“A Statistically Representative Climate Change Debate”: Satirical Television News, Scientific Consensus, and Public Perceptions of Global Warming

References

• Antilla, L. (2005). Climate of scepticism: U.S. newspaper coverage of the science of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15, 338–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, M. (2003). Soft news goes to war: Public opinion and American foreign policy in the new media age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, J., & Morris, J. S. (2006). The Daily Show effect: Candidate evaluations, efficacy, and American youth. American Politics Research, 34, 341–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baym, G. (2005). The Daily Show: Discursive integration and the reinvention of political journalism. Political Communication, 22, 259–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, A. B. (2011). Political humor as democratic relief? The effects of exposure to comedy and straight news on trust and efficacy. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 19, 235–250.
   Google Scholar
• Bolsen, T., & Druckman, J. N. (2015). Counteracting the politicization of science. Journal of Communication, 65, 745–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolsen, T., Leeper, T. J., & Shapiro, M. A. (2014). Doing what others do: Norms, science, and collective action on global warming. American Politics Research, 42, 65–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bord, R. J., O’Connor, R. E., & Fisher, A. (2000). In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change? Public Understanding of Science, 9, 205–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boykoff, M. T. (2007). Flogging a dead norm? Newspaper coverage of anthropogenic climate change in the United States and United Kingdom from 2003 to 2006. Area, 39, 470–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boykoff, M. T. (2008). Lost in translation? United States television coverage of anthropogenic climate change, 1995–2004. Climatic Change, 86, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boykoff, M. T. (2011). Who speaks for the climate? Making sense of media reporting on climate change. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boykoff, M. T., & Boykoff, J. M. (2004). Balance as bias: Global warming and the U.S. prestige press. Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions, 14, 125–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, P. R. (2013). “Science: What’s it up to?” The Daily Show and the social construction of science. International Journal of Communication, 7, 452–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, P. R., & Cao, X. (2006). Candidate appearances on soft news shows and public knowledge about primary campaigns. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50, 18–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, P. R., & McKnight, J. (2015). Climate as comedy: The effects of satirical television news on climate change perceptions. Science Communication, 37, 635–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, P. R., & Marquardt, E. (2007). Mock news and democracy: Analyzing The Daily Show. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 15, 249–267.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, J., & Jacobs, P. (2014). Scientists are from Mars, laypeople are from Venus: An evidence-based rationale for communicating the consensus on climate. Reports of the National Center for Science Education, 34(6).
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, J. B., & Durfee, J. L. (2004). Testing public (un)certainty of science media representations of global warming. Science Communication, 26, 129–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faris, R., Roberts, H., Etling, B., Othman, D., & Benkler, Y. (2015). Score another one for the Internet? The role of the networked public sphere in the U.S. net neutrality policy debate. Retrieved from https://cyber.law.harvard.edu/sites/cyber.law.harvard.edu/files/2015_02_10_Score_Another_One_for_the_Internet_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. (2013). Cloudy with a chance of heat balls: The portrayal of global warming on The Daily Show and The Colbert Report. International Journal of Communication, 7, 430–451.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, L., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. (2011). The science of satire: The Daily Show and The Colbert Report as sources of public attention to science and the environment. In A. Amarasingam (Ed.), The Stewart/Colbert effect: Essays on the real impacts of fake news (pp. 25–46). Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, L., Maibach, E. W., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2012). Climate on cable: The nature and impact of global warming coverage on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC. International Journal of Press/Politics, 17, 3–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J. R., Koloen, G., & Sahin, V. (2007). No joke: A comparison of substance in The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and broadcast network television coverage of the 2004 presidential election campaign. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51, 213–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, P. S., & Nisbet, E. C. (2012). Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Communication Research, 39, 701–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., & Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 924–936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmielowski, J. D., Feldman, L., Myers, T. A., Leiserowitz, A., & Maibach, E. (2014). An attack on science? Media use, trust in scientists, and perceptions of global warming. Public Understanding of Science, 23, 866–883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollander, B. A. (2005). Late-night learning: Do entertainment programs increase political campaign knowledge for young viewers? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49, 402–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M. (2014). Making climate-science communication evidence-based—all the way down. In D. A. Crow & M. T. Boykoff (Eds.), Culture, politics and climate change: How information shapes our common future (pp. 203–220). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M. (2014). Making climate-science communication evidence-based—all the way down. In D. A. Crow & M. T. Boykoff (Eds.), Culture, politics and climate change: How information shapes our common future (pp. 203–220). New York, NY:
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M. (2015). Climate-science communication and the measurement problem. Political Psychology, 36(S1), 1–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaMarre, H. (2013). When parody and reality collide: Examining the effects of Colbert’s Super PAC satire on issue knowledge and policy engagement across media formats. International Journal of Communication, 7, 394–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maglio, T. (2015). TV’s late-night ratings wars. The Wrap. Retrieved from http://www.thewrap.com/tvs-late-night-ratings-wars-tonight-show-wins-another-battle-kimmel-viewers-come-close-to-lettermans/
   Google Scholar
• Malka, A., Krosnick, J. A., Debell, M., Pasek, J., & Schneider, D. (2009). Featuring skeptics in news media stories about global warming reduces public beliefs in the seriousness of global warming. Retrieved from https://woods.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/files/Global-Warming-Skeptics-Technical-Detail.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2003). Defeating Kyoto: The conservative movement’s impact on US climate change policy. Social Problems, 50, 348–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. Sociological Quarterly, 52, 155–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, J. S. (2009). The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and audience attitude change during the 2004 party conventions. Political Behavior, 31, 79–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, T. A., Maibach, E., Peters, E., & Leiserowitz, A. (2015). Simple messages help set the record straight about scientific agreement on human-caused climate change: The results of two experiments. PloS ONE, 10, e0120985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, M. C. (2011). Climate shift: Clear vision for the next decade of public debate. Washington, DC: American University, School of Communication.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connell, M. (2014). John Oliver’s talk show ratings edging out HBO colleague Bill Maher. The Hollywood Reporter. Retrieved from http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/john-olivers-talk-show-ratings-735187
   Google Scholar
• Pennolino, P. (Director) (2014, June 15). Last Week Tonight with John Oliver [Television series]. New York, NY: HBO.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2015). Americans, politics, and science issues. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/07/01/chapter-2-climate-change-and-energy-issues/
   Google Scholar
• Project for Excellence in Journalism. (2008). Journalism, satire or just laughs? The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, examined. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/node/10953
   Google Scholar
• Saad, L. (2014, April 22). One in four in U.S. are solidly skeptical of global warming. Gallup. Retrieved from http://www.gallup.com/poll/168620/one-four-solidly-skeptical-global-warming.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J. (2011). Niche news: The politics of news choice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• University of Delaware Center for Political Communication. (2014). National survey shows public overwhelmingly opposes Internet “fast lanes.” Retrieved from https://www.cpc.udel.edu/news/Documents/UD-CPC-NatAgenda2014PR_2014NetNeutrality.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van der Linden, S. L., Leiserowitz, A. A., Feinberg, G. D., & Maibach, E. W. (2014). How to communicate the scientific consensus on climate change: Plain facts, pie charts or metaphors? Climatic Change, 126, 255–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Linden, S. L., Leiserowitz, A. A., Feinberg, G. D., & Maibach, E. W. (2015). The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: Experimental evidence. PloS ONE, 10, e0118489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xenos, M. A., & Becker, A. B. (2009). Moments of Zen: Effects of The Daily Show on information seeking and political learning. Political Communication, 26, 317–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, D. G. (2013). Laughter, learning, or enlightenment? Viewing and avoidance motivations behind The Daily Show and The Colbert Report. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 153–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, D. G., & Hoffman, L. (2012). Acquisition of current-events knowledge from political satire programming: An experimental approach. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 20, 290–304.
   Google Scholar