References
- Ackland, R., & Shorish, J. (2014). Political homophily on the web. In M. Cantijoch, R. Gibson, & S. Ward (Eds.), Analyzing social media data and web networks (pp. 25–46). London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Adar, E., Gearig, C., Balasubramanian, A., & Hullman, J. (2017). PersaLog: Personalization of news article content. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3188–3200). New York, NY: ACM Press.
- Ahn, H., Kwolek, E. A., & Bowman, N. D. (2015). Two faces of narcissism on SNS: The distinct effects of vulnerable and grandiose narcissism on SNS privacy control. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 375–381. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.032
- Andsager, J. L., & White, H. A. (2007). Self versus others: Media, messages, and the third-person effect. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Auxier, B., Rainie, L., Anderson, M., Perrin, A., Kumar, M., & Turner, E. (2019, November 15). Americans and privacy: Concerned, confused and feeling lack of control over their personal information. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/11/15/americans-and-privacy-concerned-confused-and-feeling-lack-of-control-over-their-personal-information/
- Baek, Y. M., Kang, H., & Kim, S. (2019). Fake news should be regulated because it influences both “others” and “me”: How and why the influence of presumed influence model should be extended. Mass Communication and Society, 22(3), 301–323. doi:10.1080/15205436.2018.1562076
- Bang, H., Choi, D., Wojdynski, B. W., & Lee, Y.-I. (2019). How the level of personalization affects the effectiveness of personalized ad messages: The moderating role of narcissism. International Journal of Advertising, 38(8), 1116–1138. doi:10.1080/02650487.2019.1590069
- Bilton, R. (2017, September 28). All the news that’s fit for you: The New York Times is experimenting with personalization to find new ways to expose readers to stories. Nieman Lab. http://www.niemanlab.org/2017/09/all-the-news-thats-fit-for-you-the-new-york-times-is-experimenting-with-personalization-to-find-new-ways-to-expose-readers-to-stories/
- Böckler, A., Sharifi, M., Kanske, P., Dziobek, I., & Singer, T. (2017). Social decision making in narcissism: Reduced generosity and increased retaliation are driven by alterations in perspective-taking and anger. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.020
- Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
- Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(1), 1–15. doi:10.1086/268763
- DeVito, M. A. (2017). From editors to algorithms. Digital Journalism, 5(6), 753–773. doi:10.1080/21670811.2016.1178592
- Dylko, I., Dolgov, I., Hoffman, W., Eckhart, N., Molina, M., & Aaziz, O. (2017). The dark side of technology: An experimental investigation of the influence of customizability technology on online political selective exposure. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 181–190. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.031
- FTC Privacy Report (n.d.). FTC’s privacy report: Balancing privacy and innovation. Federal Trade Commission. https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/media-resources/protecting-consumer-privacy/ftc-privacy-report
- Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(3), 213–224. doi:10.1002/bdm.1753
- Gramlich, J. (2020). What the 2020 electorate looks like by party, race and ethnicity, age, education and religion. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/10/26/what-the-2020-electorate-looks-like-by-party-race-and-ethnicity-age-education-and-religion/
- Grubbs, J. B., Exline, J. J., McCain, J., Campbell, W. K., Twenge, J. M., & Yechiam, E. (2019). Emerging adult reactions to labeling regarding age-group differences in narcissism and entitlement. Public Library of Science ONE, 14(5), e0215637. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0215637
- Gunther, A. C., & Christen, C. T. (2002). Projection or persuasive press? Contrary effects of personal opinion and perceived news coverage on estimates of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 52(1), 177–195. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02538.x
- Haim, M., Graefe, A., & Brosius, H.-B. (2018). Burst of the filter bubble? Digital Journalism, 6(3), 330–343. doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1338145
- Harsh, A. (2016). Is personalization more dangerous than fake news? The Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/is-personalization-more-dangerous-than-fake-news_us_5833631ee4b0eaa5f14d4969
- Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
- Hendin, H. M., & Cheek, J. M. (1997). Assessing hypersensitive narcissism: A reexamination of Murray’s narcism scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 31(4), 588–599. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1997.2204
