The first lady of social media: The visual rhetoric of Michelle Obama’s Twitter images

References

• Arsenault, D. J. (1997). The proclamation of restoration of the independent nation of Hawaii: A fantasy theme analysis ( Unpublished master’s thesis). California State University, Fullerton, California.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, A. M. (1997). Visual intelligence: Perception, image, and manipulation in visual communication. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beasley, M. (2005). First ladies and the press: The unfinished partnership of the media age. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belkin, L. (2012, September 5). Michelle Obama: What does she mean by ‘Mom-in-Chief’? Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lisa-belkin/obama-mom-in-chief_b_1858440.html
   Google Scholar
• Bormann, E., Cragan, J., & Shields, D. (2003). Defending symbolic convergence theory from an imaginary Gunn. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 89, 366–372. doi:10.1080/0033563032000160990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bormann, E. G. (1985). Symbolic convergence theory: A communication formulation. Journal of Communication., 35, 128–138. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb02977.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, D., Golder, S., & Lotan, G. (2010, January). Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.
   Google Scholar
• Boyraz, M., Krishnan, A., & Catona, D. (2015). Who is retweeted in times of political protest? An analysis of characteristics of top tweeters and top retweeted users during the 2011 Egyptian Revolution. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 23, 99–119. doi:10.1080/15456870.2015.1013103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. R., Bhadury, R. K., & Pope, N. K. L. (2010). The impact of comedic violence on viral advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 39(1), 49–65. doi:10.2753/JOA0091-3367390104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, L. (2004). First ladies as political women: Press framing of presidential wives, 1900-2001 (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Bykowicz, J. (2015). Twitter dives into campaign fundraising. Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/newshour/making-sense/twitter-takes-dive-campaign-fundraising/Associated Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caroli, B. B. (2003). First ladies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colapinto, C., & Benecchi, E. (2014). The presentation of celebrity personas in everyday twittering: Managing online reputations throughout a communication crisis. Media, Culture & Society, 36, 219–233. doi:10.1177/0163443714526550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colbert, J. (1995). Ho hum, another Hillary photo. Visual Communication Quarterly, 2(4), 4–6. doi:10.1080/15551393.1995.10387533
   Google Scholar
• Cragan, J. F., & Shields, D. C. (1995). Symbolic theories in applied communication research: Bormann, Burke, and Fisher. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, K., & Lynch, T. (2014). It takes a survey: Understanding gender stereotypes, abstract attitudes, and voting for women candidates. American Politics Research, 42, 656–676. doi:10.1177/1532673X13503034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, M. E., & Page, J. T. (2013). Does political humor matter? You betcha! Comedy TV’s performance of the 2008 vice presidential debate. The Journal of Popular Culture, 46, 545–565. doi:10.1111/jpcu.12038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, M., Page, J., & Perreault, G. (2014, August 8). Sticking it to Obamacare: A rhetorical analysis of Affordable Care Act advertising and social media. Paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication. Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Durand, J., & Van Leeuwen, T. (1983). Rhetoric and the advertising image. Australian Journal of Cultural Studies, 1(2), 29–61.
   Google Scholar
• Eksterowicz, A., & Sulfaro, V. A. (2002). The presidential partnerships of first ladies and their influence on public policy. Current Politics and Economics of the United States, 4, 307–328.
   Google Scholar
• Fahmy, S. (2004). Picturing Afghan women: A content analysis of AP wire photographs during the Taliban regime and after the fall of the Taliban regime. Gazette, 66, 91–112. doi:10.1177/0016549204041472
   Google Scholar
• Finneman, T., & Thomas, R. J. (2014). First ladies in permanent conjuncture: Grace Coolidge and “Great” American womanhood in the New York Times. Women’s Studies in Communication, 37, 220–236. doi:10.1080/07491409.2014.911232
   Google Scholar
• Foss, S. (2005). Theory of visual rhetoric. In K. Smith, S. Moriarty, G. Barbatsis, & K. Kenney (Eds.), Handbook of visual communication: Theory, methods, and media (pp. 141–152). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, M., & Stark, P. (1991). Eyes on the news. St. Petersburg, FL: Poynter Institute for Media Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Gardetto, D. (1997). Hillary Rodham Clinton, symbolic gender politics, and the New York Times: January-November 1992. Political Communication,14(2), 225. doi:10.1080/105846097199461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilliam, F. D., Jr, & Iyengar, S. (2000). Prime suspects: The influence of local television news on the viewing public. American Journal of Political Science, 44(3), 560–573. doi:10.2307/2669264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golan, G. J., & Zaidner, L. (2008). Creative strategies in viral advertising: An application of Taylor’s six-segment message strategy wheel. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 959–972. doi:10.1111/jcmc.2008.13.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, L. (1986). History: First ladies. The American Scholar, 55(4), 528–535.
