slow and respectful convergence. Semiotica, 206, 13–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radford, G. P. (2003a). Meet your footnote: Umberto Eco. American Communication Journal, 6(4), 1.
   Google Scholar
• Radford, G. P. (2003b). On Eco. Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, R. E. (2003). Introduction: In-between philosophy and communication studies. In R. E. Ramsey & D. J. Miller (Eds.), Experiences between philosophy and communication (pp. vii–viii). Albany: State University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, R. E., & Miller, D. J. (Eds.). (2003). Experiences between philosophy and communication: Engaging the philosophical contributions of Calvin O. Schrag. Albany: State University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Schrag, C. O. (1986). Communicative praxis and the space of subjectivity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vassallo, C. (2015). What’s so ‘proper’ about translation? Or interlingual translation and interpretative semiotics. Semiotica, 206, 161–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Violi, P. (2015). Global and local: Encyclopedic meaning revisited. Semiotica, 206, 89–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, L., & Ramsey, R. E. (2005). Leaving us to wonder: An essay on the questions science can’t ask. Albany: State University of New York.
   Google Scholar