- Houston, J. B., Hansen, G. J., & Nisbett, G. S. (2011). Influence of user comments on perceptions of media bias and third-person effect in online news. Electronic News, 5(2), 79–92. doi:10.1177/1931243111407618
- Jang, S. M., & Kim, J. K. (2018). Third person effects of fake news: Fake news regulation and media literacy interventions. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 295–302. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.034
- Jones, L. L., & Brunell, A. B. (2014). Clever and crude but not kind: Narcissism, self-esteem, and the self-reference effect. Memory, 22(4), 307–322. doi:10.1080/09658211.2013.778999
- Kalyanaraman, S., & Sundar, S. S. (2006). The psychological appeal of personalized content in web portals: Does customization affect attitudes and behavior? Journal of Communication, 56(1), 110–132. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00006.x
- Kees, J., Berry, C., Burton, S., & Sheehan, K. (2017). An analysis of data quality: Professional panels, student subject pools, and Amazon’s mechanical Turk. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 141–155. doi:10.1080/00913367.2016.1269304
- Kunert, J., & Thurman, N. (2019). The form of content personalisation at mainstream, transatlantic news outlets: 2010–2016. Journalism Practice, 13(7), 759–780. doi:10.1080/17512786.2019.1567271
- Lafrance, A. (2017). The Power of Personalization. Nieman Reports. https://niemanreports.org/articles/the-power-of-personalization/
- Lakshmanan, I. A. R. (2018, August 22). Finally some good news: Trust in news is up, especially for local media. Poynter. https://www.poynter.org/ethics-trust/2018/finally-some-good-news-trust-in-news-is-up-especially-for-local-media/
- Lavie, T., Sela, M., Oppenheim, I., Inbar, O., & Meyer, J. (2010). User attitudes towards news content personalization. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(8), 483–495. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.09.011
- Marzochi, S. F., & Balieiro, F. D. F. (2021). Wall of mirrors: Political narcissism on digital platforms. Revista Brasileira de Sociologia - RBS, 9(23), 121–148. doi:10.20336/rbs.766
- McCain, J. L., & Campbell, W. K. (2018). Narcissism and social media use: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 7(3), 308–327. doi:10.1037/ppm0000137
- McLeod, D. M., Detenber, B. H., & Eveland, W. P., Jr. (2001). Behind the third-person effect: Differentiating perceptual processes for self and other. Journal of Communication, 51(4), 678–695. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02902.x
- Merritt, C. (2018, February 24). Are We Developing Digital Narcissism? Medium. https://medium.com/@chris.merritt/are-we-developing-digital-narcissism-2db7db9cef65
- Mitchell, A., Jurkowitz, M., Oliphant, J. B., & Shearer, E. (2020). Americans who mainly get their news on social media are less engaged, less knowledgeable. Pew Research Center’s Journalism Project. https://www.journalism.org/2020/07/30/americans-who-mainly-get-their-news-on-social-media-are-less-engaged-less-knowledgeable/
- Morf, C. C., Weir, C., & Davidov, M. (2000). Narcissism and intrinsic motivation: The role of goal congruence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36(4), 424–438. doi:10.1006/jesp.1999.1421
- Morrow, E. (2022). Priming privacy: The effect of privacy news consumption on privacy attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 66(5), 772–793. doi:10.1080/08838151.2022.2138888
- Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Levy, D., & Nielsen, R. K. (2016). Reuters institute digital news report 2016. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. http://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/research/files/Digital%2520News%2520Report%25202016.pdf
- Paek, H.-J., Lambe, J. L., & McLeod, D. M. (2008). Antecedents to support for content restrictions. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 85(2), 273–290. doi:10.1177/107769900808500204
- Pan, Z., Abisaid, J. L., Paek, H.-J., Sun, Y., & Houden, D. (2006). Exploring the perceptual gap in perceived effects of media reports of opinion polls. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(3), 340–350. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edh103
- Paradise, A., & Sullivan, M. (2012). (In)visible threats? The third-person effect in perceptions of the influence of Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(1), 55–60. doi:10.1089/cyber.2011.0054
- Parks, M. (2020). Social media usage is at an all-time high. That could mean a nightmare for democracy. NPR.org. https://www.npr.org/2020/05/27/860369744/social-media-usage-is-at-an-all-time-high-that-could-mean-a-nightmare-for-democr