   Google Scholar
• Grabe, M., & Bucy, E. (2009). Image bite politics: News and the visual framing of elections. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, W. J., Moon, B., & Busby Grant, J. (2010). Digital dialogue? Australian politicians’ use of the social network tool Twitter. Australian Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 579–604. doi:10.1080/10361146.2010.517176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddy, L., & Terkildsen, N. (1993). The consequences of gender stereotypes for women candidates at different levels and types of office. Political Research Quarterly, 46(3), 503–525. doi:10.1177/106591299304600304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, S. (2012). The strategic use of Twitter to manage personal public relations. Public Relations Review, 38, 159–161. doi:10.1016/j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyer, A., & Oldmeadow, J. (2006). Picture this: Emotional and political responses to photographs of the Kenneth Bigley kidnapping. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(5), 635–647. doi:10.1002/ejsp.v36:5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, R. L. (2011). Hope is finally making a comeback: First lady reframed. Communication, Culture & Critique, 4(1), 56–77. doi:10.1111/j.1753-9137.2010.01093.x
   Google Scholar
• Kahl, M. L. (2009). First lady Michelle Obama: Advocate for strong families. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 6(3), 316–320. doi:10.1080/14791420903063794
   Google Scholar
• Kushin, M. J., & Yamamoto, M. (2010). Did social media really matter? College students’ use of online media and political decision making in the 2008 election. Mass Communication and Society, 13(5), 608–630. doi:10.1080/15205436.2010.516863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaMarre, H. L., & Suzuki-Lambrecht, Y. (2013). Tweeting democracy? Examining Twitter as an online public relations strategy for congressional campaigns’. Public Relations Review, 39, 360–368. doi:10.1016/j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. O., & Moe, H. (2012). Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign. New Media & Society, 14(5), 729–747. doi:10.1177/1461444811422894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z., Liu, L., & Li, H. (2012). Determinants of information retweeting in microblogging. Internet Research, 22(4), 443–466. doi:10.1108/10662241211250980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlister, J. F. (2009). Trash in the White House: Michelle Obama, post-racism, and the pre-class politics of domestic style. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 6(3), 311–315. doi:10.1080/14791420903063844
   Google Scholar
• McKewon, E. (2012). Talking points ammo. Journalism Studies, 13(2), 277–297. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2011.646403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers-Levy, J., & Peracchio, L. A. (1992). Getting an angle in advertising: The effect of camera angle on product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 454–461. doi:10.2307/3172711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortensen, T. (2015). Visually assessing the first lady in a digital age: A study of Michelle Obama as portrayed by journalists and the White House. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 36(1), 43–67. doi:10.1080/1554477X.2015.985152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newhagen, J. E., & Reeves, B. (1992). This evening’s bad news: Effects of compelling negative television news images on memory. Journal of Communication, 42(2), 25–41. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00776.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, D. (2010). Media in the 2008 election: 21st century campaign, same old story. In L. Sabato (Ed.), The year of Obama: How Barack Obama won the White House (pp. 167–186). New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Page, J., Duffy, M., Frisby, C., & Perreault, G. (2016). Richard Sherman speaks and almost breaks the Internet. Howard Journal of Communication, 27(3), 270–289. doi:10.1080/10646175.2016.1176969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, J., Duffy, M., & Perreault, G. (2014, August). Sticking it to Obamacare: The visual rhetoric of affordable care act advertising in social media. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Montreal, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Page, J. T., & Duffy, M. E. (2009). A battle of visions: Dueling images of morality in US political campaign TV ads. Communication, Culture & Critique, 2(1), 110–135. doi:10.1111/j.1753-9137.2008.01031.x
   Google Scholar
• Papanek, H. (1973). Men, women, and work: Reflections on the two-person career. American Journal of Sociology, 78(4), 90–110. doi:10.1086/225406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauly, J. (1991). A beginner’s guide to doing qualitative research in mass communication. Journalism Monographs, 125, 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Petrovic, S., Osborne, M., & Lavrenko, V. (2011, July). RT to win! Predicting message propagation in Twitter. Paper presented at the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center (2017, January 12). Social media fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/social-media/