- Perloff, R. (2009). Mass media, social perception, and the third-person effect. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Perloff, R. M. (1989). Ego-involvement and the third person effect of televised news coverage. Communication Research, 16(2), 236–262. doi:10.1177/009365089016002004
- Perloff, R. M. (1999). The third person effect: A critical review and synthesis. Media Psychology, 1(4), 353–378. doi:10.1207/s1532785xmep0104_4
- Petty, R. E., Wheeler, S. C., & Bizer, G. Y. (2000). Attitude functions and persuasion: An elaboration likelihood approach to matched versus mismatched messages. In G. R. Maio & J. M. Olson (Eds.), Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes (pp. 133–162). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Plattner, T. (2018, June 13). Five risks of news personalization. Medium. https://medium.com/jsk-class-of-2018/five-risks-of-news-personalizations-5bdc97fdbdcc
- Powers, E. (2017). My news feed is filtered?: Awareness of news personalization among college students. Digital Journalism, 5(10), 1315–1335. doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1286943
- Rainie, L. (2016). The state of privacy in post-Snowden America. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/09/21/the-state-of-privacy-in-america/
- Rainie, L. (2018). Americans’ complicated feelings about social media in an era of privacy concerns. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/03/27/americans-complicated-feelings-about-social-media-in-an-era-of-privacy-concerns/
- Rucinski, D., & Salmon, C. T. (1990). The ‘other’ as the vulnerable voter: A study of the third-person effect in the 1988 U.S. presidential campaign. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 2(4), 345–368. doi:10.1093/ijpor/2.4.345
- Salwen, M. B. (1998). Perceptions of media influence and support for censorship: The third-person effect in the 1996 presidential election. Communication Research, 25(3), 259–285. doi:10.1177/009365098025003001
- Salwen, M. B., & Dupagne, M. (1999). The third-person effect: Perceptions of the media’s influence and immoral consequences. Communication Research, 26(5), 523–549. doi:10.1177/009365099026005001
- Schmierbach, M., Boyle, M. P., Xu, Q., & McLeod, D. M. (2011). Exploring third-person differences between gamers and nongamers. Journal of Communication, 61(2), 307–327. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01541.x
- Shah, D. V., Faber, R. J., & Youn, S. (1999). Susceptibility and severity perceptual dimensions underlying the third-person effect. Communication Research, 26(2), 240–267. doi:10.1177/009365099026002006
- Shearer, E. (2021). More than eight-in-ten Americans get news from digital devices. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/01/12/more-than-eight-in-ten-americans-get-news-from-digital-devices/
- Shehata, A., & Strömbäck, J. (2021). Learning political news from social media: Network media logic and current affairs news learning in a high-choice media environment. Communication Research, 48(1), 125–147. doi:10.1177/0093650217749354
- Spayd, L. (2017). A ‘community’ of one: The Times gets tailored. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/18/public-editor/a-community-of-one-the-times-gets-tailored.html
- Sun, Y., Pan, Z., & Shen, L. (2008). Understanding the third-person perception: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Journal of Communication, 58(2), 280–300. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00385.x
- Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, N.J.; Woodstock: Princeton University Press.
- Tewksbury, D., Moy, P., & Weis, D. S. (2004). Preparations for Y2K: Revisiting the behavioral component of the third-person effect. Journal of Communication, 54(1), 138–155. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02618.x
- Thurman, N., & Schifferes, S. (2012). The future of personalization at news websites. Journalism Studies, 13(5–6), 775–790. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2012.664341
- Twenge, J., Konrath, S., Foster, J., Campbell, W. K., & Bushman, B. (2008). Egos inflating over time: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of the narcissistic Personality inventory. Journal of Personality, 76(4), 875–902. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00507.x
- Wyrich, A. (2021, July 29). Nearly 50 groups call on FTC to ban Big Tech’s “unfair and deceptive” data collection, surveillance. The Daily Dot. https://www.dailydot.com/debug/ftc-big-tech-data-practices-groups-letter/
- Yang, J. (2016). Effects of popularity-based news recommendations (“most-viewed”) on users’ exposure to online news. Media Psychology, 19(2), 243–271. doi:10.1080/15213269.2015.1006333
- Young, S. M., Du, F., Dworkis, K. K., & Olsen, K. J. (2016). It’s all about all of us: The rise of narcissism and its implications for management control system research. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 28(1), 39–55. doi:10.2308/jmar-51024