   Google Scholar
• Porter, L., & Golan, G. J. (2006). From subservient chickens to brawny men: A comparison of viral advertising to television advertising. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6(2), 30–38.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, M., & Kantor, J. (2008, June 18). After attacks, Michelle Obama looks for new introduction. The New York Times. Retrieved October 6, 2015. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/18/us/politics/18michelle.html?pagewanted=all
   Google Scholar
• Powell, T. E., Boomgaarden, H. G., De Swert, K., & De Vreese, C. H. (2015). A clearer picture: The contribution of visuals and text to framing effects. Journal of Communication, 65(6), 997–1017. doi:10.1111/jcom.12184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, N. (1993). Dismantling the mosaic of misery: Louis Sullivan’s paradoxic rhetorical vision. Howard Journal of Communications, 4(3), 234–248. doi:10.1080/10646179309359779
   Google Scholar
• Safko, L. (2010). The social media bible: Tactics, tools, and strategies for business success. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Saxonhouse, A. (1992). Introduction-public and private: The paradigm of power. In B. Garlick & A. Dixon (Eds.), Stereotype of women in power: Historical perspectives and revisionists’ views (pp. 1–9). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharrer, E., & Bissell, K. (2000). Overcoming traditional boundaries: The role of political activity in media coverage of first ladies. Women & Politics, 21(1), 55–83. doi:10.1300/J014v21n01_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. doi:10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
   Google Scholar
• Shoop, T. J. (2010). From professionals to potential first ladies: How newspapers told the stories of Cindy McCain and Michelle Obama. Sex Roles, 63(11–12), 807–819. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9858-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Southgate, D., Westoby, N., & Page, G. (2010). Creative determinants of viral video viewing. International Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 2–14. doi:10.2501/S0265048710201221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, P., Lachlan, K., Westerman, D., & Spates, S. (2013). Where the gates matter less: Ethnicity and perceived source credibility in social media health messages. Howard Journal of Communications, 24(1), 1–16. doi:10.1080/10646175.2013.748593
   Google Scholar
• Suh, B., Hong, L., Pirolli, P., & Chi, E. H. (2010, August). Want to be retweeted? Large scale analytics on factors impacting retweet in Twitter network. Paper presented at IEEE Conference, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Sulfaro, V. (2007). Affective evaluations of first ladies: A comparison of Hillary Clinton and Laura Bush. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 37(3), 486–514. doi:10.1111/psq.2007.37.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Templin, C. (1999). Hillary Clinton as threat to gender norms: Cartoon images of the first lady. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 23(1), 20–36. doi:10.1177/0196859999023001002
   Google Scholar
• Tyree, T. (2011). African American stereotypes in reality television. Howard Journal of Communications, 22(4), 394–413. doi:10.1080/10646175.2011.617217
   Google Scholar
• Underation, C. (2012). Seeding the vision: Symbolic convergence theory and Aimee Semple McPherson. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 20(5), 274–289. doi:10.1080/15456870.2012.728120
   Google Scholar
• Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006). First impressions making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17(7), 592–598. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winfield, B. H. (1994). “Madame president”: Understanding a new kind of first lady. Media Studies Journal, 8(2), 59–71.
   Google Scholar
• Winfield, B. H. (1997). The making of an image: Hillary Rodham Clinton and American journalists. Political Communication, 14(2), 241–253. doi:10.1080/105846097199470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, N. (2000). Gendered and re-gendered: Public opinion and Hillary Rodham Clinton. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, H. C., & Wang, Y. (2015). Social sharing of online videos: Examining American consumers’ video sharing attitudes, intent, and behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 32(9), 907–919. doi:10.1002/mar.20826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeldes, G. A. (2009). Maverick, escort, or style setter—TV news framing of candidates’ spouses during the 2004 and 2008 presidential elections. Electronic News, 3(4), 193–213. doi:10.1080/19312430903300012
   Google Scholar